Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
89 lines (74 loc) · 9.14 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

89 lines (74 loc) · 9.14 KB

Threat Model Analysis for socketio/socket.io

Threat: WebSocket Hijacking

  • Threat: WebSocket Hijacking
  • Description: An attacker intercepts or compromises the WebSocket connection handshake or subsequent communication. They might use network sniffing or session stealing to gain control of the communication channel. Once hijacked, the attacker can eavesdrop on messages and send malicious messages impersonating the legitimate user.
  • Impact: Loss of confidentiality and integrity of real-time communication. Account takeover, unauthorized access to data, and potential for malicious actions performed as the hijacked user.
  • Affected Socket.IO Component: WebSocket transport, Connection handshake process.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Enforce HTTPS/WSS for all Socket.IO connections to encrypt communication.
    • Implement strong session management and authentication mechanisms.
    • Regularly update Socket.IO and dependencies to patch vulnerabilities.
    • Monitor for unusual connection activity.

Threat: Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks on Unencrypted Connections

  • Threat: Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks on Unencrypted Connections
  • Description: If Socket.IO communication is not encrypted (using ws:// instead of wss://), an attacker positioned on the network path between the client and server can intercept all communication. They can read, modify, or inject messages in transit without either party being aware.
  • Impact: Complete loss of confidentiality and integrity of real-time data. Sensitive information exposure, data manipulation, and potential for malicious data injection.
  • Affected Socket.IO Component: WebSocket transport (when using ws://), all fallback transports when unencrypted.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Mandatory use of HTTPS/WSS: Always use wss:// for Socket.IO connections in production environments.
    • Disable unencrypted transport options if possible.
    • Educate developers about the critical importance of secure communication protocols.

Threat: Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities

  • Threat: Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities
  • Description: An attacker sends excessively large messages via Socket.IO that exceed the allocated buffer size in the server or client application's message handling related to Socket.IO. If message size handling within Socket.IO or the application's interaction with Socket.IO is not robust, this can lead to buffer overflows, potentially causing crashes, memory corruption, or even code execution. This could be due to vulnerabilities in Socket.IO library itself or in how the application processes messages received through Socket.IO.
  • Impact: Denial of Service (DoS), application crashes, potential for Remote Code Execution (RCE) in memory corruption scenarios.
  • Affected Socket.IO Component: Message processing logic within Socket.IO library or application code interacting with Socket.IO's message handling.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Message Size Limits: Implement and enforce limits on the size of messages that can be received and processed by Socket.IO applications.
    • Safe Memory Management: Use programming languages and libraries with robust memory management and protection against buffer overflows.
    • Regular security testing, including fuzzing, to identify potential buffer overflow vulnerabilities in Socket.IO integration and message handling.

Threat: Authentication Bypass in Socket.IO Connections

  • Threat: Authentication Bypass in Socket.IO Connections
  • Description: An attacker attempts to connect to the Socket.IO server without proper authentication or by bypassing weak authentication mechanisms specifically implemented for Socket.IO connections. This could involve exploiting vulnerabilities in the authentication implementation during the Socket.IO handshake.
  • Impact: Unauthorized access to real-time features and data. Potential for malicious actions performed under a false or unauthenticated identity within the real-time application.
  • Affected Socket.IO Component: Connection handshake, authentication middleware or logic in application code specifically for Socket.IO connections.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement robust authentication specifically for Socket.IO connections, integrated with existing application authentication.
    • Authenticate users during the Socket.IO connection handshake.
    • Regularly review and test authentication logic for vulnerabilities specific to Socket.IO integration.
    • Use strong and unique credentials and avoid default settings in Socket.IO authentication setup.

Threat: Session Fixation/Hijacking in Real-time Sessions

  • Threat: Session Fixation/Hijacking in Real-time Sessions
  • Description: An attacker attempts to steal or fixate a Socket.IO session ID to impersonate a legitimate user in real-time interactions. Session fixation involves forcing a user to use a known session ID, while session hijacking involves stealing an active session ID used for Socket.IO communication. This can compromise the real-time session context.
  • Impact: Account takeover within the real-time application, unauthorized access to real-time data and functionality, potential for malicious actions performed as the compromised user in real-time.
  • Affected Socket.IO Component: Session management logic in application code specifically for Socket.IO connections, potentially related to session ID generation, storage, and validation within the real-time context.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Use secure session management practices specifically for Socket.IO connections, including strong session IDs and secure storage.
    • Rotate session IDs periodically for Socket.IO sessions.
    • Implement HTTP-only and Secure flags for session cookies if cookies are used for Socket.IO session management.
    • Monitor for suspicious session activity within the real-time application and implement session invalidation mechanisms.

Threat: Real-time XSS via Socket.IO Messages

  • Threat: Real-time XSS via Socket.IO Messages
  • Description: An attacker injects malicious scripts into messages sent via Socket.IO. If the application renders this message data in the user interface in real-time without proper output encoding, the scripts will be executed in the browsers of other connected users immediately. This is particularly dangerous in real-time applications as the XSS can propagate rapidly and affect multiple users concurrently.
  • Impact: Client-side code execution in real-time, session hijacking, defacement of real-time UI, redirection to malicious sites, information theft affecting users interacting in real-time.
  • Affected Socket.IO Component: Client-side application code rendering data received via Socket.IO messages in real-time, potentially UI frameworks or libraries used for real-time rendering.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Output Encoding: Always properly encode all data received via Socket.IO messages before rendering it in the UI in real-time. Use context-appropriate encoding (HTML, JavaScript, etc.).
    • Implement Content Security Policy (CSP) to mitigate the impact of real-time XSS attacks.
    • Regular security audits and penetration testing focusing on real-time data rendering and XSS vulnerabilities in Socket.IO context.

Threat: Known CVEs in Socket.IO Library

  • Threat: Known CVEs in Socket.IO Library
  • Description: Using outdated or vulnerable versions of the Socket.IO library exposes the application to publicly known Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) that are specific to Socket.IO. Attackers can exploit these known vulnerabilities in the Socket.IO library itself to compromise the application.
  • Impact: Varies depending on the specific CVE, ranging from Denial of Service to Remote Code Execution and data breaches, directly related to vulnerabilities within the Socket.IO library.
  • Affected Socket.IO Component: Socket.IO library itself, specific modules or functions within vulnerable versions of Socket.IO.
  • Risk Severity: Varies (can be Critical or High depending on the CVE)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Regularly Update Socket.IO: Keep Socket.IO and its dependencies updated to the latest stable versions to patch known vulnerabilities in the library.
    • Use vulnerability scanning tools to specifically identify known CVEs in the Socket.IO library and its dependencies.
    • Subscribe to security advisories and mailing lists related to Socket.IO to stay informed about new vulnerabilities and security updates for the library.