Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
48 lines (41 loc) · 4.17 KB

File metadata and controls

48 lines (41 loc) · 4.17 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for semantic-org/semantic-ui

Description: Injection of malicious JavaScript code into the application through Semantic-UI components that handle user input or dynamically render content. How Semantic-UI Contributes: Semantic-UI components often accept user-supplied data or parameters that, if not handled correctly, can be exploited to inject scripts. The framework's built-in sanitization is not sufficient on its own. Example: A user enters <script>alert('XSS')</script> into a Semantic-UI input field, which is then displayed without proper escaping in a message or popup component. Or, a dropdown component renders options based on unsanitized data from an API. Impact: * Session hijacking. * Stealing sensitive user data. * Defacement. * Redirection to malicious sites. * Malware installation. Risk Severity: Critical Mitigation Strategies: * Server-Side Input Validation: Always validate and sanitize all user input on the server-side. This is the primary defense. * Output Encoding: Encode data appropriately when displaying it back to the user (HTML encoding, JavaScript encoding, etc.). * Client-Side Sanitization (Defense in Depth): Use DOMPurify or a similar library in addition to server-side measures. * Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a strict CSP to restrict script sources. Avoid unsafe-inline and be cautious with unsafe-eval. * Component-Specific Configuration: Carefully review Semantic-UI documentation for each component. Use text instead of html properties where appropriate. * Regular Updates: Keep Semantic-UI updated.

Description: Exploiting vulnerabilities or unexpected behaviors within specific Semantic-UI components due to bugs in the framework's code. How Semantic-UI Contributes: Semantic-UI, like any software, may contain undiscovered bugs in its component logic that could be exploited. Example: A hypothetical flaw in the modal component's event handling that allows bypassing security checks, or a vulnerability in the api module allowing unintended API calls. Impact: Varies depending on the flaw. Could range from minor issues to serious security breaches (e.g., bypassing authentication, unauthorized data access). Risk Severity: High Mitigation Strategies: * Regular Updates: Keep Semantic-UI updated to the latest version. This is the most crucial mitigation. * Monitor Security Advisories: Stay informed about security advisories and vulnerability reports. * Penetration Testing: Conduct regular penetration testing, focusing on Semantic-UI components. * Code Reviews: Perform thorough code reviews of application code interacting with Semantic-UI. * Static Analysis: Consider using static analysis tools to scan the Semantic-UI codebase.

Description: Using an outdated version of the framework that contains known vulnerabilities. How Semantic-UI Contributes: Older versions may have unpatched security flaws that have been addressed in later releases. Example: Using a version of Semantic-UI with a known XSS vulnerability in the dropdown component that has been fixed in a subsequent release. Impact: Exposes the application to known vulnerabilities, potentially leading to XSS, DoS, or other exploits. Risk Severity: High (depending on the vulnerabilities present) Mitigation Strategies: * Regular Updates: Keep Semantic-UI updated to the latest stable version. Implement a process for regularly checking for and applying updates. * Dependency Management: Use a package manager (npm, yarn) to manage Semantic-UI and other dependencies. * Vulnerability Scanning: Use vulnerability scanning tools to identify outdated dependencies and known vulnerabilities.