Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
256 lines (192 loc) · 27.6 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

256 lines (192 loc) · 27.6 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for koajs/koa

Mitigation Strategy: Thoroughly Vet and Audit Middleware

  • Mitigation Strategy: Thoroughly Vet and Audit Middleware

    • Description:

      1. Dependency Review (Koa Context Aware): When selecting Koa middleware, specifically check if the middleware is designed for Koa and leverages the ctx object correctly and securely. Look for middleware that respects Koa's asynchronous nature and doesn't introduce blocking operations within the middleware chain.
      2. Koa-Specific Code Inspection: During code review, pay attention to how middleware interacts with Koa's ctx object. Ensure it's not inadvertently modifying the ctx in ways that could lead to unexpected behavior or security issues in subsequent middleware or application logic. Verify middleware correctly handles Koa's request and response lifecycle.
      3. Koa Ecosystem Focus: Prioritize middleware that is actively maintained within the Koa ecosystem and has a good reputation within the Koa community. This often indicates better Koa-specific compatibility and security awareness.
      4. Regular npm audit for Koa Dependencies: Use npm audit or yarn audit regularly, specifically focusing on the dependencies of your Koa middleware. Vulnerabilities in middleware dependencies can directly impact your Koa application.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Supply Chain Attacks via Koa Middleware (High Severity): Malicious or compromised Koa middleware can directly exploit Koa's request handling.
      • Koa-Specific Vulnerabilities in Middleware (Medium to High Severity): Middleware not designed for Koa or poorly implemented within the Koa ecosystem can introduce vulnerabilities unique to Koa applications.
      • Incompatibility Issues Leading to Security Flaws (Medium Severity): Middleware that is incompatible with Koa's architecture (e.g., blocking operations) can lead to unexpected behavior and potential security loopholes in request processing.

    • Impact:

      • Supply Chain Attacks via Koa Middleware: Significantly reduces risk by focusing vetting on Koa-specific aspects of middleware.
      • Koa-Specific Vulnerabilities in Middleware: Substantially reduces risk by ensuring middleware is well-suited and securely implemented within the Koa framework.
      • Incompatibility Issues Leading to Security Flaws: Reduces risk by choosing Koa-compatible middleware and avoiding architectural mismatches.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Partially implemented. Dependency review considers Koa compatibility to some extent, but in-depth Koa-specific code inspection of middleware is not consistently performed.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Formalized Koa-specific code inspection guidelines for middleware are needed.
      • Security audits should specifically include a focus on Koa middleware interactions and potential Koa-related vulnerabilities.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Input Validation and Sanitization within Koa Middleware

  • Mitigation Strategy: Implement Input Validation and Sanitization within Koa Middleware

    • Description:

      1. Koa Context Input Points: Identify all input points accessible via Koa's ctx object within middleware (e.g., ctx.request.headers, ctx.request.query, ctx.request.body, ctx.params, ctx.cookies).
      2. Koa Middleware Validation: Create or use Koa middleware for input validation. This middleware should operate within the Koa request lifecycle, using the ctx object to access and validate input before it reaches application routes or controllers.
      3. Koa-Aware Validation Rules: Define validation rules that are relevant to the context of a Koa application. Consider validating request headers, query parameters, and body formats that are commonly used in Koa applications (e.g., JSON bodies, URL-encoded forms).
      4. Koa Context Sanitization: Implement sanitization middleware that operates on data accessed through the Koa ctx object. Ensure sanitization is compatible with Koa's asynchronous nature and doesn't interfere with Koa's request/response handling.
      5. Koa Error Responses: Validation middleware should use Koa's ctx object to set appropriate HTTP error responses (e.g., ctx.status = 400, ctx.body = { error: "Invalid input" }) when validation fails, adhering to Koa's error handling conventions.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • XSS in Koa Views/Responses (Medium to High Severity): Sanitization in Koa middleware prevents injection of malicious scripts that could be rendered in Koa views or sent in Koa responses.
      • SQL Injection via Koa Request Data (High Severity): Validation and sanitization in Koa middleware prevent malicious SQL queries constructed from data accessed via ctx.request.
      • Command Injection via Koa Input (High Severity): Input validation in Koa middleware can prevent execution of arbitrary commands based on data from ctx.request.
      • Path Traversal via Koa Parameters (Medium Severity): Input validation on ctx.params can prevent unauthorized file access in Koa applications.

    • Impact:

      • XSS, SQL Injection, Command Injection, Path Traversal: Significantly reduces risk by intercepting malicious input early in the Koa request lifecycle, before it reaches vulnerable application parts.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Partially implemented. Input validation is sometimes done within Koa route handlers, but not consistently as dedicated Koa middleware. Sanitization is less consistently applied within Koa middleware.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Dedicated Koa middleware for input validation and sanitization is not consistently used across all routes and input points.
      • Centralized validation rule definitions specifically for Koa request data are missing.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Koa Middleware Ordering

  • Mitigation Strategy: Secure Koa Middleware Ordering

    • Description:

      1. Koa Security Middleware Identification: Identify Koa middleware specifically designed for security within the Koa ecosystem (e.g., Koa-helmet for security headers, Koa-ratelimit for rate limiting, Koa-jwt for JWT authentication).
      2. Prioritize Koa Security Middleware in Stack: Ensure Koa security middleware is placed early in the app.use() chain. This ensures Koa's request context is secured before any route handlers or application-specific middleware are executed.
      3. Koa Authentication/Authorization Middleware First: Koa middleware for authentication and authorization (like koa-passport, koa-jwt) should be placed very early to protect Koa routes from unauthorized access.
      4. Koa Input Validation/Sanitization Middleware Early: Place Koa middleware for input validation and sanitization before any Koa middleware or route handlers that process user input from ctx.request.
      5. Koa Error Handling Middleware Placement: Custom Koa error handling middleware should be placed strategically to catch errors from Koa middleware and route handlers, allowing for controlled error responses within the Koa context.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Authorization Bypass in Koa Routes (High Severity): Incorrect Koa middleware order can bypass Koa authentication/authorization, exposing Koa routes.
      • Vulnerable Koa Route Logic Exposure (Medium to High Severity): If Koa security middleware is late, vulnerable Koa route handlers might execute before security measures are applied within the Koa request lifecycle.
      • Information Leakage via Koa Error Responses (Medium Severity): Incorrect Koa error handling middleware placement can expose sensitive data in Koa responses.

    • Impact:

      • Authorization Bypass in Koa Routes: Significantly reduces risk by ensuring Koa authentication/authorization is always enforced for Koa routes.
      • Vulnerable Koa Route Logic Exposure: Substantially reduces risk by applying Koa security measures early in the Koa request handling process.
      • Information Leakage via Koa Error Responses: Reduces risk by controlling error responses generated by Koa applications.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Partially implemented. Basic Koa middleware order is considered, but a formal security-focused review of the Koa middleware stack is missing.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Formal documentation of the Koa middleware order from a security perspective is needed.
      • Testing should specifically verify the correct order of Koa security middleware and its effectiveness in protecting Koa routes.

Mitigation Strategy: Limit Koa Context (ctx) Exposure and Access

  • Mitigation Strategy: Limit Koa Context (ctx) Exposure and Access

    • Description:

      1. Minimize ctx Data Storage: Avoid storing excessive or sensitive data directly on the Koa ctx object. Use ctx primarily for request/response flow control and passing essential request information.
      2. Restrict ctx Access in Koa Middleware/Routes: Limit access to the ctx object within Koa middleware and route handlers to only what is strictly necessary for their specific function. Avoid passing the entire ctx object around unnecessarily.
      3. Dedicated Scopes for Koa Request Data: Consider using request-scoped variables or dedicated objects (outside of ctx) to manage request-specific data within Koa applications. This reduces reliance on the global ctx and limits potential exposure.
      4. Immutable ctx Practices (Where Applicable): Where feasible, adopt practices that treat parts of the Koa ctx object as read-only or immutable after initial processing. This can prevent accidental or malicious modification of request context during the Koa lifecycle.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Accidental Data Exposure via Koa ctx (Medium Severity): Over-reliance on ctx can lead to accidental exposure of sensitive data if ctx is inadvertently logged, leaked, or accessed in unintended parts of the Koa application.
      • Context Confusion and Side Effects (Medium Severity): Uncontrolled modification of the Koa ctx object by multiple middleware or route handlers can lead to context confusion, unexpected side effects, and potential security vulnerabilities.
      • Information Disclosure in Koa Error Handling (Medium Severity): If error handling logic relies heavily on ctx and ctx contains sensitive data, error responses might inadvertently leak this data.

    • Impact:

      • Accidental Data Exposure via Koa ctx: Reduces risk by minimizing the amount of sensitive data stored directly in the Koa ctx.
      • Context Confusion and Side Effects: Reduces risk by promoting controlled and limited access to the Koa ctx object.
      • Information Disclosure in Koa Error Handling: Reduces risk by limiting sensitive data within ctx and controlling error response content.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Partially implemented. Developers are generally aware of ctx, but explicit guidelines on limiting ctx usage and exposure are not strictly enforced.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Development guidelines should be updated to emphasize minimizing ctx usage and promoting dedicated scopes for request data in Koa applications.
      • Code reviews should specifically check for excessive or unnecessary use of the Koa ctx object.

Mitigation Strategy: Sanitize and Validate Data Retrieved from Koa Context

  • Mitigation Strategy: Sanitize and Validate Data Retrieved from Koa Context

    • Description:

      1. Treat ctx Data as Untrusted: Always treat data retrieved from Koa's ctx object (e.g., ctx.request.body, ctx.params, ctx.query, ctx.cookies, ctx.request.headers) as potentially untrusted user input.
      2. Koa Context Data Validation: Apply validation rules to data obtained from the Koa ctx immediately after accessing it and before using it in any application logic or database queries within Koa route handlers or middleware.
      3. Koa Context Data Sanitization: Sanitize data from the Koa ctx to remove or encode potentially harmful characters or code before using it in Koa responses, views, or database operations.
      4. Validation and Sanitization Libraries for Koa: Utilize validation and sanitization libraries specifically designed for Node.js and compatible with Koa to streamline the process of securing data from the Koa ctx.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • XSS via Koa Context Data (Medium to High Severity): Failure to sanitize data from ctx before rendering in Koa views or responses can lead to XSS vulnerabilities.
      • SQL Injection via Koa Context Data (High Severity): Using unsanitized data from ctx in database queries can lead to SQL injection attacks.
      • Command Injection via Koa Context Data (High Severity): Using unsanitized data from ctx in system commands can lead to command injection vulnerabilities.
      • Path Traversal via Koa Context Data (Medium Severity): Using unsanitized data from ctx to construct file paths can lead to path traversal vulnerabilities.

    • Impact:

      • XSS, SQL Injection, Command Injection, Path Traversal: Significantly reduces risk by ensuring data from the Koa ctx is safe to use throughout the Koa application.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Partially implemented. Sanitization and validation are performed in some parts of the application, but not consistently applied to all data retrieved from the Koa ctx.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Consistent and systematic sanitization and validation of all data retrieved from the Koa ctx is needed across all Koa route handlers and middleware.
      • Clear guidelines and reusable functions/middleware for sanitizing and validating Koa context data are missing.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Koa Session Management (if using ctx.session)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Secure Koa Session Management (if using ctx.session)

    • Description:

      1. Strong Koa Session Secret: If using Koa's session middleware (or similar), ensure a strong, randomly generated session secret key is configured. This secret is crucial for signing session cookies and preventing tampering.
      2. Regular Koa Session Secret Rotation: Rotate the Koa session secret key periodically. This limits the window of opportunity if a secret key is compromised.
      3. Secure Koa Session Cookie Attributes: Configure Koa session cookie attributes properly:
        • httpOnly: true: Prevents client-side JavaScript from accessing the session cookie, mitigating XSS-based session hijacking.
        • secure: true: Ensures the session cookie is only transmitted over HTTPS, protecting against man-in-the-middle attacks.
        • sameSite: 'Strict' or 'Lax': Helps prevent CSRF attacks by controlling when session cookies are sent in cross-site requests. Choose 'Strict' for maximum protection or 'Lax' for more usability if needed.
      4. Secure Koa Session Storage: Choose a secure session storage mechanism for Koa sessions. Avoid default in-memory storage in production, as it's not scalable or persistent. Consider using database-backed session stores (e.g., Redis, database) or other secure storage options.
      5. Koa Session Timeout and Expiration: Configure appropriate session timeouts and expiration settings for Koa sessions. Shorter timeouts reduce the window of opportunity for session hijacking. Implement mechanisms to invalidate sessions after a period of inactivity or upon user logout.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Session Hijacking (High Severity): Weak session management in Koa applications can allow attackers to steal session IDs and impersonate users.
      • Session Fixation (Medium Severity): Vulnerabilities in Koa session handling can allow attackers to fixate a user's session ID, potentially leading to account compromise.
      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) based Session Theft (High Severity): If httpOnly is not set, XSS attacks can be used to steal Koa session cookies.
      • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks (Medium to High Severity): If secure is not set and sessions are transmitted over HTTP, man-in-the-middle attackers can intercept session cookies.
      • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) (Medium Severity): Inadequate sameSite settings can increase the risk of CSRF attacks exploiting Koa sessions.

    • Impact:

      • Session Hijacking, Session Fixation, XSS-based Session Theft, Man-in-the-Middle Attacks, CSRF: Significantly reduces risk of session-related attacks in Koa applications.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Partially implemented. Session secret is configured, but rotation is not regularly practiced. Session cookie attributes are partially configured (e.g., httpOnly and secure might be set, but sameSite might be missing or incorrectly configured). Session storage might be using defaults or not optimally secured.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Regular session secret rotation needs to be implemented.
      • Full and correct configuration of session cookie attributes (httpOnly, secure, sameSite) needs to be enforced.
      • A review and potential upgrade of the session storage mechanism is needed to ensure secure and scalable session management in the Koa application.
      • Clear guidelines for secure Koa session management need to be documented and followed.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Custom Koa Error Handling Middleware

  • Mitigation Strategy: Implement Custom Koa Error Handling Middleware

    • Description:

      1. Create Koa Error Handling Middleware: Develop custom Koa middleware specifically for handling errors within the Koa application. This middleware should be placed strategically in the middleware chain to catch errors from subsequent middleware and route handlers.
      2. Control Koa Error Responses in Production: Within the custom Koa error handling middleware, differentiate error responses based on the environment (development vs. production). In production, avoid exposing detailed error messages, stack traces, or internal server details in ctx.body. Return generic, user-friendly error messages.
      3. Secure Koa Error Logging: Implement secure server-side logging of detailed error information (including stack traces, request details, etc.) within the Koa error handling middleware. Ensure logs are stored securely and access is restricted to authorized personnel.
      4. User-Friendly Koa Error Pages (Optional): Consider creating custom, user-friendly error pages (e.g., for 404 Not Found, 500 Internal Server Error) to be served by the Koa error handling middleware in production. These pages should not reveal sensitive information.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Information Leakage via Koa Error Pages (Medium Severity): Default Koa error handling or poorly configured error pages can expose sensitive information (stack traces, internal paths, etc.) to attackers.
      • Denial of Service (DoS) via Error Exploitation (Low to Medium Severity): In some cases, predictable or verbose error messages can be exploited by attackers to probe application internals or trigger DoS conditions.
      • Reduced User Trust (Low Severity): Generic or unhelpful error pages can negatively impact user experience and trust in the application.

    • Impact:

      • Information Leakage via Koa Error Pages: Significantly reduces risk by preventing exposure of sensitive server-side details in error responses.
      • Denial of Service (DoS) via Error Exploitation: Reduces risk by providing less verbose and predictable error messages in production.
      • Reduced User Trust: Improves user experience and trust by providing user-friendly error pages.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Partially implemented. Basic custom error handling might be in place, but environment-specific error responses and secure logging are not fully implemented.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Environment-aware error responses (detailed in development, generic in production) need to be fully implemented in the Koa error handling middleware.
      • Secure server-side error logging within the Koa error handling middleware needs to be implemented.
      • Custom, user-friendly error pages for common HTTP error codes could be implemented for improved user experience.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Koa Route Definitions and Parameter Handling

  • Mitigation Strategy: Secure Koa Route Definitions and Parameter Handling

    • Description:

      1. Principle of Least Privilege for Koa Routes: Define Koa routes with the principle of least privilege in mind. Only expose routes that are absolutely necessary for the application's functionality. Avoid overly permissive or wildcard route patterns.
      2. Koa Route Parameter Validation: Implement validation for Koa route parameters (ctx.params) within route handlers or dedicated middleware. Validate data types, formats, and ranges of expected parameters.
      3. Koa Route Parameter Sanitization: Sanitize Koa route parameters to prevent injection attacks. Encode special characters or remove potentially harmful input from ctx.params before using them in application logic or database queries.
      4. Route-Specific Koa Middleware for Access Control: Use route-specific Koa middleware to enforce access control and authorization for sensitive Koa routes. This allows for fine-grained control over who can access specific parts of the application.
      5. Avoid Sensitive Data in Koa Route Paths/Parameters: Do not include sensitive information (e.g., API keys, user IDs, passwords) directly in Koa route paths or query parameters. Use secure methods like request bodies or encrypted channels for transmitting sensitive data in Koa applications.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Unauthorized Access to Koa Routes (Medium to High Severity): Overly permissive Koa route definitions can lead to unauthorized access to application functionality.
      • Injection Attacks via Koa Route Parameters (High Severity): Lack of validation and sanitization of Koa route parameters can lead to SQL injection, command injection, and other injection vulnerabilities.
      • Information Disclosure via Koa Route Paths/Parameters (Medium Severity): Exposing sensitive data in Koa route paths or query parameters can lead to information leakage through logs, browser history, and URL sharing.

    • Impact:

      • Unauthorized Access to Koa Routes: Reduces risk by enforcing stricter route definitions and access control.
      • Injection Attacks via Koa Route Parameters: Significantly reduces risk by validating and sanitizing Koa route parameters.
      • Information Disclosure via Koa Route Paths/Parameters: Reduces risk by avoiding the exposure of sensitive data in URLs.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Partially implemented. Basic route definitions are in place, but parameter validation and sanitization are not consistently applied to all Koa routes. Route-specific middleware for access control is used in some areas but not comprehensively.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Systematic validation and sanitization of Koa route parameters needs to be implemented across all routes.
      • Route-specific Koa middleware for access control should be implemented for all sensitive routes.
      • Guidelines for secure Koa route definition and parameter handling need to be documented and enforced.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Koa Rate Limiting Middleware

  • Mitigation Strategy: Implement Koa Rate Limiting Middleware

    • Description:

      1. Select Koa Rate Limiting Middleware: Choose a suitable Koa rate limiting middleware (e.g., koa-ratelimit) that is compatible with your application's needs and infrastructure.
      2. Rate Limit Sensitive Koa Routes: Apply Koa rate limiting middleware to protect sensitive Koa routes, such as authentication endpoints (/login, /register), password reset routes, API endpoints, and resource-intensive routes.
      3. Configure Koa Rate Limits Appropriately: Configure rate limits (e.g., requests per minute/hour) based on expected traffic patterns and application capacity. Start with conservative limits and adjust as needed based on monitoring and performance testing.
      4. Customize Koa Rate Limit Responses: Customize the responses sent by the Koa rate limiting middleware when limits are exceeded (e.g., HTTP 429 Too Many Requests). Provide informative error messages to clients and consider including Retry-After headers.
      5. Monitor Koa Rate Limiting: Monitor the effectiveness of Koa rate limiting middleware. Track rate limit hits, blocked requests, and adjust configurations as needed to optimize protection and user experience.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Brute-Force Attacks on Koa Authentication (High Severity): Rate limiting Koa login routes prevents or significantly slows down brute-force password guessing attacks.
      • Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks on Koa Application (Medium to High Severity): Rate limiting protects Koa applications from being overwhelmed by excessive requests, mitigating DoS attempts.
      • API Abuse and Resource Exhaustion (Medium Severity): Rate limiting Koa API endpoints prevents abuse and resource exhaustion by limiting the number of requests from individual clients or IP addresses.

    • Impact:

      • Brute-Force Attacks on Koa Authentication: Significantly reduces risk by making brute-force attacks impractical.
      • Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks on Koa Application: Substantially reduces risk by limiting the impact of DoS attempts.
      • API Abuse and Resource Exhaustion: Reduces risk by controlling API usage and preventing resource depletion.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Partially implemented. Rate limiting might be applied to some critical Koa routes, but not comprehensively across all sensitive endpoints. Configuration might be using default settings or not optimally tuned.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Comprehensive implementation of Koa rate limiting middleware across all sensitive routes is needed.
      • Rate limit configurations need to be reviewed and optimized based on application traffic patterns and security requirements.
      • Monitoring of Koa rate limiting effectiveness should be implemented.