Mitigation Strategy: {@html ...} Sanitization with DOMPurify
1. Mitigation Strategy: {@html ...}
Sanitization with DOMPurify
-
Description:
- Identify all instances of
{@html ...}
: Search the entire codebase (components,.svelte
files) for the{@html ...}
directive. Document each location. This is crucial because{@html ...}
is the primary Svelte-specific vector for XSS. - Install DOMPurify: Add
DOMPurify
as a project dependency:npm install dompurify
oryarn add dompurify
. - Import DOMPurify: In each component using
{@html ...}
, import the library:import DOMPurify from 'dompurify';
- Sanitize Input: Before rendering any content with
{@html ...}
, pass the untrusted HTML string throughDOMPurify.sanitize()
. Example:let unsafeHTML = ...; // From user input, API, etc. let safeHTML = DOMPurify.sanitize(unsafeHTML, { ALLOWED_TAGS: ['b', 'i', 'em', 'strong', 'a'], // Example: Allow only these tags ALLOWED_ATTR: ['href'] // Example: Allow only 'href' attribute for <a> tags });
- Crucially, configure
ALLOWED_TAGS
andALLOWED_ATTR
as restrictively as possible. Only allow the absolute minimum necessary tags and attributes. A whitelist approach is essential.
- Crucially, configure
- Replace
{@html unsafeHTML}
with{@html safeHTML}
: Use the sanitized output in the template. - Regularly Update DOMPurify: Keep the
dompurify
package updated to the latest version. - Test Thoroughly: Test with various inputs, including malicious ones.
- Identify all instances of
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): (Severity: Critical) - This is the primary threat.
{@html ...}
without sanitization is a direct XSS vulnerability. - HTML Injection: (Severity: High) - Prevents injection of unwanted HTML elements.
- Malware Distribution (via XSS): (Severity: Critical) - Indirectly mitigates this by preventing the XSS vector.
- Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): (Severity: Critical) - This is the primary threat.
-
Impact:
- XSS: Risk reduction: Very High (Effectively eliminates XSS risk *from
{@html ...}
if implemented correctly). - HTML Injection: Risk reduction: High
- Malware Distribution: Risk reduction: High
- XSS: Risk reduction: Very High (Effectively eliminates XSS risk *from
-
Currently Implemented:
/src/components/Comment.svelte
: Implemented with a basicALLOWED_TAGS
configuration./src/components/BlogPost.svelte
: Partially implemented; sanitizes blog post content but not author bio.
-
Missing Implementation:
/src/components/UserProfile.svelte
: Uses{@html ...}
to render user-provided "About Me" section without any sanitization. Critical vulnerability./src/components/ForumPost.svelte
: Missing sanitization for user-generated forum posts. Critical vulnerability.- No global configuration for DOMPurify; inconsistencies are possible.
Mitigation Strategy: Component-Level Input Validation and Sanitization (Focus on bind:
and props)
2. Mitigation Strategy: Component-Level Input Validation and Sanitization (Focus on bind:
and props)
-
Description:
- Identify Input Points: Within each Svelte component, identify all
props
and variables used with thebind:
directive. These are the entry points for external data. - Define Validation Rules: For each prop and bound variable, define strict validation rules. Consider data type, format, length, and allowed values.
- Implement Validation: Within the component, before using the prop or bound variable, validate it. Use a validation library or custom functions. Handle validation errors appropriately (display messages, prevent further action).
- Sanitize (Context-Specific): If the input, even after validation, might be used in a sensitive context (e.g., within
{@html ...}
, as part of a URL, etc.), sanitize it appropriately. This is crucial if the data will be rendered as HTML. - Test Thoroughly: Test with valid, invalid, and edge-case inputs.
- Identify Input Points: Within each Svelte component, identify all
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): (Severity: High) - Reduces XSS risk by validating and sanitizing data before it's used in potentially vulnerable Svelte constructs (especially
{@html ...}
, but also potentially in attributes or other template expressions). - Data Corruption: (Severity: Medium) - Prevents invalid data from being processed by the component.
- Injection Attacks (Indirectly): (Severity: Medium to High) - While not directly Svelte-specific, proper input handling within components is a crucial part of preventing various injection attacks.
- Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): (Severity: High) - Reduces XSS risk by validating and sanitizing data before it's used in potentially vulnerable Svelte constructs (especially
-
Impact:
- XSS: Risk reduction: Medium to High (Provides defense-in-depth; essential when combined with
{@html ...}
sanitization). - Data Corruption: Risk reduction: High
- Injection Attacks: Risk reduction: Medium to High (Depends on broader application context).
- XSS: Risk reduction: Medium to High (Provides defense-in-depth; essential when combined with
-
Currently Implemented:
/src/components/LoginForm.svelte
: Basic validation for email and password (checks for emptiness and basic format)./src/components/SearchInput.svelte
: Escapes special characters before sending to server (not directly a Svelte issue, but good practice).
-
Missing Implementation:
/src/components/CommentForm.svelte
: No validation or sanitization of the comment text, which is likely bound usingbind:value
. High vulnerability./src/components/BlogPostEditor.svelte
: Limited validation; relies on a rich-text editor but doesn't validate the underlying HTML that might be used with{@html ...}
later. Medium vulnerability.- No consistent validation approach across components.
Mitigation Strategy: Careful Use of bind:
(Two-Way Binding)
3. Mitigation Strategy: Careful Use of bind:
(Two-Way Binding)
-
Description:
- Identify all
bind:
usages: Search your Svelte components for all instances of thebind:
directive. - Assess Risk: For each
bind:
usage, determine where the bound data ultimately ends up. Is it used in{@html ...}
? Is it sent to the server? Is it used in other potentially sensitive contexts? - Validate and Sanitize: Implement validation and, if necessary, sanitization before the bound data is used in any risky way. This might involve:
- Using a reactive statement (
$: ...
) to validate/sanitize the bound variable whenever it changes. - Using event handlers (e.g.,
on:input
) to perform validation/sanitization as the user types. - Validating/sanitizing the data before sending it to the server or using it in
{@html ...}
.
- Using a reactive statement (
- Consider Alternatives: If the
bind:
directive is used with a complex or untrusted data source, consider if an alternative approach (e.g., using one-way binding and explicit event handlers) would be more secure.
- Identify all
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): (Severity: High) - If the bound data is eventually used in
{@html ...}
,bind:
without proper handling creates an XSS vulnerability. - Data Tampering: (Severity: Medium) - Ensures that the data bound to the component is valid and safe.
- Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): (Severity: High) - If the bound data is eventually used in
-
Impact:
- XSS: Risk reduction: Medium to High (Crucial if the bound data is used with
{@html ...}
). - Data Tampering: Risk reduction: Medium
- XSS: Risk reduction: Medium to High (Crucial if the bound data is used with
-
Currently Implemented:
/src/components/LoginForm.svelte
: Usesbind:value
for email and password, with basic validation.
-
Missing Implementation:
/src/components/CommentForm.svelte
: Usesbind:value
for the comment text area without any validation or sanitization. High vulnerability (especially if comments are later rendered with{@html ...}
)./src/components/UserProfile.svelte
: Potentially usesbind:
for editable profile fields, without clear validation/sanitization.
Mitigation Strategy: Avoid Unnecessary {@html ...}
4. Mitigation Strategy: Avoid Unnecessary {@html ...}
-
Description:
- Review all
{@html ...}
usages: Examine each instance of{@html ...}
in your codebase. - Question Necessity: For each instance, ask: "Is
{@html ...}
absolutely necessary here? Can I achieve the same result using Svelte's built-in templating features (components, loops, conditionals, text interpolation)?" - Refactor if Possible: If
{@html ...}
is not strictly necessary, refactor the code to use safer alternatives. This is the most effective mitigation strategy. - Document Rationale: If
{@html ...}
is deemed necessary, document the reason clearly in a code comment. Explain why safer alternatives were not possible. This helps with future code reviews and maintenance.
- Review all
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): (Severity: Critical) - Eliminating
{@html ...}
eliminates the primary Svelte-specific XSS vector. - HTML Injection: (Severity: High)
- Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): (Severity: Critical) - Eliminating
-
Impact:
- XSS: Risk reduction: Very High (Potentially eliminates the risk entirely in the refactored areas).
- HTML Injection: Risk reduction: Very High
-
Currently Implemented:
- No formal review of
{@html ...}
usage has been conducted.
- No formal review of
-
Missing Implementation:
- A project-wide review and refactoring effort is needed to minimize
{@html ...}
usage. This should be a high priority.
- A project-wide review and refactoring effort is needed to minimize