Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
64 lines (50 loc) · 210 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

64 lines (50 loc) · 210 KB

Okay, let's perform a deep security analysis of Ember.js based on the provided design review.

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: To conduct a thorough security analysis of the Ember.js framework, identifying potential vulnerabilities, weaknesses, and areas for improvement in its design and implementation. This analysis focuses on the framework itself, not applications built with it (though implications for those applications are considered). The primary goal is to minimize the risk of vulnerabilities in Ember.js being exploited to compromise applications built upon it. We will analyze key components like the Router, Components, Services, Helpers, and Models, as described in the C4 Container diagram.

  • Scope: This analysis covers the core Ember.js framework, including its build process, deployment model, and key architectural components. It considers the security controls already in place, accepted risks, and recommended security controls. It excludes the security of specific applications built with Ember.js, the security of backend APIs interacting with Ember.js applications, and the security of the Ember.js project's website or community forums (except where those impact the framework's security).

  • Methodology:

    1. Component Analysis: We will examine each key component (Router, Routes, Components, Services, Helpers, Models) identified in the C4 Container diagram, analyzing their security implications.
    2. Data Flow Analysis: We will trace how data flows through these components, identifying potential attack vectors.
    3. Threat Modeling: Based on the component and data flow analysis, we will identify potential threats, considering the business and security posture outlined in the design review.
    4. Mitigation Strategy Recommendation: For each identified threat, we will propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies tailored to Ember.js.
    5. Codebase and Documentation Review (Inferred): While we don't have direct access to the Ember.js codebase, we will infer its structure and behavior based on the provided documentation, C4 diagrams, and common Ember.js patterns. This is a crucial part of a real-world security review.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's break down the security implications of each key component:

  • Router & Routes:

    • Function: Manages application navigation, URL mapping, and transitions between routes. Crucial for authorization.
    • Security Implications:
      • Authorization Bypass: Incorrectly configured route guards or model hooks could allow unauthorized access to sensitive routes. If route transitions are not properly validated, attackers might manipulate URLs to bypass intended access controls.
      • Open Redirects: If the router allows redirecting to user-supplied URLs without proper validation, it could be exploited for phishing attacks.
      • Parameter Tampering: Attackers might manipulate URL parameters to access data they shouldn't, especially if those parameters are used directly in model queries without sanitization.
      • Route Hijacking: If an attacker can inject malicious code that modifies the router's behavior, they could redirect users to malicious sites or intercept data.
    • Data Flow: Receives URL requests, determines the appropriate route, loads data (potentially through model hooks), and renders the corresponding template.

  • Components:

    • Function: Reusable UI elements, responsible for rendering parts of the UI and handling user interactions.
    • Security Implications:
      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): The most significant risk. If user-supplied data is not properly escaped or sanitized before being rendered in a component's template, attackers can inject malicious JavaScript code. This applies to both direct user input and data fetched from APIs. Ember's templating system (Handlebars) provides some built-in escaping, but it's not foolproof, especially with {{{triple-curlies}}} which bypasses escaping.
      • DOM Manipulation: Components that directly manipulate the DOM (e.g., using jQuery or native DOM APIs) are more susceptible to XSS and other DOM-based vulnerabilities.
      • Data Leakage: Components might inadvertently expose sensitive data if they don't handle data binding and rendering correctly.
    • Data Flow: Receives data from parent components or services, renders it in templates, and handles user events.

  • Services:

    • Function: Long-lived objects providing shared functionality and state across the application. Often used for authentication, data fetching, and interacting with external services.
    • Security Implications:
      • Sensitive Data Storage: Services might store sensitive data (e.g., API keys, user tokens) in memory. If an attacker gains access to the application's memory (e.g., through a browser vulnerability), they could steal this data.
      • Insecure Communication: Services communicating with external APIs must use secure protocols (HTTPS) and validate certificates to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks.
      • Access Control: Services should enforce proper access control to prevent unauthorized access to their functionality and data.
    • Data Flow: Can receive data from various sources (components, routes, APIs), store it, and provide it to other parts of the application.

  • Helpers:

    • Function: Functions used in templates for data formatting and calculations.
    • Security Implications:
      • XSS (if misused): Helpers that generate HTML or manipulate the DOM could be vulnerable to XSS if they don't properly escape user-supplied input. This is less common than with components, but still a risk.
      • Logic Errors: Incorrectly implemented helpers could lead to unexpected behavior or data corruption, potentially creating security vulnerabilities.
    • Data Flow: Receive data as input and return transformed data.

  • Models:

    • Function: Represent data entities and interact with the backend API.
    • Security Implications:
      • Data Validation: Models should validate data received from the backend API to prevent data corruption and potential vulnerabilities.
      • Injection Vulnerabilities: If model attributes are used directly in database queries without proper sanitization, they could be vulnerable to injection attacks (e.g., SQL injection, NoSQL injection) on the backend. While Ember Data provides some protection, it's crucial to ensure the backend API is also secure.
      • Mass Assignment: If models allow unrestricted updates from user input, attackers might be able to modify attributes they shouldn't.
    • Data Flow: Receive data from the backend API, provide it to routes and components, and send updated data back to the API.

3. Threat Modeling and Mitigation Strategies

Based on the component analysis, here are some specific threats and mitigation strategies:

| Threat | Affected Component(s) | Mitigation Strategy