Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
144 lines (125 loc) · 14.3 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

144 lines (125 loc) · 14.3 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for prettier/prettier

Mitigation Strategy: Dependency Pinning for Prettier

  • Description:
    1. Open your project's package.json file.
    2. Locate the "prettier" dependency under devDependencies or dependencies.
    3. Change the version specification from a range (e.g., ^2.x.x, ~2.x.x) to an exact version (e.g., 2.8.0). Remove any ^, ~, or * prefixes.
    4. Run your package manager's install command (e.g., npm install, yarn install, pnpm install) to update your lock file (package-lock.json, yarn.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml) with the pinned version.
    5. Commit both package.json and the lock file to your version control system (e.g., Git).
    6. Ensure your CI/CD pipeline uses the lock file during dependency installation to enforce the pinned version.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Supply Chain Vulnerabilities (High Severity) - Risk of automatically using a vulnerable version of Prettier if a new vulnerability is discovered in a later version within the allowed range.
    • Unexpected Breaking Changes (Medium Severity) - Risk of application build or runtime errors due to incompatible changes introduced in newer Prettier versions within the allowed range.
  • Impact:
    • Supply Chain Vulnerabilities: High - Significantly reduces the risk of automatically inheriting new vulnerabilities from Prettier updates.
    • Unexpected Breaking Changes: High - Eliminates the risk of automatic breaking changes from Prettier updates.
  • Currently Implemented: Yes, in package.json and package-lock.json for the main application.
  • Missing Implementation: Potentially missing in any separate tooling or scripts within the project that might install Prettier independently (e.g., documentation build scripts, standalone linters).

Mitigation Strategy: Integrity Checks for Prettier Package

  • Description:
    1. Regularly run security audit commands provided by your package manager (e.g., npm audit, yarn audit, pnpm audit) as part of your development workflow and CI/CD pipeline.
    2. Review the audit reports for identified vulnerabilities in Prettier and its dependencies.
    3. Prioritize and address reported vulnerabilities based on severity and exploitability.
    4. Update Prettier or its vulnerable dependencies to patched versions as recommended by the audit tool or security advisories.
    5. After updating, re-run audits to confirm the vulnerabilities are resolved.
    6. Document the vulnerability remediation steps taken.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Supply Chain Vulnerabilities (High Severity) - Risk of using Prettier or its dependencies with known security vulnerabilities that could be exploited.
  • Impact:
    • Supply Chain Vulnerabilities: High - Proactively identifies and allows for remediation of known vulnerabilities, significantly reducing the risk of exploitation.
  • Currently Implemented: Yes, npm audit is run manually by developers occasionally.
  • Missing Implementation: Automate npm audit in the CI/CD pipeline to run on every build. Integrate vulnerability reporting into the project's security monitoring dashboard.

Mitigation Strategy: Version Control for Prettier Configuration

  • Description:
    1. Ensure all Prettier configuration files (e.g., .prettierrc.json, .prettierrc.js, .prettier.config.js) are stored in your project's version control system (e.g., Git).
    2. Commit any changes to Prettier configuration files to version control.
    3. Utilize version control history to track changes, identify who made modifications, and when.
    4. Use branching and merging workflows for configuration changes, similar to code changes, to facilitate review and collaboration.
    5. Implement code review processes for changes to Prettier configuration files.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Configuration Tampering (Medium Severity) - Reduces the risk of accidental or malicious modifications to Prettier configuration going unnoticed.
    • Configuration Drift (Low Severity) - Prevents inconsistencies in Prettier configuration across different environments or developer setups.
  • Impact:
    • Configuration Tampering: Medium - Improves visibility and accountability for configuration changes, making tampering more difficult and detectable.
    • Configuration Drift: High - Ensures consistent configuration across the project by tracking and managing changes.
  • Currently Implemented: Yes, Prettier configuration files are in Git.
  • Missing Implementation: Formalize code review process specifically for Prettier configuration changes.

Mitigation Strategy: Code Review of Prettier Configuration Changes

  • Description:
    1. Establish a code review process for all changes to Prettier configuration files.
    2. Require that all modifications to .prettierrc.json, .prettierrc.js, or .prettier.config.js be reviewed by at least one other developer before being merged into the main branch.
    3. During code review, focus on understanding the intent of the configuration changes, ensuring they align with project coding style guidelines, and checking for any unintended consequences or weakening of code style consistency.
    4. Use code review tools and platforms to facilitate the review process.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Configuration Tampering (Medium Severity) - Makes it harder for malicious or accidental configuration changes to be introduced without scrutiny.
    • Unintended Configuration Changes (Medium Severity) - Reduces the risk of introducing configuration changes that negatively impact code style consistency or introduce unexpected formatting behavior.
  • Impact:
    • Configuration Tampering: Medium - Adds a layer of oversight to configuration changes, making unauthorized modifications less likely.
    • Unintended Configuration Changes: Medium - Helps catch and prevent unintended or poorly understood configuration changes.
  • Currently Implemented: Code reviews are generally practiced for code changes, but not explicitly enforced for Prettier configuration changes.
  • Missing Implementation: Explicitly include Prettier configuration files in the mandatory code review process. Train developers to specifically review Prettier configuration changes.

Mitigation Strategy: Centralized and Read-Only Prettier Configuration (where feasible)

  • Description:
    1. Establish a central repository or location for the project's canonical Prettier configuration file.
    2. Distribute this central configuration file to all developer environments and build systems. This could be done through a shared configuration package, a script that copies the configuration, or environment variables.
    3. Make the central configuration file read-only in developer environments and build systems to prevent accidental or unauthorized modifications.
    4. Control modifications to the central configuration file through a defined process, such as pull requests and approvals by designated team members.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Configuration Tampering (Medium Severity) - Reduces the risk of individual developers or build processes accidentally or maliciously modifying the Prettier configuration.
    • Configuration Drift (Medium Severity) - Minimizes configuration drift by enforcing a single source of truth for Prettier configuration.
  • Impact:
    • Configuration Tampering: Medium - Makes it significantly harder to tamper with the configuration locally or in build environments.
    • Configuration Drift: Medium - Enforces consistency by centralizing and controlling configuration changes.
  • Currently Implemented: No, Prettier configuration is currently managed within each project repository and is editable by developers.
  • Missing Implementation: Evaluate feasibility of centralizing Prettier configuration. If feasible, implement a mechanism for distributing and enforcing read-only central configuration.

Mitigation Strategy: Timeouts for Prettier Execution in CI/CD

  • Description:
    1. Configure your CI/CD pipeline steps that execute Prettier to have a reasonable timeout duration.
    2. Set the timeout value based on the expected formatting time for your codebase, with a small buffer for variations.
    3. If Prettier execution exceeds the timeout, the CI/CD pipeline step should fail and terminate the process.
    4. Monitor CI/CD pipeline execution times to identify potential issues with Prettier performance or unusually large formatting tasks.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Denial of Service (DoS) (Low Severity) - Prevents excessively long Prettier processes from blocking the CI/CD pipeline and delaying deployments.
  • Impact:
    • Denial of Service (DoS): Medium - Mitigates the impact of potential DoS by preventing pipeline blockage due to long-running Prettier processes.
  • Currently Implemented: Yes, CI/CD pipelines generally have default timeouts for steps, which would implicitly apply to Prettier execution.
  • Missing Implementation: Explicitly configure and fine-tune timeouts for Prettier execution steps in CI/CD to ensure they are appropriate and effective. Monitor timeout occurrences to identify potential issues.

Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Test Code Formatting Consistency

  • Description:
    1. Integrate automated checks into your CI/CD pipeline or development workflow to verify code formatting consistency.
    2. This can be done by running Prettier in a "check" mode (e.g., prettier --check .) that reports formatting inconsistencies without modifying files.
    3. Configure the check to fail if any formatting inconsistencies are detected.
    4. Run these checks regularly, ideally on every commit or pull request, to ensure consistent code formatting across the codebase.
    5. Investigate and address any reported formatting inconsistencies promptly.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Indirect Security Risks related to Code Style (Low Severity) - Detects unexpected Prettier behavior or configuration issues that could lead to subtle code style inconsistencies, which might indirectly obscure vulnerabilities or make code harder to review.
  • Impact:
    • Indirect Security Risks related to Code Style: Low - Reduces the risk of subtle code style issues that could indirectly impact security by ensuring consistent formatting and early detection of problems.
  • Currently Implemented: Yes, Prettier is run in "check" mode in the CI/CD pipeline to verify formatting.
  • Missing Implementation: Ensure the check is robust and covers all relevant code files. Improve reporting of formatting inconsistencies to developers for easier remediation.

Mitigation Strategy: Stay Updated with Prettier Release Notes and Bug Fixes

  • Description:
    1. Subscribe to Prettier's release notes, blog, or GitHub repository notifications to stay informed about new releases, bug fixes, and security advisories.
    2. Regularly review Prettier's release notes for any security-related updates or bug fixes that might be relevant to your project.
    3. Evaluate the impact of new releases and bug fixes on your project.
    4. Plan and schedule updates to Prettier versions in your project to incorporate security fixes and benefit from improvements.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Supply Chain Vulnerabilities (Medium Severity) - Enables timely patching of known vulnerabilities in Prettier by staying informed about security updates.
    • Bugs and Unexpected Behavior (Low Severity) - Reduces the risk of encountering bugs or unexpected behavior in Prettier by staying up-to-date with bug fixes.
  • Impact:
    • Supply Chain Vulnerabilities: Medium - Improves the ability to respond to and mitigate known vulnerabilities in Prettier.
    • Bugs and Unexpected Behavior: Low - Reduces the likelihood of encountering known bugs and improves stability.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially, developers generally become aware of updates through community channels, but no formal process is in place.
  • Missing Implementation: Establish a formal process for monitoring Prettier releases and security advisories. Assign responsibility for reviewing updates and planning upgrades.

Mitigation Strategy: Verify Prettier Package Name During Installation

  • Description:
    1. When adding Prettier as a dependency using your package manager (e.g., npm install prettier, yarn add prettier, pnpm add prettier), carefully double-check the package name being installed.
    2. Verify that the package name is exactly prettier and not a similar-sounding name that could be a typosquatting attempt.
    3. Confirm that the package source is the official package registry (e.g., npmjs.com, yarnpkg.com) and that the package details (author, repository link) match the official Prettier project.
    4. Be cautious of packages with slightly altered names or from unfamiliar sources.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Dependency Confusion/Typosquatting (Medium Severity) - Prevents accidental installation of malicious packages with names similar to Prettier, which could lead to supply chain attacks.
  • Impact:
    • Dependency Confusion/Typosquatting: High - Directly prevents the installation of typosquatting packages if vigilance is maintained during installation.
  • Currently Implemented: Developers are generally aware of typosquatting risks, but no formal verification step is in place.
  • Missing Implementation: Raise awareness among developers about typosquatting risks specifically related to dependencies. Consider adding automated checks or tooling to verify package names and sources during dependency installation processes.