Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
90 lines (75 loc) · 8.13 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

90 lines (75 loc) · 8.13 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for socketio/socket.io

Attack Surface: Denial of Service (DoS) during Connection Establishment

  • Description: Attackers flood the Socket.IO server with connection requests, overwhelming resources and causing service disruption.
  • Socket.IO Contribution: Socket.IO manages persistent connections, making it a target for connection-based DoS attacks. The handshake process can be resource-intensive if not properly managed.
  • Example: A botnet sends a massive number of connection requests to the Socket.IO server, exhausting server resources and preventing legitimate users from connecting.
  • Impact: Service unavailability, degraded performance for legitimate users.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement connection rate limiting at the application or infrastructure level.
    • Set connection limits per client IP address.
    • Optimize the handshake process to minimize resource consumption.
    • Utilize DDoS protection services.

Attack Surface: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Message Broadcasting

  • Description: Malicious users inject scripts into messages sent via Socket.IO, which are then broadcasted to other connected clients and executed in their browsers.
  • Socket.IO Contribution: Socket.IO's real-time broadcasting functionality can propagate XSS payloads to multiple users simultaneously if messages are not properly sanitized.
  • Example: A user sends a chat message containing <script>alert('XSS')</script>. The server broadcasts this message, and when other clients receive it, the script executes in their browsers.
  • Impact: Client-side code execution, session hijacking, defacement, data theft, redirection to malicious sites.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Server-Side Input Sanitization: Sanitize and validate all user input on the server before broadcasting messages.
    • Client-Side Output Encoding: Encode data received from Socket.IO events before displaying it in the client-side DOM.
    • Implement Content Security Policy (CSP).

Attack Surface: Injection Vulnerabilities in Message Handlers (Server-Side)

  • Description: Server-side code processing Socket.IO messages is vulnerable to injection attacks (e.g., command injection, SQL injection, NoSQL injection) if user-provided data is not properly validated and sanitized.
  • Socket.IO Contribution: Socket.IO events trigger server-side handlers that process data received from clients. If these handlers are not securely coded, they can become injection points.
  • Example: A Socket.IO event handler constructs a database query using unsanitized data from a message, leading to SQL injection when a malicious message is sent.
  • Impact: Data breach, unauthorized data modification, server compromise, remote code execution (in severe cases like command injection).
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Input Validation and Sanitization: Thoroughly validate and sanitize all user input received via Socket.IO messages on the server-side.
    • Parameterized Queries/Prepared Statements: Use parameterized queries or prepared statements when interacting with databases.
    • Principle of Least Privilege: Grant the application minimal necessary permissions.
    • Avoid constructing system commands directly from user input.

Attack Surface: Authorization and Authentication Bypass in Socket.IO Events

  • Description: Lack of proper authentication and authorization checks for Socket.IO events allows attackers to bypass access controls and perform unauthorized actions.
  • Socket.IO Contribution: Socket.IO applications rely on developers to implement authorization logic for events. Weak or missing authorization checks can be exploited.
  • Example: An attacker calls a Socket.IO event intended for administrators without proper authentication, gaining access to administrative functionalities.
  • Impact: Unauthorized access to features and data, privilege escalation, data manipulation, disruption of application functionality.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement Authentication: Authenticate users connecting via Socket.IO.
    • Implement Authorization: Enforce authorization checks for all sensitive Socket.IO events.
    • Use role-based access control (RBAC) or attribute-based access control (ABAC).
    • Validate user roles and permissions on the server-side for each Socket.IO event.

Attack Surface: Vulnerabilities in Socket.IO Library and Dependencies

  • Description: Known security vulnerabilities in the Socket.IO library itself or its dependencies (e.g., engine.io) can be exploited by attackers.
  • Socket.IO Contribution: Using Socket.IO introduces a dependency on the library and its ecosystem, which may contain vulnerabilities.
  • Example: A publicly disclosed CVE in a specific version of Socket.IO allows remote code execution. An attacker exploits this vulnerability to compromise the server.
  • Impact: Server compromise, remote code execution, data breach, denial of service, depending on the nature of the vulnerability.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Keep Socket.IO Updated: Regularly update Socket.IO and its dependencies.
    • Monitor Security Advisories: Subscribe to security advisories and vulnerability databases.
    • Vulnerability Scanning: Use automated vulnerability scanning tools.
    • Implement a robust dependency management process.

Attack Surface: Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks during Handshake (if not using TLS/HTTPS)

  • Description: If Socket.IO communication is not encrypted using HTTPS/WSS, attackers can intercept and potentially manipulate the initial handshake and subsequent data exchange.
  • Socket.IO Contribution: Socket.IO can be configured to run over HTTP or HTTPS. If HTTP is used, it becomes vulnerable to MitM attacks.
  • Example: An attacker on the network intercepts the Socket.IO handshake, eavesdrops on messages, or injects malicious data into the communication stream.
  • Impact: Eavesdropping, data interception, data manipulation, session hijacking, injection of malicious content.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Always Use HTTPS/WSS: Configure Socket.IO to use HTTPS and WSS in production.
    • Enforce TLS/SSL: Ensure that TLS/SSL is properly configured.
    • Educate users to only connect over secure networks (HTTPS).

Attack Surface: Client-Side XSS Vulnerabilities in Socket.IO Event Handlers

  • Description: Client-side JavaScript code that handles Socket.IO events might be vulnerable to XSS if it improperly handles data received from the server.
  • Socket.IO Contribution: Client-side event handlers process data pushed from the server via Socket.IO. If this data is rendered into the DOM without proper encoding, it can lead to XSS.
  • Example: Client-side JavaScript directly uses innerHTML to display a message received from a Socket.IO event, without encoding HTML entities.
  • Impact: Client-side code execution, session hijacking, defacement, data theft, redirection to malicious sites.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Client-Side Output Encoding: Encode data received from Socket.IO events before rendering it in the client-side DOM.
    • Avoid innerHTML with User Data: Avoid using innerHTML to render user-provided data directly.
    • Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement CSP.