Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
189 lines (160 loc) · 22.2 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

189 lines (160 loc) · 22.2 KB

Okay, let's perform the deep security analysis based on the provided design document.

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: To conduct a thorough security analysis of Rocket.Chat's key components, identify potential vulnerabilities, assess their impact, and propose actionable mitigation strategies. This analysis aims to improve the overall security posture of Rocket.Chat deployments, focusing on protecting user data, ensuring service availability, and maintaining compliance with relevant regulations. We will specifically focus on the core application logic, data flows, and interactions between components as described in the C4 diagrams and deployment model.

  • Scope: This analysis covers the following:

    • The core Rocket.Chat application (server-side and client-side).
    • The MongoDB database.
    • The Realtime Engine (WebSockets).
    • Authentication and authorization mechanisms.
    • Integration with external systems (Email, LDAP/AD, SAML, Push Notifications).
    • The Docker Compose deployment model.
    • The build process.
    • Data sensitivity and risk assessment.

    This analysis does not cover:

    • The security of specific third-party integrations (beyond general recommendations).
    • The underlying operating system security of the Docker host (assuming it is properly secured).
    • Physical security of the deployment environment.
    • Network-level security beyond the load balancer (assuming appropriate firewalls and DDoS protection are in place).

  • Methodology:

    1. Architecture Review: Analyze the C4 diagrams (Context, Container, Deployment, Build) and element descriptions to understand the system's architecture, components, and data flows.
    2. Threat Modeling: Identify potential threats based on the architecture, data sensitivity, and known vulnerabilities in similar applications. We will use a combination of STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) and attack trees to systematically identify threats.
    3. Vulnerability Analysis: Assess the likelihood and impact of each identified threat, considering existing security controls and potential weaknesses.
    4. Mitigation Recommendations: Propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies to address the identified vulnerabilities and improve the overall security posture.
    5. Codebase Inference: Since we don't have direct access to the codebase, we will infer potential vulnerabilities based on common patterns in Node.js/Meteor applications, MongoDB interactions, and WebSocket implementations. We will also leverage publicly available information about known Rocket.Chat vulnerabilities.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's break down the security implications of each key component, focusing on potential threats and vulnerabilities:

  • API Server (Node.js/Meteor):

    • Threats:

      • Authentication Bypass: Vulnerabilities in authentication logic could allow attackers to bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access. This could be due to flaws in password validation, session management, or integration with external authentication providers.
      • Authorization Bypass: Incorrectly implemented RBAC or flaws in permission checks could allow users to access resources or perform actions they are not authorized to.
      • Injection Attacks (XSS, NoSQL Injection): Insufficient input validation could allow attackers to inject malicious code (JavaScript for XSS, MongoDB queries for NoSQL injection) into the application. Meteor's use of MongoDB makes NoSQL injection a particular concern.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): The server could be vulnerable to DoS attacks that overwhelm it with requests, making it unavailable to legitimate users. This could be due to resource exhaustion, inefficient code, or lack of rate limiting.
      • Business Logic Flaws: Vulnerabilities in the application's business logic could allow attackers to manipulate the system in unintended ways, such as bypassing payment checks, altering user data, or gaining unfair advantages.
      • Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR): If object identifiers (e.g., user IDs, message IDs) are predictable and not properly validated, attackers could access or modify data belonging to other users.
      • Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF): If the server makes requests to other systems based on user input, attackers could craft malicious requests to access internal resources or external systems.
      • Exposure of Sensitive Information: Error messages, debug logs, or stack traces could inadvertently reveal sensitive information about the server's configuration or internal workings.
      • Outdated Dependencies: Using outdated or vulnerable versions of Node.js, Meteor, or other dependencies could expose the server to known vulnerabilities.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Strong Authentication: Implement robust password policies, secure session management (using HttpOnly and Secure cookies), and multi-factor authentication (MFA). Thoroughly validate all authentication flows, including those involving external providers (LDAP, SAML).
      • Strict Authorization: Enforce RBAC with fine-grained permissions. Implement the principle of least privilege. Regularly audit user roles and permissions.
      • Comprehensive Input Validation: Validate all user inputs on both the client-side and server-side. Use a whitelist approach whenever possible. Sanitize inputs to prevent XSS and NoSQL injection. Use parameterized queries for MongoDB interactions. Consider using a dedicated library for input validation and sanitization.
      • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting on API endpoints to prevent brute-force attacks and DoS. Use different rate limits for different endpoints based on their sensitivity and resource consumption.
      • Secure Coding Practices: Follow secure coding guidelines for Node.js and Meteor. Use a linter and static analysis tools to identify potential vulnerabilities. Conduct regular code reviews.
      • IDOR Prevention: Use indirect object references (e.g., UUIDs) instead of predictable IDs. Always validate that the authenticated user has permission to access the requested resource.
      • SSRF Prevention: Avoid making requests to external systems based on user input. If necessary, use a whitelist of allowed URLs and validate the user input against this whitelist.
      • Secure Error Handling: Avoid exposing sensitive information in error messages or logs. Use generic error messages for users and log detailed information securely for debugging purposes.
      • Dependency Management: Regularly update all dependencies to their latest secure versions. Use a tool like npm audit or Snyk to identify and track vulnerabilities in dependencies. Implement an SBOM management system.
      • Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS): Carefully review and test all regular expressions used in the application to ensure they are not vulnerable to ReDoS attacks. Avoid using overly complex or nested regular expressions.

  • Database (MongoDB):

    • Threats:

      • NoSQL Injection: As mentioned above, MongoDB is vulnerable to NoSQL injection if user inputs are not properly sanitized.
      • Unauthorized Access: Weak or default credentials, misconfigured access control, or network vulnerabilities could allow attackers to gain unauthorized access to the database.
      • Data Exfiltration: Attackers who gain access to the database could steal sensitive data, including messages, files, and user information.
      • Data Modification/Deletion: Attackers could modify or delete data in the database, causing data loss or corruption.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): The database could be targeted by DoS attacks that make it unavailable to the application.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Parameterized Queries: Use parameterized queries or a secure ORM to prevent NoSQL injection. Avoid constructing queries by concatenating user inputs.
      • Strong Authentication and Authorization: Use strong, unique passwords for the database user. Configure MongoDB to require authentication. Implement the principle of least privilege, granting only the necessary permissions to the application user.
      • Network Security: Restrict network access to the database. Only allow connections from the Rocket.Chat application server. Use a firewall to block unauthorized access.
      • Encryption at Rest: Enable encryption at rest for the database to protect data in case of physical theft or unauthorized access to the server.
      • Regular Backups: Implement a robust backup and recovery plan to protect against data loss. Store backups securely and test the recovery process regularly.
      • Auditing: Enable MongoDB auditing to track database activity and identify potential security incidents.
      • Update MongoDB: Keep MongoDB updated to the latest version to patch security vulnerabilities.
      • Connection String Security: Protect the MongoDB connection string. Do not hardcode it in the application code. Use environment variables or a secure configuration management system.

  • Realtime Engine (WebSockets):

    • Threats:

      • Unauthorized Access: If WebSocket connections are not properly authenticated, attackers could connect to the Realtime Engine and eavesdrop on conversations or inject malicious messages.
      • Cross-Site WebSocket Hijacking (CSWSH): Similar to CSRF, attackers could trick a user's browser into establishing a WebSocket connection to the server and sending malicious requests.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): The Realtime Engine could be overwhelmed with WebSocket connections, making it unavailable to legitimate users.
      • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks: If WebSocket connections are not secured with TLS, attackers could intercept and modify messages in transit.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Authentication and Authorization: Require authentication for all WebSocket connections. Use the same authentication mechanisms as the API server. Authorize users to access specific channels or resources.
      • Origin Validation: Validate the Origin header of WebSocket connections to prevent CSWSH attacks. Only allow connections from trusted origins.
      • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting on WebSocket connections and message frequency to prevent DoS attacks.
      • Secure WebSocket Communication (WSS): Use WSS (WebSocket Secure) to encrypt all WebSocket communication with TLS. This protects against MitM attacks.
      • Input Validation: Validate all messages received over WebSockets to prevent injection attacks.
      • Connection Management: Implement proper connection management to handle disconnections and reconnections gracefully.

  • Web App (Browser-based UI):

    • Threats:

      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): The most significant threat to the web app. Attackers could inject malicious JavaScript code into the application, allowing them to steal user cookies, redirect users to phishing sites, or deface the application.
      • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF): Attackers could trick a user's browser into making unintended requests to the server, such as changing their password or sending messages.
      • Clickjacking: Attackers could overlay the Rocket.Chat UI with an invisible iframe to trick users into clicking on malicious elements.
      • Open Redirects: If the application uses user-provided URLs for redirects, attackers could redirect users to malicious sites.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a strict CSP to control the resources that the browser is allowed to load. This is a crucial defense against XSS.
      • Input Validation and Output Encoding: Validate all user inputs on the client-side (in addition to server-side validation). Encode all user-supplied data before displaying it in the UI to prevent XSS. Use a templating engine that automatically escapes output.
      • CSRF Protection: Use CSRF tokens to protect against CSRF attacks. Ensure that all state-changing requests (e.g., POST, PUT, DELETE) require a valid CSRF token.
      • X-Frame-Options Header: Set the X-Frame-Options header to DENY or SAMEORIGIN to prevent clickjacking attacks.
      • Open Redirect Prevention: Avoid using user-provided URLs for redirects. If necessary, use a whitelist of allowed redirect URLs.
      • HttpOnly and Secure Flags: Set the HttpOnly and Secure flags on cookies to prevent them from being accessed by JavaScript and to ensure they are only transmitted over HTTPS.

  • Mobile App (iOS, Android) & Desktop App (Electron-based):

    • Threats: Similar to the Web App, plus:

      • Insecure Data Storage: Sensitive data (e.g., credentials, tokens, messages) could be stored insecurely on the device, making it vulnerable to theft or unauthorized access.
      • Code Injection (Electron): Electron applications are susceptible to code injection vulnerabilities if not properly secured.
      • Reverse Engineering: Attackers could reverse engineer the application to extract sensitive information or identify vulnerabilities.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Secure Data Storage: Use platform-specific secure storage mechanisms (e.g., Keychain on iOS, Keystore on Android) to store sensitive data.
      • Code Signing: Code sign the application to ensure its integrity and prevent tampering.
      • Obfuscation: Consider using code obfuscation techniques to make it more difficult to reverse engineer the application.
      • Electron Security Best Practices: Follow security best practices for Electron development, such as disabling Node.js integration in renderers, using context isolation, and validating all external resources.
      • Regular Updates: Keep the application and its dependencies updated to patch security vulnerabilities.

  • External Systems (Email, LDAP/AD, SAML, Push Notifications):

    • Threats:

      • Compromised Credentials: If the credentials used to connect to external systems are compromised, attackers could gain access to those systems.
      • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks: If communication with external systems is not secured with TLS, attackers could intercept and modify data in transit.
      • Vulnerabilities in External Systems: Vulnerabilities in the external systems themselves could be exploited by attackers.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Strong Credentials: Use strong, unique passwords for all external system accounts.
      • Secure Communication (TLS/SSL): Use TLS/SSL for all communication with external systems.
      • Regular Updates: Keep the external systems updated to patch security vulnerabilities.
      • Least Privilege: Grant only the necessary permissions to Rocket.Chat to access external systems.
      • Monitor External System Security: Stay informed about the security of the external systems you are using and take appropriate action if vulnerabilities are discovered.

  • Docker Compose Deployment:

    • Threats:

      • Container Escape: Vulnerabilities in the Docker engine or container configuration could allow attackers to escape the container and gain access to the host system.
      • Image Vulnerabilities: Using vulnerable base images or outdated application images could expose the deployment to known vulnerabilities.
      • Misconfigured Network: Incorrectly configured network settings could expose the containers to unauthorized access.
      • Insecure Secrets Management: Storing secrets (e.g., database credentials, API keys) insecurely in environment variables or Dockerfiles could expose them to attackers.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Use Minimal Base Images: Use minimal base images (e.g., Alpine Linux) to reduce the attack surface.
      • Regularly Update Images: Regularly update the base images and application images to patch security vulnerabilities. Use a container image scanner (e.g., Trivy, Clair) to identify vulnerabilities.
      • Secure Network Configuration: Use Docker networks to isolate containers from each other and from the host system. Only expose the necessary ports.
      • Secrets Management: Use a secure secrets management solution (e.g., Docker Secrets, HashiCorp Vault) to store and manage secrets. Do not store secrets in environment variables or Dockerfiles.
      • Docker Security Best Practices: Follow Docker security best practices, such as running containers as non-root users, using read-only file systems, and limiting container capabilities.
      • Resource Limits: Set resource limits (CPU, memory) on containers to prevent DoS attacks.

  • Build Process:

    • Threats:

      • Compromised Build Server: If the build server is compromised, attackers could inject malicious code into the application.
      • Dependency Vulnerabilities: Using vulnerable dependencies could introduce vulnerabilities into the application.
      • Insecure Artifact Storage: Storing build artifacts (e.g., Docker images) insecurely could allow attackers to access or modify them.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Secure Build Environment: Use a secure build environment (e.g., isolated CI runners). Restrict access to the build server.
      • Dependency Scanning: Use a dependency scanner (e.g., npm audit, Snyk) to identify and track vulnerabilities in dependencies.
      • SAST and DAST: Integrate SAST and DAST tools into the CI/CD pipeline to identify security vulnerabilities in the code.
      • Image Scanning: Scan Docker images for vulnerabilities before deploying them.
      • Secure Artifact Storage: Store build artifacts in a secure registry (e.g., Docker Hub, private registry) with access control.
      • Code Signing: Code sign the application (especially for desktop applications) to ensure its integrity.

3. Actionable Mitigation Strategies (Tailored to Rocket.Chat)

This section summarizes the most critical and actionable mitigation strategies, prioritized based on their impact and feasibility:

  • High Priority (Implement Immediately):

    • Implement a robust secrets management solution. This is crucial for protecting API keys, database credentials, and other sensitive information. HashiCorp Vault is a strong option.
    • Integrate SAST and DAST into the CI/CD pipeline. This will help identify vulnerabilities early in the development process. SonarQube (SAST) and OWASP ZAP (DAST) are good starting points.
    • Implement a comprehensive SBOM management system. This is essential for tracking and managing dependencies and identifying vulnerabilities. Tools like Syft or Dependency-Track can be used.
    • Enforce strict input validation and output encoding. This is the primary defense against XSS and NoSQL injection. Use a whitelist approach whenever possible. Consider using a dedicated library like validator.js for input validation and a templating engine with automatic escaping.
    • Implement rate limiting on all API endpoints and WebSocket connections. This will help prevent brute-force attacks and DoS. Use different rate limits based on the sensitivity and resource consumption of each endpoint.
    • Ensure all communication with external systems (Email, LDAP, SAML, Push Notifications) uses TLS/SSL. This protects against MitM attacks.
    • Regularly update all dependencies (npm packages, MongoDB, Docker images). This is crucial for patching known vulnerabilities. Use npm audit and a container image scanner.
    • Configure MongoDB with strong authentication, authorization, and network security. Restrict network access to the database and use strong, unique passwords. Enable encryption at rest.
    • Implement a strict Content Security Policy (CSP). This is a critical defense against XSS.
    • Use WSS (WebSocket Secure) for all WebSocket communication.

  • Medium Priority (Implement Soon):

    • Conduct regular penetration testing and vulnerability assessments. This should be performed by independent security experts.
    • Enhance data loss prevention (DLP) capabilities. This will help prevent sensitive data from leaving the platform. This could involve monitoring message content and file uploads for sensitive information.
    • Implement a robust backup and recovery plan. This is essential for protecting against data loss.
    • Enable MongoDB auditing. This will help track database activity and identify potential security incidents.
    • Review and improve the incident response plan. Ensure that the plan is up-to-date and that all relevant personnel are trained on their roles and responsibilities.
    • Provide security training to developers and administrators. This will help raise awareness of security best practices and reduce the likelihood of human error.

  • Low Priority (Consider for Future Implementation):

    • Implement code obfuscation for the mobile and desktop applications. This will make it more difficult to reverse engineer the applications.
    • Explore more advanced security features, such as hardware security modules (HSMs) for key management.

This deep analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the security considerations for Rocket.Chat. By implementing the recommended mitigation strategies, the development team can significantly improve the security posture of the application and protect user data from a wide range of threats. Remember that security is an ongoing process, and regular reviews and updates are essential to maintain a strong security posture.