Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
123 lines (103 loc) · 9.49 KB

File metadata and controls

123 lines (103 loc) · 9.49 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for twbs/bootstrap

Objective: To degrade the user experience, deface the application, or gain unauthorized access to application functionality by exploiting vulnerabilities or misconfigurations specific to the Bootstrap framework.

Attack Tree Visualization

[Attacker's Goal: Degrade UX, Deface, or Gain Unauthorized Access via Bootstrap]* | --------------------------------------------------- | [Exploit Known Bootstrap Vulnerabilities] [Exploit Bootstrap Misconfiguration/Misuse] | ------------------- ------------------------------------------------- | | | [CVE-XXXX-XXXX (XSS)] [Outdated Bootstrap]*** [Overriding/Customizing] [Using Untrusted Bootstrap Themes/Templates]*** | (e.g., v3.x) [Styles Incorrectly] | | | | | | | [Craft Malicious] [Exploit Known] [Theme/Template Contains] [Input to Trigger] [Vulnerabilities] [Malicious JS/CSS]* [Stored/Reflected] [in Older Version]* | [XSS]* | | | | ----------------- [XSS/Data Exfiltration]*

  • Critical Node: [Outdated Bootstrap (e.g., v3.x)]***

    • Description: The application is using an outdated version of Bootstrap (e.g., 3.x or earlier) that contains known, publicly disclosed vulnerabilities. This is a critical node because it's a common and easily exploitable entry point.
    • Likelihood: High (Many sites neglect dependency updates)
    • Impact: Medium to Very High (Depends on the specific vulnerabilities present in the outdated version)
    • Effort: Very Low (Identifying the version is often trivial)
    • Skill Level: Script Kiddie (Checking the version number)
    • Detection Difficulty: Very Easy (Version number is often exposed)
  • Critical Node: [Exploit Known Vulnerabilities in Older Version]***

    • Description: The attacker leverages publicly available exploits or develops their own based on disclosed vulnerabilities in the outdated Bootstrap version. This is critical because it represents the actual exploitation step.
    • Likelihood: Medium to High (Depends on vulnerability specifics and public exploit availability)
    • Impact: Medium to Very High (Depends on the specific vulnerability exploited)
    • Effort: Low to Medium (Public exploits reduce effort; custom exploits require more)
    • Skill Level: Beginner to Intermediate
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Relies on intrusion detection/prevention systems and vulnerability scanning)
  • Attack Vector Details:

    1. Reconnaissance: Attacker identifies the target application and determines it uses Bootstrap. They inspect the source code, HTTP headers, or use automated tools to identify the specific Bootstrap version.
    2. Vulnerability Research: Attacker searches vulnerability databases (e.g., CVE, NVD) for known vulnerabilities affecting the identified Bootstrap version. They prioritize vulnerabilities with publicly available exploits or those that are easily exploitable.
    3. Exploit Selection/Development: Attacker chooses a suitable exploit or develops a custom one based on the vulnerability details. This might involve crafting malicious input, manipulating URLs, or exploiting specific Bootstrap components.
    4. Exploitation: Attacker delivers the exploit to the target application. This could be through a web form, URL parameter, HTTP header, or other input vectors.
    5. Post-Exploitation: Depending on the vulnerability, the attacker may gain XSS, achieve DoS, or gain other unauthorized access.
  • Critical Node: [Using Untrusted Bootstrap Themes/Templates]***

    • Description: The application incorporates a Bootstrap theme or template obtained from an untrusted source (e.g., a random website, a forum post, a cracked theme repository). This is critical because it introduces a direct vector for malicious code.
    • Likelihood: Low to Medium (Depends on developer practices; responsible developers use trusted sources)
    • Impact: High to Very High (Theme could contain any type of malicious code)
    • Effort: Very Low (Downloading and using a theme)
    • Skill Level: Script Kiddie
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium to Hard (Requires code review, dynamic analysis)
  • Critical Node: [Theme/Template Contains Malicious JS/CSS]***

    • Description: The untrusted theme or template includes malicious JavaScript or CSS code designed to compromise the application. This is critical because it's the payload delivery mechanism.
    • Likelihood: Low to Medium (Higher if from a known malicious source)
    • Impact: High to Very High (XSS, data exfiltration, complete site compromise)
    • Effort: Very Low (For the attacker who uses the theme; high for the attacker who created it)
    • Skill Level: (User: Script Kiddie; Theme Creator: Intermediate to Advanced)
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium to Hard (Requires thorough code review, dynamic analysis, sandboxing)
  • Attack Vector Details:

    1. Theme Acquisition: The developer (unwittingly) downloads a malicious Bootstrap theme or template from an untrusted source.
    2. Theme Integration: The developer integrates the theme into their application, typically by including the theme's CSS and JavaScript files.
    3. Malicious Code Execution: When a user visits the application, the malicious JavaScript or CSS within the theme is executed in the user's browser.
    4. Exploitation: The malicious code can perform various actions, such as:
      • XSS: Steal cookies, redirect users, deface the site, inject phishing forms.
      • Data Exfiltration: Send sensitive data (form inputs, user information) to an attacker-controlled server.
      • Drive-by Downloads: Attempt to install malware on the user's system.
      • Cryptojacking: Use the user's browser to mine cryptocurrency.
  • Critical Node: [CVE-XXXX-XXXX (XSS)]

    • Description: Represents a specific, known XSS vulnerability.
    • Likelihood: Medium
    • Impact: High
    • Effort: Low to Medium
    • Skill Level: Beginner to Intermediate
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Critical Node: [Craft Malicious Input to Trigger Stored/Reflected XSS]

    • Description: The attacker crafts input to trigger the vulnerability.
    • Likelihood: Medium
    • Impact: High
    • Effort: Low to Medium
    • Skill Level: Beginner to Intermediate
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Critical Node: [XSS]*

    • Description: Successful XSS execution.
    • Likelihood: Medium
    • Impact: High
    • Effort: Low to Medium
    • Skill Level: Beginner to Intermediate
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Attack Vector Details:

    1. Vulnerability Research: Attacker researches the specific CVE and understands how to trigger the XSS.
    2. Payload Crafting: Attacker crafts a malicious JavaScript payload designed to achieve their objective (e.g., steal cookies, redirect users).
    3. Injection: Attacker injects the payload into the vulnerable input field.
    4. Execution: If the application doesn't properly sanitize the input, the payload is executed in the context of the victim's browser.
    5. Post-Exploitation: Attacker achieves their objective (e.g., session hijacking, defacement).
  • Critical Node: [XSS/Data Exfiltration]*

    • Description: This represents the successful outcome of the malicious theme attack, where the attacker achieves XSS or data exfiltration.
    • Likelihood: Low to Medium (Dependent on the presence of malicious code in the theme)
    • Impact: High to Very High (Loss of sensitive data, account compromise, reputational damage)
    • Effort: Very Low (The attacker simply benefits from the user visiting the compromised site)
    • Skill Level: Script Kiddie (For the attacker leveraging the theme; the theme creator would have higher skill)
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium to Hard (Requires monitoring for unusual network traffic, data exfiltration attempts, and analyzing user behavior)
  • Attack Vector Details: This is a consequence of the "Theme/Template Contains Malicious JS/CSS" node, so the attack vector is the same as described above. The focus here is on the outcome of the attack.