Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
56 lines (43 loc) · 5.41 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

56 lines (43 loc) · 5.41 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for minimistjs/minimist

Mitigation Strategy: Use a Safe Version of minimist

Description:

  1. Identify Current Version: Check the package-lock.json or yarn.lock file in your project's root directory. Look for the minimist entry and note the version number.
  2. Check for Updates: Run npm outdated or yarn outdated in your project's root directory. This command lists any outdated dependencies, including minimist.
  3. Update if Necessary: If the current version is less than 1.2.6, update to the latest version by running npm install minimist@latest or yarn add minimist@latest. This will update the package and the lock file.
  4. Verify Update: Re-check package-lock.json or yarn.lock to confirm the updated version is installed.
  5. Automate Checks: Integrate a dependency checker (e.g., npm audit, yarn audit, Snyk, Dependabot) into your CI/CD pipeline. Configure it to fail builds if vulnerable versions of minimist (or any other dependency) are detected.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Prototype Pollution (High Severity): Older versions of minimist (pre-1.2.6) are vulnerable to prototype pollution. An attacker could inject malicious input that modifies the __proto__ property of objects, potentially leading to denial of service or, in some scenarios, remote code execution.
  • Denial of Service (DoS) (High Severity): Through prototype pollution, an attacker could disrupt the application's normal operation, making it unavailable to legitimate users.
  • Remote Code Execution (RCE) (Critical Severity): In certain circumstances, prototype pollution could be exploited to execute arbitrary code on the server, giving the attacker full control.

Impact:

  • Prototype Pollution: Risk reduced to near zero. This is the primary threat addressed by using a safe version.
  • Denial of Service (DoS): Risk significantly reduced, as the main vector for DoS via minimist is eliminated.
  • Remote Code Execution (RCE): Risk significantly reduced, as the primary pathway for RCE through minimist is removed.

Currently Implemented:

  • Project A (Example): Yes, minimist version 1.2.8 is installed, verified in package-lock.json. npm audit is integrated into the CI/CD pipeline.
  • Project B (Example): Partially. minimist version is 2.0.0, but CI/CD integration of npm audit is pending.

Missing Implementation:

  • Project B (Example): Full CI/CD integration of dependency checking is missing. This needs to be configured to automatically block builds with vulnerable dependencies.
  • Legacy Codebase (Example): An older, unmaintained part of the system still uses minimist 1.2.0. This needs to be identified and updated.

Mitigation Strategy: Avoid Dangerous minimist Options

Description:

  1. Review Code: Examine all instances where minimist is used in your codebase. Identify any uses of the opts.protoAction or opts.parseNumbers options.
  2. Justify Usage: For each instance of these options, carefully evaluate whether they are absolutely necessary. If not, remove them.
  3. Document Rationale: If these options are deemed necessary, clearly document the reason for their use and the potential risks involved. This documentation should be easily accessible to developers.
  4. Consider Alternatives: If the functionality provided by these options can be achieved through other means (e.g., custom parsing logic), consider refactoring the code to avoid using these options.
  5. Code Reviews: Enforce code reviews that specifically check for the use of these options and require justification for their inclusion.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Unintended Behavior (Low-Medium Severity): Misuse of opts.protoAction, even in safe versions, could lead to unexpected behavior, although direct prototype pollution is prevented.
  • Type Confusion (Low Severity): Careless use of opts.parseNumbers could lead to unexpected type conversions, potentially causing logic errors in the application. This is more of a general input handling issue, but minimist's behavior can contribute.
  • Exploitation in Conjunction with Other Vulnerabilities (Variable Severity): While not directly vulnerable, complex minimist configurations could potentially be leveraged by an attacker in combination with other vulnerabilities in the application.

Impact:

  • Unintended Behavior: Risk reduced by minimizing the use of potentially confusing options.
  • Type Confusion: Risk slightly reduced by encouraging more careful consideration of number parsing.
  • Exploitation in Conjunction with Other Vulnerabilities: Attack surface is reduced by simplifying the minimist configuration.

Currently Implemented:

  • Project A (Example): No uses of opts.protoAction or opts.parseNumbers were found. Code reviews are standard practice.
  • Project C (Example): opts.parseNumbers is used in one location. Justification is documented, but a review is planned to see if it can be avoided.

Missing Implementation:

  • Project C (Example): The planned review of opts.parseNumbers usage needs to be completed.
  • General: A formal code review guideline specifically mentioning minimist options could be added to the development process.