Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
50 lines (41 loc) · 7.93 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

50 lines (41 loc) · 7.93 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for twbs/bootstrap

Attack Surface: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Bootstrap JavaScript Components

  • Description: Injection of malicious scripts into web pages, executed by users' browsers, specifically through vulnerabilities or misuse of Bootstrap's JavaScript components.
    • Bootstrap Contribution: Older Bootstrap versions (v3 and earlier) contained XSS vulnerabilities within components like tooltips, popovers, and modals due to insufficient sanitization. Even in newer versions, improper handling of user input in data attributes used by these components can lead to XSS.
    • Example: An attacker injects malicious JavaScript code into the data-bs-content attribute of a Bootstrap popover. When the popover is triggered, the unsanitized JavaScript executes, potentially stealing user session cookies or redirecting the user to a malicious website.
    • Impact: Account takeover, sensitive data theft, website defacement, malware distribution to users.
  • Risk Severity: High (can be Critical in older, unpatched versions)
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Update Bootstrap: Immediately upgrade to the latest stable version of Bootstrap. Newer versions contain patches for known XSS vulnerabilities.
      • Strict Input Sanitization: Thoroughly sanitize all user-provided input before using it in data attributes (e.g., data-bs-content, data-bs-title) or when dynamically generating content for Bootstrap components. Use context-aware output encoding.
      • Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a robust Content Security Policy to limit the sources from which scripts can execute, reducing the impact of successful XSS attacks.

Attack Surface: Dependency Vulnerabilities in Bootstrap Ecosystem (Plugins & Older Versions)

  • Description: Exploiting known security vulnerabilities present in third-party libraries or dependencies used by Bootstrap plugins or indirectly included in older Bootstrap versions.
    • Bootstrap Contribution: While Bootstrap core aims to be self-contained, applications utilizing older Bootstrap versions or community-developed Bootstrap plugins might inadvertently rely on libraries with publicly known vulnerabilities. This expands the attack surface beyond Bootstrap's core code.
    • Example: An application uses an outdated Bootstrap v3 plugin that depends on a vulnerable version of jQuery. An attacker exploits a known jQuery vulnerability through this plugin, gaining client-side control and potentially executing malicious actions on behalf of the user.
    • Impact: Client-side compromise, similar to XSS, potentially leading to data theft, account hijacking, or malware injection.
  • Risk Severity: High (depending on the severity of the vulnerability in the dependency)
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Dependency Scanning & Management: Regularly scan project dependencies, including Bootstrap plugins and any libraries they rely on, for known vulnerabilities using security scanning tools.
      • Keep Dependencies Updated: Maintain up-to-date versions of Bootstrap, all plugins, and their underlying dependencies. Follow security advisories and patch promptly.
      • Minimize Plugin Usage & Vet Sources: Carefully evaluate the necessity of using Bootstrap plugins. Minimize their use, especially from untrusted or unverified sources. Prioritize plugins from reputable developers or the official Bootstrap ecosystem (if available and vetted).

Attack Surface: Subresource Integrity (SRI) Failures - Supply Chain Compromise of Bootstrap CDN

  • Description: Compromise of external Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) hosting Bootstrap files, leading to the injection of malicious code into the Bootstrap files served to applications.
    • Bootstrap Contribution: Bootstrap is frequently loaded from public CDNs for performance and ease of use. If SRI is not correctly implemented or entirely absent, a compromised CDN could serve malicious Bootstrap files without the application detecting the tampering.
    • Example: An attacker compromises a CDN hosting Bootstrap files. They inject malicious JavaScript into the bootstrap.min.js file on the CDN. Applications loading Bootstrap from this compromised CDN without SRI will unknowingly load and execute the malicious script, potentially affecting all users.
    • Impact: Widespread client-side compromise affecting all applications loading Bootstrap from the compromised CDN, potentially leading to large-scale data breaches, malware distribution, or widespread website defacement.
  • Risk Severity: Critical (due to the potential for widespread and impactful compromise)
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Mandatory SRI Implementation: Always implement Subresource Integrity (SRI) attributes when loading Bootstrap CSS and JavaScript files from CDNs. This ensures that the browser verifies the integrity of the fetched files against a cryptographic hash.
      • Correct SRI Hash Generation & Verification: Ensure SRI hashes are correctly generated for the specific Bootstrap files being used and that these hashes are accurately included in the integrity attributes of <link> and <script> tags. Regularly re-verify hashes, especially after updating Bootstrap versions.
      • Consider Self-Hosting for High-Security Applications: For applications with stringent security requirements, consider self-hosting Bootstrap files from your own infrastructure. This eliminates the CDN as a single point of failure in the supply chain, although it introduces other operational responsibilities.

Attack Surface: Usage of Outdated and Vulnerable Bootstrap Versions

  • Description: Continuing to use older versions of Bootstrap that are known to contain publicly disclosed security vulnerabilities that have been patched in later releases.
    • Bootstrap Contribution: Bootstrap, like any software, evolves and vulnerabilities are discovered and fixed over time. Using outdated versions directly exposes applications to these known and often easily exploitable vulnerabilities present in the older Bootstrap codebase.
    • Example: An application remains on Bootstrap v3, which has known XSS vulnerabilities in its tooltip and popover components. Attackers can readily find and exploit these publicly documented vulnerabilities to compromise the application and its users.
    • Impact: Exploitation of known vulnerabilities leading to XSS, CSS injection, or other security issues depending on the specific vulnerabilities present in the outdated Bootstrap version. This can result in data breaches, account compromise, and other severe security incidents.
  • Risk Severity: Critical (due to the ease of exploiting known, publicly documented vulnerabilities)
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Prioritize Bootstrap Updates: Make updating Bootstrap to the latest stable version a high priority and a regular part of the application's maintenance cycle.
      • Vulnerability Monitoring & Patching Process: Actively monitor security advisories, Bootstrap release notes, and vulnerability databases for information about security patches and vulnerabilities affecting Bootstrap. Establish a rapid patching process to apply updates promptly.
      • Automated Dependency Management & Updates: Utilize dependency management tools that can automate the process of checking for and updating Bootstrap and other libraries, streamlining the update process and reducing the risk of using outdated, vulnerable versions.