Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
198 lines (149 loc) · 17.6 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

198 lines (149 loc) · 17.6 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for vercel/hyper

Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Update Electron and Hyper

  • Description:

    1. Subscribe to Hyper Release Channels: Monitor Hyper's official website, GitHub repository, and social media for announcements of new releases and security advisories.
    2. Review Release Notes: When a new version is released, carefully review the release notes to identify security patches, Electron version upgrades, and any other security-related changes.
    3. Test Updates in a Non-Production Environment (Recommended for Organizations): Before deploying updates widely, test them in a staging or development environment to ensure compatibility with your plugins and workflows and to identify any potential issues.
    4. Apply Updates Promptly: Once tested (if applicable) or reviewed, apply the updates to all Hyper installations as soon as possible. This includes updating the Hyper application itself and ensuring any bundled Electron framework is also updated.
    5. Enable Automatic Updates (If Appropriate for Your Environment): If your environment allows, enable Hyper's automatic update feature (if available) to ensure you are always running the latest version. Be mindful of organizational change management policies if using automatic updates in a corporate setting.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Exploitation of Known Electron Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Outdated Electron versions may contain publicly known vulnerabilities that attackers can exploit.
    • Exploitation of Known Hyper Application Vulnerabilities (High to Medium Severity): Hyper-specific code might have vulnerabilities that are patched in newer versions.
    • Zero-day Vulnerabilities (Medium to High Severity): Staying up-to-date reduces the window of opportunity for attackers to exploit newly discovered vulnerabilities.

  • Impact:

    • Exploitation of Known Electron Vulnerabilities: High Reduction - Directly patches known vulnerabilities.
    • Exploitation of Known Hyper Application Vulnerabilities: High Reduction - Directly patches known vulnerabilities in Hyper itself.
    • Zero-day Vulnerabilities: Medium Reduction - Reduces the window of exposure and ensures faster patching.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Partially Implemented: Hyper likely has an update mechanism to notify users of new versions. Electron framework updates are bundled with Hyper updates.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Proactive Security Advisories: Hyper could improve by having a dedicated security advisory channel.
    • Clear Communication of Electron Version: Hyper release notes should clearly state the Electron version included in each release.
    • Automated Update Mechanism Details: More transparency about the update mechanism itself would be beneficial.

Mitigation Strategy: Disable Node.js Integration in Renderer Processes (If Possible and Not Required)

  • Description:

    1. Assess Plugin and Feature Requirements: Review all Hyper plugins and custom configurations you are using to see if Node.js integration is required.
    2. Modify Hyper Configuration (If Configurable): Check Hyper's configuration documentation for options related to Node.js integration in renderer processes.
    3. Set nodeIntegration: false (If Available and Compatible): If you find a configurable option and Node.js integration is not essential, set the configuration to disable it.
    4. Test Functionality: After disabling Node.js integration, thoroughly test Hyper and all your plugins.
    5. Re-enable Selectively (If Necessary): If a critical plugin requires Node.js integration, you might need to re-enable it, but consider alternatives.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Renderer Process Compromise Leading to Full System Access (High Severity): If a renderer process is compromised and Node.js integration is enabled, an attacker could gain full system access.
    • Increased Attack Surface (Medium Severity): Enabling Node.js integration in the renderer expands the attack surface.

  • Impact:

    • Renderer Process Compromise Leading to Full System Access: High Reduction - Disabling Node.js integration prevents renderer process compromises from directly escalating to full system access via Node.js APIs.
    • Increased Attack Surface: Medium Reduction - Reduces the attack surface by removing a risky capability from the renderer process.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Likely Not Configurable by Default: It's unlikely that Hyper disables it by default without a configuration option.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Configuration Option: Hyper should provide a clear configuration option to easily disable Node.js integration in renderer processes.
    • Documentation and Guidance: Hyper documentation should explain the security implications of Node.js integration and recommend disabling it when not strictly necessary.
    • Plugin Security Guidelines: Plugin development guidelines should encourage plugin authors to avoid requiring Node.js integration in renderer processes.

Mitigation Strategy: Enable Context Isolation and Context Bridge

  • Description:

    1. Verify Context Isolation is Enabled: Check Hyper's configuration or Electron BrowserWindow options to ensure that context isolation is enabled.
    2. Implement Context Bridge for Necessary Node.js APIs: If Node.js APIs are needed in the renderer, use Electron's Context Bridge API (contextBridge).
    3. Expose Only Necessary APIs: Through the Context Bridge, selectively expose only the minimum necessary Node.js APIs.
    4. Document Exposed APIs: Clearly document which Node.js APIs are exposed through the Context Bridge and why.
    5. Secure Communication via Context Bridge: Ensure secure communication between the renderer and main process via the Context Bridge.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Renderer Process Compromise Leading to Full System Access (High Severity): Context isolation prevents direct access to Node.js environment from the renderer, making escalation harder.
    • Data Leakage and Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Exploitation (Medium to High Severity): Context isolation helps prevent malicious scripts from directly accessing sensitive data or manipulating the application's internal state.

  • Impact:

    • Renderer Process Compromise Leading to Full System Access: High Reduction - Context isolation significantly reduces the risk of renderer compromises escalating to full system access.
    • Data Leakage and XSS Exploitation: Medium to High Reduction - Improves the security boundary between the renderer and Node.js environment.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Likely Partially Implemented (Electron Framework Level): Modern Electron versions often enable context isolation by default. Hyper likely benefits from this.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Explicit Configuration Verification: Hyper's documentation should explicitly state whether context isolation is enabled by default and how to verify it.
    • Context Bridge Usage Guidance for Plugins: Hyper should provide clear guidelines and examples for plugin developers on using the Context Bridge securely.
    • Security Audits of Context Bridge Usage (If Applicable): If Hyper or its core plugins use the Context Bridge, these implementations should be regularly audited.

Mitigation Strategy: Sanitize Input and Output in Plugins and Customizations

  • Description:

    1. Identify Input Sources: For each plugin or customization, identify all sources of input.
    2. Input Sanitization: Implement robust input sanitization for all input sources.
    3. Output Encoding: When displaying output in the Hyper UI, use proper output encoding to prevent cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities.
    4. Regular Security Reviews: Periodically review plugin and customization code to ensure input sanitization and output encoding are correctly implemented.
    5. Security Testing: Perform security testing on plugins and customizations to identify potential injection vulnerabilities.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Hyper UI (Medium to High Severity): Rendering unsanitized data in the Hyper UI can lead to XSS vulnerabilities.
    • Command Injection (Less Likely in Hyper UI, but Possible in Plugins Processing Terminal Output - Medium Severity): Plugins processing terminal output without sanitization could lead to command injection.
    • Data Injection Vulnerabilities (General - Medium Severity): Improper handling of input data in plugins can lead to various data injection vulnerabilities.

  • Impact:

    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Hyper UI: High Reduction - Proper output encoding effectively prevents XSS vulnerabilities.
    • Command Injection: Medium Reduction - Input sanitization reduces the risk of command injection.
    • Data Injection Vulnerabilities: Medium Reduction - Input sanitization helps mitigate various data injection vulnerabilities.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Plugin Developer Responsibility: Input sanitization and output encoding are primarily the responsibility of plugin developers.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Security Guidelines for Plugin Developers: Hyper should provide comprehensive security guidelines for plugin developers, specifically addressing input sanitization and output encoding.
    • Security Review Process for Plugins (Optional): Consider establishing a security review process for popular or officially recommended Hyper plugins.
    • Built-in Sanitization/Encoding Utilities (Optional): Providing built-in utility functions or libraries within the Hyper plugin API could improve security.

Mitigation Strategy: Review and Audit Hyper Plugins

  • Description:

    1. Plugin Source Code Review: Before installing any Hyper plugin, especially from untrusted sources, review its source code.
    2. Check Plugin Reputation and Community Feedback: Research the plugin's reputation.
    3. Minimize Plugin Usage: Only install plugins that are truly necessary.
    4. Prefer Plugins from Trusted Sources: Prioritize using plugins from official Hyper repositories, verified developers, or reputable sources.
    5. Regular Plugin Audits: Periodically review installed plugins and audit their source code and update status.
    6. Automated Plugin Security Scanning (Advanced): For organizations, consider using automated security scanning tools to analyze plugin code.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Malicious Plugins (High Severity): Malicious plugins could be designed to steal data or execute arbitrary code.
    • Vulnerable Plugins (Medium to High Severity): Even well-intentioned plugins can have security vulnerabilities.
    • Supply Chain Attacks via Plugins (Medium Severity): If a plugin's dependencies or update mechanism is compromised, it could become a vector for supply chain attacks.

  • Impact:

    • Malicious Plugins: High Reduction - Code review and reputation checks significantly reduce the risk of installing malicious plugins.
    • Vulnerable Plugins: Medium to High Reduction - Code review and security audits help identify and mitigate vulnerabilities in plugins.
    • Supply Chain Attacks via Plugins: Medium Reduction - Reviewing plugin dependencies and update mechanisms can help identify potential supply chain risks.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • User Responsibility: Plugin review and auditing are primarily the responsibility of the Hyper user.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Plugin Security Scoring/Rating System (Optional): A plugin store or registry could incorporate a security scoring or rating system.
    • Plugin Permission System (Advanced, Potentially Complex): A plugin permission system could allow users to control plugin access to system resources.
    • Official Plugin Repository with Security Checks (Future Consideration): Establishing an official, curated Hyper plugin repository with security vetting could improve plugin security.

Mitigation Strategy: Ensure Secure Update Channel (HTTPS)

  • Description:

    1. Verify Update Channel Configuration: Check Hyper's update settings or documentation to confirm that it is configured to use HTTPS for downloading updates.
    2. Monitor Network Traffic (Advanced): For organizations, monitor network traffic during Hyper updates to verify HTTPS usage.
    3. Report Non-HTTPS Update Channels: If you discover that Hyper is using a non-HTTPS update channel, report this as a security concern.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attacks on Updates (High Severity): If Hyper uses a non-HTTPS update channel, attackers could perform MITM attacks to inject malicious updates.

  • Impact:

    • Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attacks on Updates: High Reduction - Using HTTPS for updates effectively prevents MITM attacks.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Likely Implemented (Best Practice): It is highly likely that Hyper uses HTTPS for its update channel.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Explicit Documentation of Secure Update Channel: Hyper documentation should explicitly state that HTTPS is used for updates.
    • Configuration Option to Verify HTTPS (Optional): A configuration option to explicitly enforce HTTPS for updates could provide an extra layer of assurance.

Mitigation Strategy: Code Signing for Updates

  • Description:

    1. Verify Update Signatures (If Possible): If Hyper provides information about update signatures or code signing, verify that updates are digitally signed.
    2. Check for Code Signing Information in Release Notes/Documentation: Look for mentions of code signing in Hyper's release notes or documentation.
    3. Report Lack of Code Signing (If Not Implemented): If you cannot find evidence of code signing for Hyper updates, consider reporting this as a security concern.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Tampered Updates (High Severity): Without code signing, attackers could potentially tamper with Hyper updates.
    • Compromised Update Servers (Medium to High Severity): Even with HTTPS, if update servers are compromised, code signing helps ensure update integrity.

  • Impact:

    • Tampered Updates: High Reduction - Code signing ensures the integrity of updates, preventing the installation of tampered updates.
    • Compromised Update Servers: Medium to High Reduction - Code signing provides a strong layer of defense against compromised update servers.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Likely Implemented (Best Practice): It is highly likely that Vercel implements code signing for Hyper updates.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Explicit Documentation of Code Signing: Hyper documentation should explicitly state that updates are code-signed.
    • Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) Details (Optional, for Advanced Users): For advanced users, providing details about the PKI used for code signing could enhance verifiability.

Mitigation Strategy: Control Automatic Updates (Balance Convenience and Control)

  • Description:

    1. Understand Hyper's Update Settings: Familiarize yourself with Hyper's update settings and the level of control users have over them.
    2. Configure Update Settings Based on Organizational Policy: Adjust Hyper's update settings to align with your organization's security and change management policies (disable automatic updates for maximum control, enable for convenience and timely patching, or use a hybrid approach).
    3. Communicate Update Policy to Users: Clearly communicate the organization's Hyper update policy to users.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Uncontrolled Updates Causing Instability (Low to Medium Severity): Automatic updates can sometimes introduce instability. Controlling updates allows for testing.
    • Delayed Security Patching (Medium to High Severity): Disabling automatic updates can lead to delays in applying critical security patches.

  • Impact:

    • Uncontrolled Updates Causing Instability: Medium Reduction - Controlling updates allows for testing and validation.
    • Delayed Security Patching: Medium Reduction - Automatic updates ensure timely patching. The impact depends on the chosen update strategy.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Likely User Configurable: Hyper probably provides some level of user control over automatic updates.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Granular Update Configuration Options: Hyper could potentially offer more granular update configuration options.
    • Centralized Update Management (For Organizations): For enterprise deployments, features for centralized update management could be beneficial.