Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
126 lines (99 loc) · 12.8 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

126 lines (99 loc) · 12.8 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for ianstormtaylor/slate

Objective: Compromise Application Using Slate.js by Exploiting Slate-Specific Weaknesses

Attack Tree Visualization

High-Risk Paths:

Client-Side Exploitation (Directly Targeting Slate in User's Browser) └── Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Slate Input [CRITICAL NODE: XSS Vulnerability] ├── Stored XSS (Persisted in Database) │ └── Exploit Insufficient Input Sanitization in Slate [CRITICAL NODE: Exploit Insufficient Input Sanitization in Slate] │ └── Application Stores Unsanitized Slate Output [CRITICAL NODE: Application Stores Unsanitized Slate Output] │ └── Application Logic Renders Unsanitized Output [CRITICAL NODE: Application Logic Renders Unsanitized Output] ├── Reflected XSS (Immediate Execution in User's Browser) │ └── Application Reflects Unsanitized Slate Input in Response [CRITICAL NODE: Application Reflects Unsanitized Slate Input in Response] │ └── Output is Rendered in a Context that Executes JavaScript [CRITICAL NODE: Output is Rendered in a Context that Executes JavaScript] └── DOM-Based XSS (Exploiting Client-Side Script Vulnerabilities) └── Exploit Vulnerabilities in Application's JavaScript Code Handling Slate Output [CRITICAL NODE: Exploit Vulnerabilities in Application's JavaScript Code Handling Slate Output] └── Application's JavaScript Renders Unsanitized Slate Output into DOM [CRITICAL NODE: Application's JavaScript Renders Unsanitized Slate Output into DOM] └── Client-Side Script Directly Inserts Raw Slate Output into HTML [CRITICAL NODE: Client-Side Script Directly Inserts Raw Slate Output into HTML] └── DOM Manipulation Functions (e.g., innerHTML) Used without Sanitization [CRITICAL NODE: DOM Manipulation Functions (e.g., innerHTML) Used without Sanitization]

Attack Tree Path: High-Risk Path: Client-Side Exploitation (Directly Targeting Slate in User's Browser)

  • Description: Attackers directly target vulnerabilities in the Slate.js editor or the application's client-side code that processes Slate output, executing malicious code within the user's browser.
  • Focus Area: Primarily centers around Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities.

Attack Tree Path: Critical Node: XSS Vulnerability (Cross-Site Scripting via Slate Input)

  • Description: The fundamental vulnerability is the presence of XSS flaws arising from the handling of Slate.js input. This node represents the overarching risk of XSS when using Slate.
  • Mechanism: Attackers inject malicious scripts (JavaScript, HTML) through the Slate editor. If the application fails to properly sanitize this input, the scripts can be executed in a user's browser when the content is displayed.
  • Impact:
    • Account Takeover: Stealing user credentials (cookies, local storage) leading to session hijacking.
    • Data Theft: Accessing sensitive data within the application.
    • Website Defacement: Altering the visual appearance of the website.
    • Redirection to Malicious Sites: Phishing attacks, malware distribution.
    • Arbitrary JavaScript Execution: Full client-side compromise, enabling a wide range of malicious actions.
  • Key Mitigation Strategies:
    • Robust Server-Side Sanitization: Sanitize all Slate editor output on the server-side before storing or displaying it. Use a well-vetted HTML sanitization library (e.g., DOMPurify, Bleach).
    • Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a strong CSP to limit the capabilities of injected scripts and reduce the impact of XSS.
    • Regular Security Testing: Conduct penetration testing and vulnerability scanning specifically targeting XSS vulnerabilities in Slate.js integration.

Attack Tree Path: Critical Node: Exploit Insufficient Input Sanitization in Slate

  • Description: This node highlights the core weakness: inadequate or bypassed sanitization of Slate input.
  • Mechanism: Attackers craft malicious input that bypasses any default sanitization provided by Slate.js or the application, allowing harmful HTML or JavaScript to be injected.
  • Impact: Enables Stored XSS, Reflected XSS, and potentially DOM-Based XSS.
  • Key Mitigation Strategies:
    • Server-Side Sanitization (Re-emphasized): This is the primary defense. Do not rely solely on client-side or default Slate.js sanitization.
    • Context-Aware Sanitization: Tailor sanitization rules to the specific context where the Slate output will be used.
    • Regularly Update Sanitization Libraries: Keep sanitization libraries updated to benefit from bug fixes and improved security.

Attack Tree Path: Critical Node: Application Stores Unsanitized Slate Output

  • Description: Storing unsanitized Slate output in the database creates the foundation for Stored XSS attacks.
  • Mechanism: The application directly saves the raw, potentially malicious output from the Slate editor into the database without any sanitization.
  • Impact: Leads to Stored XSS vulnerabilities, affecting all users who view the compromised content.
  • Key Mitigation Strategies:
    • Sanitize Before Storage: Always sanitize Slate output before persisting it in the database.
    • Database Input Validation (Secondary): While sanitization is primary, consider database-level input validation as a secondary defense layer.

Attack Tree Path: Critical Node: Application Logic Renders Unsanitized Output

  • Description: Rendering unsanitized Slate output from the database or other sources directly executes malicious scripts in the user's browser.
  • Mechanism: The application retrieves raw Slate output from storage and directly renders it in the user's browser without sanitization.
  • Impact: Executes Stored XSS attacks, compromising users viewing the content.
  • Key Mitigation Strategies:
    • Sanitize Before Rendering: Sanitize Slate output before displaying it to users, even if it was previously sanitized before storage (defense in depth).
    • Output Encoding: Ensure proper output encoding (e.g., HTML escaping) in addition to sanitization to prevent interpretation of malicious code.

Attack Tree Path: Critical Node: Application Reflects Unsanitized Slate Input in Response

  • Description: Reflecting unsanitized Slate input in the application's response creates Reflected XSS vulnerabilities.
  • Mechanism: The application takes user-provided Slate input (e.g., from URL parameters or form data) and includes it directly in the HTML response without sanitization.
  • Impact: Leads to Reflected XSS attacks, affecting users who click malicious links or submit crafted forms.
  • Key Mitigation Strategies:
    • Avoid Reflection of Raw Input: Minimize or eliminate the reflection of user-provided Slate input in responses.
    • Sanitize Before Reflection (If unavoidable): If reflection is absolutely necessary, sanitize the Slate output before including it in the response.

Attack Tree Path: Critical Node: Output is Rendered in a Context that Executes JavaScript

  • Description: This node emphasizes the context of rendering. Even if some basic escaping is done, if the output is placed in a context where JavaScript can execute, XSS is still possible.
  • Mechanism: Reflected or stored Slate output, even if superficially processed, is rendered in a location within the HTML document (e.g., directly within HTML tags) where the browser will interpret and execute JavaScript code embedded within it.
  • Impact: Enables both Reflected and Stored XSS attacks.
  • Key Mitigation Strategies:
    • Context-Aware Sanitization (Re-emphasized): Ensure sanitization is appropriate for the rendering context.
    • Avoid Rendering User Input Directly in Executable Contexts: Structure HTML to minimize the risk of user input being interpreted as executable code.

Attack Tree Path: Critical Node: Exploit Vulnerabilities in Application's JavaScript Code Handling Slate Output

  • Description: Vulnerabilities in the application's own client-side JavaScript code that processes Slate output can lead to DOM-Based XSS.
  • Mechanism: Attackers exploit flaws in the application's JavaScript logic that handles Slate output. This could involve manipulating how the JavaScript processes or renders the Slate data, leading to the execution of malicious scripts within the DOM.
  • Impact: DOM-Based XSS, with similar consequences to Stored and Reflected XSS.
  • Key Mitigation Strategies:
    • Secure Client-Side Coding Practices: Follow secure coding practices in all client-side JavaScript, especially when handling user input and DOM manipulation.
    • Code Reviews for Client-Side JavaScript: Conduct thorough code reviews of client-side JavaScript code that processes Slate output.
    • Static Analysis for Client-Side Code: Use static analysis tools to identify potential DOM-Based XSS vulnerabilities in client-side JavaScript.

Attack Tree Path: Critical Node: Application's JavaScript Renders Unsanitized Slate Output into DOM

  • Description: Client-side rendering of unsanitized Slate output directly into the DOM is a direct path to DOM-Based XSS.
  • Mechanism: The application's client-side JavaScript takes raw, unsanitized Slate output and directly inserts it into the HTML DOM structure.
  • Impact: DOM-Based XSS, client-side compromise.
  • Key Mitigation Strategies:
    • Avoid Client-Side Rendering of Unsanitized Input: Do not directly render unsanitized Slate output on the client-side.
    • Sanitize Client-Side (If absolutely necessary): If client-side rendering of user input is unavoidable, sanitize the Slate output client-side using a robust sanitization library before DOM insertion. However, server-side sanitization is still strongly recommended as the primary defense.

Attack Tree Path: Critical Node: Client-Side Script Directly Inserts Raw Slate Output into HTML

  • Description: Specifically highlights the dangerous practice of directly inserting raw Slate output into HTML using client-side JavaScript.
  • Mechanism: Client-side JavaScript code directly manipulates the DOM by inserting raw Slate output into HTML elements, often using functions like innerHTML.
  • Impact: Direct DOM-Based XSS vulnerability.
  • Key Mitigation Strategies:
    • Avoid innerHTML with Unsanitized Input: Never use innerHTML (or similar DOM manipulation functions that interpret HTML) with unsanitized user input, including Slate output.
    • Use Safer DOM Manipulation Methods: Prefer safer DOM manipulation methods that do not interpret HTML, or sanitize the input before using innerHTML (though avoiding innerHTML altogether with user input is best practice).

Attack Tree Path: Critical Node: DOM Manipulation Functions (e.g., innerHTML) Used without Sanitization

  • Description: This node pinpoints the specific coding error: using DOM manipulation functions like innerHTML without prior sanitization of the input.
  • Mechanism: Developers mistakenly use DOM manipulation functions that interpret HTML (like innerHTML, outerHTML, insertAdjacentHTML) to insert Slate output into the DOM without first sanitizing the output.
  • Impact: Directly creates DOM-Based XSS vulnerabilities.
  • Key Mitigation Strategies:
    • Code Reviews Focused on DOM Manipulation: Specifically review code for instances of DOM manipulation functions used with user input, ensuring proper sanitization is in place.
    • Developer Training: Educate developers about the dangers of using innerHTML and similar functions with unsanitized user input and promote safer alternatives.