Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
160 lines (104 loc) · 9.81 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

160 lines (104 loc) · 9.81 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for afollestad/material-dialogs

Objective: Compromise Application using Material Dialogs

Attack Tree Visualization

Attack Goal: Compromise Application using Material Dialogs [CRITICAL NODE - PRIMARY GOAL] └───(OR)─ 1. Exploit Vulnerabilities in Material Dialogs Library Directly [CRITICAL NODE - ATTACK VECTOR CATEGORY] │ └───(OR)─ 1.1. Code Injection through Custom Views [HIGH RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE - ATTACK VECTOR] │ │ └───(AND)─ 1.1.1. Application Allows Custom View Dialogs │ │ │ └───(AND)─ 1.1.1.1. Attacker Controls Custom View Layout (e.g., via external source, deeplink, etc.) │ │ │ └───(AND)─ 1.1.1.2. Custom View Layout Contains Malicious Code (e.g., JavaScript in WebView, malicious Android components) │ │ └───(Mitigation)─ Sanitize and Validate Custom View Layouts [CRITICAL NODE - MITIGATION] │ │ └───(Mitigation)─ Isolate Custom Views [CRITICAL NODE - MITIGATION] │ │ └───(Mitigation)─ Review Custom View Code Carefully [CRITICAL NODE - MITIGATION] │ └───(OR)─ 1.4. Vulnerabilities in Dependencies of Material Dialogs [CRITICAL NODE - ATTACK VECTOR] │ │ └───(AND)─ 1.4.1. Material Dialogs Library Depends on Vulnerable Libraries │ │ │ └───(AND)─ 1.4.1.2. Vulnerability in Dependency is Exploitable in Application Context [HIGH RISK PATH] │ │ └───(Mitigation)─ Regularly Update Material Dialogs and its Dependencies [CRITICAL NODE - MITIGATION] │ │ └───(Mitigation)─ Perform Dependency Vulnerability Scanning [CRITICAL NODE - MITIGATION] │ └───(OR)─ 2. Exploit Misuse/Misconfiguration of Material Dialogs by Application [CRITICAL NODE - ATTACK VECTOR CATEGORY] │ └───(OR)─ 2.1. Displaying Sensitive Information in Dialogs Insecurely [HIGH RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE - ATTACK VECTOR] │ │ └───(AND)─ 2.1.1. Application Displays Sensitive Data in Dialog Messages │ │ │ └───(AND)─ 2.1.1.1. Sensitive Data is Logged or Cached Unintentionally (e.g., system logs, screenshotting) [HIGH RISK PATH] │ │ │ └───(AND)─ 2.1.1.2. Sensitive Data is Visible to Shoulder Surfing or Malicious Apps with Accessibility Permissions [HIGH RISK PATH] │ │ └───(Mitigation)─ Avoid Displaying Highly Sensitive Data in Dialogs [CRITICAL NODE - MITIGATION] │ │ └───(Mitigation)─ Mask or Anonymize Sensitive Data [CRITICAL NODE - MITIGATION] │ │ └───(Mitigation)─ Implement Secure Logging Practices [CRITICAL NODE - MITIGATION] │ └───(OR)─ 2.3. Improper Handling of Dialog Input/Callbacks Leading to Application Vulnerabilities [HIGH RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE - ATTACK VECTOR] │ │ └───(AND)─ 2.3.1. Application Relies on User Input from Dialogs for Security-Sensitive Operations │ │ │ └───(AND)─ 2.3.1.1. Application Does Not Properly Validate or Sanitize Input from Dialogs [HIGH RISK PATH] │ │ │ └───(AND)─ 2.3.1.2. Input Validation Flaws Lead to Application-Level Vulnerabilities (e.g., logic bypass, data corruption) [HIGH RISK PATH] │ │ └───(Mitigation)─ Always Validate and Sanitize Input Received from Dialogs [CRITICAL NODE - MITIGATION] │ │ └───(Mitigation)─ Implement Secure Input Handling Practices [CRITICAL NODE - MITIGATION] │ │ └───(Mitigation)─ Follow Least Privilege Principle [CRITICAL NODE - MITIGATION] │ └───(OR)─ 2.4. Misuse of Dialog Types for Unintended Purposes (Leading to User Confusion/Phishing) [HIGH RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE - ATTACK VECTOR] │ │ └───(AND)─ 2.4.1. Application Uses Dialogs in a Way That Mimics System Dialogs or Trusted Sources │ │ │ └───(AND)─ 2.4.1.1. Attacker Can Craft Dialog Content to Deceive Users (e.g., phishing for credentials, tricking into permissions) [HIGH RISK PATH] │ │ │ └───(AND)─ 2.4.1.2. User Trusts the Dialog and Performs Unintended Actions [HIGH RISK PATH] │ │ └───(Mitigation)─ Design Dialogs Clearly and Distinguish Them from System Dialogs [CRITICAL NODE - MITIGATION] │ │ └───(Mitigation)─ Avoid Mimicking System UI Elements [CRITICAL NODE - MITIGATION] │ │ └───(Mitigation)─ Clearly Indicate the Application's Identity in Dialogs [CRITICAL NODE - MITIGATION]

Attack Tree Path: 1.1. Code Injection through Custom Views [HIGH RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE - ATTACK VECTOR]

Description: If the application uses custom views within material-dialogs and allows external influence over the custom view's layout, an attacker could inject malicious code (e.g., JavaScript in a WebView, malicious Android components).

Likelihood: Low-Medium

Impact: High (Code execution, data theft, app takeover)

Effort: Medium

Skill Level: Medium-High

Detection Difficulty: Hard

Mitigations [CRITICAL NODE - MITIGATION]:

  • Sanitize and Validate Custom View Layouts
  • Isolate Custom Views
  • Review Custom View Code Carefully

Attack Tree Path: 1.4. Vulnerabilities in Dependencies of Material Dialogs [CRITICAL NODE - ATTACK VECTOR]

Description: material-dialogs relies on other libraries. If these dependencies have vulnerabilities, and they are exploitable in the application's context, it can lead to compromise.

Likelihood: Medium

Impact: High (Depends on the vulnerability, could be code execution, data breach)

Effort: Low (to identify), Medium-High (to exploit)

Skill Level: Low (to identify), Medium-High (to exploit)

Detection Difficulty: Easy (to identify), Hard (to detect exploitation)

High-Risk Sub-Path: 1.4.1.2. Vulnerability in Dependency is Exploitable in Application Context [HIGH RISK PATH]

Mitigations [CRITICAL NODE - MITIGATION]:

  • Regularly Update Material Dialogs and its Dependencies
  • Perform Dependency Vulnerability Scanning

Attack Tree Path: 2.1. Displaying Sensitive Information in Dialogs Insecurely [HIGH RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE - ATTACK VECTOR]

Description: Applications might unintentionally display sensitive data in dialog messages, leading to exposure through logs, screenshots, or malicious apps.

Likelihood: Medium

Impact: Medium-High (Data leak, privacy violation)

Effort: Low

Skill Level: Low

Detection Difficulty: Medium-Hard

High-Risk Sub-Paths [HIGH RISK PATH]:

  • 2.1.1.1. Sensitive Data is Logged or Cached Unintentionally (e.g., system logs, screenshotting)
  • 2.1.1.2. Sensitive Data is Visible to Shoulder Surfing or Malicious Apps with Accessibility Permissions

Mitigations [CRITICAL NODE - MITIGATION]:

  • Avoid Displaying Highly Sensitive Data in Dialogs
  • Mask or Anonymize Sensitive Data
  • Implement Secure Logging Practices

Attack Tree Path: 2.3. Improper Handling of Dialog Input/Callbacks Leading to Application Vulnerabilities [HIGH RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE - ATTACK VECTOR]

Description: If applications rely on user input from dialogs for security-sensitive operations but fail to validate or sanitize this input, it can lead to application-level vulnerabilities.

Likelihood: High

Impact: High (Application-level vulnerabilities, data corruption, logic bypass, injection)

Effort: Low-Medium

Skill Level: Low-Medium

Detection Difficulty: Medium

High-Risk Sub-Paths [HIGH RISK PATH]:

  • 2.3.1.1. Application Does Not Properly Validate or Sanitize Input from Dialogs
  • 2.3.1.2. Input Validation Flaws Lead to Application-Level Vulnerabilities (e.g., logic bypass, data corruption)

Mitigations [CRITICAL NODE - MITIGATION]:

  • Always Validate and Sanitize Input Received from Dialogs
  • Implement Secure Input Handling Practices
  • Follow Least Privilege Principle

Attack Tree Path: 2.4. Misuse of Dialog Types for Unintended Purposes (Leading to User Confusion/Phishing) [HIGH RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE - ATTACK VECTOR]

Description: Attackers might exploit user familiarity with dialogs by crafting application dialogs that mimic system dialogs or trusted sources to deceive users into performing unintended actions (phishing).

Likelihood: Medium

Impact: Medium-High (Credential theft, unauthorized actions, permission abuse)

Effort: Medium

Skill Level: Medium

Detection Difficulty: Hard

High-Risk Sub-Paths [HIGH RISK PATH]:

  • 2.4.1.1. Attacker Can Craft Dialog Content to Deceive Users (e.g., phishing for credentials, tricking into permissions)
  • 2.4.1.2. User Trusts the Dialog and Performs Unintended Actions

Mitigations [CRITICAL NODE - MITIGATION]:

  • Design Dialogs Clearly and Distinguish Them from System Dialogs
  • Avoid Mimicking System UI Elements
  • Clearly Indicate the Application's Identity in Dialogs