Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
44 lines (37 loc) · 5.85 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

44 lines (37 loc) · 5.85 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for facebook/react-native

Attack Surface: JavaScript Bridge Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Weaknesses in the communication channel (the bridge) between JavaScript and native code in React Native applications.
  • React Native Contribution: React Native's core architecture fundamentally relies on the JavaScript bridge. It is the central point of interaction between the JavaScript UI logic and the native device functionalities. Vulnerabilities here are inherently tied to React Native's design.
  • Example: A native module deserializes JSON data from JavaScript without proper type checking. An attacker sends a crafted JSON payload with unexpected data types that triggers a type confusion vulnerability in the native code, leading to memory corruption and potential remote code execution.
  • Impact: Remote code execution, data manipulation, denial of service, privilege escalation.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers:
      • Strict Data Validation and Sanitization: Implement rigorous input validation and sanitization for all data crossing the bridge from JavaScript to native. Enforce type checking and range validation.
      • Secure Serialization Practices: Use secure and well-vetted serialization libraries. Avoid custom serialization/deserialization logic where possible.
      • Principle of Least Privilege for Native Modules: Design native modules to expose the minimum necessary API surface to JavaScript. Limit the functionalities accessible via the bridge.
      • Regular Security Audits: Conduct frequent security code reviews and penetration testing specifically targeting the bridge communication and native module interactions.

Attack Surface: Insecure Native Modules

  • Description: Vulnerabilities within custom native modules written in platform-specific languages (Java/Kotlin for Android, Objective-C/Swift for iOS). These vulnerabilities are directly introduced by developers extending React Native's capabilities.
  • React Native Contribution: React Native encourages and necessitates the creation of native modules for accessing platform-specific features not available in JavaScript. Insecurely written native modules directly become part of the React Native application's attack surface.
  • Example: A native module responsible for file system access is implemented with a path traversal vulnerability. JavaScript code can use this module to access files outside of the intended application sandbox by crafting malicious file paths passed through the bridge.
  • Impact: Data breaches (access to sensitive files), unauthorized access to device resources, privilege escalation, potentially remote code execution if native module vulnerabilities are severe enough.
  • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the vulnerability type and the sensitivity of the resources accessed by the native module).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers:
      • Secure Native Coding Practices: Adhere to strict secure coding guidelines for the target platform (Android/iOS) when developing native modules. Focus on preventing common native vulnerabilities like path traversal, buffer overflows, format string bugs, and injection flaws.
      • Robust Input Validation in Native Modules: Thoroughly validate all inputs received from JavaScript within native modules before using them in native code operations.
      • Principle of Least Privilege for Native Module Permissions: Request and utilize only the minimum necessary native permissions required for the module's functionality. Avoid over-permissioning.
      • Security Testing of Native Modules: Mandatory security testing, including static analysis and dynamic testing, of all custom native modules.

Attack Surface: Insecure Over-the-Air (OTA) Updates

  • Description: Vulnerabilities in the process of delivering and applying application updates over-the-air, a feature commonly used in React Native development to bypass traditional app store update cycles.
  • React Native Contribution: React Native's ecosystem promotes and facilitates OTA updates (through libraries like CodePush and Expo Updates) as a core development workflow advantage. If OTA update mechanisms are insecure, they become a direct and significant React Native-specific attack vector.
  • Example: An application uses CodePush for OTA updates but fails to properly verify the code signing signature of updates. An attacker compromises the update server or performs a MITM attack and injects a malicious update package. The application, lacking signature verification, installs the compromised update, leading to widespread malware distribution.
  • Impact: Malware distribution to a large user base, complete application compromise, data theft, remote code execution on user devices.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers:
      • Mandatory HTTPS for OTA Updates: Always use HTTPS for all OTA update communication to prevent Man-in-the-Middle attacks.
      • Cryptographic Signing and Integrity Checks: Implement strong cryptographic code signing for OTA updates. Strictly verify signatures and/or checksums before applying any update.
      • Secure OTA Update Infrastructure: Harden the OTA update server infrastructure and access controls to prevent unauthorized access and tampering with update packages.
      • Rollback and Recovery Mechanisms: Implement robust rollback mechanisms to revert to previous versions in case of failed or malicious updates. Thoroughly test rollback procedures.