Mitigation Strategy: Upgrade and Transition to Alternatives
-
Description:
- Identify Current Version: Determine the exact version of
moment
currently used in the project (package.json
,package-lock.json
, oryarn.lock
). - Upgrade to Latest
moment
(Temporary): Immediately upgrade to the absolute latest version ofmoment
:npm install moment@latest
oryarn add moment@latest
. This addresses known, patched vulnerabilities within moment. - Choose a Replacement: Select a replacement library (
date-fns
,Luxon
,Day.js
, or the nativeIntl
object). - Phased Replacement: Plan a phased replacement, replacing
moment
usage module by module, prioritizing those handling user input. - Remove
moment
: Once all usages are replaced, removemoment
from your project's dependencies:npm uninstall moment
oryarn remove moment
. - Update Documentation: Update any project documentation.
- Identify Current Version: Determine the exact version of
-
Threats Mitigated:
- ReDoS (CVE-2016-4055 and similar): Severity: High. Upgrading mitigates known ReDoS. Transitioning eliminates this
moment
-specific risk. - Locale-Related Vulnerabilities (Potential): Severity: Medium. Transitioning reduces the attack surface.
- Prototype Pollution (Indirect): Severity: Medium. Transitioning to an immutable library eliminates the risk of
moment
's mutability exacerbating this.
- ReDoS (CVE-2016-4055 and similar): Severity: High. Upgrading mitigates known ReDoS. Transitioning eliminates this
-
Impact:
- ReDoS: Risk reduced from High to Low (upgrade) and then to Negligible (transition).
- Locale-Related: Risk reduced from Medium to Low.
- Prototype Pollution: Risk reduced from Medium to Low.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Check
package.json
and lock files for the currentmoment
version. - Search codebase for
moment
version checks or migration plans. - Example: "Partially implemented.
moment
is at version 2.29.4. Some components usedate-fns
."
- Check
-
Missing Implementation:
- Identify modules still using
moment
(e.g.,grep -r "moment(" .
). - Prioritize modules handling user-supplied dates.
- Example: "Missing in reporting, event scheduling, and date input validation. No full migration plan."
- Identify modules still using
Mitigation Strategy: Strict Input Validation (Pre-moment
)
-
Description:
- Identify Input Points: Identify all points where user-supplied data is input to
moment
functions, especiallymoment(userInput)
. - Implement Validation Before
moment
: Implement strict validation before passing data tomoment
. - Format Enforcement:
- Define Expected Formats: Determine the exact date/time formats (e.g., "YYYY-MM-DD").
- Use Safe Regular Expressions: Use simple, non-
moment
based regular expressions to enforce formats. Example (YYYY-MM-DD):/^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}$/
. - Dedicated Validation Library: Consider a dedicated non-
moment
date/time validation library.
- Length Limits: Set reasonable maximum lengths for date/time strings.
- Character Whitelisting/Blacklisting: Restrict allowed characters (e.g., only digits and separators for numeric dates).
- Reject Invalid Input: Reject invalid input immediately. Do not pass it to
moment
. - Test Thoroughly: Test with valid and invalid inputs, including boundary cases and potential ReDoS strings.
- Identify Input Points: Identify all points where user-supplied data is input to
-
Threats Mitigated:
- ReDoS (CVE-2016-4055 and similar): Severity: High. Prevents crafted input from reaching
moment
's parsing logic. - Locale-Related Vulnerabilities (Potential): Severity: Medium. Reduces reliance on
moment
's locale-specific parsing.
- ReDoS (CVE-2016-4055 and similar): Severity: High. Prevents crafted input from reaching
-
Impact:
- ReDoS: Risk reduced from High to Medium (with latest
moment
) or Low (with an alternative). - Locale-Related: Risk reduced from Medium to Low.
- ReDoS: Risk reduced from High to Medium (with latest
-
Currently Implemented:
- Examine code handling user date/time input.
- Look for validation before calls to
moment
. - Check for regular expressions, length checks, etc.
- Example: "Partially implemented. Length checks on date inputs in user registration, but no format validation."
-
Missing Implementation:
- Identify areas where user-supplied date/time data is used without prior validation.
- Prioritize where input is directly passed to
moment
's parsing. - Example: "Missing in event creation, reporting date range selector, and API endpoints with date parameters. No consistent validation."
Mitigation Strategy: Controlled Locale Loading
-
Description:
- Identify Required Locales: Determine which locales your application needs.
- Bundle Locales: Include locale files within your application's codebase. Do not load them dynamically.
- Explicitly Load Locales: Explicitly load only required locales:
moment.locale('en');
. Do not allow users to select locales arbitrarily. - Regular Audits: Periodically review locale files to ensure they haven't been tampered with.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Locale-Related Vulnerabilities (Potential): Severity: Medium. Controls which locales are loaded and from where, reducing the risk of malicious files.
-
Impact:
- Locale-Related: Risk reduced from Medium to Low.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Check how locales are loaded.
- Look for
moment.locale()
calls. - See if locale files are bundled or loaded dynamically.
- Example: "Partially implemented. 'en' and 'fr' are bundled and explicitly loaded."
-
Missing Implementation:
- Identify instances of dynamic locale loading or user-influenced locale selection.
- Example: "Missing: User profile settings allow selecting a preferred language, potentially loading arbitrary locales."
Mitigation Strategy: Avoid Mutating moment
Objects
-
Description:
- Treat
moment
objects as immutable: Even though some mutation methods exist inmoment
, always create new instances instead of modifying existing ones. - Use cloning: If you need a copy of a
moment
object, use the.clone()
method to create a new, independent instance. Avoid directly assigningmoment
objects. - Avoid mutation methods: Do not use methods that modify the
moment
object in place (e.g.,add()
,subtract()
,startOf()
, etc., without reassigning). If you must use them, reassign the result to a new variable:newDate = oldDate.add(1, 'day');
instead ofoldDate.add(1, 'day');
- Treat
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Prototype Pollution (Indirect): Severity: Medium. Reduces the risk of
moment
's mutability exacerbating prototype pollution vulnerabilities.
- Prototype Pollution (Indirect): Severity: Medium. Reduces the risk of
-
Impact:
- Prototype Pollution: Risk reduced. While this doesn't eliminate prototype pollution risk, it prevents
moment
from making it worse.
- Prototype Pollution: Risk reduced. While this doesn't eliminate prototype pollution risk, it prevents
-
Currently Implemented:
- Review code for any instances where
moment
objects are modified in place. - Look for uses of
.clone()
and reassignment after using mutation methods. - Example: "Partially implemented. Some areas use
.clone()
, but others directly modifymoment
objects."
- Review code for any instances where
-
Missing Implementation:
- Identify all instances of in-place modification of
moment
objects. - Refactor code to create new instances instead.
- Example: "Missing: Widespread use of
add()
andsubtract()
without reassignment. Needs comprehensive refactoring."
- Identify all instances of in-place modification of