Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
58 lines (49 loc) · 5.56 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

58 lines (49 loc) · 5.56 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for standardnotes/app

Attack Surface: Cryptographic Implementation Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Flaws in the implementation of encryption and decryption algorithms within the application's codebase.
  • App Contribution: Standard Notes heavily relies on client-side end-to-end encryption as a core security feature. The application's design and code directly implement this cryptography.
  • Example: A bug in the JavaScript code handling AES-256 encryption allows an attacker to recover the plaintext of notes given the ciphertext and encryption key.
  • Impact: Complete compromise of user data confidentiality. Attackers can decrypt and read user notes, defeating the primary security feature of the application.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers:
      • Rigorous code reviews of cryptographic implementations by security experts.
      • Use of well-vetted and audited cryptographic libraries instead of custom implementations where possible.
      • Thorough testing of encryption and decryption processes, including fuzzing and penetration testing.
      • Regular security audits focusing on cryptographic aspects.

Attack Surface: Malicious Extensions/Plugins

  • Description: Users can install extensions that are not vetted or are intentionally malicious, designed to compromise the application or user data.
  • App Contribution: Standard Notes' extension system, a feature of the application itself, allows for significant customization and feature expansion, but inherently introduces the risk of malicious extensions. The app's architecture directly enables extensions.
  • Example: A user installs a seemingly useful extension that, in the background, exfiltrates decrypted notes to a remote server controlled by the attacker.
  • Impact: Data theft, account compromise, injection of malicious scripts into notes, denial of service, and potentially broader system compromise depending on extension permissions.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers:
      • Implement a robust extension API with strict permission controls and sandboxing to limit extension capabilities.
      • Establish a process for reviewing and vetting extensions before they are made available in an official marketplace (if applicable).
      • Provide clear warnings to users about the risks of installing third-party extensions.
      • Implement Content Security Policy (CSP) to limit the actions extensions can take within the application context.

Attack Surface: Synchronization Protocol Flaws

  • Description: Vulnerabilities in the protocol used to synchronize encrypted notes between client applications and the server.
  • App Contribution: Synchronization is a core functionality of Standard Notes, and the application defines and implements this protocol. A flawed protocol can expose data during transit or allow for manipulation of synchronized data.
  • Example: A man-in-the-middle attacker intercepts the synchronization traffic and exploits a vulnerability in the protocol to inject malicious data or steal session tokens, gaining access to the user's account and notes.
  • Impact: Data interception, data manipulation, account takeover, denial of service, and potential compromise of encryption keys if key exchange is part of the synchronization process.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers:
      • Use secure transport protocols (HTTPS/TLS) for all synchronization communication.
      • Design a robust and well-audited synchronization protocol, considering potential attack vectors like replay attacks, injection attacks, and man-in-the-middle attacks.
      • Implement proper authentication and authorization mechanisms for synchronization requests.
      • Regularly review and test the synchronization protocol for security vulnerabilities.

Attack Surface: Key Management Issues (Client-Side)

  • Description: Weaknesses in how encryption keys are generated, stored, and managed on the client-side application.
  • App Contribution: Secure key management is paramount for end-to-end encryption, and the Standard Notes application is directly responsible for implementing client-side key management.
  • Example: Encryption keys are stored in plaintext in browser local storage, allowing an attacker with local access to the user's machine or through a client-side vulnerability (like XSS) to steal the keys and decrypt all notes.
  • Impact: Complete compromise of user data confidentiality. Attackers can access encryption keys and decrypt all notes, even if the cryptographic algorithms themselves are strong.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers:
      • Use secure key derivation functions (KDFs) to generate encryption keys from user passwords.
      • Employ secure storage mechanisms provided by the operating system or browser (e.g., Keychain, Credential Manager) to protect encryption keys.
      • Avoid storing encryption keys in easily accessible locations like local storage or cookies without proper encryption and protection.
      • Implement measures to protect against key extraction through memory dumping or other techniques.