Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
164 lines (131 loc) · 85.4 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

164 lines (131 loc) · 85.4 KB

Deep Security Analysis of Hapi.js Application

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

This deep security analysis aims to thoroughly evaluate the security posture of a typical web application built using the hapi.js framework, based on the provided Security Design Review. The primary objective is to identify potential security vulnerabilities inherent in the architecture, components, and development lifecycle of a hapi.js application. Furthermore, this analysis will provide specific, actionable, and hapi.js-tailored mitigation strategies to enhance the security of such applications. The analysis will focus on key security domains including authentication, authorization, input validation, cryptography, and secure development practices within the hapi.js ecosystem.

Scope:

The scope of this analysis encompasses the following aspects of a hapi.js application, as defined in the Security Design Review:

  • Architecture: Context, Container, and Deployment views as described in the C4 diagrams, including interactions between components.
  • Components: Node.js Runtime, hapi.js Framework Core, Hapi.js Plugins (specifically for authentication and validation), Application Code (routes, handlers, business logic), Database System, External API Providers, Load Balancer, Container Instances, CI/CD Pipeline, and Code Repository.
  • Development Lifecycle: Build process, dependency management, and deployment practices.
  • Security Requirements: Authentication, Authorization, Input Validation, and Cryptography as outlined in the Security Design Review.
  • Identified Risks and Controls: Existing and recommended security controls, accepted risks, and business risks.

The analysis will primarily focus on the hapi.js application itself and its immediate dependencies and deployment environment. It will not extend to in-depth security audits of external systems like the Database System or External API Providers, but will consider the security implications of interactions with them.

Methodology:

This deep security analysis will be conducted using the following methodology:

  1. Document Review: Thorough review of the provided Security Design Review document to understand the business context, security posture, design, and identified risks and controls.
  2. Architecture and Data Flow Inference: Based on the C4 diagrams and understanding of hapi.js framework principles, infer the typical architecture, component interactions, and data flow within a hapi.js application. This will involve referencing hapi.js documentation and community best practices.
  3. Threat Modeling: Identify potential security threats and vulnerabilities relevant to each component and interaction point within the inferred architecture. This will be guided by common web application security vulnerabilities (OWASP Top 10) and specific characteristics of hapi.js and Node.js environments.
  4. Component-Specific Security Analysis: Analyze each key component (Node.js Runtime, hapi.js Core, Plugins, Application Code, etc.) for potential security weaknesses, considering the security requirements and recommended controls from the design review.
  5. Hapi.js Tailored Mitigation Strategy Development: For each identified threat and vulnerability, develop specific, actionable mitigation strategies that are tailored to the hapi.js framework. These strategies will leverage hapi.js features, plugins, configuration options, and best practices.
  6. Actionable Recommendations: Provide clear, concise, and actionable recommendations for the development team to improve the security posture of hapi.js applications. These recommendations will be prioritized based on risk and impact.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Based on the C4 Container diagram and the Security Design Review, we can break down the security implications of each key component within the hapi.js application:

2.1. Node.js Runtime:

  • Security Implications:
    • Vulnerabilities in Node.js itself: Node.js, like any software, can have vulnerabilities. Exploiting these vulnerabilities could lead to Remote Code Execution (RCE) or Denial of Service (DoS) attacks affecting the entire application.
    • Dependency vulnerabilities: Node.js applications heavily rely on npm packages. Vulnerabilities in these dependencies can be exploited if not properly managed.
    • Runtime configuration: Insecure runtime configurations can expose the application to risks. For example, running Node.js with excessive privileges or not properly configuring security-related runtime flags.
  • Hapi.js Tailored Mitigation Strategies:
    • Node.js Version Management: Implement a process to regularly update Node.js to the latest LTS (Long-Term Support) version to patch known vulnerabilities. Use tools like nvm or asdf for managing Node.js versions consistently across development and production environments.
    • Dependency Management and Scanning: Utilize npm audit or yarn audit regularly to identify and address vulnerabilities in project dependencies. Integrate dependency scanning tools (like Snyk, OWASP Dependency-Check) into the CI/CD pipeline to automate this process. Implement a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) as recommended to track dependencies effectively.
    • Runtime Security Hardening: Run Node.js processes with the least necessary privileges. Consider using security-focused container base images. Explore Node.js security flags and options to enhance runtime security (e.g., --security-revert).

2.2. hapi.js Framework Core:

  • Security Implications:
    • Framework vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities within the hapi.js framework itself could have widespread impact on applications built upon it. This includes vulnerabilities in routing, request handling, plugin system, or core utilities.
    • Misconfiguration of framework features: Improper configuration of hapi.js features, such as routing, payload parsing, or error handling, can introduce security weaknesses.
    • Default settings: Default settings in hapi.js might not always be the most secure. Reviewing and hardening default configurations is crucial.
  • Hapi.js Tailored Mitigation Strategies:
    • Framework Updates: Stay updated with the latest stable versions of hapi.js to benefit from security patches and improvements. Monitor hapi.js release notes and security advisories.
    • Secure Configuration Review: Thoroughly review hapi.js configuration options and ensure they are set securely. Pay attention to settings related to payload parsing (size limits, content types), routing (path validation), and error handling (preventing information leakage).
    • Input Validation within Framework: Leverage hapi.js's built-in validation capabilities (using joi for schema definition) to enforce strict input validation at the framework level. This helps prevent common injection attacks before they reach application handlers.
    • Security Headers: Utilize hapi.js plugins like inert and vision (for serving static files and templating) and configure them to set appropriate security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, Strict-Transport-Security, X-XSS-Protection, X-Content-Type-Options). Consider using a dedicated security header plugin for easier management.

2.3. Plugins (Authentication, Validation, etc.):

  • Security Implications:
    • Plugin vulnerabilities: Plugins, especially those from third-party sources, can introduce vulnerabilities if they are not well-maintained or securely developed.
    • Plugin misconfiguration: Improper configuration of plugins, particularly security-related plugins like authentication and authorization, can lead to bypasses or weaknesses.
    • Plugin compatibility and updates: Ensuring plugin compatibility with the hapi.js core and keeping plugins updated is crucial for security and stability.
  • Hapi.js Tailored Mitigation Strategies:
    • Plugin Selection and Review: Carefully select plugins from trusted and reputable sources. Prioritize plugins that are actively maintained and have a strong security track record. Review plugin code and dependencies before integration, especially for security-sensitive plugins.
    • Secure Plugin Configuration: Thoroughly understand and securely configure all plugins, especially authentication, authorization, and validation plugins. Follow plugin documentation and security best practices.
    • Plugin Updates and Dependency Management: Regularly update plugins to their latest versions to patch vulnerabilities. Manage plugin dependencies and scan them for vulnerabilities just like application dependencies.
    • Formal Authentication and Authorization Plugins: Utilize well-established and community-vetted hapi.js authentication and authorization plugins (e.g., hapi-auth-jwt2, hapi-auth-cookie, bell for OAuth, hapi-rbac). Avoid rolling custom authentication and authorization solutions unless absolutely necessary and with expert security review.

2.4. Application Code (Routes, Handlers, Business Logic):

  • Security Implications:
    • Application-specific vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities introduced in the custom application code are a primary concern. This includes injection flaws (SQL injection, XSS, command injection), business logic flaws, insecure session management, and improper error handling.
    • Input validation gaps: Insufficient or incorrect input validation in application handlers can lead to various vulnerabilities.
    • Authorization flaws: Incorrectly implemented authorization logic can result in unauthorized access to resources or functionalities.
    • Sensitive data handling: Insecure handling of sensitive data (e.g., passwords, API keys, PII) in application code, including logging, storage, and transmission.
  • Hapi.js Tailored Mitigation Strategies:
    • Secure Coding Practices: Educate developers on secure coding practices, including input validation, output encoding, secure session management, proper error handling, and avoiding common vulnerabilities.
    • Input Validation in Handlers: Implement robust input validation in route handlers using joi schemas. Validate all request parameters, headers, and payloads against defined schemas. Sanitize and encode outputs to prevent XSS.
    • Authorization Implementation: Implement fine-grained authorization controls using hapi.js plugins or custom logic. Define roles and permissions clearly and enforce access control policies consistently across the application. Utilize plugins like hapi-rbac or implement custom authorization middleware.
    • Secure Session Management: Use secure session management mechanisms provided by hapi.js plugins or libraries. Configure session cookies with httpOnly, secure, and sameSite flags. Implement session timeout and renewal mechanisms.
    • Error Handling and Logging: Implement proper error handling to prevent sensitive information leakage in error messages. Log security-relevant events (authentication attempts, authorization failures, input validation errors, exceptions) for monitoring and incident response. Use a dedicated logging plugin for structured and secure logging.
    • Output Encoding: Encode all user-controlled data before rendering it in HTML or other output formats to prevent XSS vulnerabilities. Utilize templating engines that provide automatic output encoding.
    • Regular Security Code Reviews: Conduct regular security code reviews, both manual and automated (using SAST tools), to identify and remediate vulnerabilities in application code.

2.5. Database System:

  • Security Implications:
    • SQL Injection: If application code constructs SQL queries dynamically without proper input sanitization, it can be vulnerable to SQL injection attacks.
    • Database access control: Weak database access controls can allow unauthorized access to sensitive data.
    • Data breaches: Database breaches can result in the exposure of sensitive application data.
    • Database vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities in the database system itself can be exploited.
  • Hapi.js Tailored Mitigation Strategies:
    • Parameterized Queries/ORMs: Always use parameterized queries or Object-Relational Mappers (ORMs) like Sequelize or Objection.js with hapi.js to prevent SQL injection vulnerabilities. Avoid constructing raw SQL queries directly from user input.
    • Principle of Least Privilege: Grant the hapi.js application database user only the minimum necessary privileges required for its operation. Restrict access to sensitive tables and operations.
    • Database Security Hardening: Follow database vendor security best practices to harden the database system. This includes strong password policies, regular patching, disabling unnecessary features, and enabling database auditing.
    • Encryption at Rest and in Transit: Enable encryption for data at rest (database encryption features) and in transit (TLS/SSL for database connections).
    • Database Access Control Lists (ACLs): Implement network-level ACLs to restrict database access to only authorized sources (e.g., hapi.js application servers).

2.6. External API Provider:

  • Security Implications:
    • Insecure API communication: Communication with external APIs over insecure channels (HTTP instead of HTTPS) can expose data in transit.
    • API Key Management: Insecure storage or handling of API keys can lead to unauthorized API access.
    • Data breaches from external APIs: If external APIs are compromised, it could indirectly impact the hapi.js application if it relies on data from those APIs.
    • Input validation of external API responses: Failing to validate data received from external APIs can introduce vulnerabilities if that data is used within the application.
  • Hapi.js Tailored Mitigation Strategies:
    • HTTPS for API Communication: Always use HTTPS for communication with external APIs to ensure data confidentiality and integrity in transit.
    • Secure API Key Management: Store API keys securely using environment variables or dedicated secret management solutions (e.g., HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager). Avoid hardcoding API keys in the application code.
    • API Authentication and Authorization: Implement proper authentication and authorization mechanisms when interacting with external APIs, as required by the API provider.
    • Input Validation of API Responses: Validate and sanitize data received from external APIs before using it within the hapi.js application to prevent injection attacks or other vulnerabilities.
    • Rate Limiting and Error Handling: Implement rate limiting and robust error handling when interacting with external APIs to prevent abuse and handle potential API outages gracefully.

2.7. Load Balancer:

  • Security Implications:
    • DDoS Attacks: Load balancers are often the first point of contact for incoming traffic and can be targets for Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks.
    • SSL/TLS Misconfiguration: Improper SSL/TLS configuration on the load balancer can weaken encryption and expose traffic.
    • Access Control Weaknesses: Insecure load balancer configurations can allow unauthorized access or manipulation.
  • Hapi.js Tailored Mitigation Strategies:
    • DDoS Protection: Utilize DDoS protection services offered by cloud providers or dedicated DDoS mitigation solutions to protect the load balancer and application from DDoS attacks.
    • Strong SSL/TLS Configuration: Configure the load balancer with strong SSL/TLS settings, including using TLS 1.2 or higher, strong cipher suites, and enabling HSTS (HTTP Strict Transport Security). Regularly update SSL/TLS certificates.
    • Access Control Lists (ACLs): Implement ACLs on the load balancer to restrict access to management interfaces and potentially limit incoming traffic based on source IP addresses if appropriate.
    • Security Monitoring and Logging: Enable security monitoring and logging on the load balancer to detect and respond to suspicious activity.

2.8. Container Instances and hapi.js Application Container:

  • Security Implications:
    • Container vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities in the container runtime or base image can be exploited.
    • Container image vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities in the hapi.js application container image (Node.js, dependencies, application code) can be exploited.
    • Container configuration and isolation: Insecure container configurations or insufficient isolation can lead to container breakouts or other security issues.
  • Hapi.js Tailored Mitigation Strategies:
    • Container Image Scanning: Implement automated container image scanning in the CI/CD pipeline to identify vulnerabilities in base images and application dependencies. Use tools like Clair, Trivy, or cloud provider's container scanning services.
    • Minimal Container Images: Build minimal container images that only include necessary components to reduce the attack surface. Use multi-stage builds to minimize image size and remove unnecessary build tools.
    • Container Runtime Security: Harden the container runtime environment by applying security patches, configuring security profiles (e.g., AppArmor, SELinux), and using secure container runtime options.
    • Principle of Least Privilege for Containers: Run containers with the least necessary privileges. Avoid running containers as root user. Utilize user namespaces and security context constraints to restrict container capabilities.
    • Regular Container Updates and Patching: Regularly update container images and underlying infrastructure to patch vulnerabilities. Implement a process for timely patching of container instances.

2.9. Build Process and CI/CD Pipeline:

  • Security Implications:
    • Compromised CI/CD pipeline: A compromised CI/CD pipeline can be used to inject malicious code into the application or deploy vulnerable artifacts.
    • Supply chain attacks: Vulnerabilities in dependencies or build tools can be exploited to compromise the application build process.
    • Secret leakage: Accidental leakage of secrets (API keys, credentials) in the build process or CI/CD logs.
  • Hapi.js Tailored Mitigation Strategies:
    • Secure CI/CD Pipeline Configuration: Secure the CI/CD pipeline environment by implementing access controls, using secure credentials management, and enabling audit logging. Follow CI/CD platform security best practices.
    • Dependency Scanning in CI/CD: Integrate dependency scanning tools into the CI/CD pipeline to automatically detect and prevent vulnerable dependencies from being included in the build.
    • Static Application Security Testing (SAST) in CI/CD: Integrate SAST tools into the CI/CD pipeline to automatically identify potential security vulnerabilities in the application code during the build process.
    • Container Image Scanning in CI/CD: Integrate container image scanning into the CI/CD pipeline to scan container images for vulnerabilities before they are pushed to the artifact repository.
    • Secret Management in CI/CD: Use secure secret management solutions (e.g., CI/CD platform's secret management, HashiCorp Vault) to manage and inject secrets into the build process. Avoid hardcoding secrets in code or CI/CD configurations.
    • Code Repository Security: Enforce branch protection, code review processes, and access controls on the code repository to prevent unauthorized code changes.
    • Build Provenance: Implement build provenance mechanisms to ensure the integrity and traceability of build artifacts.

3. Actionable and Tailored Mitigation Strategies Summary

| Component | Threat | Hapi.js Tailored Mitigation Strategy * Actionable Recommendations: * Implement Automated Security Testing: Integrate SAST and DAST tools into the CI/CD pipeline to automatically scan for vulnerabilities in code and running applications. * Establish Incident Response Plan: Develop a formal security incident response plan to handle reported vulnerabilities efficiently, including patching, communication, and disclosure procedures. * Conduct Periodic Security Audits: Perform regular security audits and penetration testing by external security experts to identify vulnerabilities that might be missed by automated tools and internal reviews. * Provide Security Guidelines for Developers: Create and maintain comprehensive security guidelines and best practices for developers using hapi.js, covering secure coding, configuration, and deployment. * Implement SBOM: Generate and maintain a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) to track dependencies and facilitate vulnerability management, as recommended in the Security Design Review.

By implementing these tailored mitigation strategies, the development team can significantly enhance the security posture of hapi.js applications, reducing the likelihood of vulnerabilities and minimizing the impact of potential security incidents. This deep analysis provides a solid foundation for building more secure and resilient applications with the hapi.js framework.