Attack Surface: Prototype Pollution
- Description: Injection of properties into the global
Object.prototype
, leading to unexpected behavior, denial of service, or potentially remote code execution. - How Minimist Contributes: Older versions of
minimist
(before 1.2.6) were vulnerable to prototype pollution through specially crafted command-line arguments using properties like__proto__
,constructor
, andprototype
.minimist
's parsing logic did not prevent these properties from being assigned, directly enabling the attack. - Example:
node vulnerable-app.js --__proto__.polluted=true node vulnerable-app.js --a.__proto__.polluted=true node vulnerable-app.js --constructor.prototype.polluted=true
- Impact:
- Denial of Service (DoS): Application crashes or becomes unresponsive.
- Remote Code Execution (RCE): Attacker executes arbitrary code on the server.
- Data Tampering: Modification of application data or behavior.
- Risk Severity: Critical (in vulnerable versions)
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Update Minimist (Essential): Use
minimist
version 1.2.6 or later. This is the primary and most effective mitigation, directly addressing the vulnerability withinminimist
. - Input Sanitization (Defense in Depth): Validate and sanitize all command-line arguments. Whitelist allowed arguments and their expected types. Reject any input that doesn't conform to the whitelist. While this is a good practice, it's secondary to updating
minimist
. - Avoid Dangerous Properties: Do not directly access or rely on properties like
__proto__
,constructor
, orprototype
in application logic. This is a general good practice, but updatingminimist
is the core mitigation. - Code Review: Regularly review code for potential prototype pollution vulnerabilities. Again, this is a good practice but secondary to the direct fix of updating.
- Update Minimist (Essential): Use