Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
261 lines (221 loc) · 18.1 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

261 lines (221 loc) · 18.1 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for socketio/socket.io

Objective: Compromise Application using Socket.IO Vulnerabilities

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Application via Socket.IO [CRITICAL NODE] ├───(OR)─ Exploit Socket.IO Protocol/Implementation Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] │ └───(OR)─ Exploit Known Socket.IO Vulnerabilities (CVEs) [CRITICAL NODE] │ └───(AND)─ Successfully Exploit CVE (e.g., Remote Code Execution, DoS) [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH] ├───(OR)─ Denial of Service (DoS) via Socket.IO [CRITICAL NODE] │ └───(AND)─ Send Malformed or Excessive Socket.IO Messages [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ └───(AND)─ Overload Server Resources (CPU, Memory, Network) [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ └───(AND)─ Cause Server Crash or Unresponsiveness [HIGH-RISK PATH] ├───(OR)─ Exploit Misconfiguration or Insecure Deployment of Socket.IO [CRITICAL NODE] │ └───(OR)─ Lack of Rate Limiting or Input Validation on Socket.IO Events [CRITICAL NODE] │ ├───(AND)─ Send Excessive Requests via Socket.IO Events [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ └───(AND)─ Cause DoS or Application Logic Abuse [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ └───(AND)─ Send Malicious Payloads in Socket.IO Events [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ └───(AND)─ Exploit Input Validation Vulnerabilities in Application Logic [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH] └───(OR)─ Exploit Application Logic Vulnerabilities via Socket.IO [CRITICAL NODE] └───(OR)─ Injection Attacks via Socket.IO Events [CRITICAL NODE] └───(AND)─ Send Malicious Code in Socket.IO Event Data [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH] └───(AND)─ Application Logic Executes Untrusted Data (e.g., Command Injection, SQL Injection, XSS if reflected to other clients) [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

Attack Tree Path: 1. Compromise Application via Socket.IO [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: This is the root goal, representing the attacker successfully compromising the application by exploiting vulnerabilities related to Socket.IO.
  • Risk Metrics:
    • Likelihood: Varies depending on specific vulnerabilities present.
    • Impact: Critical - Full application compromise.
    • Effort: Varies depending on the attack path.
    • Skill Level: Varies depending on the attack path.
    • Detection Difficulty: Varies depending on the attack path.
  • Mitigation Strategies: Implement all recommended security measures across all attack vectors to minimize the overall risk of application compromise.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Exploit Socket.IO Protocol/Implementation Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Attackers target inherent weaknesses or bugs within the Socket.IO library itself.
  • Risk Metrics:
    • Likelihood: Medium (if outdated Socket.IO is used).
    • Impact: Critical - Can lead to RCE, DoS, Information Disclosure.
    • Effort: Medium to High (depending on vulnerability).
    • Skill Level: Medium to Expert (depending on vulnerability).
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium to High (depending on vulnerability).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Keep Socket.IO Updated: Regularly update to the latest version to patch known vulnerabilities.
    • Vulnerability Scanning: Implement vulnerability scanning to detect known CVEs in used Socket.IO versions.

Attack Tree Path: 3. Exploit Known Socket.IO Vulnerabilities (CVEs) [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Attackers exploit publicly disclosed vulnerabilities (CVEs) in specific Socket.IO versions.
  • Risk Metrics:
    • Likelihood: Medium (if vulnerable version is used).
    • Impact: Critical - RCE, DoS, Information Disclosure.
    • Effort: Medium.
    • Skill Level: Medium.
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Patch Management: Strict patch management process to apply security updates promptly.
    • Version Control: Maintain an inventory of used software components, including Socket.IO versions.

Attack Tree Path: 4. Successfully Exploit CVE (e.g., Remote Code Execution, DoS) [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: The successful exploitation of a known CVE in Socket.IO, leading to severe consequences like Remote Code Execution or Denial of Service.
  • Risk Metrics:
    • Likelihood: Medium (if vulnerable version and exploitable CVE exist).
    • Impact: Critical - RCE allows full system control; DoS disrupts service.
    • Effort: Medium.
    • Skill Level: Medium.
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Immediate Patching: Prioritize patching CVEs with high severity ratings and known exploits.
    • Intrusion Detection/Prevention Systems (IDS/IPS): Deploy IDS/IPS to detect and potentially block exploitation attempts.

Attack Tree Path: 5. Denial of Service (DoS) via Socket.IO [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Attackers aim to disrupt the application's availability by overwhelming the server with Socket.IO related attacks.
  • Risk Metrics:
    • Likelihood: High.
    • Impact: Medium - Service disruption, potential financial loss.
    • Effort: Low.
    • Skill Level: Low.
    • Detection Difficulty: Low.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting on Socket.IO connections and events to prevent excessive requests.
    • Resource Monitoring: Monitor server resources (CPU, memory, network) to detect DoS attacks early.
    • Input Validation: Validate and sanitize Socket.IO messages to prevent malformed message-based DoS.

Attack Tree Path: 6. Send Malformed or Excessive Socket.IO Messages [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: Attackers send a large volume of messages or messages crafted to be malformed, aiming to overload server resources and cause a DoS.
  • Risk Metrics:
    • Likelihood: High.
    • Impact: Medium - Service disruption.
    • Effort: Low.
    • Skill Level: Low.
    • Detection Difficulty: Low.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Input Validation: Validate the format and content of incoming Socket.IO messages.
    • Message Queuing: Implement message queues to buffer and process messages, preventing server overload.
    • Connection Limits: Limit the number of concurrent Socket.IO connections from a single IP address.

Attack Tree Path: 7. Overload Server Resources (CPU, Memory, Network) [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: The consequence of sending excessive or malformed messages, leading to resource exhaustion on the server.
  • Risk Metrics:
    • Likelihood: High (if no rate limiting or input validation).
    • Impact: Medium - Service degradation or outage.
    • Effort: Low.
    • Skill Level: Low.
    • Detection Difficulty: Low.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Resource Optimization: Optimize server-side code and infrastructure to handle expected load and spikes.
    • Load Balancing: Distribute Socket.IO traffic across multiple servers to prevent single server overload.

Attack Tree Path: 8. Cause Server Crash or Unresponsiveness [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: The ultimate outcome of a successful DoS attack, resulting in server crash or unresponsiveness, making the application unavailable.
  • Risk Metrics:
    • Likelihood: Medium (if DoS attack is successful).
    • Impact: Medium - Service outage.
    • Effort: Low (to initiate DoS).
    • Skill Level: Low (to initiate DoS).
    • Detection Difficulty: Low (outage is easily noticeable).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Redundancy and Failover: Implement redundant server infrastructure and failover mechanisms to ensure service continuity during DoS attacks.
    • DoS Mitigation Services: Consider using cloud-based DoS mitigation services to filter malicious traffic.

Attack Tree Path: 9. Exploit Misconfiguration or Insecure Deployment of Socket.IO [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Attackers exploit vulnerabilities arising from improper setup or deployment of Socket.IO.
  • Risk Metrics:
    • Likelihood: Medium (depending on deployment practices).
    • Impact: Medium to High (depending on misconfiguration).
    • Effort: Low to Medium.
    • Skill Level: Low to Medium.
    • Detection Difficulty: Low to Medium.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Secure Configuration Review: Regularly review Socket.IO and WebSocket configurations against security best practices.
    • Security Hardening Guides: Follow security hardening guides for Socket.IO and related infrastructure.

Attack Tree Path: 10. Lack of Rate Limiting or Input Validation on Socket.IO Events [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: A common misconfiguration where applications fail to implement rate limiting and input validation for data received via Socket.IO events.
  • Risk Metrics:
    • Likelihood: High.
    • Impact: High - DoS, Application Logic Abuse, Injection Attacks.
    • Effort: Low.
    • Skill Level: Low.
    • Detection Difficulty: Low.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement Rate Limiting: Apply rate limits to Socket.IO events to prevent abuse.
    • Strict Input Validation: Validate and sanitize all data received via Socket.IO events on the server-side.

Attack Tree Path: 11. Send Excessive Requests via Socket.IO Events [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: Attackers send a large number of requests through Socket.IO events, exploiting the lack of rate limiting to cause DoS or abuse application logic.
  • Risk Metrics:
    • Likelihood: High (if no rate limiting).
    • Impact: Medium - DoS, Application Logic Abuse.
    • Effort: Low.
    • Skill Level: Low.
    • Detection Difficulty: Low.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Rate Limiting (Event Level): Implement rate limiting specifically for Socket.IO events.
    • Anomaly Detection: Monitor event frequency and patterns to detect unusual activity.

Attack Tree Path: 12. Cause DoS or Application Logic Abuse [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: The outcome of sending excessive requests, leading to service disruption (DoS) or unintended behavior due to application logic being overwhelmed or manipulated.
  • Risk Metrics:
    • Likelihood: High (if excessive requests are successful).
    • Impact: Medium - Service disruption, potential data corruption or logic errors.
    • Effort: Low.
    • Skill Level: Low.
    • Detection Difficulty: Low.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Application Logic Review: Review application logic handling Socket.IO events to ensure resilience against abuse and unexpected input.
    • Error Handling: Implement robust error handling to gracefully manage excessive requests and prevent cascading failures.

Attack Tree Path: 13. Send Malicious Payloads in Socket.IO Events [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: Attackers embed malicious payloads within data sent through Socket.IO events, aiming to exploit input validation vulnerabilities in the application logic.
  • Risk Metrics:
    • Likelihood: High (if no input validation).
    • Impact: High - Injection Attacks (Command Injection, SQL Injection, XSS).
    • Effort: Low.
    • Skill Level: Low.
    • Detection Difficulty: Low.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strict Input Validation (Event Data): Thoroughly validate and sanitize all data received in Socket.IO events before processing it in application logic.
    • Principle of Least Privilege: Run application processes with minimal necessary privileges to limit the impact of successful injection attacks.

Attack Tree Path: 14. Exploit Input Validation Vulnerabilities in Application Logic [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: The successful exploitation of missing or weak input validation in the application logic that processes Socket.IO event data, leading to injection vulnerabilities.
  • Risk Metrics:
    • Likelihood: High (if input validation is weak or missing).
    • Impact: High - Injection Attacks (Command Injection, SQL Injection, XSS).
    • Effort: Low.
    • Skill Level: Low.
    • Detection Difficulty: Low.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Secure Coding Practices: Train developers on secure coding practices, emphasizing input validation and output encoding.
    • Security Code Reviews: Conduct regular security code reviews to identify and fix input validation vulnerabilities.
    • Web Application Firewalls (WAF): Deploy WAF to detect and block common injection attack patterns.

Attack Tree Path: 15. Exploit Application Logic Vulnerabilities via Socket.IO [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Attackers target weaknesses in the application's code that interacts with Socket.IO, even if Socket.IO itself is secure.
  • Risk Metrics:
    • Likelihood: Medium to High (depending on application complexity and security practices).
    • Impact: Medium to Critical (depending on vulnerability).
    • Effort: Low to Medium.
    • Skill Level: Low to Medium.
    • Detection Difficulty: Low to Medium.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Secure Design Principles: Design application logic with security in mind, following principles like least privilege and separation of concerns.
    • Thorough Testing: Conduct comprehensive functional and security testing of application logic interacting with Socket.IO.

Attack Tree Path: 16. Injection Attacks via Socket.IO Events [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: A category of attacks where malicious code or commands are injected into the application through Socket.IO events, exploiting vulnerabilities in how the application processes this data.
  • Risk Metrics:
    • Likelihood: Medium to High (if input validation is weak).
    • Impact: High - Command Injection, SQL Injection, XSS (if reflected).
    • Effort: Low.
    • Skill Level: Low.
    • Detection Difficulty: Low.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Output Encoding: Encode output data properly to prevent XSS vulnerabilities if data is reflected to other clients.
    • Parameterized Queries/Prepared Statements: Use parameterized queries or prepared statements to prevent SQL Injection.
    • Sandboxing/Isolation: If possible, sandbox or isolate processes that handle Socket.IO events to limit the impact of command injection.

Attack Tree Path: 17. Send Malicious Code in Socket.IO Event Data [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: Attackers specifically craft Socket.IO event data to contain malicious code (e.g., shell commands, SQL queries, JavaScript) intended to be executed by the application.
  • Risk Metrics:
    • Likelihood: Medium (if application is vulnerable to injection).
    • Impact: High - Command Injection, SQL Injection, XSS.
    • Effort: Low.
    • Skill Level: Low.
    • Detection Difficulty: Low.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement CSP to mitigate XSS risks if Socket.IO interactions involve rendering dynamic content in the browser.
    • Regular Security Audits: Conduct regular security audits to identify potential injection points in application logic.

Attack Tree Path: 18. Application Logic Executes Untrusted Data (e.g., Command Injection, SQL Injection, XSS if reflected to other clients) [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: The consequence of successful injection attacks, where the application logic processes and executes the malicious code injected via Socket.IO events, leading to various forms of compromise.
  • Risk Metrics:
    • Likelihood: Medium (if injection attack is successful).
    • Impact: High - Full system compromise (Command Injection), Data Breach (SQL Injection), Client-side compromise (XSS).
    • Effort: Low (if injection point exists).
    • Skill Level: Low (if injection point exists).
    • Detection Difficulty: Low to Medium (depending on the type of injection and logging).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Logging and Monitoring: Implement comprehensive logging and monitoring to detect suspicious activity and injection attempts.
    • Incident Response Plan: Have a well-defined incident response plan to handle security breaches effectively.