Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
217 lines (171 loc) · 134 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

217 lines (171 loc) · 134 KB

Okay, let's perform a deep security analysis of the Ghost blogging platform based on the provided design review and the GitHub repository.

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: To conduct a thorough security analysis of the Ghost blogging platform's key components, identifying potential vulnerabilities, assessing their impact, and recommending mitigation strategies. This analysis aims to provide actionable insights for improving the overall security posture of Ghost, both for self-hosted instances and, where applicable, for Ghost(Pro). The focus is on architectural and design-level vulnerabilities, rather than specific code-level bugs (which would require a full code audit).

  • Scope: The analysis will cover the following key components, as identified in the design review and inferred from the Ghost codebase and documentation:

    • Admin API (Node.js): The core API for managing the Ghost instance.
    • Content API (Node.js): The API for serving public content.
    • Frontend (Ember.js): The client-side application for the admin interface.
    • Rendering Engine (Node.js): The component responsible for generating HTML pages.
    • Email Worker (Node.js): The component for sending transactional emails.
    • Storage Adapter (Node.js): The component for handling file storage.
    • Ghost Database (SQLite/MySQL): The database used to store Ghost's data.
    • Authentication and Authorization Mechanisms: The systems for user login, session management, and role-based access control.
    • Data Flow: The movement of data between these components.
    • Deployment (Docker): The security implications of the chosen Docker-based deployment model.
    • Build Process: The security controls within the build pipeline.

  • Methodology:

    1. Architecture Review: Analyze the provided C4 diagrams and design documentation to understand the system's architecture, components, and data flow.
    2. Threat Modeling: Identify potential threats based on the identified components, data flows, and business risks. We'll use a combination of STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) and attack trees to systematically identify threats.
    3. Vulnerability Analysis: Assess the likelihood and impact of each identified threat, considering existing security controls and potential weaknesses.
    4. Mitigation Recommendations: Propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies to address the identified vulnerabilities. These recommendations will be tailored to the Ghost platform and its architecture.
    5. Codebase Examination (Limited): While a full code audit is out of scope, we will perform targeted examination of the Ghost codebase (available on GitHub) to validate assumptions and identify specific implementation details relevant to the security analysis.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's break down the security implications of each key component:

  • Admin API (Node.js)

    • Threats:

      • Authentication Bypass: Exploiting vulnerabilities in the authentication logic to gain unauthorized access to the admin API.
      • Authorization Bypass (Privilege Escalation): Exploiting vulnerabilities in the authorization logic to perform actions beyond the user's permitted role.
      • SQL Injection: If input validation is flawed, attackers could inject malicious SQL code to access or modify data in the database.
      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): If input validation and output encoding are flawed, attackers could inject malicious JavaScript code to be executed in the context of other users' browsers.
      • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF): Attackers could trick authenticated users into performing unintended actions on the admin API.
      • Remote Code Execution (RCE): Vulnerabilities in dependencies or custom code could allow attackers to execute arbitrary code on the server.
      • Session Hijacking: Stealing or manipulating session tokens to impersonate legitimate users.
      • Brute-Force Attacks: Repeated login attempts to guess user passwords.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): Overwhelming the API with requests, making it unavailable to legitimate users.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Strong Authentication: Enforce strong password policies, implement 2FA (as recommended), and use secure password hashing algorithms (bcrypt). Regularly review and update authentication libraries.
      • Robust Authorization: Strictly enforce RBAC, ensuring that users can only access resources and perform actions permitted by their roles. Follow the principle of least privilege.
      • Input Validation and Sanitization: Implement rigorous input validation and sanitization for all API endpoints, using a whitelist approach whenever possible. Validate data types, lengths, and formats.
      • Output Encoding: Properly encode output to prevent XSS vulnerabilities. Use context-aware encoding techniques.
      • CSRF Protection: Implement and verify CSRF protection mechanisms (e.g., using synchronizer tokens).
      • Dependency Management: Regularly update dependencies to patch known vulnerabilities. Use tools like npm audit or Snyk to identify vulnerable packages. Consider using a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) to track dependencies.
      • Secure Session Management: Use strong, randomly generated session IDs, set appropriate session timeouts, and use HTTPS to protect session cookies. Invalidate sessions on logout.
      • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting on login attempts and other sensitive API endpoints to mitigate brute-force attacks and DoS attempts.
      • Security Headers: Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
      • Regular Security Audits: Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to identify and address vulnerabilities.

  • Content API (Node.js)

    • Threats:

      • Information Disclosure: Leaking sensitive information through API responses (e.g., unpublished content, user details).
      • Denial of Service (DoS): Overwhelming the API with requests, making content unavailable to readers.
      • Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards: Exploiting redirects to send users to malicious websites.
      • Data Tampering: Modifying content served through the API (less likely, as this API is primarily read-only).

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Access Control: Ensure that only publicly accessible content is served through the Content API. Implement proper authorization checks.
      • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting to prevent DoS attacks.
      • Input Validation: Validate any parameters used in API requests (e.g., pagination parameters).
      • Secure Redirects: Validate redirect URLs to prevent open redirect vulnerabilities.
      • Caching: Implement caching mechanisms to improve performance and reduce the load on the API.

  • Frontend (Ember.js)

    • Threats:

      • XSS (Reflected and DOM-based): Vulnerabilities in the Ember.js code could allow attackers to inject malicious JavaScript.
      • Client-Side Logic Manipulation: Attackers could manipulate the client-side code to bypass security controls or perform unauthorized actions.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Secure Coding Practices: Follow secure coding practices for Ember.js development, including proper use of templates and data binding.
      • Input Validation (Client-Side): While client-side validation is not a primary security control, it can improve user experience and provide some defense-in-depth.
      • Content Security Policy (CSP): Use a strict CSP to limit the sources from which the frontend can load resources, mitigating XSS risks.
      • Regular Updates: Keep the Ember.js framework and dependencies up-to-date.
      • Minimize Client-Side Logic: Avoid performing sensitive operations or storing sensitive data on the client-side.

  • Rendering Engine (Node.js)

    • Threats:

      • Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI): If user input is improperly handled in templates, attackers could inject malicious code to be executed on the server.
      • XSS (Stored): If user-submitted content is not properly sanitized before being rendered, attackers could inject malicious JavaScript that would be executed when other users view the content.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Template Security: Use a secure templating engine (like Handlebars, which Ghost uses) and follow its security guidelines. Avoid concatenating user input directly into templates.
      • Context-Aware Output Encoding: Use context-aware output encoding to prevent XSS vulnerabilities. Encode data appropriately for the context in which it will be displayed (e.g., HTML, JavaScript, CSS).
      • Input Validation and Sanitization: Sanitize all user-submitted content before storing it in the database and rendering it in templates. Use a whitelist approach whenever possible.
      • CSP: Use a CSP to limit the sources from which the rendered pages can load resources.

  • Email Worker (Node.js)

    • Threats:

      • Email Injection: Attackers could inject malicious content into emails (e.g., headers, body) to send spam or phishing emails.
      • Credential Exposure: If email service credentials are not securely stored, they could be compromised.
      • Dependency Vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities in email libraries could be exploited.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Input Validation: Validate all data used in emails, including recipient addresses, subject lines, and body content.
      • Secure Credential Storage: Store email service credentials securely (e.g., using environment variables or a secrets management system). Do not hardcode credentials in the codebase.
      • Dependency Management: Regularly update email libraries to patch known vulnerabilities.
      • Use a Reputable Email Service: Use a reputable email service (like Mailgun, SendGrid, or AWS SES) that provides security features like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC.

  • Storage Adapter (Node.js)

    • Threats:

      • Path Traversal: Attackers could manipulate file paths to access or modify files outside the intended directory.
      • Unrestricted File Upload: Attackers could upload malicious files (e.g., web shells) to the server.
      • Data Leakage: If files are not properly protected, they could be accessed by unauthorized users.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Path Validation: Strictly validate file paths to prevent path traversal vulnerabilities. Use a whitelist approach to allow only specific file extensions and directories.
      • File Upload Restrictions: Implement strict file upload restrictions, including:
        • File Type Validation: Validate the file type based on its content, not just its extension.
        • File Size Limits: Enforce maximum file size limits.
        • File Name Sanitization: Sanitize file names to prevent malicious characters or patterns.
        • Store Uploaded Files Outside the Web Root: Store uploaded files in a directory that is not directly accessible from the web.
      • Access Control: Implement proper access control for stored files, ensuring that only authorized users can access them. Use appropriate file system permissions.
      • Secure Communication: If using external storage (e.g., S3), use HTTPS for all communication.
      • Regular Scanning: Regularly scan stored files for malware.

  • Ghost Database (SQLite/MySQL)

    • Threats:

      • SQL Injection: Attackers could inject malicious SQL code to access or modify data in the database.
      • Unauthorized Access: If database credentials are not securely stored, attackers could gain direct access to the database.
      • Data Breach: Attackers could steal sensitive data from the database.
      • Denial of Service: Attackers could flood the database with requests.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Prepared Statements: Use prepared statements (parameterized queries) to prevent SQL injection vulnerabilities. Avoid dynamic SQL construction.
      • Strong Passwords: Use strong, unique passwords for database user accounts.
      • Principle of Least Privilege: Grant database users only the minimum necessary privileges.
      • Database Firewall: Use a database firewall to restrict access to the database server.
      • Encryption at Rest: Encrypt the database files to protect data at rest.
      • Regular Backups: Perform regular backups of the database and store them securely.
      • Monitoring and Auditing: Monitor database activity for suspicious behavior and enable audit logging.
      • Database Hardening: Follow database hardening best practices (e.g., disabling unnecessary features, configuring secure settings).

  • Authentication and Authorization Mechanisms

    • Threats: (Covered in detail under Admin API)

    • Mitigation Strategies: (Covered in detail under Admin API)

  • Data Flow

    • Threats:

      • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks: If communication between components is not encrypted, attackers could intercept and modify data.
      • Data Leakage: Sensitive data could be leaked if it is not properly protected during transit.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • HTTPS: Enforce HTTPS for all communication between the client and server, and between internal components (if applicable).
      • Secure Internal Communication: If components communicate over a network, use secure protocols (e.g., TLS) to encrypt the communication.

  • Deployment (Docker)

    • Threats:

      • Vulnerable Base Images: Using outdated or vulnerable base images for the Docker containers could introduce security flaws.
      • Container Escape: Vulnerabilities in the Docker engine or container configuration could allow attackers to escape the container and gain access to the host system.
      • Insecure Network Configuration: Exposing unnecessary ports or using insecure network settings could increase the attack surface.
      • Lack of Resource Limits: Not setting resource limits (CPU, memory) for containers could allow a compromised container to consume excessive resources and cause a denial-of-service.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Use Minimal Base Images: Use minimal, well-maintained base images (e.g., Alpine Linux) to reduce the attack surface.
      • Regularly Update Images: Regularly update base images and rebuild Ghost containers to patch vulnerabilities.
      • Container Security Scanning: Use container security scanning tools (e.g., Trivy, Clair) to identify vulnerabilities in Docker images.
      • Docker Security Best Practices: Follow Docker security best practices, including:
        • Run Containers as Non-Root Users: Avoid running containers as the root user.
        • Use Read-Only File Systems: Mount the container's file system as read-only whenever possible.
        • Limit Container Capabilities: Use Docker capabilities to restrict the privileges of containers.
        • Set Resource Limits: Set resource limits (CPU, memory) for containers.
        • Use a Secure Docker Registry: Use a private Docker registry with authentication and access control.
        • Network Segmentation: Use Docker networks to isolate containers and restrict communication.
      • Host Security: Secure the Docker host operating system by applying security updates, configuring a firewall, and using strong passwords.

  • Build Process

    • Threats:

      • Compromised Dependencies: Attackers could compromise a third-party dependency used by Ghost, introducing vulnerabilities into the build process.
      • Insecure Build Environment: Vulnerabilities in the build environment (e.g., GitHub Actions) could be exploited.
      • Code Injection: Attackers could inject malicious code into the codebase during the build process.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Dependency Management: Use npm audit or similar tools to identify and address vulnerable dependencies. Consider using a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM).
      • SAST: Integrate Static Application Security Testing (SAST) tools into the build pipeline to scan the codebase for vulnerabilities.
      • SCA: Integrate Software Composition Analysis (SCA) tools to identify vulnerabilities in open-source components.
      • Code Signing: Consider code signing to verify the integrity of the built artifacts.
      • Secure Build Environment: Use a secure build environment (e.g., GitHub Actions with appropriate security settings).
      • Regular Audits: Regularly audit the build process and its security controls.

3. Actionable Mitigation Strategies (Summary and Prioritization)

The following table summarizes the key mitigation strategies, prioritized based on their impact and feasibility:

| Priority | Mitigation Strategy | Component(s) Affected | Description

4. Specific Recommendations for Ghost

Based on the analysis, here are specific, actionable recommendations tailored to the Ghost platform:

  • Implement Robust Input Validation and Output Encoding:

    • Admin API: Utilize a dedicated validation library like express-validator to define validation rules for all incoming data. Ensure that these rules are applied to every relevant route handler. For example, when creating or updating a post, validate the title, slug, content, tags, and any other user-provided fields. Use a whitelist approach where possible (e.g., only allow specific HTML tags in the content).
    • Content API: Validate any query parameters used for filtering or pagination.
    • Rendering Engine: Leverage Handlebars' built-in escaping mechanisms ({{escapeExpression}} or triple braces {{{ }}} for raw HTML) to prevent XSS. Ensure that user-provided data is always properly escaped based on the context (HTML, attributes, JavaScript, etc.). Consider using a dedicated HTML sanitizer library (like DOMPurify on the server-side) to further sanitize user-provided HTML content before storing it in the database. This is crucial for preventing stored XSS.
    • Storage Adapter: Implement strict file type validation using a library like file-type to determine the MIME type based on the file content, not just the extension. Reject uploads that don't match expected types (e.g., images should be image/jpeg, image/png, image/gif, etc.). Sanitize filenames to remove potentially dangerous characters. Store uploaded files outside the webroot and serve them through a dedicated route that performs access control checks.
    • Email Worker: Sanitize all input used in email templates and headers. Use a library like validator to validate email addresses.

  • Strengthen Authentication and Authorization:

    • Two-Factor Authentication (2FA): Implement 2FA, especially for administrator accounts. Consider using TOTP (Time-Based One-Time Password) as a 2FA method. This is a high-priority item.
    • Password Reset Security: Implement secure password reset mechanisms. Use time-limited, single-use tokens. Send password reset links via email and avoid displaying sensitive information in the reset URL. Consider adding security questions or other verification steps.
    • Session Management: Review and strengthen session management. Ensure session IDs are long, random, and unpredictable. Use the HttpOnly and Secure flags for session cookies. Implement session timeouts and ensure proper