Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
133 lines (107 loc) · 9.35 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

133 lines (107 loc) · 9.35 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for nodejs/string_decoder

Objective: Compromise Application via string_decoder by exploiting high-risk vulnerabilities, leading to Denial of Service or Data Integrity issues.

Attack Tree Visualization

└── 🎯 Compromise Application via string_decoder ❗
    ├── 🔥💥 Achieve Denial of Service (DoS) ❗
    │   ├── 🔥💣 Resource Exhaustion ❗
    │   │   └── 🔥🐌 Send Extremely Long Encoded Sequences ❗
    │   │       └── 📤 Send very large byte buffers for decoding, exceeding memory limits or processing capacity.
    │   └── 🔥💀 Crash Application ❗
    │       └── 🔥🐛 Trigger Unhandled Exception in Decoder ❗
    │           └── 🔥🧪 Send Malformed/Invalid Encoded Data ❗
    └── ⚠️ Achieve Data Manipulation/Integrity Issues ❗
        └── 🔥🎭 Incorrect Decoding ❗
            ├── 🔥😵‍💫 Send Malformed/Invalid Encoded Data ❗
            └── 🔥👾 Exploit Encoding Confusion ❗
                └── 🔥🤹‍♂️ Trick Application into Using Wrong Encoding ❗
                    └── 🎭 If the application relies on external factors (e.g., headers, user input) to determine encoding, manipulate these factors to force string_decoder to use an incorrect encoding for the input data.

Attack Tree Path: 1. Compromise Application via string_decoder (Critical Root Goal) ❗

  • Goal: To successfully compromise the target application by exploiting vulnerabilities within the string_decoder module.
  • Likelihood: Medium (Overall, considering all high-risk paths)
  • Impact: High (Application compromise, potential data breach, service disruption)
  • Effort: Varies depending on the specific attack path (Low to High)
  • Skill Level: Varies depending on the specific attack path (Low to High)
  • Detection Difficulty: Varies depending on the specific attack path (Low to High)
  • Mitigation: Implement all mitigations listed for the sub-nodes to reduce the overall risk.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Achieve Denial of Service (DoS) (Critical Node) 🔥💥 ❗

  • Goal: To make the application unavailable or unresponsive to legitimate users.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: High (Application unavailability, business disruption)
  • Effort: Low to Medium (Depending on the specific DoS method)
  • Skill Level: Low to Medium (Depending on the specific DoS method)
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Spike in resource usage, slow response times, application errors)
  • Mitigation: Implement resource management, input size limits, rate limiting, and robust error handling.

Attack Tree Path: 3. Resource Exhaustion (Critical Node) 🔥💣 ❗

  • Goal: To consume excessive server resources (CPU, memory) to the point of application slowdown or failure.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: High (Application slowdown, potential temporary unavailability, resource contention)
  • Effort: Low to Medium
  • Skill Level: Low to Medium
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Resource monitoring, performance degradation alerts)
  • Mitigation: Implement input size limits, stream processing, resource monitoring, and rate limiting.

Attack Tree Path: 4. Send Extremely Long Encoded Sequences (Critical Node & High-Risk Path) 🔥🐌 ❗

  • Goal: To overwhelm the string_decoder with massive input data, leading to resource exhaustion.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: High (Application unavailability, resource exhaustion)
  • Effort: Low
  • Skill Level: Low
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Spike in resource usage, slow response times)
  • Mitigation: Implement strict input size limits on data processed by string_decoder.

Attack Tree Path: 5. Crash Application (Critical Node) 🔥💀 ❗

  • Goal: To cause the application to terminate unexpectedly, leading to service disruption.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: High (Application crash, service interruption, potential data loss if not handled gracefully)
  • Effort: Low to Medium (Depending on the crash method)
  • Skill Level: Low to Medium (Depending on the crash method)
  • Detection Difficulty: Low to Medium (Error logs, application restarts, crash reports)
  • Mitigation: Implement robust error handling, input validation, and regularly update string_decoder.

Attack Tree Path: 6. Trigger Unhandled Exception in Decoder (Critical Node & High-Risk Path) 🔥🐛 ❗

  • Goal: To send malformed or invalid encoded data that triggers an uncaught exception within the string_decoder, causing the application to crash.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: High (Application crash, service interruption)
  • Effort: Low
  • Skill Level: Low
  • Detection Difficulty: Low (Error logs, application restarts)
  • Mitigation: Implement robust error handling around string_decoder usage and validate input data before decoding.

Attack Tree Path: 7. Send Malformed/Invalid Encoded Data (Critical Node & High-Risk Path) 🔥🧪 ❗

  • Goal: To provide byte sequences that violate encoding rules, leading to parsing errors and uncaught exceptions within string_decoder, or incorrect decoding.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: High (Application crash or Data Integrity issues)
  • Effort: Low
  • Skill Level: Low
  • Detection Difficulty: Low (for crashes), High (for data corruption)
  • Mitigation: Implement strict input validation and sanitization to reject malformed data before it reaches string_decoder.

Attack Tree Path: 8. Achieve Data Manipulation/Integrity Issues (Critical Node) ⚠️ ❗

  • Goal: To alter or corrupt data processed by the application, leading to incorrect application logic or potential security bypasses.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: Medium (Data corruption, application logic errors, potential security bypasses)
  • Effort: Low to Medium
  • Skill Level: Low to Medium
  • Detection Difficulty: High (Silent data corruption, may be hard to detect without specific data integrity checks)
  • Mitigation: Implement strict input validation, encoding control, and data integrity checks.

Attack Tree Path: 9. Incorrect Decoding (Critical Node & High-Risk Path) 🔥🎭 ❗

  • Goal: To cause the string_decoder to produce incorrect string representations of the encoded data.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: Medium (Data corruption, application logic errors)
  • Effort: Low to Medium
  • Skill Level: Low to Medium
  • Detection Difficulty: High (Silent data corruption, may be hard to detect)
  • Mitigation: Enforce strict input validation, understand and control the expected encoding, and perform thorough testing with various encoded inputs.

Attack Tree Path: 10. Exploit Encoding Confusion (Critical Node & High-Risk Path) 🔥👾 ❗

  • Goal: To trick the application into using an incorrect encoding with string_decoder, leading to misinterpretation of the data.
  • Likelihood: Medium (If application relies on external encoding hints)
  • Impact: Medium (Data corruption, application logic errors, potential security bypasses)
  • Effort: Low
  • Skill Level: Low
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium-High (Depends on application logging and monitoring of encoding usage)
  • Mitigation: Explicitly define and control the encoding used with string_decoder and avoid relying on external, attacker-controlled encoding hints.

Attack Tree Path: 11. Trick Application into Using Wrong Encoding (Critical Node & High-Risk Path) 🔥🤹‍♂️ ❗

  • Goal: To manipulate external factors (e.g., headers, user input) that the application uses to determine the encoding, forcing string_decoder to use an incorrect encoding.
  • Likelihood: Medium (If application relies on external encoding hints)
  • Impact: Medium (Data corruption, application logic errors, potential security bypasses)
  • Effort: Low
  • Skill Level: Low
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium-High (Depends on application logging and monitoring of encoding usage)
  • Mitigation: Avoid relying on external factors for encoding detection. If external factors are used, validate and sanitize them rigorously.