Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
143 lines (124 loc) · 13.3 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

143 lines (124 loc) · 13.3 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for fluxml/flux.jl

Objective: Compromise Application Functionality and/or Data Integrity by Exploiting Flux.jl Specific Vulnerabilities.

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Flux.jl Application [CRITICAL NODE]
├───(+) Exploit Flux.jl Library Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   ├───(++) Exploit Dependency Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   └───(+++) Outdated or Vulnerable Julia Package Dependencies [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │       └───(++++) Exploit known vulnerability in dependency (e.g., code injection, arbitrary code execution) [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   └───(++) Exploit Insecure Defaults or Configurations in Flux.jl Usage [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]
│       └───(+++) Misconfiguration of Flux.jl parameters leading to unexpected behavior [HIGH RISK PATH]
│       └───(+++) Using insecure or outdated Flux.jl versions with known vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]
├───(+) Manipulate Model Behavior [HIGH RISK PATH] (If applicable)
│   ├───(++) Model Poisoning (Training Phase) [HIGH RISK PATH] (If applicable)
│   │   └───(+++) If application allows user-provided training data or retraining: [HIGH RISK PATH] (If applicable)
│   │       └───(++++) Inject malicious training data to skew model behavior [HIGH RISK PATH] (If applicable)
│   │       └───(++++) Corrupt training data to degrade model accuracy or introduce backdoors [HIGH RISK PATH] (If applicable)
│   │       └───(++++) Trigger retraining with poisoned data via application interface [HIGH RISK PATH] (If applicable)
│   ├───(++) Adversarial Examples (Inference Phase) [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   └───(+++) Craft adversarial inputs to fool the model during inference [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │       └───(++++) Generate inputs designed to cause misclassification or desired incorrect output [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │       └───(++++) Inject adversarial examples through application input mechanisms [HIGH RISK PATH]
├───(+) Exploit Data Handling Vulnerabilities in Flux.jl Context [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   ├───(++) Data Injection Attacks in Preprocessing/Postprocessing with Flux.jl [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   └───(+++) If application uses Flux.jl for data preprocessing or postprocessing: [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │       └───(++++) Inject malicious data into preprocessing steps to bypass security checks or alter model input [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │       └───(++++) Inject malicious data into postprocessing steps to manipulate output or gain unauthorized access [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   ├───(++) Data Leakage through Flux.jl Operations [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   └───(+++) Information disclosure through error messages or debugging outputs from Flux.jl [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │       └───(+++) Unintended data exposure due to insecure serialization or logging of Flux.jl model states or data [HIGH RISK PATH]
├───(+) Resource Exhaustion via ML Operations [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   ├───(++) Denial of Service (DoS) through computationally expensive Flux.jl operations [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   └───(+++) Trigger excessively long model training or inference tasks [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │       └───(++++) Send requests that initiate training on large or complex datasets (if application allows) [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │       └───(++++) Send a flood of complex inference requests to overwhelm resources [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   └───(++) Memory Exhaustion [HIGH RISK PATH]
│       └───(+++) Trigger Flux.jl operations that consume excessive memory [HIGH RISK PATH]
│           └───(++++) Provide inputs that lead to large intermediate data structures in Flux.jl computations [HIGH RISK PATH]

Attack Tree Path: 1. Exploit Dependency Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]:

  • Attack Vector: Outdated or Vulnerable Julia Package Dependencies [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]

    • Description: Application uses outdated or vulnerable Julia packages that Flux.jl depends on.
    • Likelihood: Medium
    • Impact: Low (Information Gathering) initially, High (Arbitrary Code Execution, Full System Compromise) if exploited.
    • Effort: Low to Medium (Identifying outdated dependencies is easy, exploiting vulnerabilities depends on exploit availability).
    • Skill Level: Beginner to Intermediate (Identifying), Intermediate to Expert (Exploiting).
    • Detection Difficulty: Very Low (Identifying outdated), Medium (Detecting exploit in action).
    • Mitigation: Regularly update Julia packages, use vulnerability scanning tools, pin dependency versions.

  • Attack Vector: Exploit known vulnerability in dependency (e.g., code injection, arbitrary code execution) [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]

    • Description: Attacker exploits a known vulnerability in a Julia package dependency to gain unauthorized access or control.
    • Likelihood: Low (Depends on vulnerability existence and exploit availability).
    • Impact: High (Arbitrary Code Execution, Full System Compromise).
    • Effort: Medium (If exploit exists, Low; if exploit needs to be developed, High).
    • Skill Level: Intermediate (Using existing exploit), Expert (Developing exploit).
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Exploit might be subtle, but system anomalies can be detected).
    • Mitigation: Patch vulnerabilities promptly, use security monitoring, implement input validation even at dependency boundaries.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Exploit Insecure Defaults or Configurations in Flux.jl Usage [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]:

  • Attack Vector: Misconfiguration of Flux.jl parameters leading to unexpected behavior [HIGH RISK PATH]

    • Description: Incorrectly configured Flux.jl parameters lead to unintended application behavior that can be exploited.
    • Likelihood: Medium (Common developer mistake).
    • Impact: Low to Medium (Unexpected model behavior, potential data manipulation).
    • Effort: Low (Requires understanding of Flux.jl parameters and application logic).
    • Skill Level: Beginner to Intermediate.
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Behavioral anomalies might be noticed, but root cause might be hard to pinpoint).
    • Mitigation: Follow security best practices for configuration, use secure defaults, conduct thorough testing and code reviews.

  • Attack Vector: Using insecure or outdated Flux.jl versions with known vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]

    • Description: Application uses an outdated version of Flux.jl that has known security vulnerabilities.
    • Likelihood: Medium (Common if version management is not prioritized).
    • Impact: Medium to High (Depends on the nature of the known vulnerabilities).
    • Effort: Low (Identifying outdated versions is easy).
    • Skill Level: Beginner.
    • Detection Difficulty: Low (Vulnerability scanners can easily detect outdated versions).
    • Mitigation: Keep Flux.jl updated to the latest stable version, monitor security advisories.

Attack Tree Path: 3. Manipulate Model Behavior [HIGH RISK PATH] (If applicable):

  • Attack Vector: Model Poisoning (Training Phase) [HIGH RISK PATH] (If applicable)

    • Description: If the application allows user-provided training data or retraining, attackers can inject malicious data to compromise the model's integrity.
    • Likelihood: Medium (If application allows user data in training).
    • Impact: Medium (Model accuracy degradation, biased predictions, backdoors).
    • Effort: Low to Medium (Crafting malicious data requires some ML understanding).
    • Skill Level: Intermediate (Basic ML knowledge).
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Requires monitoring model performance and data integrity).
    • Mitigation: Secure training data sources, implement data validation and sanitization for training data, monitor model performance for anomalies.

  • Attack Vector: Adversarial Examples (Inference Phase) [HIGH RISK PATH]

    • Description: Attackers craft specific inputs (adversarial examples) to fool the model during inference, causing misclassification or desired incorrect outputs.
    • Likelihood: Medium (If model is vulnerable to adversarial examples).
    • Impact: Medium (Incorrect application behavior based on model output).
    • Effort: Medium to High (Crafting effective adversarial examples can be complex).
    • Skill Level: Intermediate to Expert (ML and optimization knowledge).
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium to High (Adversarial examples are designed to be subtle).
    • Mitigation: Implement adversarial robustness techniques, input sanitization, output validation, monitor model output for anomalies.

Attack Tree Path: 4. Exploit Data Handling Vulnerabilities in Flux.jl Context [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]:

  • Attack Vector: Data Injection Attacks in Preprocessing/Postprocessing with Flux.jl [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]

    • Description: Attackers inject malicious data into preprocessing or postprocessing steps that use Flux.jl to bypass security checks or manipulate model input/output.
    • Likelihood: Medium (If preprocessing/postprocessing steps are not properly secured).
    • Impact: Medium to High (Bypass security, manipulate model input/output, application compromise).
    • Effort: Low to Medium (Depends on preprocessing/postprocessing complexity and input/output validation).
    • Skill Level: Beginner to Intermediate.
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Monitoring data flow and preprocessing/postprocessing outputs).
    • Mitigation: Secure preprocessing and postprocessing pipelines, implement strict input and output validation at each stage, sanitize data.

  • Attack Vector: Data Leakage through Flux.jl Operations [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]

    • Description: Sensitive information is unintentionally leaked through error messages, debugging outputs, insecure serialization, or logging of Flux.jl operations.
    • Likelihood: Medium (Common if error handling, logging, and serialization are not properly secured).
    • Impact: Medium to High (Sensitive data leakage, model compromise).
    • Effort: Low to Medium (Exploiting insecure logging/serialization or triggering errors can be straightforward).
    • Skill Level: Beginner to Intermediate.
    • Detection Difficulty: Low to Medium (Error logging and monitoring, log analysis and security audits).
    • Mitigation: Implement secure error handling (avoid exposing sensitive data in errors), secure logging practices (avoid logging sensitive data), use secure serialization methods, conduct security audits of logging and error handling mechanisms.

Attack Tree Path: 5. Resource Exhaustion via ML Operations [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]:

  • Attack Vector: Denial of Service (DoS) through computationally expensive Flux.jl operations [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]

    • Description: Attackers trigger computationally expensive Flux.jl operations (training or complex inference) to exhaust server resources and cause service unavailability.
    • Likelihood: Medium (Common DoS vector).
    • Impact: High (Service Unavailability).
    • Effort: Low (Sending requests is easy, especially with botnets).
    • Skill Level: Beginner.
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium (DoS detection tools and traffic analysis).
    • Mitigation: Implement rate limiting, resource limits (CPU, time), input validation to prevent excessively complex operations, use load balancing and auto-scaling, monitor resource usage and traffic patterns.

  • Attack Vector: Memory Exhaustion [HIGH RISK PATH]

    • Description: Attackers trigger Flux.jl operations that consume excessive memory, leading to service unavailability or system instability.
    • Likelihood: Low to Medium (Depends on application input validation and Flux.jl behavior).
    • Impact: High (Service Unavailability, potential system instability).
    • Effort: Medium (Requires understanding of application and Flux.jl data handling).
    • Skill Level: Intermediate.
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Resource monitoring and anomaly detection).
    • Mitigation: Implement memory limits, input validation to prevent large data structures, monitor memory usage, investigate and address potential memory leaks.