Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
42 lines (35 loc) · 6.53 KB

File metadata and controls

42 lines (35 loc) · 6.53 KB

Threat Model Analysis for nodejs/readable-stream

  • Threat: Unbounded Stream Consumption
    • Description: An attacker sends an extremely large or never-ending stream of data to the application. Due to the application's failure to implement proper backpressure or resource limits when consuming the readable-stream, the application buffers data indefinitely, leading to memory exhaustion and CPU overload. The attacker exploits the lack of backpressure handling in the stream processing logic.
    • Impact: Denial of Service (DoS), application crash, server instability, resource exhaustion, making the application unavailable to legitimate users.
    • Affected Component: readable-stream's buffering mechanism, pipe() function when used without backpressure control, application's stream consumption logic interacting with readable-stream.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Implement Backpressure: Utilize readable-stream's backpressure features correctly. When using pipe(), ensure the destination stream (writable stream) exerts backpressure on the source stream (readable stream). Use pause() and resume() methods or the drain event to manage data flow based on the writable stream's capacity.
      • Set highWaterMark: Configure the highWaterMark option for both readable and writable streams to limit internal buffering within readable-stream. This sets a threshold for buffer size, helping to prevent unbounded memory growth.
      • Implement Timeouts: Set timeouts for stream processing operations. If a stream takes too long to process, terminate the operation to prevent resource exhaustion.
      • Resource Monitoring: Monitor application resource usage (memory, CPU) and implement alerts to detect and respond to excessive stream consumption.
  • Threat: Dependency Vulnerabilities in readable-stream
    • Description: A security vulnerability is discovered within the readable-stream library itself (or potentially in its underlying core Node.js stream implementation). An attacker exploits this vulnerability by sending specially crafted stream data or triggering specific stream operations that expose the vulnerability. This is a direct compromise of the readable-stream module.
    • Impact: Potentially Critical. Impacts can range from Remote Code Execution (RCE) on the server, allowing the attacker to gain full control, to Denial of Service (DoS), or Information Disclosure, depending on the nature of the vulnerability.
    • Affected Component: The readable-stream module itself, specific functions or internal mechanisms within readable-stream that contain the vulnerability.
    • Risk Severity: Critical (if RCE or significant DoS is possible), High (for other serious vulnerabilities like information disclosure).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Keep Node.js Updated: Regularly update Node.js to the latest stable version. Security patches for core modules like stream (which readable-stream is based on) are included in Node.js updates.
      • Monitor Security Advisories: Stay informed about security advisories related to Node.js and its core modules. Subscribe to Node.js security mailing lists or use vulnerability scanning tools that track Node.js security updates.
      • Vulnerability Scanning (Limited for Core Modules): While less common for core modules, in theory, vulnerability scanning tools might detect known vulnerabilities in dependencies. Ensure your tooling is up-to-date.
      • Code Reviews and Security Audits: Conduct regular code reviews and security audits of your application, paying attention to stream processing logic and potential interactions with readable-stream that might expose vulnerabilities (though this is less about your code and more about potential bugs in the library itself).
  • Threat: Incorrect Backpressure Implementation Leading to Buffer Overflow
    • Description: Developers misunderstand or incorrectly implement backpressure mechanisms provided by readable-stream. Specifically, they might fail to handle drain events or properly pause/resume streams, leading to situations where data is pushed into the writable stream's buffer faster than it can be consumed. This can result in buffer overflows within readable-stream's internal buffers, potentially leading to unexpected behavior or even crashes. While less likely to be directly exploitable for RCE in modern Node.js environments due to memory safety features, it can still cause DoS or application instability.
    • Impact: High. Denial of Service (DoS), application instability, potential crashes, memory exhaustion, unpredictable application behavior due to buffer overflows within stream processing.
    • Affected Component: readable-stream's backpressure mechanisms, pipe(), pause(), resume(), drain event handling in application code, internal stream buffers.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Thoroughly Understand Backpressure: Invest time in understanding readable-stream's backpressure concepts and how to correctly implement them using pipe(), pause(), resume(), and drain events. Refer to Node.js documentation and examples.
      • Careful pipe() Usage: When using pipe(), be mindful of the backpressure implications. Ensure the writable stream is capable of handling the data rate from the readable stream, or implement explicit backpressure control if needed.
      • Test Backpressure Under Load: Test stream processing pipelines under realistic load conditions to verify that backpressure is functioning correctly and preventing buffer overflows. Monitor memory usage during load testing.
      • Code Reviews for Backpressure Logic: Specifically review code sections that implement stream piping and backpressure handling to identify potential errors in implementation.
      • Use Stream Utilities/Abstractions: Consider using higher-level stream utilities or libraries that abstract away some of the complexity of backpressure management, potentially reducing the risk of implementation errors.