Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
265 lines (210 loc) · 27.1 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

265 lines (210 loc) · 27.1 KB

Deep Security Analysis of Element Web Client

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

This deep security analysis aims to provide a thorough evaluation of the security posture of the Element Web Client, based on the provided security design review and inferred architecture from the codebase context (https://github.com/elemefe/element). The primary objective is to identify potential security vulnerabilities and risks associated with the client-side web application, its interactions with Matrix homeservers and related infrastructure, and the software development lifecycle. The analysis will focus on confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the Element Web Client and user data within the context of the Matrix communication network.

Scope:

The scope of this analysis encompasses the following:

  • Client-Side Web Application: Security considerations related to the JavaScript, HTML, and CSS codebase running within the user's browser.
  • Data Storage within the Browser: Security of data stored in browser local storage and session storage.
  • Communication with Matrix Homeservers and Identity Servers: Security of API interactions and data exchange between the web client and backend services.
  • Deployment Architecture: Security aspects of the web client deployment environment, including web servers, load balancers, and static file storage.
  • Build Process: Security considerations within the CI/CD pipeline, including static analysis, dependency scanning, and artifact management.
  • User Interactions: Security risks associated with user input and client-side processing.
  • Matrix Protocol Integration: Security implications arising from the client's implementation of the Matrix protocol.

The analysis will not cover:

  • In-depth analysis of the Matrix protocol itself: The analysis assumes the Matrix protocol's inherent security features (like end-to-end encryption) are correctly implemented.
  • Security of specific Matrix homeserver implementations: The analysis focuses on the client-side risks and assumes a reasonably secure homeserver environment.
  • Operating system or browser-level vulnerabilities: These are considered accepted risks as outlined in the security design review.

Methodology:

This analysis will employ the following methodology:

  1. Document Review: Thorough review of the provided security design review document, including business posture, security posture, design diagrams (C4 Context, Container, Deployment, Build), risk assessment, questions, and assumptions.
  2. Architecture Inference: Based on the design review, codebase context (Element as a Matrix client), and general web application architecture principles, infer the detailed architecture, components, and data flow of the Element Web Client.
  3. Threat Modeling: For each key component and data flow, identify potential security threats and vulnerabilities, considering common web application security risks (OWASP Top 10, etc.) and specific risks relevant to a Matrix client.
  4. Security Control Analysis: Evaluate the existing and recommended security controls outlined in the design review and assess their effectiveness in mitigating identified threats.
  5. Gap Analysis: Identify gaps in security controls and areas where further security measures are needed.
  6. Tailored Recommendations: Develop specific, actionable, and tailored security recommendations for the Element Web Client project to address identified threats and vulnerabilities.
  7. Mitigation Strategy Formulation: For each recommendation, propose concrete and practical mitigation strategies that can be implemented by the development team.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Breaking down the security implications of each key component based on the provided design review and inferred architecture:

2.1 User:

  • Threats:
    • Phishing and Social Engineering: Users can be tricked into providing credentials or sensitive information to malicious actors impersonating the Element Web Client or Matrix services.
    • Weak Passwords: Users might choose weak passwords, making their accounts vulnerable to brute-force attacks.
    • Compromised Browsers/Devices: Malware or browser extensions on the user's device could compromise the security of the Element Web Client session and user data.
  • Security Implications: User actions and security awareness are crucial for the overall security posture. Client-side security controls can only mitigate, not eliminate, user-related risks.

2.2 Element Web Client (Web Application Container):

  • Threats:
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): Vulnerabilities in the web application code could allow attackers to inject malicious scripts into the client, potentially stealing user data, session tokens, or performing actions on behalf of the user.
    • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF): Attackers could trick users into performing unintended actions on the Matrix homeserver while authenticated to the Element Web Client.
    • Client-Side Injection Attacks: Although less common than server-side injection, vulnerabilities in client-side code could lead to code injection or other client-side attacks.
    • Insecure Data Storage in Local Storage: Sensitive data stored in browser local storage without proper encryption could be exposed if the user's device is compromised or through XSS vulnerabilities.
    • Session Hijacking/Fixation: Vulnerabilities in session management could allow attackers to hijack or fixate user sessions.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) - Client-Side: Maliciously crafted data from the homeserver or injected scripts could cause the client to crash or become unresponsive.
    • Dependency Vulnerabilities: Vulnerable third-party JavaScript libraries used by the client could introduce security flaws.
    • Information Disclosure: Debug information, error messages, or insecure logging on the client-side could leak sensitive information.
  • Security Implications: The web application is the primary attack surface. Client-side vulnerabilities can directly impact user confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

2.3 Local Storage (Browser Local Storage Container):

  • Threats:
    • Data Breach via Device Compromise: If a user's device is physically compromised or infected with malware, data stored in local storage (even if encrypted client-side) could be accessed.
    • XSS-based Data Theft: XSS vulnerabilities in the web application can be exploited to steal data from local storage.
    • Insecure Storage of Sensitive Data: Storing sensitive data in local storage without encryption or with weak encryption is a significant risk.
  • Security Implications: Local storage is a persistent storage mechanism within the browser and requires careful security considerations, especially for sensitive data like session tokens or encryption keys (if client-side key management is involved).

2.4 Matrix Homeserver (External System):

  • Threats (from Client perspective):
    • Homeserver Compromise: If the homeserver the client connects to is compromised, user data and communications could be exposed.
    • Malicious Homeserver Operator: A malicious homeserver operator could eavesdrop on unencrypted communications (if end-to-end encryption is not used or compromised) or manipulate user data.
    • Homeserver Vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities in the homeserver software could be exploited to gain unauthorized access to user data or disrupt service.
    • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks (if HTTPS is not enforced or compromised): Attackers could intercept communication between the client and the homeserver, potentially stealing credentials or messages.
  • Security Implications: The client relies on the security of the homeserver infrastructure. While the client can implement end-to-end encryption, the overall security is still dependent on the homeserver's security posture.

2.5 Identity Server (External System):

  • Threats (from Client perspective):
    • Identity Server Compromise: If the identity server is compromised, user discovery and identity verification processes could be manipulated, potentially leading to impersonation or information disclosure.
    • Privacy Violations through Identifier Mapping: Insecure handling of identifier mappings (email, phone numbers to Matrix IDs) could lead to privacy violations and user tracking.
    • Enumeration Attacks: Attackers might try to enumerate users by probing the identity server with different identifiers.
  • Security Implications: The identity server plays a role in user discovery and identity management. Its security is important for user privacy and preventing impersonation.

2.6 Deployment Environment (Load Balancer, Web Servers, Static Files Storage):

  • Threats:
    • Web Server Compromise: If web servers are compromised, attackers could replace the static files with malicious versions, leading to widespread client-side attacks.
    • Load Balancer Vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities in the load balancer could be exploited to disrupt service or gain unauthorized access.
    • Insecure Static File Storage: If static file storage is not properly secured, attackers could modify or replace the files.
    • DDoS Attacks: The deployment environment could be targeted by DDoS attacks, making the client unavailable.
    • HTTPS Misconfiguration: Improper HTTPS configuration could lead to MitM attacks and exposure of data in transit.
  • Security Implications: The deployment environment ensures the availability and integrity of the web client application. Compromises in this layer can have widespread impact.

2.7 Build Process (VCS, CI/CD System, Build Steps, Artifact Storage):

  • Threats:
    • Compromised CI/CD Pipeline: If the CI/CD pipeline is compromised, attackers could inject malicious code into the build artifacts, leading to supply chain attacks.
    • Vulnerable Dependencies Introduced during Build: If dependency scanning is not effective, vulnerable dependencies could be included in the final application.
    • Insecure Artifact Storage: If artifact storage is not properly secured, malicious actors could replace build artifacts with compromised versions.
    • Developer Account Compromise: Compromised developer accounts could be used to inject malicious code into the VCS or CI/CD pipeline.
  • Security Implications: A secure build process is crucial for ensuring the integrity and trustworthiness of the deployed application. Supply chain attacks are a significant concern.

3. Architecture, Components, and Data Flow Inference

Based on the provided diagrams and the nature of a web-based Matrix client, the inferred architecture, components, and data flow are as follows:

Architecture: Client-Server Architecture with a web browser client interacting with Matrix homeservers and identity servers over HTTPS.

Components:

  1. User's Web Browser: Executes the Element Web Client application (JavaScript, HTML, CSS).
  2. Element Web Application (JavaScript/HTML/CSS):
    • UI Rendering Engine: Handles display and user interaction.
    • Matrix Client-Server API Client: Communicates with Matrix homeservers over HTTPS.
    • Encryption/Decryption Engine: Handles client-side message encryption and decryption (as per Matrix protocol - likely using browser crypto APIs).
    • Session Management: Manages user sessions and authentication tokens.
    • Local Storage Manager: Handles storage and retrieval of data from browser local storage.
  3. Browser Local Storage: Persistent storage within the user's browser for user settings, session data, and potentially cached data.
  4. Matrix Homeserver: External server responsible for:
    • User authentication and authorization.
    • Room management.
    • Message storage and routing.
    • Federation with other homeservers.
    • Message encryption key management.
  5. Identity Server: External server responsible for:
    • Mapping third-party identifiers (email, phone numbers) to Matrix user IDs.
    • User discovery.
    • Identity verification.
  6. Deployment Infrastructure:
    • Load Balancer: Distributes traffic to web servers.
    • Web Servers (e.g., Nginx, Apache): Serve static files (HTML, CSS, JavaScript) of the Element Web Client.
    • Static Files Storage: Stores the static files.
  7. Build Pipeline (CI/CD):
    • Version Control System (VCS) - e.g., GitHub: Stores source code.
    • CI/CD System - e.g., GitHub Actions: Automates build, test, and deployment.
    • SAST Tool: Performs static application security testing.
    • Dependency Scanning Tool: Scans dependencies for vulnerabilities.
    • Artifact Storage: Stores build artifacts.

Data Flow (Simplified):

  1. User Interaction: User interacts with the Element Web Client UI in the browser.
  2. API Requests: Web Client sends API requests (e.g., login, send message, join room) to the Matrix Homeserver over HTTPS using the Matrix Client-Server API.
  3. Homeserver Processing: Homeserver processes requests, authenticates users, manages rooms, stores messages, and routes messages to other users/homeservers.
  4. Data Storage: Web Client stores user settings, session tokens, and potentially cached data in browser local storage. Homeserver stores user accounts, room data, and message history.
  5. Identity Server Interaction (User Discovery/Verification): Web Client interacts with the Identity Server for user discovery and identity verification processes.
  6. Static File Delivery: Web servers serve static files (HTML, CSS, JavaScript) to the user's browser via HTTPS.
  7. Build and Deployment: Developers commit code to VCS, CI/CD pipeline builds, tests, scans, and deploys the web application to the deployment environment.

4. Tailored and Specific Security Recommendations for Element Web Client

Based on the identified threats and inferred architecture, here are tailored security recommendations for the Element Web Client project:

4.1 Client-Side Security:

  • Strict Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a strict CSP to mitigate XSS risks.
    • Specific Directives: Use script-src 'nonce-{{nonce}}' 'strict-dynamic', object-src 'none', base-uri 'none', frame-ancestors 'none', form-action 'self', and carefully review and configure other directives.
    • Nonce Generation: Implement proper nonce generation and injection for inline scripts.
    • CSP Reporting: Configure CSP reporting to monitor and identify CSP violations during development and in production.
  • Subresource Integrity (SRI): Enforce SRI for all external JavaScript libraries and CSS files loaded from CDNs or other external sources to prevent tampering.
  • Regular Security Code Reviews: Conduct thorough security code reviews, focusing on areas prone to vulnerabilities like input handling, UI rendering, API interactions, and encryption/decryption logic.
  • Client-Side Input Validation and Output Encoding: Implement robust client-side input validation to prevent basic injection attacks. Crucially, ensure proper output encoding to prevent XSS when displaying user-generated content or data received from the homeserver.
  • Secure Browser Storage Practices:
    • Minimize Sensitive Data in Local Storage: Avoid storing highly sensitive data like unencrypted private keys or passwords in local storage.
    • Encryption for Sensitive Data in Local Storage: If sensitive data must be stored locally, encrypt it using browser-provided crypto APIs (e.g., Web Crypto API) with strong encryption algorithms. Consider using a robust encryption library if needed, but prioritize browser-native APIs.
    • Consider Session Storage for Session Tokens: Use session storage instead of local storage for session tokens if persistence across browser sessions is not required, as session storage is cleared when the browser tab or window is closed.
  • CSRF Protection: Implement CSRF protection mechanisms. While Matrix API might have built-in CSRF protection, ensure the client-side application correctly leverages and reinforces it. Consider using techniques like synchronizer tokens or double-submit cookies if needed for specific client-side actions.
  • Rate Limiting on Client-Side Actions: Implement client-side rate limiting for sensitive actions (e.g., login attempts, password reset requests) to mitigate brute-force attacks and DoS attempts targeting the client.
  • Regular Dependency Updates and Scanning: Keep all client-side dependencies (JavaScript libraries, CSS frameworks) up-to-date and regularly scan them for known vulnerabilities using automated dependency scanning tools.

4.2 Communication Security:

  • Enforce HTTPS Everywhere: Ensure HTTPS is strictly enforced for all communication between the web client and Matrix homeservers, identity servers, and any other backend services. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) to prevent protocol downgrade attacks.
  • TLS Configuration Review: Regularly review and harden TLS configurations on web servers and load balancers to ensure strong cipher suites are used and outdated protocols are disabled.

4.3 Build and Deployment Security:

  • Automated SAST and Dependency Scanning in CI/CD: Integrate automated SAST and dependency scanning tools into the CI/CD pipeline to identify vulnerabilities early in the development lifecycle.
    • SAST Tool Configuration: Configure SAST tools to detect common web application vulnerabilities (XSS, injection, etc.) and Matrix-specific security issues if possible.
    • Dependency Scanning Tool Integration: Integrate a dependency scanning tool (e.g., Snyk, OWASP Dependency-Check) into the CI/CD pipeline and fail builds if critical vulnerabilities are found in dependencies.
  • Secure CI/CD Pipeline Configuration: Harden the CI/CD pipeline itself:
    • Access Control: Implement strict access control to the CI/CD system and pipeline configurations.
    • Secret Management: Securely manage secrets (API keys, credentials) used in the CI/CD pipeline using dedicated secret management solutions. Avoid hardcoding secrets in code or pipeline configurations.
    • Pipeline Integrity: Implement measures to ensure the integrity of the CI/CD pipeline and prevent unauthorized modifications.
  • Immutable Infrastructure for Deployment: Consider using immutable infrastructure for deploying the web client. This can reduce the attack surface and improve security by ensuring consistent and hardened deployment environments.
  • Regular Penetration Testing and Vulnerability Assessments: Conduct regular penetration testing and vulnerability assessments by qualified security professionals to identify and address security weaknesses in the Element Web Client application and its deployment environment. Focus on both automated and manual testing techniques.

4.4 Matrix Protocol Specific Security:

  • Proper Implementation of Matrix End-to-End Encryption (E2EE): Ensure correct and robust implementation of Matrix E2EE within the web client. This includes:
    • Key Management: Secure key generation, storage, and exchange as per the Matrix protocol specifications.
    • Encryption/Decryption Logic: Verify the correctness of encryption and decryption algorithms and their implementation.
    • Cross-Signing and Device Verification: Implement and encourage users to utilize Matrix cross-signing and device verification features to enhance E2EE security and prevent key compromise.
  • Homeserver Security Guidance for Users: Provide clear guidance to users on choosing reputable and secure Matrix homeservers, as the client's security is partially dependent on the homeserver's security posture.

5. Actionable and Tailored Mitigation Strategies

For each recommendation above, here are actionable mitigation strategies:

5.1 Client-Side Security Mitigations:

  • Strict CSP Implementation:
    • Action: Implement a CSP meta tag or HTTP header in the main HTML file. Start with a restrictive policy and gradually refine it based on application needs and CSP reporting. Use a library or framework to assist with nonce generation and CSP management.
    • Tool: Use online CSP generators and validators to create and test CSP policies. Integrate CSP reporting tools to monitor violations.
  • SRI Enforcement:
    • Action: Use tools or build scripts to automatically generate SRI hashes for all external resources. Integrate SRI attributes into <script> and <link> tags.
    • Tool: Utilize online SRI hash generators or npm packages that automate SRI hash generation and integration.
  • Regular Security Code Reviews:
    • Action: Establish a regular schedule for security code reviews. Train developers on secure coding practices and common web application vulnerabilities. Use code review checklists focused on security.
    • Tool: Utilize code review tools that integrate with the VCS and CI/CD pipeline. Consider security-focused code review plugins or extensions.
  • Client-Side Input Validation and Output Encoding:
    • Action: Implement input validation using JavaScript libraries or custom functions to sanitize and validate user inputs before processing. Use appropriate output encoding functions (e.g., HTML entity encoding, JavaScript escaping) when displaying user-generated content or data from the homeserver.
    • Tool: Utilize input validation libraries like Joi or express-validator (for server-side validation, but principles apply client-side). Use browser-native or library functions for output encoding.
  • Secure Browser Storage Practices:
    • Action: Audit data stored in local storage. Identify sensitive data and minimize its storage. For essential sensitive data, implement encryption using the Web Crypto API (e.g., crypto.subtle.encrypt, crypto.subtle.decrypt). Use session storage for session tokens where persistence is not needed.
    • Tool: Utilize browser developer tools to inspect local storage content. Research and implement Web Crypto API for encryption.
  • CSRF Protection:
    • Action: If Matrix API doesn't fully handle CSRF, implement synchronizer tokens. Generate a unique token on the server-side and embed it in the client-side application. Include this token in requests to the server and validate it on the server-side.
    • Tool: Frameworks or libraries might provide CSRF protection mechanisms. Implement custom token generation and validation logic if needed.
  • Rate Limiting on Client-Side Actions:
    • Action: Implement JavaScript-based rate limiting logic for sensitive actions. Use techniques like storing timestamps in local storage or session storage to track request frequency.
    • Tool: Implement custom JavaScript functions for rate limiting. Consider using libraries that provide rate limiting functionalities if needed.
  • Regular Dependency Updates and Scanning:
    • Action: Establish a process for regularly updating dependencies (e.g., using npm update or yarn upgrade). Integrate a dependency scanning tool into the CI/CD pipeline.
    • Tool: Integrate tools like Snyk, OWASP Dependency-Check, or GitHub Dependency Scanning into the CI/CD pipeline. Configure alerts and fail builds on vulnerability detection.

5.2 Communication Security Mitigations:

  • Enforce HTTPS Everywhere:
    • Action: Configure web servers and load balancers to redirect all HTTP requests to HTTPS. Enable HSTS by setting the Strict-Transport-Security header.
    • Tool: Configure web server software (Nginx, Apache) and load balancer settings to enforce HTTPS and HSTS.
  • TLS Configuration Review:
    • Action: Regularly review TLS configurations using online tools and best practice guides. Disable weak cipher suites and outdated protocols.
    • Tool: Use online TLS configuration scanners (e.g., SSL Labs SSL Test). Follow security best practices for TLS configuration.

5.3 Build and Deployment Security Mitigations:

  • Automated SAST and Dependency Scanning in CI/CD:
    • Action: Integrate SAST and dependency scanning tools as steps in the CI/CD pipeline (e.g., GitHub Actions workflows). Configure tools to scan code and dependencies on every commit or pull request.
    • Tool: Select and integrate SAST tools (e.g., SonarQube, Checkmarx, Veracode Static Analysis) and dependency scanning tools (e.g., Snyk, OWASP Dependency-Check, GitHub Dependency Scanning) into the CI/CD pipeline.
  • Secure CI/CD Pipeline Configuration:
    • Action: Implement role-based access control for the CI/CD system. Use dedicated secret management tools (e.g., HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager) to manage secrets. Regularly audit CI/CD pipeline configurations and logs.
    • Tool: Utilize CI/CD platform's access control features. Implement and integrate secret management tools.
  • Immutable Infrastructure for Deployment:
    • Action: Use containerization (e.g., Docker) and infrastructure-as-code (IaC) tools (e.g., Terraform, CloudFormation) to define and deploy immutable infrastructure. Automate infrastructure provisioning and deployment processes.
    • Tool: Utilize Docker, Kubernetes, Terraform, CloudFormation, or similar technologies to implement immutable infrastructure.
  • Regular Penetration Testing and Vulnerability Assessments:
    • Action: Schedule penetration testing and vulnerability assessments at least annually or after significant code changes. Engage reputable security firms or ethical hackers for testing. Remediate identified vulnerabilities promptly.
    • Tool: Engage penetration testing services. Utilize vulnerability scanning tools (e.g., Nessus, OpenVAS) for automated vulnerability assessments.

5.4 Matrix Protocol Specific Security Mitigations:

  • Proper Implementation of Matrix E2EE:
    • Action: Thoroughly review and test the E2EE implementation against Matrix protocol specifications. Conduct security audits of the E2EE code. Provide user-friendly interfaces for key verification and cross-signing.
    • Tool: Utilize Matrix SDKs and libraries that provide E2EE functionalities. Conduct code reviews and security testing specifically focused on E2EE implementation.
  • Homeserver Security Guidance for Users:
    • Action: Create documentation or in-app guidance for users on selecting secure Matrix homeservers. Recommend using homeservers with good security reputations and transparent security practices.
    • Tool: Develop informational resources (blog posts, help articles) and integrate security tips within the Element Web Client application.

By implementing these tailored recommendations and actionable mitigation strategies, the development team can significantly enhance the security posture of the Element Web Client and provide a more secure and private communication experience for users. Remember that security is an ongoing process, and continuous monitoring, testing, and improvement are essential.