Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
242 lines (184 loc) · 26.2 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

242 lines (184 loc) · 26.2 KB

Deep Security Analysis of reveal.js

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

This deep security analysis aims to thoroughly evaluate the security posture of reveal.js, an open-source HTML presentation framework. The primary objective is to identify potential security vulnerabilities and risks associated with the reveal.js library, its build process, deployment, and usage scenarios. This analysis will focus on providing actionable and tailored security recommendations to the reveal.js development team to enhance the security of the framework and guide users in securely utilizing it.

Scope:

The scope of this analysis encompasses the following aspects of reveal.js, as defined by the provided Security Design Review and C4 architecture diagrams:

  • Reveal.js Library: The core JavaScript library and associated assets responsible for presentation rendering and functionality within a web browser.
  • Build Process: The automated process for building, testing, and packaging reveal.js, including dependency management and security scanning tools.
  • Deployment Architecture: Typical deployment scenarios involving web servers, CDNs, and static hosting environments.
  • User Interaction: Interaction of Presentation Creators and Presentation Viewers with reveal.js and its ecosystem.
  • Dependencies: Third-party libraries and tools used by reveal.js during development and runtime.

The analysis will not directly cover the security of user-created presentation content or the specific security configurations of user-managed hosting environments, except where these are directly influenced by or interact with reveal.js itself. However, recommendations will be provided to guide users in securing their presentations.

Methodology:

This deep security analysis will employ the following methodology:

  1. Document Review: Thorough review of the provided Security Design Review document, including business and security posture, existing and recommended security controls, security requirements, C4 architecture diagrams, risk assessment, and questions/assumptions.
  2. Architecture and Data Flow Analysis: Analysis of the C4 Context, Container, Deployment, and Build diagrams to understand the system's architecture, component interactions, and data flow. This will involve inferring potential attack vectors and security weaknesses based on the design.
  3. Component-Based Security Assessment: Breaking down the system into key components (as identified in C4 diagrams) and analyzing the security implications of each component. This will include identifying potential threats, vulnerabilities, and risks associated with each component.
  4. Threat Modeling (Implicit): While not explicitly stated as a formal threat modeling exercise, the analysis will implicitly perform threat modeling by considering potential attackers, attack vectors, and assets at risk for each component.
  5. Best Practices and Standards Application: Applying industry best practices and security standards relevant to web application security, JavaScript libraries, and open-source projects to identify potential gaps and areas for improvement.
  6. Tailored Recommendation Generation: Developing specific, actionable, and tailored security recommendations and mitigation strategies for reveal.js, directly addressing the identified threats and vulnerabilities. These recommendations will be practical and feasible for the reveal.js development team to implement.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

This section breaks down the security implications of each key component identified in the C4 architecture diagrams and the Security Design Review.

2.1. Context Diagram Components

  • Presentation Viewers:

    • Security Implication: Viewers are primarily consumers of reveal.js presentations. Their security risk is mainly related to being targeted by malicious presentations (e.g., XSS if a presentation is compromised or intentionally crafted maliciously). Compromised presentations could potentially execute malicious JavaScript in the viewer's browser, leading to information disclosure or other client-side attacks.
    • Specific Risk: If reveal.js or user-created presentations have XSS vulnerabilities, viewers could be targeted.
    • Mitigation (Viewer-side, beyond reveal.js control): Browser security controls (CSP, XSS filters), user awareness of suspicious links, up-to-date browsers.

  • Presentation Creators:

    • Security Implication: Creators are responsible for developing presentation content and configuring reveal.js. They could unintentionally introduce vulnerabilities through insecure content or misconfiguration. They also need to ensure the security of their development environment and the presentations they create, especially if they contain sensitive data.
    • Specific Risk: Accidental introduction of XSS in presentation content, insecure configuration of reveal.js features, exposure of sensitive data within presentations if not properly secured during hosting.
    • Mitigation (Creator-side, guidance from reveal.js needed): Secure development practices, input sanitization for dynamic content generation (if applicable), following reveal.js security best practices documentation, secure storage and handling of presentation content.

  • Reveal.js Library:

    • Security Implication: As the core component, vulnerabilities in reveal.js directly impact all users and presentations. Vulnerabilities could range from XSS, prototype pollution, dependency vulnerabilities, to denial-of-service.
    • Specific Risk: XSS vulnerabilities in core library code, vulnerabilities in dependencies, insecure handling of configuration options, logic flaws leading to unexpected behavior.
    • Mitigation (reveal.js responsibility): Secure coding practices, regular security audits, automated security testing (SAST, dependency scanning), prompt vulnerability patching, clear security documentation for users.

  • Web Browser:

    • Security Implication: Reveal.js relies on the security of the web browser environment. Browser vulnerabilities could indirectly affect reveal.js. However, browser security features (CSP, Same-Origin Policy, etc.) are crucial for mitigating risks associated with client-side JavaScript applications like reveal.js.
    • Specific Risk: Browser vulnerabilities exploited by malicious presentations (less direct reveal.js responsibility, but relevant context).
    • Mitigation (Browser responsibility, reveal.js can leverage): Encourage users to use modern, up-to-date browsers. Provide guidance on leveraging browser security features like CSP.

  • Web Server:

    • Security Implication: Web servers host and serve reveal.js presentations. Server misconfigurations or vulnerabilities can expose presentations and the reveal.js library to attacks.
    • Specific Risk: Server misconfiguration leading to information disclosure, unauthorized access, or denial of service.
    • Mitigation (Hosting environment responsibility, guidance from reveal.js needed): Server hardening, HTTPS configuration, access control, security monitoring, WAF (if applicable), clear documentation for users on secure hosting practices.

  • Content Delivery Network (CDN):

    • Security Implication: CDNs are used to distribute reveal.js and presentations for performance and availability. CDN compromise or misconfiguration could lead to serving malicious versions of reveal.js or presentations to users.
    • Specific Risk: CDN account compromise, CDN misconfiguration leading to unauthorized access or serving of malicious content, CDN provider vulnerabilities.
    • Mitigation (CDN provider and reveal.js project responsibility): Secure CDN configuration, access control to CDN management, HTTPS delivery, CDN provider security practices, Subresource Integrity (SRI) for users loading reveal.js from CDNs (reveal.js can recommend/provide SRI hashes).

  • Package Manager (npm/yarn):

    • Security Implication: Package managers are used to manage dependencies during development. Compromised packages or vulnerabilities in dependencies can be introduced into reveal.js during the build process (supply chain risk).
    • Specific Risk: Malicious packages in registries, vulnerabilities in dependencies, compromised developer accounts leading to malicious package updates.
    • Mitigation (reveal.js project responsibility): Dependency scanning in build process, using npm audit/yarn audit, verifying package integrity (checksums, lock files), regularly updating dependencies, considering dependency pinning, potentially using private registries for critical dependencies.

2.2. Container Diagram Components

  • Reveal.js Library (JavaScript Library Container):

    • Security Implications: As detailed above, vulnerabilities in the core JavaScript library are critical. Input validation of configuration options is important. Secure coding practices are paramount to prevent XSS, prototype pollution, and other client-side vulnerabilities. Dependency management is crucial.
    • Specific Risks: XSS vulnerabilities, prototype pollution, insecure configuration handling, dependency vulnerabilities, logic flaws.
    • Mitigation: Input validation for configuration, SAST scanning, dependency scanning, secure coding practices, code reviews, penetration testing, prompt patching, clear security documentation.

  • Presentation Content (Static Files Container):

    • Security Implications: While primarily user-generated, reveal.js can influence the security of presentation content. If reveal.js features allow for dynamic content injection or unsafe handling of user-provided content, it could indirectly contribute to XSS risks. Reveal.js should encourage and facilitate secure content creation by users (e.g., through documentation and examples).
    • Specific Risks: XSS vulnerabilities if reveal.js features allow unsafe content injection, users embedding malicious content.
    • Mitigation: Provide clear documentation and best practices for users on creating secure presentation content, especially when using features that involve dynamic content or external resources. Recommend CSP to users to mitigate XSS risks in their presentations.

  • Web Server Application (Web Server Container):

    • Security Implications: The web server's security is crucial for hosting reveal.js presentations. This is largely outside the direct control of reveal.js, but the project can provide guidance to users.
    • Specific Risks: Server misconfiguration, unpatched server software, weak access controls, lack of HTTPS.
    • Mitigation (Guidance from reveal.js): Recommend server hardening, HTTPS configuration, access control, regular security updates, security monitoring.

  • Static File Storage (File System/Object Storage Container):

    • Security Implications: Secure storage of reveal.js files and presentation content is important. Access control to the storage is crucial to prevent unauthorized modification or deletion.
    • Specific Risks: Unauthorized access to storage leading to data breaches or tampering, misconfigured access controls.
    • Mitigation (Guidance from reveal.js): Recommend appropriate access control lists (ACLs), encryption at rest (if handling sensitive presentations), regular backups.

  • Content Delivery Network (CDN Container):

    • Security Implications: As discussed in the Context Diagram, CDN security is vital for distributing reveal.js.
    • Specific Risks: CDN compromise, misconfiguration, serving outdated or malicious versions.
    • Mitigation: Secure CDN configuration, access control, HTTPS delivery, SRI, CDN provider security practices.

  • Package Manager (Package Management Tool Container):

    • Security Implications: Dependency management security is critical for the build process.
    • Specific Risks: Vulnerable dependencies, malicious packages, supply chain attacks.
    • Mitigation: Dependency scanning, npm audit/yarn audit, package integrity checks, regular updates, dependency pinning, potentially private registries.

2.3. Deployment Diagram Components

  • User Device:

    • Security Implications: User device security is outside reveal.js control, but users' security posture impacts their risk when viewing presentations.
    • Specific Risks: Malware on user devices, compromised browsers.
    • Mitigation (User responsibility, general awareness): Antivirus, firewall, OS updates, user security awareness.

  • Internet:

    • Security Implications: The internet is the public network. Reveal.js relies on HTTPS for secure communication, but general internet security is outside its control.
    • Specific Risks: Man-in-the-middle attacks (mitigated by HTTPS), general internet threats.
    • Mitigation (HTTPS is key, general internet security practices): Ensure HTTPS is always used for serving reveal.js and presentations.

  • Load Balancer:

    • Security Implications: Load balancers are part of the hosting infrastructure. Their security is important for availability and potentially for SSL termination.
    • Specific Risks: DDoS attacks, load balancer misconfiguration, vulnerabilities in load balancer software.
    • Mitigation (Hosting environment responsibility): DDoS protection, secure load balancer configuration, regular security updates.

  • Web Server Instance:

    • Security Implications: As discussed in the Container Diagram, web server instance security is crucial.
    • Specific Risks: Server misconfiguration, unpatched server software, weak access controls.
    • Mitigation (Hosting environment responsibility): Server hardening, OS security patching, intrusion detection, security logging, access control, firewall.

  • Static File Storage (Cloud Storage Service):

    • Security Implications: Secure cloud storage is essential for hosting reveal.js and presentations.
    • Specific Risks: Misconfigured access control policies (IAM), data breaches due to storage vulnerabilities.
    • Mitigation (Hosting environment responsibility): Access control policies (IAM), encryption at rest, versioning, audit logging, data replication.

  • Content Delivery Network (CDN Service):

    • Security Implications: CDN service security is vital for distributing reveal.js assets.
    • Specific Risks: CDN provider compromise, misconfiguration, unauthorized access to CDN configuration.
    • Mitigation (CDN provider and reveal.js project responsibility): CDN provider security controls, origin protection, access control to CDN configuration, HTTPS delivery.

2.4. Build Diagram Components

  • Developer Workstation:

    • Security Implications: Developer workstations are part of the supply chain. Compromised workstations could lead to malicious code being introduced into reveal.js.
    • Specific Risks: Malware on developer workstations, compromised developer accounts.
    • Mitigation (Developer responsibility, project guidance): Secure coding practices, code review, workstation security (antivirus, OS updates), strong authentication for developer accounts.

  • Source Code (GitHub Repository):

    • Security Implications: The source code repository is the central point for code integrity. Access control and security features of GitHub are crucial.
    • Specific Risks: Unauthorized code changes, compromised developer accounts, vulnerabilities in GitHub platform.
    • Mitigation (GitHub and reveal.js project responsibility): Access control (GitHub permissions), branch protection, commit signing, vulnerability scanning (GitHub Dependabot), regular security audits of GitHub configuration.

  • Build Server (CI/CD Server):

    • Security Implications: The build server is a critical component in the supply chain. Secure build environment and access control are essential.
    • Specific Risks: Compromised build server, insecure build configurations, unauthorized access to build pipeline, secrets exposure.
    • Mitigation (reveal.js project responsibility): Secure build environment, access control, secrets management (secure vault, environment variables, not hardcoded), build isolation, regular security audits of CI/CD pipeline.

  • Dependency Scanner:

    • Security Implications: Dependency scanners are crucial for identifying vulnerable dependencies. Effectiveness depends on the tool's accuracy and up-to-date vulnerability database.
    • Specific Risks: Missed vulnerabilities, false positives/negatives, outdated vulnerability database.
    • Mitigation (reveal.js project responsibility): Integrate dependency scanning into CI/CD pipeline, use reputable and regularly updated scanners (npm audit, yarn audit, snyk, OWASP Dependency-Check), configure to fail builds on high-severity vulnerabilities, regularly review and update scanner configurations.

  • SAST Scanner:

    • Security Implications: SAST scanners help identify code-level vulnerabilities. Effectiveness depends on rule sets and configuration.
    • Specific Risks: Missed vulnerabilities, false positives/negatives, outdated rule sets, misconfiguration.
    • Mitigation (reveal.js project responsibility): Integrate SAST scanning into CI/CD pipeline, use reputable SAST tools, configure rule sets for relevant vulnerability types (XSS, prototype pollution, etc.), regularly review and update scanner configurations, address identified vulnerabilities.

  • Linter:

    • Security Implications: Linters primarily focus on code quality, but can indirectly help with security by identifying potential code quality issues that could lead to vulnerabilities.
    • Specific Risks: Limited direct security impact, but can improve code maintainability and reduce potential for bugs.
    • Mitigation (reveal.js project responsibility): Integrate linters into CI/CD pipeline, configure rules to identify potential security-related code quality issues, address linter warnings.

  • Automated Tests:

    • Security Implications: Automated tests are crucial for ensuring functionality and stability. Security-focused tests can help identify vulnerabilities.
    • Specific Risks: Insufficient security test coverage, tests not designed to detect vulnerabilities.
    • Mitigation (reveal.js project responsibility): Include security-focused test cases (input validation, error handling, boundary conditions, XSS prevention), regularly review and expand test suite to cover security aspects.

  • Build Artifacts (Distribution Files):

    • Security Implications: Integrity of build artifacts is crucial for preventing supply chain attacks.
    • Specific Risks: Tampering with build artifacts, serving compromised artifacts to users.
    • Mitigation (reveal.js project responsibility): Integrity checks (checksums, signatures) for build artifacts, secure storage of artifacts, access control to artifacts, HTTPS delivery of artifacts.

  • Publish (npm, CDN, GitHub Releases):

    • Security Implications: Secure publishing process is essential to ensure users receive legitimate and untampered versions of reveal.js.
    • Specific Risks: Compromised publishing accounts, insecure publishing process, serving malicious versions.
    • Mitigation (reveal.js project responsibility): Secure publishing process, multi-factor authentication for publishing accounts, access control to publishing platforms, integrity checks for published artifacts, HTTPS delivery from distribution platforms.

3. Actionable and Tailored Mitigation Strategies

Based on the identified security implications, here are actionable and tailored mitigation strategies for reveal.js:

General Security Practices for Reveal.js Project:

  1. Implement a Security-Focused Development Lifecycle: Integrate security considerations into every stage of the development lifecycle, from design to deployment.
  2. Establish a Vulnerability Disclosure Policy: Create a clear and public vulnerability disclosure policy outlining how security researchers and users can report vulnerabilities. Provide a dedicated security contact email address.
  3. Prioritize Security in Code Reviews: Emphasize security aspects during code reviews, looking for potential vulnerabilities like XSS, prototype pollution, and insecure configuration handling.
  4. Regular Security Audits and Penetration Testing: Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing by qualified security professionals to proactively identify and address vulnerabilities. Focus on client-side security aspects and potential attack vectors in reveal.js core and plugins.
  5. Promote Security Awareness within the Development Team: Provide security training to developers on secure coding practices, common web vulnerabilities, and secure development lifecycle principles.

Specific Mitigation Strategies for Components:

Reveal.js Library:

  • Input Validation and Sanitization: Implement robust input validation and sanitization for all configuration options and any user-provided input handled by reveal.js. Specifically, carefully validate and sanitize any HTML or JavaScript content that might be dynamically generated or processed by reveal.js.
  • Context-Aware Output Encoding: When dynamically generating HTML or injecting content into the DOM, use context-aware output encoding to prevent XSS vulnerabilities. Ensure proper encoding based on the context (HTML entities, JavaScript encoding, URL encoding, etc.).
  • Prototype Pollution Prevention: Actively guard against prototype pollution vulnerabilities. Avoid merging objects recursively without careful control. Use safer alternatives for object merging or deep cloning if necessary. Implement checks to prevent modification of built-in prototypes.
  • Dependency Management and Scanning:
    • Automated Dependency Scanning: Integrate npm audit or yarn audit into the CI/CD pipeline and fail the build on high-severity vulnerabilities.
    • Advanced Dependency Scanning: Explore using commercial tools like Snyk or OWASP Dependency-Check for more comprehensive vulnerability scanning and reporting.
    • Regular Dependency Updates: Establish a process for regularly reviewing and updating dependencies to their latest secure versions.
    • Dependency Pinning: Consider using dependency pinning (lock files) to ensure consistent builds and mitigate risks from unexpected dependency updates.
  • Static Application Security Testing (SAST):
    • Integrate SAST into CI/CD: Implement a SAST tool in the CI/CD pipeline to automatically analyze the source code for potential vulnerabilities.
    • Configure SAST Rules: Configure the SAST tool with rulesets that are relevant to JavaScript web application security, focusing on XSS, prototype pollution, and other client-side vulnerabilities.
    • Address SAST Findings: Prioritize and address vulnerabilities identified by the SAST scanner.
  • Security-Focused Automated Tests:
    • XSS Prevention Tests: Develop specific test cases to verify XSS prevention mechanisms in reveal.js. Test various input scenarios and edge cases to ensure proper encoding and sanitization.
    • Prototype Pollution Tests: Create tests to specifically check for prototype pollution vulnerabilities, especially in areas where object merging or manipulation occurs.
    • Input Validation Tests: Implement tests to verify input validation logic for configuration options and user-provided data.
  • Content Security Policy (CSP) Guidance:
    • Document CSP Best Practices: Provide clear documentation and examples for users on how to implement Content Security Policy (CSP) in their reveal.js presentations to mitigate XSS risks.
    • CSP Header Recommendations: Recommend a strong default CSP header configuration that users can adapt for their needs. Emphasize the importance of restricting script-src, style-src, and other directives.

Build Process:

  • Secure Build Environment: Ensure the CI/CD build environment is securely configured and isolated. Minimize the attack surface of the build server.
  • Secrets Management: Implement secure secrets management practices for API keys, credentials, and other sensitive information used in the build process. Avoid hardcoding secrets in code or build scripts. Use secure vault solutions or environment variables.
  • Code Signing and Artifact Integrity: Implement code signing for releases and provide checksums (e.g., SHA-256 hashes) for distribution files to ensure artifact integrity and allow users to verify authenticity.
  • Secure Publishing Process: Secure the publishing process to npm, CDN, and GitHub Releases. Use multi-factor authentication for publishing accounts and restrict access to publishing platforms.

Distribution (CDN & npm):

  • Subresource Integrity (SRI): Recommend and provide SRI hashes for reveal.js files when users load the library from CDNs. This allows browsers to verify the integrity of fetched files and prevent loading of tampered assets.
  • HTTPS Delivery: Ensure that reveal.js and all related assets are always served over HTTPS from both the project website, CDN, and npm registry.
  • CDN Security Configuration: Work with the CDN provider to ensure secure CDN configuration, including access control, origin protection, and HTTPS settings.

Documentation and User Guidance:

  • Security Best Practices Documentation: Create a dedicated section in the reveal.js documentation outlining security best practices for users. This should include:
    • Recommendations for secure hosting environments (HTTPS, server hardening, access control).
    • Guidance on implementing Content Security Policy (CSP).
    • Best practices for creating secure presentation content (avoiding inline scripts, sanitizing dynamic content).
    • Information about reveal.js security features and configurations.
  • Security Advisories and Patching: Establish a clear process for issuing security advisories when vulnerabilities are discovered and for releasing security patches promptly. Communicate security updates effectively to users.

By implementing these tailored mitigation strategies, the reveal.js project can significantly enhance its security posture, protect its users, and maintain the trust and reputation of the framework. It is crucial to continuously monitor for new threats and vulnerabilities and adapt security practices accordingly.