Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
143 lines (117 loc) · 154 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

143 lines (117 loc) · 154 KB

Gatsby Security Analysis: Deep Dive

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

The objective of this deep analysis is to conduct a thorough security assessment of a Gatsby-based application, focusing on the key components and their interactions as outlined in the provided security design review. This analysis aims to identify potential vulnerabilities, assess their impact, and provide specific, actionable mitigation strategies tailored to the Gatsby framework and its ecosystem. We will pay particular attention to the interaction between Gatsby, its plugins, data sources (CMS, APIs, databases), and the deployment environment.

Scope:

This analysis covers the following areas:

  • Gatsby Core: The core functionalities of the Gatsby framework itself.
  • Gatsby Plugins: The security implications of using both official and third-party plugins.
  • Data Sourcing: Security considerations related to fetching data from various sources (CMS, APIs, databases).
  • GraphQL Layer: Security aspects of Gatsby's GraphQL implementation.
  • Build Process: Security controls within the CI/CD pipeline.
  • Deployment Environment: Security of the chosen hosting solution (AWS S3 + CloudFront, as specified).
  • Client-Side Security: Vulnerabilities that could be exploited in the user's browser.

Methodology:

  1. Architecture and Component Inference: Based on the provided C4 diagrams, documentation, and typical Gatsby usage patterns, we will infer the application's architecture, components, and data flow.
  2. Threat Modeling: For each component and interaction, we will identify potential threats using a combination of STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) and known attack vectors relevant to web applications and static site generators.
  3. Vulnerability Analysis: We will analyze the identified threats to determine potential vulnerabilities specific to Gatsby and its ecosystem.
  4. Impact Assessment: We will assess the potential impact of each vulnerability on the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the application and its data.
  5. Mitigation Recommendations: We will provide specific, actionable, and Gatsby-tailored mitigation strategies to address the identified vulnerabilities. These recommendations will consider the existing security controls and accepted risks.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

2.1 Gatsby Core:

  • Architecture: Gatsby core acts as the orchestrator, fetching data, transforming it, and generating static assets. It relies heavily on Node.js and its package ecosystem.
  • Threats:
    • Dependency Vulnerabilities (T, I): Vulnerabilities in core Node.js modules or Gatsby's own dependencies could lead to code execution, data breaches, or denial of service.
    • Configuration Errors (I, D): Incorrect configuration of Gatsby itself (e.g., exposing sensitive environment variables) could lead to information disclosure.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) (A): Extremely large or complex builds could exhaust server resources during the build process, making the build pipeline unavailable.
  • Mitigation:
    • Regularly update Gatsby and its dependencies: Use npm outdated and npm update (or yarn equivalents) to keep all packages up-to-date. Automate this process within the CI/CD pipeline.
    • Implement SBOM: Maintain a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) to track all dependencies and their versions. Use tools like cyclonedx-bom or syft to generate and manage the SBOM.
    • Secure Configuration Management: Store sensitive configuration values (API keys, secrets) securely using environment variables and a secrets management solution (e.g., AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault, or GitHub Actions secrets). Never hardcode secrets in the codebase.
    • Build Timeouts: Implement build timeouts in the CI/CD pipeline to prevent excessively long builds from consuming resources.
    • Rate Limiting (Build Process): If the build process is triggered frequently, consider implementing rate limiting to prevent abuse.

2.2 Gatsby Plugins:

  • Architecture: Plugins extend Gatsby's functionality, providing data sourcing, transformations, and other features. They are essentially Node.js packages.
  • Threats:
    • Supply Chain Attacks (T, I, D): Malicious or compromised plugins could inject malicious code, steal data, or disrupt the website. This is a significant risk due to the accepted risk of relying on third-party plugins.
    • Vulnerable Plugin Code (T, I, D): Plugins may contain their own vulnerabilities (e.g., XSS, SQL injection, insecure data handling) that could be exploited.
    • Overly Permissive Plugins (I, D): Plugins might request more data than they need, increasing the risk of data exposure if compromised.
    • Unmaintained Plugins (T, I, D, A): Plugins that are no longer maintained are more likely to contain unpatched vulnerabilities.
  • Mitigation:
    • Plugin Vetting: Carefully vet all plugins before using them. Prioritize official plugins and those from reputable sources. Examine the plugin's code, community activity, and security track record. Check for recent updates and maintenance.
    • Dependency Scanning (Plugins): Use tools like npm audit, yarn audit, or Snyk to scan plugin dependencies for known vulnerabilities. Integrate this into the CI/CD pipeline.
    • Principle of Least Privilege (Plugins): Configure plugins with the minimum necessary permissions. Avoid granting plugins access to data or resources they don't require.
    • Regular Plugin Audits: Periodically review the plugins used in the project and remove any that are no longer needed or have become unmaintained.
    • Sandboxing (Advanced): Explore techniques for sandboxing plugin execution to limit their potential impact if compromised. This is complex but can significantly enhance security. This might involve running plugin code in separate processes or using containerization.

2.3 Data Sourcing:

  • Architecture: Gatsby fetches data from various sources (CMS, APIs, databases) using source plugins.
  • Threats:
    • Injection Attacks (T, I): If data from external sources is not properly validated and sanitized, it could lead to injection vulnerabilities (e.g., SQL injection, NoSQL injection, command injection) within the data sourcing process or when the data is used later.
    • Data Exposure (I, D): Misconfigured API keys or credentials could expose sensitive data from the data sources.
    • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks (I, D): If communication with data sources is not secured, attackers could intercept or modify data in transit.
    • Data Source Compromise (T, I, D, A): If the CMS, API, or database itself is compromised, the attacker could gain access to all data sourced by Gatsby.
  • Mitigation:
    • Secure API Key Management: Store API keys and credentials securely using environment variables and a secrets management solution. Never hardcode them in the codebase or commit them to version control.
    • HTTPS Enforcement: Use HTTPS for all communication with data sources. Ensure that TLS certificates are valid and trusted.
    • Input Validation and Sanitization: Validate and sanitize all data received from external sources, regardless of the source. Use a robust validation library and follow OWASP guidelines for preventing injection vulnerabilities. This is critical for data that will be used in GraphQL queries or rendered as HTML.
    • Data Source Security: Ensure that the CMS, APIs, and databases used by Gatsby are themselves secure. Follow security best practices for each data source.
    • Rate Limiting (Data Sources): Implement rate limiting on API requests to prevent abuse and potential denial-of-service attacks against the data sources.
    • Principle of Least Privilege (Data Sources): Configure data source access with the minimum necessary permissions. Gatsby should only have read access to the data it needs.

2.4 GraphQL Layer:

  • Architecture: Gatsby uses GraphQL to manage and query data internally.
  • Threats:
    • Query Complexity Attacks (DoS) (A): Attackers could craft complex or deeply nested GraphQL queries that consume excessive server resources, leading to denial of service.
    • Introspection Attacks (I, D): If introspection is enabled in production, attackers could discover the entire GraphQL schema, including potentially sensitive fields and relationships.
    • Over-fetching (I): While GraphQL helps prevent over-fetching, poorly designed queries could still retrieve more data than necessary.
    • Injection Attacks (T, I): If user-supplied input is used to construct GraphQL queries without proper sanitization, it could lead to injection vulnerabilities.
  • Mitigation:
    • Query Cost Analysis and Limiting: Implement query cost analysis to limit the complexity and depth of GraphQL queries. Use libraries like graphql-cost-analysis or graphql-validation-complexity to enforce these limits.
    • Disable Introspection in Production: Disable GraphQL introspection in the production environment to prevent attackers from discovering the schema.
    • Input Validation (GraphQL): Validate and sanitize all user-supplied input used in GraphQL queries. Use GraphQL's built-in type system and validation features, and consider adding custom validation logic where needed.
    • Authorization (GraphQL): Implement authorization checks within GraphQL resolvers to ensure that users can only access data they are authorized to see.
    • Rate Limiting (GraphQL): Implement rate limiting on GraphQL queries to prevent abuse.

2.5 Build Process (GitHub Actions):

  • Architecture: The build process uses GitHub Actions to automate the steps of fetching data, building the site, and deploying it.
  • Threats:
    • Compromised CI/CD Pipeline (T, I, D, A): If an attacker gains access to the GitHub Actions workflow or the underlying infrastructure, they could inject malicious code, steal secrets, or disrupt the build process.
    • Dependency Vulnerabilities (Build) (T, I): Vulnerabilities in build tools or dependencies could be exploited during the build process.
    • Secret Exposure (Build) (I, D): If secrets are not handled securely within the CI/CD pipeline, they could be exposed to attackers.
  • Mitigation:
    • Secure GitHub Actions Configuration: Follow security best practices for configuring GitHub Actions workflows. Use specific commit SHAs for actions, avoid using third-party actions from untrusted sources, and regularly review workflow configurations.
    • Least Privilege (Build): Run the build process with the minimum necessary permissions. Avoid granting the workflow unnecessary access to resources.
    • Secret Management (Build): Use GitHub Actions secrets to securely store API keys, credentials, and other sensitive information. Do not hardcode secrets in the workflow configuration.
    • Dependency Scanning (Build): Integrate dependency scanning tools (e.g., npm audit, yarn audit, Snyk) into the GitHub Actions workflow to automatically check for vulnerabilities in build dependencies.
    • Code Scanning (Build): Integrate static analysis tools (e.g., SonarQube, ESLint with security plugins) into the workflow to scan the codebase for potential security issues.
    • Artifact Signing (Optional): For increased security, consider signing build artifacts to ensure their integrity.

2.6 Deployment Environment (AWS S3 + CloudFront):

  • Architecture: The static site is hosted on AWS S3 and served through CloudFront.
  • Threats:
    • Misconfigured S3 Bucket (I, D): If the S3 bucket is publicly accessible, attackers could access or modify the website's files.
    • Lack of HTTPS (I, D): If HTTPS is not enforced, attackers could intercept or modify traffic between users and the website (MitM attack).
    • DDoS Attacks (A): Distributed denial-of-service attacks could overwhelm the website, making it unavailable to users.
    • Lack of WAF (T, I, D): Without a Web Application Firewall (WAF), the website is more vulnerable to common web attacks (e.g., XSS, SQL injection).
  • Mitigation:
    • Restrict S3 Bucket Access: Configure the S3 bucket policy to allow access only from CloudFront using an Origin Access Identity (OAI). Disable public access to the bucket.
    • Enable Server-Side Encryption (S3): Enable server-side encryption on the S3 bucket to protect data at rest.
    • Enforce HTTPS (CloudFront): Configure CloudFront to redirect all HTTP requests to HTTPS. Use a strong TLS configuration.
    • Enable CloudFront Logging: Enable access logging for the CloudFront distribution to monitor traffic and identify potential security issues.
    • AWS WAF Integration: Integrate AWS WAF with CloudFront to protect against common web attacks. Configure WAF rules to block malicious requests based on OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities and other relevant threats.
    • DDoS Protection: Utilize AWS Shield (Standard or Advanced) for DDoS protection. CloudFront itself provides some level of DDoS mitigation, but AWS Shield offers more comprehensive protection.
    • Origin Shield (Optional): Consider using CloudFront Origin Shield for an additional caching layer to improve cache hit ratio and reduce load on the origin (S3 bucket).

2.7 Client-Side Security:

  • Architecture: The user's browser renders the static HTML, CSS, and JavaScript generated by Gatsby.
  • Threats:
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (T, I): If user-supplied input is not properly sanitized before being displayed on the website, attackers could inject malicious JavaScript code that executes in the user's browser.
    • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) (T): While less common for static sites, CSRF attacks are possible if the site interacts with external APIs that require authentication.
    • Clickjacking (T): Attackers could trick users into clicking on something different from what they think they are clicking on.
    • Data Exfiltration (I, D): Malicious JavaScript code (e.g., from a compromised third-party library) could steal sensitive data from the user's browser.
  • Mitigation:
    • Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a strict CSP to control the resources that the browser is allowed to load. This is a crucial defense against XSS and data exfiltration. Use the gatsby-plugin-csp to configure CSP headers.
    • Input Validation and Sanitization (Client-Side): Validate and sanitize all user-supplied input on the client-side before sending it to any server or displaying it on the page. Use a robust sanitization library like DOMPurify. Remember that client-side validation is not a substitute for server-side validation.
    • Subresource Integrity (SRI): Use SRI to ensure that the browser only loads JavaScript and CSS files with the expected content. This helps protect against compromised CDNs or third-party libraries. Gatsby does not have built-in SRI support, but it can be implemented manually or with custom scripts.
    • HTTP Headers: Use security-related HTTP headers like X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy to enhance browser security. The gatsby-plugin-netlify can help manage these headers.
    • CSRF Protection (if applicable): If the site interacts with external APIs that require authentication, implement CSRF protection mechanisms (e.g., CSRF tokens) on the API side.
    • Avoid Inline Scripts: Minimize the use of inline scripts and event handlers. Favor external scripts with SRI.

3. Actionable Mitigation Strategies (Summary)

The following table summarizes the key mitigation strategies, categorized by the component they address:

| Component | Mitigation Strategy