Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
114 lines (101 loc) · 16.9 KB

File metadata and controls

114 lines (101 loc) · 16.9 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for facebook/react-native

  • Description:
    1. Choose an Obfuscation Tool: Select a JavaScript obfuscation and minification tool suitable for React Native projects. Examples include javascript-obfuscator, uglify-js, or tools integrated into build systems like Webpack.
    2. Integrate into Build Process: Modify your React Native build scripts (e.g., in package.json or a dedicated build script) to include the obfuscation and minification step. This should occur after the JavaScript bundle is created but before the final application package is built.
    3. Configure Obfuscation Settings: Adjust the obfuscation settings of your chosen tool. Balance the level of obfuscation (which impacts security) with potential performance overhead and debugging complexity. Consider options like variable renaming, string encryption, control flow flattening, and dead code injection.
    4. Test Thoroughly: After implementing obfuscation, rigorously test the application on various devices and platforms to ensure that the obfuscation process hasn't introduced any functional issues or performance regressions.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Reverse Engineering (High Severity): Attackers can extract and analyze the React Native JavaScript bundle to understand application logic and find vulnerabilities.
    • Exposure of Sensitive Logic (High Severity): Sensitive algorithms, API keys, or business rules embedded in the React Native JavaScript code can be exposed.
    • Intellectual Property Theft (Medium Severity): Proprietary algorithms and unique application features within the React Native codebase can be more easily copied.
  • Impact:
    • Reverse Engineering: High Reduction - Significantly increases the effort and expertise required to understand the React Native JavaScript code.
    • Exposure of Sensitive Logic: High Reduction - Makes it much harder to extract sensitive information directly from the React Native JavaScript code.
    • Intellectual Property Theft: Medium Reduction - Raises the barrier to entry for copying React Native application logic, but doesn't eliminate it entirely.
  • Currently Implemented: Yes, implemented in the production build pipeline using webpack and uglify-js with basic minification and variable renaming.
  • Missing Implementation: More advanced obfuscation techniques like string encryption and control flow flattening are not currently enabled. Could be considered for increased security in future releases of the React Native application.

Mitigation Strategy: Regular Dependency Audits

  • Description:
    1. Choose an Audit Tool: Utilize npm's built-in npm audit or yarn's yarn audit command-line tools, as React Native projects heavily rely on npm packages. Alternatively, consider using dedicated dependency scanning tools that integrate with your CI/CD pipeline.
    2. Run Audits Regularly: Schedule regular dependency audits, ideally as part of your React Native development workflow (e.g., before each release, weekly, or monthly).
    3. Automate Audits in CI/CD: Integrate dependency auditing into your Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery (CI/CD) pipeline for your React Native application. This ensures that every build is checked for vulnerable dependencies.
    4. Review and Resolve Vulnerabilities: When vulnerabilities are reported, review them carefully in the context of your React Native application. Prioritize fixing high and critical severity vulnerabilities. Update dependencies to patched versions or apply workarounds if updates are not immediately available within the React Native project.
    5. Document Audit Process: Document the dependency audit process specifically for your React Native project, including tools used, frequency, and remediation procedures.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Dependency Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Exploitable vulnerabilities in third-party npm libraries used in your React Native application can be directly leveraged to compromise the application.
    • Supply Chain Attacks (Medium Severity): Compromised npm dependencies can introduce malicious code into your React Native application through seemingly legitimate updates.
  • Impact:
    • Dependency Vulnerabilities: High Reduction - Proactively identifies and allows for remediation of known vulnerabilities in React Native project dependencies.
    • Supply Chain Attacks: Medium Reduction - Reduces the risk by ensuring awareness of dependency health in the React Native project and encouraging timely updates, but doesn't prevent all supply chain risks.
  • Currently Implemented: Yes, npm audit is manually run by developers before each release of the React Native application.
  • Missing Implementation: Automation of npm audit in the CI/CD pipeline for the React Native application is missing. Integration with a vulnerability management platform for tracking and remediation is also not in place for React Native dependencies.
  • Description:
    1. Define Data Schemas: Clearly define the data structures (schemas) for communication between JavaScript and native modules in your React Native application. This helps in validating data integrity and format across the React Native bridge.
    2. Input Validation in Native Modules: Implement robust input validation in native modules for all data received from the JavaScript side via the React Native bridge. Validate data types, formats, ranges, and expected values.
    3. Output Sanitization from Native Modules: Sanitize data sent from native modules back to JavaScript to prevent potential injection vulnerabilities if the JavaScript code processes this data dynamically (e.g., in eval or similar contexts, though these should be avoided in React Native).
    4. Use Secure Serialization Formats: Prefer using JSON for React Native bridge communication as it is widely understood and generally safe when parsed correctly. Avoid using formats that are known to have deserialization vulnerabilities if possible within the React Native bridge context.
    5. Avoid Passing Executable Code: Never pass executable code (e.g., functions, code strings to be evaluated) over the React Native bridge. This is a major security risk in React Native applications.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Injection Attacks (Medium to High Severity): Malicious data injected through the React Native bridge could exploit vulnerabilities in native modules or JavaScript code.
    • Data Corruption (Medium Severity): Improper serialization or deserialization across the React Native bridge can lead to data corruption and unexpected application behavior.
  • Impact:
    • Injection Attacks: Medium Reduction - Significantly reduces the risk of common injection attacks by validating and sanitizing data crossing the React Native bridge.
    • Data Corruption: High Reduction - Ensures data integrity by enforcing data schemas and proper handling of data across the React Native bridge.
  • Currently Implemented: Basic input validation is implemented in some native modules, primarily focusing on data type checks for data received from the React Native JavaScript side. JSON is used for bridge communication.
  • Missing Implementation: Comprehensive input validation and sanitization are not consistently applied across all native modules in the React Native application. Output sanitization from native modules is not systematically implemented for data sent back to React Native JavaScript. Data schemas are not formally defined and enforced for React Native bridge communication.
  • Description:
    1. Identify Sensitive Data: Clearly identify data within your React Native application that requires secure storage (e.g., API keys, authentication tokens, user credentials, personal information).
    2. Implement Native Secure Storage: For sensitive data in React Native applications, use platform-specific secure storage APIs: Keychain on iOS and Keystore on Android. Utilize React Native libraries that abstract these APIs for easier integration (e.g., react-native-keychain).
    3. Avoid AsyncStorage for Sensitive Data: Do not use AsyncStorage for storing sensitive information in React Native applications as it is not designed for security and data is stored in plain text or with weak encryption on some platforms.
    4. Encrypt Data at Rest (If Necessary): If platform secure storage is not feasible for all sensitive data in your React Native application, and you must use local storage, implement robust encryption at rest. Use strong encryption algorithms and securely manage encryption keys (ideally using platform secure storage to protect the keys themselves).
    5. Regularly Review Storage Practices: Periodically review your React Native application's data storage practices to ensure sensitive data is handled securely and minimize the amount of sensitive data stored locally.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Data Breaches from Local Storage (High Severity): Sensitive data stored insecurely in the React Native application can be easily accessed by attackers who gain physical access to the device or exploit vulnerabilities to access application data.
    • Credential Theft (High Severity): Insecure storage of credentials within the React Native application can lead to account compromise and unauthorized access.
  • Impact:
    • Data Breaches from Local Storage: High Reduction - Platform secure storage provides strong protection against unauthorized access to sensitive data in React Native applications, even if the device is compromised.
    • Credential Theft: High Reduction - Securely storing credentials in React Native applications significantly reduces the risk of theft and misuse.
  • Currently Implemented: react-native-keychain is used to store authentication tokens in Keychain/Keystore within the React Native application.
  • Missing Implementation: AsyncStorage is still used for storing some less sensitive but potentially valuable user preferences and application state in the React Native application. A review is needed to determine if any of this data should be migrated to secure storage or removed from local storage entirely within the React Native context.

Mitigation Strategy: Code Signing for OTA Updates

  • Description:
    1. Set up Code Signing Infrastructure: Establish a secure code signing infrastructure for your React Native OTA updates. This involves generating and securely storing code signing certificates and private keys.
    2. Integrate Signing into OTA Update Process: Modify your React Native OTA update process to automatically sign update packages before they are distributed to users.
    3. Implement Signature Verification in Application: Implement signature verification within the React Native application itself. Before applying an OTA update, the application must verify the digital signature of the update package using the corresponding public key.
    4. Secure Key Management: Implement robust key management practices to protect the code signing private key used for React Native OTA updates. Store it securely (e.g., in a Hardware Security Module or secure vault) and restrict access to authorized personnel only.
    5. Regularly Rotate Keys (Optional but Recommended): Consider periodically rotating code signing keys used for React Native OTA updates as a security best practice to limit the impact of potential key compromise.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Malicious OTA Updates (High Severity): Attackers could distribute malicious OTA updates for your React Native application that replace the legitimate application with a compromised version, leading to data theft, malware installation, or other harmful actions.
    • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks on OTA Updates (Medium Severity): If React Native OTA updates are not signed and delivered over HTTPS, attackers could intercept and modify update packages in transit.
  • Impact:
    • Malicious OTA Updates: High Reduction - Code signing ensures the authenticity and integrity of React Native OTA updates, preventing the installation of tampered or malicious versions.
    • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks on OTA Updates: Medium Reduction - While HTTPS protects the transport of React Native OTA updates, code signing provides an additional layer of defense by verifying the update content itself.
  • Currently Implemented: OTA updates for the React Native application are delivered over HTTPS, but code signing is not currently implemented.
  • Missing Implementation: Code signing infrastructure needs to be set up for React Native OTA updates, and signature verification logic needs to be implemented in the application's OTA update mechanism.
  • Description:
    1. Establish Vetting Criteria: Define clear criteria for vetting third-party native modules used in your React Native application. Consider factors like:
      • Source Reputation: Is the native module from a reputable developer or organization within the React Native community?
      • Community Activity: Is the native module actively maintained and supported by a large community of React Native developers?
      • Security History: Are there any known security vulnerabilities associated with the native module? Has the developer demonstrated a commitment to security within the React Native context?
      • Code Quality: Is the native module's code well-written, documented, and easy to understand for React Native developers?
      • Permissions and Dependencies: What permissions does the native module request within the native platform? What other dependencies does it introduce into the React Native project?
    2. Perform Security Reviews: Conduct security reviews of native modules before incorporating them into your React Native project. This can involve:
      • Code Audits: Manually review the native module's source code for potential vulnerabilities, focusing on aspects relevant to React Native integration.
      • Static Analysis: Use static analysis tools to scan the native module's code for security flaws, considering the React Native context.
      • Vulnerability Scanning: Check for known vulnerabilities in the native module and its dependencies using vulnerability databases, specifically looking for issues relevant to React Native usage.
    3. Document Vetting Process: Document the vetting process and the rationale for choosing specific native modules for your React Native project.
    4. Regularly Re-vet Modules: Periodically re-vet existing native modules in your React Native application, especially when updating to new versions, to ensure they still meet security standards.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Vulnerable Native Modules (High Severity): Vulnerabilities in native modules used in your React Native application can directly compromise the application and the user's device.
    • Malicious Native Modules (High Severity): Malicious native modules used in your React Native application can be intentionally designed to harm the application or user.
    • Unnecessary Permissions (Medium Severity): Native modules requesting excessive permissions in your React Native application can expand the attack surface and potentially be misused.
  • Impact:
    • Vulnerable Native Modules: High Reduction - Proactive vetting significantly reduces the risk of introducing known vulnerabilities through third-party native modules in React Native projects.
    • Malicious Native Modules: High Reduction - Careful vetting and source reputation checks help to mitigate the risk of incorporating intentionally malicious native modules into React Native applications.
    • Unnecessary Permissions: Medium Reduction - Vetting helps to identify and avoid native modules that request excessive permissions within React Native applications, limiting potential misuse.
  • Currently Implemented: Informal vetting is performed by senior developers based on source reputation and community activity before adding new native modules to the React Native project.
  • Missing Implementation: A formal, documented vetting process with defined criteria and security review steps is missing for native modules in the React Native project. Static analysis and vulnerability scanning of native modules are not routinely performed.