Attack Surface: Middleware Error Handling Failures
- Description: Uncaught exceptions or unhandled promise rejections within Koa middleware can lead to application crashes, information disclosure, or unexpected behavior.
- How Koa Contributes: Koa's minimalist design relies entirely on middleware for error handling. The framework provides no default error handling beyond a basic console log; it's entirely the developer's responsibility. This is a core design choice of Koa.
- Example: A middleware that interacts with a database doesn't catch a database connection error, leading to an unhandled promise rejection and application crash.
- Impact:
- Denial of Service (DoS) due to application crashes.
- Information disclosure (stack traces, internal error messages) revealing sensitive details.
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Implement a global error-handling middleware as the first middleware.
try...catch
aroundawait next()
. - Log errors securely.
- Return appropriate HTTP status codes and sanitized error messages. Never expose raw error details.
- Ensure all promises have
await
or.catch()
. - Use a dedicated error-handling library if needed.
- Implement a global error-handling middleware as the first middleware.
Attack Surface: Middleware Ordering Vulnerabilities
- Description: Incorrect ordering of middleware can bypass security checks.
- How Koa Contributes: Koa's execution flow is completely determined by the order of
app.use()
. This is a fundamental aspect of Koa's design, providing flexibility but also creating this risk. Koa does not provide any built-in mechanisms to enforce or validate middleware order. - Example: Authentication middleware placed after resource access middleware.
- Impact:
- Bypass of authentication and authorization.
- Incomplete logging.
- Exposure of sensitive data.
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Carefully plan and document middleware order. Security middleware before business logic.
- Use a consistent pattern.
- Thoroughly test to ensure correct order and effective security controls.
Attack Surface: Trust Proxy Misconfiguration
- Description: Incorrectly configuring Koa's
app.proxy
can lead to trusting forgedX-Forwarded-*
headers. - How Koa Contributes: Koa provides the
app.proxy
setting and related header options (app.proxyIpHeader
, etc.). The framework itself does the header processing based on this configuration. The vulnerability arises from misusing these Koa-provided features. - Example:
app.proxy = true
without verifying the reverse proxy's trustworthiness. - Impact:
- Bypass of IP-based access control and rate limiting.
- Spoofing of client IPs in logs.
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
app.proxy = true
only if you trust the proxy.- Configure
app.proxyIpHeader
,app.proxyProtocolHeader
andapp.proxyHostHeader
correctly. - Ensure the reverse proxy is secure.
app.proxy = false
(default) if not needed.- Validate header values if used for security decisions.
Attack Surface: Asynchronous Operation Issues (Unhandled Promise Rejections)
- Description: Failure to handle promise rejections in asynchronous Koa middleware.
- How Koa Contributes: Koa's core is built around asynchronous operations and promises. The framework relies entirely on developers to handle rejections. Koa does not automatically handle them in a safe way.
- Example: A middleware makes an asynchronous API call but omits a
.catch()
. - Impact:
- Application crashes (DoS).
- Resource leaks.
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Ensure all promises have
await
or.catch()
. - Use a global unhandled rejection handler as a last resort. Prioritize proper handling within middleware.
- Ensure all promises have