Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
213 lines (155 loc) · 24.9 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

213 lines (155 loc) · 24.9 KB

Deep Security Analysis of Rocket.Chat Application

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

The objective of this deep security analysis is to thoroughly evaluate the security posture of Rocket.Chat, an open-source team communication platform, based on the provided security design review. This analysis will focus on identifying potential security vulnerabilities and risks associated with Rocket.Chat's architecture, components, and data flow. The goal is to provide actionable and tailored security recommendations to the development team to enhance the platform's security and mitigate identified threats.

Scope:

This analysis encompasses the following key components of Rocket.Chat, as outlined in the security design review documentation:

  • User Types: Internal Users, External Users, Administrators.
  • Rocket.Chat Server Components: Web Application, API Server, Realtime Server.
  • External System Integrations: LDAP/AD Server, Email Server, Push Notification Service, Database Server, Object Storage.
  • Deployment Architecture: Cloud-based deployment model including Load Balancer, Application Tier, and Data Tier.
  • Build Process: CI/CD pipeline, Version Control System, Artifact Repository.
  • Critical Business Processes and Data Sensitivity: Real-time communication, data storage, user authentication, system availability, and the sensitivity of chat messages, user credentials, user profiles, files, logs, and configuration data.

The analysis will be limited to the information provided in the security design review document and inferences drawn from the described architecture and components. It will not involve live testing or code review of the Rocket.Chat codebase itself, but will leverage publicly available information about Rocket.Chat and general security best practices for similar applications.

Methodology:

This deep security analysis will employ the following methodology:

  1. Architecture Decomposition: Analyze the C4 Context, Container, Deployment, and Build diagrams to understand the architecture, components, and data flow of Rocket.Chat.
  2. Threat Modeling: For each component and interaction, identify potential security threats and vulnerabilities based on common web application security risks, cloud deployment risks, and supply chain security risks.
  3. Security Control Mapping: Map existing and recommended security controls from the design review to the identified threats and vulnerabilities.
  4. Gap Analysis: Identify gaps in existing security controls and areas where recommended controls are not yet implemented or may be insufficient.
  5. Tailored Mitigation Strategies: Develop specific, actionable, and tailored mitigation strategies for each identified threat, focusing on Rocket.Chat's architecture and functionalities. These strategies will be aligned with the recommended security controls and aim to enhance the overall security posture of the platform.
  6. Prioritization: Implicitly prioritize recommendations based on the severity of the potential risks and the sensitivity of the data being protected, as outlined in the Risk Assessment section of the design review.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

This section breaks down the security implications of each key component of Rocket.Chat, based on the provided design review.

2.1. User Types (Internal User, External User, Administrator)

Security Implications:

  • Privilege Escalation: If access control is not properly implemented, internal or external users could potentially gain administrator privileges, leading to unauthorized access and system compromise.
  • Data Leakage: External users with overly permissive access could potentially access sensitive internal communication data.
  • Account Compromise: Compromised user accounts (especially administrator accounts) can lead to significant data breaches, service disruption, and reputational damage.
  • Social Engineering: All user types are susceptible to social engineering attacks (phishing, pretexting) to gain unauthorized access.

Threats:

  • Insider Threats: Malicious or negligent actions by internal users.
  • External Attacks: Attackers targeting user accounts through credential stuffing, brute-force attacks, or social engineering.
  • Authorization Bypass: Vulnerabilities in RBAC implementation allowing users to bypass intended access restrictions.

Mitigation Strategies:

  • Enforce Strong Password Policies: Implement and enforce strong password policies for all user types, including complexity requirements, password rotation, and preventing password reuse. (Requirement: Strong Password Policies)
  • Implement Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Mandate MFA for administrators and strongly recommend/offer it for all internal and external users. This significantly reduces the risk of account compromise even if passwords are leaked. (Recommended Control & Requirement: MFA)
  • Principle of Least Privilege: Strictly adhere to the principle of least privilege when assigning roles and permissions to all user types. Regularly review and refine RBAC policies. (Requirement: Principle of Least Privilege & RBAC)
  • Regular User Security Awareness Training: Conduct regular security awareness training for all user types, focusing on phishing, social engineering, and password security best practices. (Existing Control Mitigation for Accepted Risk: Social Engineering)
  • Session Management Security: Implement robust session management to prevent session hijacking. Use secure session tokens, HTTP-only and Secure flags for cookies, and session timeout mechanisms. (Requirement: Secure Session Management)
  • Account Monitoring and Anomaly Detection: Implement monitoring for suspicious login attempts, unusual access patterns, and potential account compromise indicators. Integrate with SIEM for centralized monitoring. (Recommended Control: SIEM)

2.2. Rocket.Chat Server Components (Web Application, API Server, Realtime Server)

Security Implications:

  • Web Application Vulnerabilities (WebApp): Susceptible to common web vulnerabilities like XSS, CSRF, injection flaws (if input validation is insufficient), and insecure session management.
  • API Server Vulnerabilities (APIServer): API endpoints can be vulnerable to injection attacks, broken authentication/authorization, data exposure, lack of rate limiting leading to DoS, and insecure API design.
  • Realtime Server Vulnerabilities (RealtimeServer): WebSocket vulnerabilities, DoS attacks targeting real-time connections, and potential for message injection or interception if not properly secured.
  • Inter-Component Communication Security: Insecure communication between WebApp, API Server, and Realtime Server could be exploited to bypass security controls or intercept data.

Threats:

  • Web Application Attacks: XSS, CSRF, Injection attacks (SQL, Command, etc.).
  • API Attacks: API abuse, broken authentication, data breaches via API endpoints.
  • Realtime Communication Attacks: WebSocket hijacking, DoS attacks, message interception.
  • Internal Network Exploitation: Attackers gaining access to one component and pivoting to others due to weak internal security.

Mitigation Strategies:

  • Comprehensive Input Validation and Sanitization: Implement robust input validation and sanitization on all layers (WebApp, API Server, Realtime Server) to prevent injection attacks. Use parameterized queries for database interactions. (Existing Control & Requirement: Input Validation)
  • Secure Coding Practices: Enforce secure coding practices throughout the development lifecycle, including code reviews, security training for developers, and using secure coding guidelines. (Requirement: Secure Coding Practices)
  • Regular SAST/DAST: Integrate Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) into the CI/CD pipeline to automatically identify vulnerabilities in code and running application. (Recommended Control: SAST/DAST)
  • Web Application Firewall (WAF): Implement a WAF in front of the Web Application and API Server to protect against common web attacks like XSS, SQL injection, and DDoS. Configure WAF rules tailored to Rocket.Chat's application logic. (Recommended Control: WAF)
  • Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a strict Content Security Policy (CSP) for the Web Application to mitigate XSS attacks by controlling the sources from which the browser is allowed to load resources. (WebApp Specific)
  • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting on API endpoints and Realtime Server connections to prevent brute-force attacks, DoS attacks, and API abuse. (APIServer & RealtimeServer Specific)
  • Secure WebSocket Communication (WSS): Ensure Realtime Server uses secure WebSocket communication (WSS) with TLS encryption to protect real-time message traffic. (RealtimeServer Specific)
  • Regular Penetration Testing and Vulnerability Assessments: Conduct regular penetration testing and vulnerability assessments by qualified security professionals to identify and remediate security weaknesses in all server components. (Recommended Control: Penetration Testing)
  • Secure Inter-Component Communication: If internal communication between components is not already secured (e.g., using TLS for internal HTTP requests), consider implementing mutual TLS or other mechanisms to authenticate and encrypt communication between WebApp, API Server, and Realtime Server.

2.3. External System Integrations (LDAP/AD, Email, Push Notification, Database, Object Storage)

Security Implications:

  • LDAP/AD Integration: Vulnerabilities in LDAP/AD integration can lead to authentication bypass, credential theft, and directory information disclosure. Insecure LDAP/AD configuration can expose Rocket.Chat to directory service vulnerabilities.
  • Email Server Integration: Insecure email server configuration or compromised email accounts can be used for phishing attacks, spam distribution, and unauthorized access to Rocket.Chat through password reset mechanisms.
  • Push Notification Service Integration: Compromised push notification service credentials or insecure API communication can lead to unauthorized push notifications, data leakage through notification content, and potential for phishing via notifications.
  • Database Server Security: Database vulnerabilities (SQL injection if not mitigated in API Server, weak access controls, unencrypted data at rest if not configured) can lead to massive data breaches, data manipulation, and service disruption.
  • Object Storage Security: Insecure object storage configuration (public buckets, weak access policies, lack of encryption at rest if not configured) can lead to unauthorized access to uploaded files, data leakage, and data integrity issues.

Threats:

  • Integration Vulnerabilities: Exploiting weaknesses in the integration points with external systems.
  • External System Compromise: Compromise of external systems (LDAP/AD, Email Server, Push Notification Service, Database, Object Storage) impacting Rocket.Chat security.
  • Data Breaches: Data leakage through insecure external system integrations or compromised external systems.

Mitigation Strategies:

  • Secure LDAP/AD Integration (LDAPS): Use LDAPS (LDAP over SSL/TLS) for secure communication with LDAP/AD servers. Implement strong access controls and follow LDAP/AD security best practices. (Existing Control: Secure Communication Protocols for LDAP)
  • Secure Email Server Configuration (SMTP Authentication, TLS): Configure SMTP authentication and enforce TLS encryption for email transmission. Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records to prevent email spoofing and phishing. (Existing Control: SMTP Authentication, TLS for Email)
  • Secure Push Notification API Communication (HTTPS): Ensure secure API communication (HTTPS) with the Push Notification Service. Securely manage API keys and credentials for the push notification service. (Existing Control: Secure API Communication for Push)
  • Database Security Hardening: Harden the Database Server by implementing strong access controls, enabling data encryption at rest, regularly patching the database system, and performing database security audits. (Existing Control: Data Encryption at Rest, Database Hardening)
  • Object Storage Security Hardening: Harden Object Storage by implementing strict access control policies (Principle of Least Privilege), enabling data encryption at rest, using secure API access methods, and regularly reviewing object storage configurations. (Existing Control: Data Encryption at Rest, Access Control for Object Storage)
  • Regular Security Audits of Integrations: Conduct regular security audits of all external system integrations to identify and remediate any misconfigurations or vulnerabilities.
  • Network Segmentation: Isolate Database and Object Storage instances in private subnets with restricted network access, as depicted in the Deployment Diagram. (Deployment Diagram Best Practice)
  • Monitor External System Integrations: Monitor logs and security events related to external system integrations for suspicious activity and potential security incidents. Integrate with SIEM. (Recommended Control: SIEM)

2.4. Deployment Architecture (Cloud-based Deployment)

Security Implications:

  • Cloud Infrastructure Vulnerabilities: Potential vulnerabilities in the underlying cloud infrastructure (AWS, Azure, GCP) or misconfigurations of cloud services.
  • Network Security Misconfigurations: Misconfigured Security Groups, NACLs, or firewalls can expose Rocket.Chat components to unauthorized access from the internet or within the cloud network.
  • Load Balancer Vulnerabilities: Load balancer misconfigurations or vulnerabilities can lead to service disruption, data leakage, or unauthorized access.
  • Instance Security: Unhardened operating systems or insecure configurations of Web Application, API Server, Realtime Server, Database, and Object Storage instances can be exploited.
  • Data in Transit Security: Insecure communication between components within the cloud environment (e.g., between Load Balancer and instances, between application tier and data tier) can lead to data interception.

Threats:

  • Cloud Infrastructure Attacks: Exploiting vulnerabilities in the cloud provider's infrastructure.
  • Network-Based Attacks: Network sniffing, man-in-the-middle attacks, unauthorized access due to network misconfigurations.
  • Instance Compromise: Compromising individual instances due to OS or application vulnerabilities.
  • Data Breaches: Data leakage due to insecure data in transit or data at rest within the cloud environment.

Mitigation Strategies:

  • Cloud Security Best Practices: Adhere to cloud security best practices for the chosen cloud provider (AWS, Azure, GCP). Utilize cloud provider's security services (e.g., AWS Security Hub, Azure Security Center, GCP Security Command Center).
  • Network Segmentation and Micro-segmentation: Implement network segmentation using Virtual Networks and Subnets as depicted in the Deployment Diagram. Consider further micro-segmentation within subnets using Security Groups and Network Policies to restrict traffic flow between instances based on the principle of least privilege. (Deployment Diagram Best Practice)
  • Load Balancer Security Hardening: Properly configure the Load Balancer with SSL/TLS termination, DDoS protection, and access logs. Regularly review and update Load Balancer configurations. (Existing Control: HTTPS Encryption, DDoS Protection for LB)
  • Instance Hardening: Harden operating systems of all instances (Web Application, API Server, Realtime Server, Database, Object Storage) by applying security patches, disabling unnecessary services, and following OS hardening guidelines.
  • Encryption in Transit (Internal Network): Ensure encryption in transit for all communication within the cloud environment, including communication between Load Balancer and instances, and between application tier and data tier. Use TLS for internal HTTP requests and other appropriate protocols.
  • Regular Security Audits of Cloud Configuration: Conduct regular security audits of the cloud environment configuration to identify and remediate misconfigurations and security weaknesses. Utilize cloud provider's configuration scanning tools.
  • Infrastructure as Code (IaC) Security: Implement Infrastructure as Code (IaC) for managing cloud infrastructure and integrate security checks into the IaC pipeline to prevent misconfigurations from being deployed.
  • Security Groups and NACLs Review: Regularly review and refine Security Groups and NACLs to ensure they are configured according to the principle of least privilege and effectively restrict network access. (Deployment Diagram Best Practice)

2.5. Build Process (CI/CD Pipeline)

Security Implications:

  • Compromised CI/CD Pipeline: A compromised CI/CD pipeline can be used to inject malicious code into the Rocket.Chat application, leading to widespread compromise of deployments.
  • Supply Chain Attacks: Vulnerabilities in third-party dependencies used during the build process can introduce vulnerabilities into the final application.
  • Insecure Artifact Repository: An insecure Artifact Repository can be exploited to tamper with build artifacts or distribute malicious versions of Rocket.Chat.
  • Developer Account Compromise: Compromised developer accounts can be used to push malicious code or tamper with the build process.
  • Secrets Management in CI/CD: Improper handling of secrets (API keys, credentials) within the CI/CD pipeline can lead to secrets leakage and unauthorized access.

Threats:

  • CI/CD Pipeline Attacks: Pipeline hijacking, malicious code injection, unauthorized access to pipeline secrets.
  • Supply Chain Vulnerabilities: Exploiting vulnerabilities in dependencies.
  • Artifact Repository Attacks: Tampering with artifacts, distributing malicious artifacts.
  • Developer Account Compromise: Using compromised developer accounts to attack the build process.

Mitigation Strategies:

  • Secure CI/CD Pipeline Configuration: Harden the CI/CD pipeline by implementing strong access controls, using dedicated service accounts with least privilege, and regularly auditing pipeline configurations.
  • Dependency Vulnerability Scanning: Implement dependency vulnerability scanning in the Build Stage of the CI/CD pipeline to identify and remediate vulnerable dependencies. Utilize tools like Snyk, OWASP Dependency-Check. (Existing Control Mitigation for Accepted Risk: Third-Party Dependencies)
  • SAST/DAST in CI/CD: Integrate Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) into the Security Scan Stage of the CI/CD pipeline to automatically identify vulnerabilities before deployment. (Recommended Control: SAST/DAST)
  • Secure Artifact Repository Access: Implement strong access controls for the Artifact Repository. Use role-based access control and multi-factor authentication for accessing the repository.
  • Artifact Integrity Checks: Implement artifact integrity checks (e.g., signing and verification) to ensure that deployed artifacts are not tampered with. (Build Diagram Best Practice)
  • Secrets Management Best Practices: Implement secure secrets management practices in the CI/CD pipeline. Use dedicated secrets management tools (e.g., HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager) to store and manage secrets securely. Avoid hardcoding secrets in code or pipeline configurations.
  • Developer Security Training: Provide security training to developers on secure coding practices, CI/CD pipeline security, and supply chain security.
  • Code Review Process: Implement a robust code review process to identify and prevent security vulnerabilities from being introduced into the codebase. (Build Diagram Best Practice)
  • Regular Pipeline Audits: Conduct regular security audits of the CI/CD pipeline to identify and remediate any security weaknesses.

3. Actionable and Tailored Mitigation Strategies

This section provides actionable and tailored mitigation strategies applicable to Rocket.Chat, based on the identified threats and security implications. These strategies are specific to Rocket.Chat's architecture and functionalities and build upon the existing and recommended security controls.

General Recommendations:

  • Prioritize Recommended Security Controls: Implement all recommended security controls from the design review, especially MFA, SIEM integration, Penetration Testing, WAF, SAST/DAST, and enhanced logging. These controls address significant security gaps and are crucial for strengthening Rocket.Chat's security posture.
  • Security Champions Program: Establish a security champions program within the development team to promote security awareness, advocate for secure coding practices, and act as a point of contact for security-related questions.
  • Threat Modeling Workshops: Conduct regular threat modeling workshops for new features and major updates to proactively identify potential security risks and design secure solutions.
  • Incident Response Plan: Develop and regularly test an incident response plan specifically tailored to Rocket.Chat. This plan should outline procedures for handling security incidents, data breaches, and service disruptions.
  • Compliance Readiness: If compliance requirements (GDPR, HIPAA, etc.) are applicable, conduct a thorough compliance assessment and implement necessary controls to meet these requirements. This may involve data privacy controls, audit logging, and data retention policies.

Specific Recommendations per Component:

  • User Types:

    • Action: Implement MFA enforcement for administrators immediately and plan for phased rollout to all users.
    • Action: Regularly review and refine RBAC roles and permissions based on user activity and business needs. Automate RBAC reviews where possible.
    • Action: Integrate user security awareness training into onboarding and conduct refresher training at least annually. Track training completion and effectiveness.

  • Rocket.Chat Server Components:

    • Action: Implement WAF in front of WebApp and API Server with rulesets specifically tuned for Rocket.Chat vulnerabilities (e.g., OWASP ModSecurity Core Rule Set with Rocket.Chat specific customizations).
    • Action: Integrate SAST/DAST tools into the CI/CD pipeline and configure them to automatically fail builds if critical vulnerabilities are detected.
    • Action: Implement robust rate limiting on API endpoints, especially authentication and message sending endpoints, to prevent brute-force and DoS attacks.
    • Action: Conduct a thorough security code review of critical components (authentication, authorization, input handling, message processing) focusing on common web vulnerabilities.

  • External System Integrations:

    • Action: Implement SIEM and integrate logs from all external systems (LDAP/AD, Email Server, Push Notification Service, Database, Object Storage) into the SIEM for centralized monitoring and correlation.
    • Action: Regularly audit access controls and configurations of Database and Object Storage instances to ensure least privilege and prevent unauthorized access.
    • Action: Implement automated checks to verify secure configurations of external systems (e.g., LDAPS enabled, TLS for email, database encryption at rest enabled).

  • Deployment Architecture:

    • Action: Implement Infrastructure as Code (IaC) for managing cloud infrastructure and integrate security scanning into the IaC pipeline (e.g., using tools like Checkov, Terrascan).
    • Action: Conduct regular penetration testing of the deployed Rocket.Chat environment, focusing on cloud infrastructure vulnerabilities, network security, and application-level weaknesses.
    • Action: Implement network micro-segmentation within private subnets to further restrict lateral movement in case of instance compromise.

  • Build Process:

    • Action: Implement a robust secrets management solution for the CI/CD pipeline and rotate secrets regularly.
    • Action: Enable branch protection rules in VCS to require code reviews and prevent direct pushes to main branches.
    • Action: Implement artifact signing and verification in the CI/CD pipeline to ensure artifact integrity and prevent tampering.

By implementing these tailored mitigation strategies, Rocket.Chat can significantly enhance its security posture, protect sensitive communication data, and build user trust in the platform's reliability and security. Continuous security monitoring, regular security assessments, and proactive vulnerability management are essential for maintaining a strong security posture over time.