Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
100 lines (75 loc) · 10.4 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

100 lines (75 loc) · 10.4 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for emberjs/ember.js

Mitigation Strategy: Template Security and Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Prevention

  • Description:

    1. Rely on Ember.js's default HTML escaping: Ensure you understand and leverage Ember.js templates' automatic HTML escaping. This is the primary defense against XSS in Ember. Templates escape by default, protecting against common injection vulnerabilities.
    2. Minimize use of {{unescaped}} and SafeString: Treat {{unescaped}} and SafeString with extreme caution. Only use them when absolutely necessary for rendering trusted, safe content. Overuse negates Ember's built-in XSS protection.
    3. Implement Content Security Policy (CSP): While CSP is a general web security practice, it's crucial for Ember.js applications to further mitigate XSS risks.
      • Define a strict CSP policy to control resource loading.
      • Restrict script-src to 'self' and trusted sources.
      • Use 'nonce' or 'hash' for inline scripts if absolutely needed in Ember components, but prefer external scripts.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) - Reflected and Stored (High Severity): Injection of malicious scripts into Ember.js templates that execute in users' browsers, potentially leading to session hijacking, data theft, and defacement. Ember's templating system, if misused, can be a vector for XSS.

  • Impact:

    • XSS Prevention (Default Escaping): High Risk Reduction. Ember.js's default escaping is a fundamental and highly effective defense against many XSS vulnerabilities arising from template rendering.
    • CSP Implementation: High Risk Reduction. CSP provides a strong secondary defense layer specifically relevant to Ember.js applications by limiting the impact of XSS even if template escaping is bypassed or misused.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Implemented: Ember.js default HTML escaping is inherently in use due to the framework's design.
    • Partially Implemented: Basic CSP is implemented, but needs refinement and stricter directives, especially concerning inline scripts often used in early Ember.js development or quick prototyping.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Comprehensive CSP policy review and hardening, specifically tailored to Ember.js application structure and component usage.
    • Formal guidelines and developer training on the secure use of {{unescaped}} and SafeString within Ember.js templates.

Mitigation Strategy: Route Authorization and Authentication (Ember.js Route Guards)

  • Description:

    1. Implement Ember.js Route Guards: Leverage Ember.js's built-in route guards (beforeModel, model, afterModel) to control access to different parts of your application based on authentication and authorization.
      • Use beforeModel to check if a user is authenticated before allowing route transition. Redirect to login if not.
      • Implement authorization logic within route guards to restrict access based on user roles or permissions, controlling navigation within the Ember.js application.
      • Use services within route guards to encapsulate authentication and authorization logic, keeping routes clean and maintainable.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Unauthorized Access (High Severity): Users gaining access to specific Ember.js routes and application sections they are not permitted to access due to insufficient client-side authorization checks within the Ember.js routing layer. While backend authorization is crucial, Ember.js route guards provide an important initial layer of access control within the client application.

  • Impact:

    • Ember.js Route Guards: Medium Risk Reduction. Provides a crucial layer of client-side authorization within the Ember.js application. Enhances user experience by preventing unauthorized UI elements from loading and provides a first line of defense against unauthorized navigation within the application's routes. Crucially, this is not a replacement for backend authorization, but a necessary component in an Ember.js application.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Implemented: Ember.js route guards are used for basic authentication checks and redirection in key application routes.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • More granular authorization logic within Ember.js route guards, based on user roles and permissions, extending beyond simple authentication checks.
    • Centralized and well-documented authorization service used consistently across all relevant Ember.js routes.

Mitigation Strategy: Third-Party Addon Security (Ember.js Addon Ecosystem)

  • Description:

    1. Security Review of Ember.js Addons: Due to Ember.js's addon-centric ecosystem, rigorous review of addons is vital.
      • Before integrating any addon, carefully review its source code, specifically looking for potential security vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns.
      • Check the addon's dependencies for known vulnerabilities using npm audit or similar tools.
      • Assess the addon's maintainability, community activity, and the reputation of its maintainers within the Ember.js community.
      • Search for security advisories or community discussions specifically related to the addon's security within Ember.js forums and communities.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Vulnerabilities in Addons (High Severity): Exploits targeting vulnerabilities specifically within third-party Ember.js addons. The extensive use of addons in Ember.js applications makes this a significant threat vector.
    • Malicious Addons (Medium Severity): Risk of incorporating intentionally malicious addons from the Ember.js ecosystem, although less common, it's a potential supply chain risk.
    • Supply Chain Attacks via Addons (Medium Severity): Compromised Ember.js addons or their dependencies injecting malicious code into your application, leveraging the trust placed in the Ember.js addon ecosystem.

  • Impact:

    • Security Review of Ember.js Addons: Medium Risk Reduction. Reduces the risk of introducing vulnerable or malicious code specifically through the Ember.js addon ecosystem by proactively assessing addon security.
    • Regular Addon Updates: High Risk Reduction. Ensures that known vulnerabilities in Ember.js addons are patched promptly, maintaining the security of the application's addon dependencies.
    • Minimize Addon Usage: Medium Risk Reduction. Reduces the attack surface and dependency complexity inherent in Ember.js applications that heavily rely on addons, making the application easier to secure and manage within the Ember.js context.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Partially Implemented: Developers generally review addons before adding them, but a formalized security review process specifically for Ember.js addons is lacking. Informal reviews may not be thorough enough for security.
    • Partially Implemented: Addons are updated periodically, but not always proactively or immediately after security updates are released, and not with a specific focus on Ember.js addon security advisories.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Formal, documented security review process specifically tailored for Ember.js addons, including checklists and security-focused code review steps.
    • Automated addon vulnerability scanning integrated into the Ember.js development workflow.
    • Proactive monitoring of Ember.js addon updates and security advisories within the Ember.js community.
    • Clear guidelines and training for developers on minimizing addon usage and prioritizing in-house solutions within the Ember.js context where feasible.

Mitigation Strategy: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) Mitigation (Ember.js Integration)

  • Description:

    1. Backend CSRF Protection: While backend-focused, it's crucial for Ember.js applications interacting with APIs. Implement CSRF protection on the backend API using synchronizer tokens (CSRF tokens).
    2. Ember.js CSRF Token Handling: Configure your Ember.js application to correctly handle CSRF tokens provided by the backend. This is Ember.js specific integration.
      • Fetch the CSRF token from the backend, typically during initial application load or login, using Ember.js services or initializers.
      • Include the CSRF token in the appropriate header (e.g., X-CSRF-Token) for all state-changing API requests originating from the Ember.js application. This often involves customizing Ember.js's request mechanisms (e.g., fetch or ember-ajax) to automatically include the token.
      • Use an Ember.js service to encapsulate CSRF token management, ensuring consistent and correct token handling across the Ember.js application.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) (Medium to High Severity): Attackers tricking users into performing unintended actions on the application while authenticated, potentially leading to data modification, unauthorized transactions, or account compromise. Ember.js applications, as frontend clients, are vulnerable to CSRF if not properly integrated with backend CSRF protection.

  • Impact:

    • Backend CSRF Protection & Ember.js Integration: High Risk Reduction. Essential for preventing CSRF attacks in Ember.js applications. Correctly handling CSRF tokens within the Ember.js frontend is critical for the overall CSRF defense.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Implemented: Backend API implements CSRF protection using synchronizer tokens.
    • Implemented: Ember.js application fetches and includes CSRF tokens in API requests, likely using a custom service or modification to the request layer.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Regular review and testing of the integration of CSRF protection between the Ember.js frontend and the backend, ensuring tokens are correctly fetched, transmitted, and validated in the Ember.js application.
    • Documentation and standardization of the Ember.js CSRF token handling service or mechanism for maintainability and consistency across the project.