Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
175 lines (145 loc) · 11.3 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

175 lines (145 loc) · 11.3 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for feross/safe-buffer

Objective: Compromise Application Using safe-buffer

Attack Tree Visualization

Attack Goal: Compromise Application Using safe-buffer [CRITICAL] ├───[AND] Exploit safe-buffer Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL] │ ├───[OR] 1. Memory Exposure via Uninitialized Buffer (Bypass safe-buffer's safety) [CRITICAL] │ │ ├─── 1.1. Vulnerability in safe-buffer's Implementation [CRITICAL] │ │ │ └─── 1.1.1. Logic Error in Allocation/Initialization │ │ │ └─── 1.1.1.1 Exploit: Craft input to trigger logic error leading to uninitialized buffer [CRITICAL, HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ └─── 1.2. Incorrect Usage of safe-buffer API by Application Developer [CRITICAL] │ │ ├─── 1.2.1. Misunderstanding of safe-buffer's Safety Guarantees │ │ │ └─── 1.2.1.1 Exploit: Application developer assumes complete safety where it doesn't exist, leading to vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ ├─── 1.2.2. Using safe-buffer in Unsafe Contexts (e.g., mixing with unsafe Buffer operations) [CRITICAL] │ │ │ └─── 1.2.2.1 Exploit: Combine safe-buffer with unsafe Buffer methods to bypass safety measures [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ └─── 1.2.3. Logic Errors in Application Code Handling Buffers Created by safe-buffer [CRITICAL] │ │ └─── 1.2.3.1 Exploit: Application code mishandles buffer data, leading to information leaks or other vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ ├───[OR] 2. Denial of Service (DoS) related to Buffer Allocation [CRITICAL] │ │ ├─── 2.1. Excessive Memory Allocation [CRITICAL] │ │ │ ├─── 2.1.1. Large Buffer Size Request via Application Input [CRITICAL] │ │ │ │ └─── 2.1.1.1 Exploit: Provide extremely large size values to application endpoints that use safe-buffer for allocation [CRITICAL, HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ └─── 2.1.2. Repeated Buffer Allocation in Short Time [CRITICAL] │ │ │ └─── 2.1.2.1 Exploit: Send numerous requests triggering buffer allocations to exhaust server memory [CRITICAL, HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ └─── 2.2. CPU Exhaustion during Buffer Operations (Less likely with safe-buffer itself, more with complex buffer processing) │ │ └─── 2.2.1. Complex Buffer Operations triggered by Application Input │ │ └─── 2.2.1.1 Exploit: Provide input that leads to computationally expensive buffer operations using safe-buffer [HIGH-RISK PATH] └───[AND] Exploit Application Logic Flaws Related to Buffer Handling (Indirectly related to safe-buffer, but important context) [CRITICAL] ├───[OR] 4. Information Leakage via Buffer Content [CRITICAL] │ ├─── 4.1. Exposing Buffer Content in Logs or Error Messages [CRITICAL] │ │ └─── 4.1.1.1 Exploit: Trigger application errors or logging mechanisms that inadvertently reveal sensitive data stored in buffers [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ ├─── 4.2. Insecure Transmission of Buffer Data [CRITICAL] │ │ └─── 4.2.1.1 Exploit: Intercept or access insecure channels where buffer data is transmitted without proper encryption [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ └─── 4.3. Improper Sanitization of Buffer Content before Output [CRITICAL] │ └─── 4.3.1.1 Exploit: Application fails to sanitize buffer data before displaying it to users, leading to information disclosure (e.g., displaying raw binary data or encoded secrets) [HIGH-RISK PATH] ├───[OR] 5. Buffer Overflow/Underflow in Application Logic (Less likely due to safe-buffer, but consider application code) [CRITICAL] │ ├─── 5.1. Incorrect Size Calculations in Application Code when using safe-buffer [CRITICAL] │ │ └─── 5.1.1.1 Exploit: Application logic miscalculates buffer sizes leading to overflows or underflows when writing or reading data [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ └─── 5.2. Off-by-One Errors in Buffer Indexing in Application Code │ └─── 5.2.1.1 Exploit: Introduce off-by-one errors in application code that manipulates buffers, leading to memory corruption or information leaks [HIGH-RISK PATH] └───[OR] 6. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Buffer Data (If buffer content is used in web responses without proper encoding) [CRITICAL] └─── 6.2. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Buffer Data (If buffer content is used in web responses without proper encoding) [CRITICAL] └─── 6.2.1.1 Exploit: Inject malicious scripts into buffer data that is later rendered in a web page without proper encoding, leading to XSS vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH]

Attack Tree Path: Logic Error in safe-buffer Allocation/Initialization Exploit

  • 1.1.1.1 Exploit: Craft input to trigger logic error leading to uninitialized buffer [CRITICAL, HIGH-RISK PATH]
    • Attack Vector Name: Logic Error in safe-buffer Allocation/Initialization Exploit
    • Likelihood: Low
    • Impact: High
    • Effort: High
    • Skill Level: High
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium

Attack Tree Path: Misunderstanding of safe-buffer Safety Guarantees Exploit

  • 1.2.1.1 Exploit: Application developer assumes complete safety where it doesn't exist, leading to vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    • Attack Vector Name: Misunderstanding of safe-buffer Safety Guarantees Exploit
    • Likelihood: Medium
    • Impact: Medium
    • Effort: Low to Medium
    • Skill Level: Medium
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium

Attack Tree Path: Mixing safe-buffer with Unsafe Buffer Operations Exploit

  • 1.2.2.1 Exploit: Combine safe-buffer with unsafe Buffer methods to bypass safety measures [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    • Attack Vector Name: Mixing safe-buffer with Unsafe Buffer Operations Exploit
    • Likelihood: Medium
    • Impact: Medium to High
    • Effort: Medium
    • Skill Level: Medium
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium

Attack Tree Path: Application Logic Error in Buffer Handling Exploit

  • 1.2.3.1 Exploit: Application code mishandles buffer data, leading to information leaks or other vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    • Attack Vector Name: Application Logic Error in Buffer Handling Exploit
    • Likelihood: Medium to High
    • Impact: Medium to High
    • Effort: Low to Medium
    • Skill Level: Low to Medium
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium

Attack Tree Path: Large Buffer Size Request DoS Exploit

  • 2.1.1.1 Exploit: Provide extremely large size values to application endpoints that use safe-buffer for allocation [CRITICAL, HIGH-RISK PATH]
    • Attack Vector Name: Large Buffer Size Request DoS Exploit
    • Likelihood: High
    • Impact: Medium to High
    • Effort: Low
    • Skill Level: Low
    • Detection Difficulty: Low

Attack Tree Path: Repeated Buffer Allocation DoS Exploit

  • 2.1.2.1 Exploit: Send numerous requests triggering buffer allocations to exhaust server memory [CRITICAL, HIGH-RISK PATH]
    • Attack Vector Name: Repeated Buffer Allocation DoS Exploit
    • Likelihood: Medium to High
    • Impact: Medium to High
    • Effort: Low
    • Skill Level: Low
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium

Attack Tree Path: CPU Exhaustion via Complex Buffer Operations Exploit

  • 2.2.1.1 Exploit: Provide input that leads to computationally expensive buffer operations using safe-buffer [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    • Attack Vector Name: CPU Exhaustion via Complex Buffer Operations Exploit
    • Likelihood: Low to Medium
    • Impact: Medium
    • Effort: Medium
    • Skill Level: Medium
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium

Attack Tree Path: Information Leakage via Logs/Errors Exploit

  • 4.1.1.1 Exploit: Trigger application errors or logging mechanisms that inadvertently reveal sensitive data stored in buffers [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    • Attack Vector Name: Information Leakage via Logs/Errors Exploit
    • Likelihood: Medium
    • Impact: Medium
    • Effort: Low
    • Skill Level: Low
    • Detection Difficulty: Low to Medium

Attack Tree Path: Information Leakage via Insecure Transmission Exploit

  • 4.2.1.1 Exploit: Intercept or access insecure channels where buffer data is transmitted without proper encryption [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    • Attack Vector Name: Information Leakage via Insecure Transmission Exploit
    • Likelihood: Medium
    • Impact: Medium to High
    • Effort: Low to Medium
    • Skill Level: Low to Medium
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium

Attack Tree Path: Information Leakage via Improper Output Sanitization Exploit

  • 4.3.1.1 Exploit: Application fails to sanitize buffer data before displaying it to users, leading to information disclosure (e.g., displaying raw binary data or encoded secrets) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    • Attack Vector Name: Information Leakage via Improper Output Sanitization Exploit
    • Likelihood: Medium
    • Impact: Medium
    • Effort: Low
    • Skill Level: Low
    • Detection Difficulty: Low

Attack Tree Path: Buffer Overflow/Underflow via Incorrect Size Calculation Exploit

  • 5.1.1.1 Exploit: Application logic miscalculates buffer sizes leading to overflows or underflows when writing or reading data [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    • Attack Vector Name: Buffer Overflow/Underflow via Incorrect Size Calculation Exploit
    • Likelihood: Medium
    • Impact: Medium to High
    • Effort: Medium
    • Skill Level: Medium
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium

Attack Tree Path: Buffer Overflow/Underflow via Off-by-One Error Exploit

  • 5.2.1.1 Exploit: Introduce off-by-one errors in application code that manipulates buffers, leading to memory corruption or information leaks [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    • Attack Vector Name: Buffer Overflow/Underflow via Off-by-One Error Exploit
    • Likelihood: Medium
    • Impact: Medium
    • Effort: Low to Medium
    • Skill Level: Low to Medium
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium

Attack Tree Path: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Buffer Data Exploit

  • 6.2.1.1 Exploit: Inject malicious scripts into buffer data that is later rendered in a web page without proper encoding, leading to XSS vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    • Attack Vector Name: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Buffer Data Exploit
    • Likelihood: Medium
    • Impact: Medium
    • Effort: Low
    • Skill Level: Low
    • Detection Difficulty: Low