Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
96 lines (78 loc) · 8.11 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

96 lines (78 loc) · 8.11 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for feross/safe-buffer

Objective: Compromise Application via safe-buffer

Attack Tree Visualization

Goal: Compromise Application via safe-buffer
├── 1.  Exploit Incorrect Usage of safe-buffer API [HIGH-RISK]
│   ├── 1.1.1.2  Provide negative or excessively large values as input, leading to incorrect size calculation. [CRITICAL]
│   └── 1.1.3  Incorrectly handle `Buffer.allocUnsafe()` leading to uninitialized memory exposure. [HIGH-RISK]
│       └── 1.1.3.1  Read from an `allocUnsafe` buffer before writing to it, potentially exposing sensitive data from previous allocations. [CRITICAL]
└── 1.3  Denial of Service (DoS) via Excessive Memory Allocation [HIGH-RISK]
    ├── 1.3.1  Trigger repeated calls to `Buffer.alloc()` or `Buffer.allocUnsafe()` with large sizes. [HIGH-RISK]
    │   └── 1.3.1.1  Exploit application logic that allows an attacker to control the size parameter of buffer allocation. [CRITICAL]

Attack Tree Path: 1. Exploit Incorrect Usage of safe-buffer API [HIGH-RISK]

  • Description: This is the overarching high-risk category. The safe-buffer library is designed to prevent buffer-related vulnerabilities, but only if used correctly. Incorrect usage opens the door to various attacks.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strictly adhere to the recommended safe-buffer API.
    • Avoid deprecated Buffer constructors (e.g., new Buffer()).
    • Use Buffer.alloc() for initialized buffers.
    • Use Buffer.allocUnsafe() only when absolutely necessary and with extreme caution.
    • Thorough code reviews focusing on safe-buffer usage.
    • Developer training on secure buffer handling.

Attack Tree Path: 1.1.1.2 Provide negative or excessively large values as input, leading to incorrect size calculation. [CRITICAL]

  • Description: An attacker provides invalid input (e.g., negative numbers, extremely large numbers, non-numeric values) to a part of the application that uses this input to determine the size of a buffer to be allocated using safe-buffer functions (like Buffer.allocUnsafe() or Buffer.from()). This can lead to either very small buffers (potentially causing overflows later) or excessively large buffers (leading to DoS).
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: High (Potential for both buffer overflows/underflows and DoS)
  • Effort: Low
  • Skill Level: Intermediate
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Robust Input Validation: Implement strict input validation to ensure that only positive, reasonable-sized numeric values are used for buffer size calculations. Reject any input that doesn't meet these criteria.
    • Type Checking: Ensure that the input is of the expected numeric type before using it in calculations.
    • Sanitization: If input must be transformed before use, sanitize it carefully to prevent unexpected values.

Attack Tree Path: 1.1.3 Incorrectly handle Buffer.allocUnsafe() leading to uninitialized memory exposure. [HIGH-RISK]

  • Description: Buffer.allocUnsafe() allocates a buffer of the specified size without initializing its contents. This means the buffer will contain whatever data was previously present in that memory location. If the application reads from this buffer before writing to it, it may expose sensitive information (e.g., remnants of previous requests, encryption keys, other user data).
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: Medium-High (Data leakage)
  • Effort: Low
  • Skill Level: Intermediate
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium-Hard
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Immediate Initialization: Always initialize a buffer allocated with Buffer.allocUnsafe() immediately after allocation. Use buf.fill(0) or write the intended data to the entire buffer before any reads occur.
    • Prefer Buffer.alloc(): Use Buffer.alloc() whenever possible, as it automatically initializes the buffer with zeros, eliminating this risk. Reserve Buffer.allocUnsafe() for performance-critical situations where the initialization overhead is truly unacceptable, and you can guarantee immediate initialization.
    • Code Audits: Carefully review code that uses Buffer.allocUnsafe() to ensure proper initialization.

Attack Tree Path: 1.1.3.1 Read from an allocUnsafe buffer before writing to it, potentially exposing sensitive data from previous allocations. [CRITICAL]

  • Description: This is the specific, critical action that leads to the data leakage vulnerability described in 1.1.3. It's the direct consequence of not initializing an allocUnsafe buffer.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: Medium-High (Data leakage)
  • Effort: Low
  • Skill Level: Intermediate
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium-Hard
  • Mitigation Strategies: (Same as 1.1.3)

Attack Tree Path: 1.3 Denial of Service (DoS) via Excessive Memory Allocation [HIGH-RISK]

  • Description: An attacker exploits the application to trigger the allocation of excessively large buffers, consuming a significant amount of memory. This can lead to the application crashing or becoming unresponsive, denying service to legitimate users.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement strict input validation to prevent users from controlling buffer allocation sizes.
    • Set reasonable limits on the maximum size of buffers that can be allocated.
    • Use resource limits (e.g., memory limits) at the operating system or container level to constrain the application's memory usage.
    • Implement rate limiting to prevent attackers from making a large number of requests that trigger buffer allocations.

Attack Tree Path: 1.3.1 Trigger repeated calls to Buffer.alloc() or Buffer.allocUnsafe() with large sizes. [HIGH-RISK]

  • Description: This describes the mechanism of a DoS attack. The attacker repeatedly sends requests, or manipulates a single request, to cause the application to allocate many large buffers, or a single extremely large buffer.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: Medium (Service disruption)
  • Effort: Low
  • Skill Level: Intermediate
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Mitigation Strategies: (Same as 1.3)

Attack Tree Path: 1.3.1.1 Exploit application logic that allows an attacker to control the size parameter of buffer allocation. [CRITICAL]

  • Description: This is the critical vulnerability that enables the DoS attack. The application has a flaw that allows an attacker to directly or indirectly specify the size of a buffer to be allocated. This is often due to insufficient input validation.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: Medium (Service disruption)
  • Effort: Low
  • Skill Level: Intermediate
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strict Input Validation: Implement rigorous input validation to prevent attackers from influencing buffer allocation sizes. Do not trust user-supplied data for buffer sizes.
    • Hardcoded Limits: Use hardcoded or configuration-based limits on the maximum size of buffers that can be allocated.
    • Indirect Size Calculation: If the buffer size must be determined dynamically, derive it from trusted internal data rather than directly from user input.