Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
146 lines (91 loc) · 12.4 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

146 lines (91 loc) · 12.4 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for ianstormtaylor/slate

Mitigation Strategy: Strict Content Sanitization

Description:

  1. Choose a robust HTML Sanitization Library: Select a well-vetted and actively maintained library like DOMPurify or similar, suitable for your application's language.
  2. Configure Allowlists and Denylists: Define strict allowlists for HTML tags, attributes, and CSS properties permitted in Slate user-generated content. Denylist potentially dangerous elements. Tailor lists to application features.
  3. Client-Side Sanitization (Pre-rendering): Implement sanitization in the frontend before rendering previews in Slate editor. Provides immediate feedback and prevents basic XSS.
  4. Server-Side Sanitization (Pre-storage): Crucially, perform sanitization on the server-side before storing any Slate content in the database. Primary defense against persistent XSS in Slate data.
  5. Output Sanitization (Pre-display): Sanitize Slate content again when displaying it in different contexts, especially if display context has different security needs.
  6. Regular Library Updates: Keep the sanitization library updated to benefit from security patches and new vulnerability detections relevant to Slate content.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) - High Severity: Prevents attackers from injecting malicious scripts into Slate content, leading to execution in other users' browsers, session hijacking, data theft, etc.

Impact:

  • XSS - High Severity: Significantly reduces XSS risk within Slate editor content by neutralizing malicious HTML and JavaScript.

Currently Implemented: [Describe if content sanitization is currently implemented for Slate content in your project and where (e.g., "Client-side using library X in Slate editor", "Server-side using library Y on Slate content save"). If not implemented, state "Not Implemented"]

Missing Implementation: [Describe where content sanitization is missing for Slate content (e.g., "Server-side sanitization for Slate content not yet implemented", "Output sanitization missing for Slate content in specific display areas"). If fully implemented, state "No missing implementation"]

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Handling of Custom HTML and Raw Text Nodes in Slate

Description:

  1. Minimize Raw HTML Usage in Slate: Reduce or eliminate the need for raw HTML nodes within Slate documents. Favor Slate's built-in node types and rich text formatting.
  2. Strict Validation for Custom HTML in Slate: If custom HTML nodes are unavoidable in Slate, implement rigorous validation on both client and server sides. Verify HTML structure and content conform to a strict schema for Slate content.
  3. Enhanced Sanitization for Custom HTML in Slate: Apply a more aggressive sanitization policy specifically to custom HTML nodes in Slate, potentially using a stricter allowlist or denylist.
  4. Secure Rendering of Raw Text in Slate: When rendering raw text nodes within Slate, ensure proper output encoding. Escape HTML entities to prevent interpretation as HTML tags.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) - High Severity: Prevents bypassing sanitization in Slate through custom HTML or improperly handled raw text nodes.
  • HTML Injection - Medium Severity: Prevents attackers from injecting arbitrary HTML in Slate content, altering page appearance or functionality.

Impact:

  • XSS - High Severity: Significantly reduces XSS risk originating from custom HTML or raw text within Slate.
  • HTML Injection - Medium Severity: Minimizes HTML injection risk and UI manipulation within Slate content.

Currently Implemented: [Describe handling of custom HTML and raw text nodes in Slate (e.g., "Custom HTML nodes not allowed in Slate", "Raw text nodes encoded on output in Slate using function Z"). If not implemented, state "Not Implemented"]

Missing Implementation: [Describe areas where secure handling of custom HTML and raw text in Slate is missing (e.g., "Validation for custom HTML in Slate missing server-side", "Raw text encoding not consistently applied in all Slate rendering contexts"). If fully implemented, state "No missing implementation"]

Mitigation Strategy: Plugin Security Audits and Management for Slate

Description:

  1. Plugin Vetting Process for Slate: Establish a formal process for vetting and approving Slate plugins before integration.
  2. Code Review and Security Audit for Slate Plugins: Conduct code reviews and security audits of Slate plugin code, especially from external sources. Look for vulnerabilities or malicious code.
  3. Reputable Sources Preference for Slate Plugins: Prioritize using Slate plugins from reputable sources with active maintenance and community support.
  4. Plugin Update Management for Slate: Implement a system for tracking and managing updates for Slate plugins. Regularly update plugins to patch vulnerabilities.
  5. Content Security Policy (CSP) for Slate Plugins: Implement CSP to restrict capabilities of Slate plugins. Limit resource access, origin connections, and actions to contain damage from compromised plugins.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Malicious Plugin Execution - High Severity: Prevents execution of malicious code in Slate plugins, leading to data breaches or system compromise.
  • Vulnerable Plugin Exploitation - High Severity: Mitigates risks of using Slate plugins with known vulnerabilities.
  • Supply Chain Attacks - Medium to High Severity: Reduces risk of supply chain attacks injecting malicious code into Slate plugins at their source.

Impact:

  • Malicious Plugin Execution - High Severity: Significantly reduces malicious plugin-related attack risk in Slate.
  • Vulnerable Plugin Exploitation - High Severity: Minimizes window for attackers to exploit Slate plugin vulnerabilities.
  • Supply Chain Attacks - Medium to High Severity: Partially reduces risk by increasing scrutiny of Slate plugin sources.

Currently Implemented: [Describe plugin management for Slate (e.g., "Slate plugins reviewed by team lead before integration", "CSP restricts Slate plugin capabilities"). If not implemented, state "Not Implemented"]

Missing Implementation: [Describe plugin security management gaps for Slate (e.g., "Formal plugin vetting process for Slate not in place", "CSP not configured to restrict Slate plugin actions"). If fully implemented, state "No missing implementation"]

Mitigation Strategy: Server-Side Validation of Slate JSON Data

Description:

  1. Define Slate JSON Schema: Create a strict schema defining expected structure and data types of Slate JSON documents processed server-side.
  2. Schema Validation for Slate JSON: Implement server-side validation to ensure incoming Slate JSON data conforms to the schema. Reject or sanitize non-compliant data.
  3. Input Type Validation for Slate JSON: Validate data types within Slate JSON. Ensure values are expected types and format.
  4. Avoid Server-Side Code Execution from Slate JSON: Never execute arbitrary code embedded within Slate JSON data on the server. Treat JSON as data only.
  5. Secure Deserialization Practices for Slate JSON: Use secure deserialization libraries and practices for Slate JSON to prevent deserialization vulnerabilities.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Server-Side Code Injection - High Severity: Prevents code injection on the server via manipulated Slate JSON data.
  • Data Integrity Issues - Medium Severity: Ensures valid and consistent Slate data on the server, preventing corruption or unexpected behavior.
  • Denial of Service (DoS) - Medium Severity: Prevents DoS from malformed or complex Slate JSON consuming server resources.

Impact:

  • Server-Side Code Injection - High Severity: Significantly reduces server-side code injection risk via Slate JSON.
  • Data Integrity Issues - Medium Severity: Significantly improves data integrity and application stability related to Slate data.
  • Denial of Service (DoS) - Medium Severity: Partially reduces DoS risk related to malformed Slate JSON.

Currently Implemented: [Describe server-side validation of Slate JSON (e.g., "Server-side validation using schema X for Slate JSON is implemented", "Secure deserialization library Z used for Slate JSON"). If not implemented, state "Not Implemented"]

Missing Implementation: [Describe server-side JSON validation gaps (e.g., "Schema validation not implemented for all endpoints processing Slate JSON", "Secure deserialization not consistently applied to Slate JSON"). If fully implemented, state "No missing implementation"]

Mitigation Strategy: Input Size and Complexity Limits for Slate Documents

Description:

  1. Document Size Limits for Slate: Implement limits on maximum size of Slate documents submitted or processed.
  2. Node Count Limits for Slate: Limit maximum number of nodes allowed in a Slate document.
  3. Nesting Depth Limits for Slate: Restrict maximum nesting depth of nodes within a Slate document.
  4. Server-Side Rate Limiting for Slate Endpoints: Implement rate limiting on endpoints processing Slate documents to prevent abuse and DoS.
  5. Resource Monitoring for Slate Processing: Monitor server resource usage when processing Slate documents. Implement alerts and throttling for excessive consumption.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Denial of Service (DoS) - Medium to High Severity: Prevents DoS attacks exploiting resource consumption by processing large or complex Slate documents.

Impact:

  • Denial of Service (DoS) - Medium to High Severity: Significantly reduces DoS risk related to Slate document size and complexity.

Currently Implemented: [Describe input size/complexity limits for Slate (e.g., "Document size limit of X MB enforced for Slate", "Rate limiting implemented for Slate document upload endpoint"). If not implemented, state "Not Implemented"]

Missing Implementation: [Describe input size/complexity limit gaps for Slate (e.g., "Nesting depth limits not enforced for Slate documents", "Resource monitoring for Slate processing not in place"). If fully implemented, state "No missing implementation"]

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Custom Renderers and Components in Slate

Description:

  1. Security Review of Custom Slate Code: Conduct security reviews of all custom Slate renderers and components.
  2. Input Sanitization in Slate Renderers: Ensure custom Slate renderers sanitize user-provided data before rendering, applying same sanitization as standard Slate content.
  3. Output Encoding in Slate Renderers: Implement output encoding in custom Slate renderers to prevent HTML injection. Escape HTML entities when rendering text from user input.
  4. Principle of Least Privilege for Slate Components: Design custom Slate renderers/components with least privilege. Grant only necessary permissions.
  5. Regular Testing of Custom Slate Code: Include custom Slate renderers/components in regular security testing and vulnerability scanning.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) - High Severity: Prevents new XSS vulnerabilities through insecure custom Slate renderers/components.
  • HTML Injection - Medium Severity: Prevents HTML injection vulnerabilities in custom Slate rendering logic.

Impact:

  • XSS - High Severity: Significantly reduces XSS risk from custom Slate rendering code.
  • HTML Injection - Medium Severity: Minimizes HTML injection risk in custom Slate rendering.

Currently Implemented: [Describe security measures for custom Slate renderers/components (e.g., "Custom Slate renderers undergo code review", "Input sanitization applied in all custom Slate renderers"). If not implemented, state "Not Implemented"]

Missing Implementation: [Describe secure custom renderer implementation gaps for Slate (e.g., "Formal security review process for custom Slate renderers not established", "Output encoding not consistently applied in custom Slate renderers"). If fully implemented, state "No missing implementation"]