Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
38 lines (31 loc) · 5.64 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

38 lines (31 loc) · 5.64 KB

Threat Model Analysis for elemefe/element

Threat: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in el-table Column Rendering

  • Description: An attacker could inject malicious JavaScript code through data displayed in an el-table column if the application fails to properly sanitize or encode user-provided data before rendering. By manipulating the data source, an attacker can insert malicious scripts that execute when el-table renders the unsanitized data in a user's browser.
  • Impact: Account compromise, session hijacking, data theft, redirection to malicious websites, application defacement, and potential for further attacks leveraging the user's session and permissions.
  • Affected Component: el-table component, specifically the column rendering and data binding mechanisms.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strict Output Encoding: Mandatory HTML entity encoding of all user-provided data before rendering it within el-table columns. Utilize secure encoding functions provided by backend frameworks or secure JavaScript libraries.
    • Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a robust CSP to restrict the sources from which the browser can load resources and execute scripts. This acts as a strong secondary defense against XSS.
    • Regular Security Audits and Testing: Conduct frequent code reviews and penetration testing specifically targeting el-table implementations to identify and remediate potential XSS vulnerabilities.
    • Up-to-date Element UI: Maintain Element UI at the latest stable version to benefit from security patches and bug fixes that may address rendering vulnerabilities.

Threat: DOM-Based XSS via el-tooltip Content Injection

  • Description: An attacker can exploit improper handling of the content property in el-tooltip to inject and execute malicious JavaScript code. If the application dynamically sets the content of el-tooltip using unsanitized data from sources like URL parameters or user input, it can lead to DOM-based XSS. When a user interacts with the element triggering the tooltip, the injected script executes within their browser context.
  • Impact: Account compromise, session hijacking, data theft, redirection to malicious websites, application defacement, and potential for further client-side attacks.
  • Affected Component: el-tooltip component, specifically the content property and dynamic data binding functionality.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Input Sanitization and Validation: Rigorous sanitization and validation of all data sources used to populate the el-tooltip content property. Treat data from URL parameters, user input, and external APIs as untrusted and potentially malicious.
    • Avoid Dynamic HTML Content: Minimize or eliminate the use of dynamic HTML within el-tooltip content. Prefer plain text or pre-defined, safe HTML structures. If dynamic content is necessary, ensure it's constructed securely using templating mechanisms that automatically handle encoding.
    • Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement CSP to provide an additional layer of defense against DOM-based XSS attacks.
    • Secure Coding Practices Training: Educate developers on the risks of DOM-based XSS and secure coding practices for client-side frameworks, specifically focusing on proper data handling with components like el-tooltip.

Threat: Vulnerable Dependencies within Element UI Framework

  • Description: Element UI, like most modern JavaScript frameworks, relies on a set of third-party dependencies. If any of these dependencies contain known security vulnerabilities, applications using Element UI are indirectly exposed to these vulnerabilities. Attackers could potentially exploit these vulnerabilities through the application's client-side code if the vulnerable dependency is reachable and exploitable in the browser context.
  • Impact: Depending on the nature of the dependency vulnerability, the impact can range from Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) and Denial of Service (DoS) to more severe client-side exploits. In critical scenarios, it could potentially lead to Remote Code Execution within the user's browser environment (though less common in typical browser-based attacks).
  • Affected Component: Element UI framework as a whole, specifically its dependency management and the inclusion of potentially vulnerable third-party libraries.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Proactive Dependency Auditing: Regularly audit Element UI's dependencies using automated tools like npm audit, yarn audit, or dedicated Software Composition Analysis (SCA) tools. Integrate these audits into the CI/CD pipeline.
    • Consistent Element UI Updates: Maintain Element UI at the latest stable version. Updates frequently include dependency updates that address known security vulnerabilities. Prioritize applying security updates promptly.
    • Dependency Scanning and Monitoring: Implement continuous dependency scanning and monitoring to detect newly disclosed vulnerabilities in Element UI's dependencies. Subscribe to security advisories and vulnerability databases relevant to JavaScript and frontend frameworks.
    • Vulnerability Remediation Plan: Establish a clear plan for responding to and remediating identified dependency vulnerabilities, including steps for patching, workarounds, or component replacement if necessary.