Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
56 lines (48 loc) · 4.77 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

56 lines (48 loc) · 4.77 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for faisalman/ua-parser-js

Objective: Execute Arbitrary Code OR Cause DoS via ua-parser-js [*]

Attack Tree Visualization

[Attacker's Goal: Execute Arbitrary Code OR Cause DoS via ua-parser-js] [] | --------------------------------- | [Sub-Goal: Exploit Regex] [!] [Sub-Goal: Exploit Logic/Parsing Flaws] | | --------------------------------- | [Attack: ReDoS via Crafted] [Attack: Input Validation Bypass] [!] [] [User-Agent] [!] [*] [Leading to XSS/RCE (if used improperly)]

Attack Tree Path: Attack: ReDoS via Crafted User-Agent

  • Description:
    • This attack leverages the Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability.
    • An attacker crafts a malicious user-agent string specifically designed to trigger a computationally expensive regular expression operation within the ua-parser-js library.
    • This excessive computation consumes CPU resources, leading to a denial-of-service condition for the application.
  • Likelihood: High
  • Impact: Medium to High (Denial of Service)
  • Effort: Low
  • Skill Level: Intermediate
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Regularly Update ua-parser-js: Keep the library updated to the latest version to benefit from any patched ReDoS vulnerabilities.
    • Input Validation and Sanitization: Implement strict input validation before passing the user-agent string to the library. Limit the length of the string and disallow unusual or unnecessary characters.
    • Resource Limits and Timeouts: Enforce resource limits (CPU, memory) and timeouts for the parsing process. This prevents a single malicious request from consuming all available resources.
    • Web Application Firewall (WAF): Utilize a WAF with ReDoS protection capabilities. WAFs can often detect and block known ReDoS patterns.
    • Monitoring and Alerting: Implement robust monitoring of CPU usage and application response times. Set up alerts for anomalous behavior that might indicate a ReDoS attack.
    • Testing: Test the application with known ReDoS payloads to ensure that mitigations are effective.

Attack Tree Path: Attack: Input Validation Bypass Leading to XSS/RCE (if used improperly)

  • Description:
    • This attack is not a direct vulnerability of ua-parser-js itself, but rather a vulnerability in how the application uses the library's output.
    • If the application takes the parsed data from ua-parser-js (e.g., browser name, operating system version) and inserts it directly into the DOM (for Cross-Site Scripting - XSS) or uses it in server-side code execution (for Remote Code Execution - RCE) without proper sanitization or escaping, it becomes vulnerable.
    • An attacker can craft a user-agent string containing malicious code (e.g., JavaScript for XSS, shell commands for RCE). When the application displays or uses this unsanitized output, the attacker's code is executed.
  • Likelihood: Low to Medium (depends entirely on the application's code)
  • Impact: High to Very High (XSS can lead to session hijacking, data theft; RCE can lead to complete system compromise)
  • Effort: Low to Medium
  • Skill Level: Intermediate to Advanced
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Output Encoding/Escaping: Always use appropriate output encoding or escaping techniques when displaying data from ua-parser-js in HTML, JavaScript, or other contexts. This prevents the browser or server from interpreting the data as code.
    • Input Validation (of Output): Even though the data comes from ua-parser-js, treat it as untrusted input from the application's perspective. Validate and sanitize it before using it in any potentially dangerous context.
    • Context-Aware Sanitization: Use sanitization libraries that are aware of the specific context where the data will be used (e.g., HTML sanitizers for HTML output, JavaScript sanitizers for JavaScript output).
    • Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a strong CSP to mitigate the impact of XSS vulnerabilities. CSP can restrict the sources from which scripts can be loaded, making it harder for attackers to inject malicious code.
    • Avoid Dynamic Code Execution: Minimize or eliminate the use of dynamic code execution (e.g., eval(), new Function()) with data derived from ua-parser-js or any user-supplied input.
    • Principle of Least Privilege: Ensure that the application runs with the minimum necessary privileges. This limits the damage an attacker can do if they achieve RCE.