Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
78 lines (59 loc) · 6.47 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

78 lines (59 loc) · 6.47 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for elemefe/element

Mitigation Strategy: Mandatory Attribute Value Escaping within elemefe/element Usage

Description:

  1. Code Review: Conduct a thorough code review of all instances where elemefe/element is used to set any HTML attribute. This includes standard attributes (href, src, class, id, etc.) and custom data-* attributes.
  2. Consistent Escaping: Immediately before passing data to elemefe/element for attribute assignment, apply a robust, language-appropriate HTML escaping function. Do not rely on any assumed internal escaping within the library unless explicitly and verifiably documented.
  3. Context-Aware Escaping (Advanced): For attributes with specific security implications (href, src, style), implement additional escaping on top of HTML escaping. Use URL encoding/parsing libraries for href and src, and CSS escaping libraries for style.
  4. Targeted Testing: Create unit tests that specifically target elemefe/element usage, providing known XSS payloads as attribute values to verify correct escaping.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Attribute-Based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): (Severity: Critical) - Prevents injection of malicious JavaScript via attributes.
  • Data Attribute Manipulation: (Severity: High) - Prevents alteration of application behavior through data attributes.
  • CSS Injection (via style): (Severity: High) - Prevents CSS-based attacks.

Impact:

  • XSS: Reduces risk to near zero if implemented correctly.
  • Data Attribute Manipulation: Significantly reduces risk.
  • CSS Injection: Significantly reduces risk.

Currently Implemented:

  • Example: "In user_profile.py, we escape the username before passing it to Element("span", class_=escaped_username)." (Provide precise code locations).
  • Example: "link_generator.js escapes href attributes, but not other attributes."

Missing Implementation:

  • Example: "comment_rendering.py does not escape the data-comment-id attribute when using elemefe/element." (Provide precise code locations).
  • Example: "Context-aware escaping is missing for href attributes in link_generator.js."
  • Example: "No unit tests specifically target attribute escaping with elemefe/element."

Mitigation Strategy: Mandatory Text Content Escaping within elemefe/element Usage

Description:

  1. Code Review: Review all code where elemefe/element sets the text content of an element.
  2. Consistent Escaping: Immediately before passing data to elemefe/element for text content, apply the same robust HTML escaping function used for attribute values.
  3. Avoid innerHTML-like Methods: If elemefe/element has any method that directly sets raw HTML content (similar to JavaScript's innerHTML), strictly avoid using it with any data that might be influenced by user input. Use the library's standard element creation methods instead.
  4. Targeted Testing: Create unit tests that specifically target elemefe/element's text content handling, using XSS payloads to verify escaping.

Threats Mitigated:

  • HTML Injection (including XSS): (Severity: Critical) - Prevents injection of malicious HTML, including <script> tags.

Impact:

  • HTML Injection/XSS: Reduces risk to near zero if implemented correctly.

Currently Implemented:

  • Example: "blog_post_renderer.py escapes the post body using html.escape before passing it to Element("div", children=[escaped_body])."
  • Example: "We have a general escape_text function, but its usage with elemefe/element is inconsistent."

Missing Implementation:

  • Example: "comment_section.js does not escape user comments before using them as text content with elemefe/element."
  • Example: "We need a comprehensive audit to ensure consistent escaping of text content in all elemefe/element calls."
  • Example: "Unit tests for text content escaping with elemefe/element are incomplete."

Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation and Limits for elemefe/element-Driven Element Creation

Description:

  1. Identify Control Points: Identify all user inputs that directly or indirectly influence the number, size, attributes, or nesting depth of elements created via elemefe/element.
  2. Strict Input Validation: Implement strict input validation before any data is used with elemefe/element. Use allowlists where possible. If allowlists are not feasible, use strong validation rules (regular expressions, length limits, type checks).
  3. Reasonable Limits: Set reasonable, server-enforced limits on the number, size, and nesting depth of elements that can be created through elemefe/element, based on user input. These limits should be informed by application requirements and performance considerations.
  4. Server-Side Enforcement: Always enforce these limits and validation rules on the server-side, regardless of any client-side checks.
  5. Document the limits: Clearly document the implemented limits and the rationale behind them.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Denial of Service (DoS) via Excessive Element Creation: (Severity: High) - Prevents attackers from overwhelming the server or client by controlling element creation.
  • Resource Exhaustion: (Severity: High) - Prevents excessive server resource consumption.

Impact:

  • DoS: Significantly reduces the risk of DoS.
  • Resource Exhaustion: Significantly reduces the risk.

Currently Implemented:

  • Example: "list_builder.py limits the number of list items to 50, based on user input, before calling elemefe/element."
  • Example: "We have basic input validation for the 'number of columns' input, but it's not very strict, and it's not directly tied to elemefe/element usage."

Missing Implementation:

  • Example: "recursive_component.js has no limits on nesting depth when using elemefe/element recursively."
  • Example: "Server-side validation is missing for some inputs that control elemefe/element's behavior."
  • Example: "We need to document the existing limits and their connection to elemefe/element usage."