Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
173 lines (129 loc) · 15.1 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

173 lines (129 loc) · 15.1 KB

Okay, here's a deep analysis of the security considerations for reveal.js, based on the provided security design review and the GitHub repository:

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

The objective of this deep analysis is to conduct a thorough security assessment of the reveal.js framework, focusing on its key components, potential vulnerabilities, and mitigation strategies. The analysis aims to identify potential security risks associated with using reveal.js and provide actionable recommendations to enhance its security posture. This includes examining the core library, common usage patterns, and the plugin ecosystem.

Scope:

  • Core reveal.js library: Analysis of the core JavaScript, CSS, and HTML structure provided by the reveal.js framework itself (as found on the GitHub repository).
  • Plugin architecture: Assessment of the security implications of the plugin system and how it can be used or misused.
  • Common deployment scenarios: Focus on static site hosting, as identified in the design review.
  • Data flow: Analysis of how data (presentation content, user input) flows through the system.
  • Exclusions: This analysis will not cover:
    • Specific third-party plugins (unless they are officially maintained and documented by the reveal.js team). A general analysis of the plugin architecture is included.
    • Server-side components or services that might be used in conjunction with reveal.js (e.g., a custom backend for speaker notes). The focus is on the client-side presentation framework.
    • Security of the hosting environment itself (e.g., GitHub Pages, AWS S3). We assume the hosting provider implements basic security measures like HTTPS.

Methodology:

  1. Code Review: Examine the reveal.js codebase (JavaScript, HTML, CSS) on GitHub to identify potential vulnerabilities and insecure coding practices.
  2. Documentation Review: Analyze the official reveal.js documentation to understand intended usage, configuration options, and security recommendations.
  3. Architecture Inference: Based on the codebase and documentation, infer the overall architecture, components, and data flow.
  4. Threat Modeling: Identify potential threats and attack vectors based on the architecture and functionality.
  5. Vulnerability Analysis: Assess the likelihood and impact of identified threats.
  6. Mitigation Recommendations: Propose specific, actionable steps to mitigate identified vulnerabilities and improve the overall security posture.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Based on the C4 diagrams and the provided information, here's a breakdown of the security implications of key components:

  • reveal.js Core Library (JavaScript):

    • Threats:

      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): The most significant threat. If user-provided content (e.g., Markdown, HTML) is not properly sanitized, an attacker could inject malicious JavaScript that executes in the context of the presentation. This could lead to data theft, session hijacking, or defacement.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): Maliciously crafted presentations could potentially consume excessive resources (CPU, memory) in the browser, leading to a denial of service for viewers. This is less likely than XSS but still possible.
      • Dependency Vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities in third-party libraries used by reveal.js could be exploited.

    • Mitigation:

      • Robust Input Sanitization: The most critical mitigation. reveal.js must thoroughly sanitize all user-provided input before rendering it in the DOM. This should include:
        • HTML Sanitization: Use a well-vetted HTML sanitizer library (like DOMPurify) to remove potentially dangerous tags, attributes, and event handlers. Do not rely on regular expressions alone.
        • Markdown Sanitization: If Markdown is supported, ensure the Markdown parser and renderer are configured to prevent XSS. Many Markdown libraries have built-in sanitization options.
        • JavaScript Sanitization: Be extremely cautious about allowing user-provided JavaScript. If it's necessary, consider sandboxing techniques (see below).
      • Content Security Policy (CSP): Provide a default, restrictive CSP that can be customized by users. The default CSP should:
        • Disallow inline scripts (script-src 'self').
        • Restrict the sources of external resources (scripts, styles, images, etc.).
        • Prevent the execution of eval() and similar functions.
        • Consider using require-trusted-types-for 'script'; to enforce Trusted Types.
      • Dependency Management:
        • Regularly update dependencies to patch known vulnerabilities.
        • Use a dependency vulnerability scanner (e.g., Snyk, npm audit, GitHub Dependabot) to identify and address vulnerable dependencies.
        • Pin dependencies to specific versions (using package-lock.json or yarn.lock) to prevent unexpected changes.
      • Sandboxing (for untrusted content): If allowing user-provided JavaScript or complex HTML is unavoidable, explore sandboxing techniques:
        • <iframe> with the sandbox attribute: This can restrict the capabilities of the embedded content.
        • Web Workers: Run untrusted JavaScript in a separate thread, limiting its access to the main DOM.
        • Subresource Integrity (SRI): Use SRI attributes to ensure that external scripts and stylesheets haven't been tampered with.

  • reveal.js Plugins (JavaScript):

    • Threats:

      • All threats listed for the core library apply to plugins. Plugins can introduce new vulnerabilities or exacerbate existing ones.
      • Supply Chain Attacks: A malicious plugin (or a compromised dependency of a plugin) could be used to inject malicious code into presentations.

    • Mitigation:

      • Plugin Vetting: Establish a process for reviewing and approving official plugins. Provide clear security guidelines for plugin developers.
      • User Education: Warn users about the potential risks of using third-party plugins. Encourage them to carefully review the code and reputation of any plugins they install.
      • Sandboxing (as described above): Consider providing mechanisms for sandboxing plugins, especially those that handle user input or interact with external services.
      • CSP: The CSP should be configurable to allow or disallow specific plugins.
      • Plugin-Specific Security Reviews: Encourage (or require) security reviews for plugins, especially those that are widely used or handle sensitive data.

  • Static Assets (Images, etc.):

    • Threats:

      • Maliciously Crafted Files: While less common, it's theoretically possible for image files (or other asset types) to contain exploits that target vulnerabilities in image parsers or other browser components.
      • Content Spoofing: An attacker might try to replace legitimate assets with malicious ones.

    • Mitigation:

      • Serve assets with appropriate Content-Type headers: This helps the browser interpret the files correctly and prevents certain types of attacks.
      • Image Optimization and Validation: Use image optimization tools to reduce file size and potentially remove malicious code embedded in image metadata. Validate that images are of the expected type and dimensions.
      • Subresource Integrity (SRI): Use SRI for externally hosted assets to ensure their integrity.
      • Content Security Policy (CSP): Use CSP to restrict the sources of images and other assets.

  • reveal.js Application (HTML, CSS, JS): This is the user's presentation built using reveal.js.

    • Threats: This layer inherits all the threats of the components it uses (core library, plugins, assets). The primary threat is user-introduced vulnerabilities through insecure content.

    • Mitigation: The primary mitigation is for the user (presentation developer) to follow secure coding practices and utilize the security features provided by reveal.js (CSP, input sanitization). The reveal.js documentation should provide clear and comprehensive security guidelines.

  • Web Browser:

    • Threats: The browser is the ultimate execution environment, and vulnerabilities in the browser itself could be exploited.

    • Mitigation: Users should keep their browsers up to date. reveal.js should be tested against a range of modern browsers to ensure compatibility and identify any browser-specific security issues.

3. Architecture, Components, and Data Flow (Inferred)

Based on the C4 diagrams and the GitHub repository, the architecture can be summarized as follows:

  • Client-Side Framework: reveal.js is primarily a client-side framework that runs entirely within the user's web browser.
  • Modular Design: The core library provides the basic presentation functionality, and plugins extend this functionality.
  • Data Flow:
    1. The user (presenter or viewer) accesses the presentation through a web browser.
    2. The browser loads the HTML, CSS, and JavaScript files that make up the presentation.
    3. The reveal.js core library initializes and renders the presentation.
    4. User input (e.g., keyboard navigation, mouse clicks) is handled by the core library and any loaded plugins.
    5. Presentation content (text, images, etc.) is displayed in the browser.
    6. Plugins may interact with external services (but this is outside the scope of the core framework).
  • Components:
    • Core Library: The main JavaScript file (reveal.js), core CSS, and HTML structure.
    • Plugins: Optional JavaScript files that add features.
    • User Content: The HTML, Markdown, or other content that makes up the presentation slides.
    • Static Assets: Images, videos, and other media files.
    • Configuration: JavaScript object that controls the behavior of reveal.js and its plugins.

4. Specific Security Considerations (Tailored to reveal.js)

  • Markdown Processing: If reveal.js uses a Markdown parser, ensure it's configured securely to prevent XSS. Many Markdown parsers have options to disable HTML rendering or sanitize the output. Specifically recommend a parser with built-in XSS protection.
  • data- Attributes: reveal.js heavily uses data- attributes to store configuration and state. Carefully review how these attributes are used and ensure that user-provided data is not directly inserted into data- attributes without sanitization.
  • Event Handling: Review all event handlers (e.g., click, keydown) to ensure they don't create opportunities for XSS or other injection attacks.
  • URL Handling: If reveal.js handles URLs (e.g., for navigation or external resources), ensure that URLs are properly validated and sanitized to prevent open redirect vulnerabilities or protocol smuggling.
  • Plugin Loading: If plugins are loaded dynamically (e.g., from external URLs), implement strict controls to prevent the loading of malicious plugins. Consider using SRI and CSP to restrict plugin sources.
  • Speaker Notes: If speaker notes are handled client-side, ensure they are also subject to the same security measures as the main presentation content (sanitization, CSP).
  • Multiplexing/Remote Control: If features like multiplexing or remote control are used, ensure that communication between the presenter and viewers is secure (e.g., using HTTPS and WebSockets with proper authentication and authorization).
  • Fragments: If reveal.js uses fragments, ensure that they are properly sanitized.

5. Actionable Mitigation Strategies (Tailored to reveal.js)

  1. Implement a Robust Default CSP: The reveal.js library should ship with a strict default CSP that can be customized by users. This CSP should be well-documented and include clear explanations of each directive. Example (starting point - needs to be tailored to reveal.js's specific needs):

    Content-Security-Policy:
  default-src 'self';
  script-src 'self' https://cdn.jsdelivr.net;  # Allow reveal.js and potentially a CDN
  style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://cdn.jsdelivr.net; # Consider removing 'unsafe-inline' if possible
  img-src 'self' data: https:; # Allow data URIs and HTTPS sources for images
  font-src 'self' https://cdn.jsdelivr.net;
  connect-src 'self'; # Restrict AJAX requests
  frame-src 'none';  # Disallow iframes (unless explicitly needed)
  object-src 'none';  # Disallow Flash and other plugins
  require-trusted-types-for 'script';

  2. Enforce Input Sanitization: Use a robust HTML sanitization library (like DOMPurify) to sanitize all user-provided content, including HTML, Markdown, and any data used in data- attributes. Provide clear documentation on how sanitization is performed and what responsibilities fall on the user.

  3. Vulnerability Disclosure Program: Establish a formal vulnerability disclosure program and a security contact (e.g., a security.txt file) to make it easy for security researchers to report vulnerabilities.

  4. Regular Security Audits: Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing of the core library and official plugins.

  5. Dependency Management: Implement a robust dependency management process, including:

    • Regular updates.
    • Vulnerability scanning (Snyk, Dependabot, etc.).
    • Pinning dependencies.

  6. Plugin Security Guidelines: Provide clear security guidelines for plugin developers, including recommendations for input sanitization, CSP, and secure coding practices.

  7. Sandboxing Options: Explore and document sandboxing options for untrusted content or plugins (e.g., <iframe> with sandbox attribute, Web Workers).

  8. Subresource Integrity (SRI): Use SRI for all externally hosted scripts and stylesheets.

  9. Code Reviews: Enforce code reviews (through pull requests) for all changes to the codebase.

  10. Security-Focused Documentation: Create a dedicated section in the documentation that covers security best practices for using and extending reveal.js. This should include:

    • Detailed explanation of the CSP and how to customize it.
    • Guidance on input sanitization.
    • Recommendations for choosing and using plugins securely.
    • Information about the vulnerability disclosure program.

  11. Automated Security Testing: Integrate automated security testing tools into the build process (e.g., linters, static analysis tools, dependency vulnerability scanners).

  12. Consider Trusted Types: Explore the use of Trusted Types to further mitigate DOM-based XSS vulnerabilities.

By implementing these mitigation strategies, the reveal.js project can significantly improve its security posture and reduce the risk of vulnerabilities that could compromise presentations or user data. The key is to prioritize input sanitization, implement a strong CSP, and establish a robust security culture within the project and its community.