Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
125 lines (89 loc) · 12.4 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

125 lines (89 loc) · 12.4 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for afollestad/material-dialogs

Mitigation Strategy: Sanitize User Input Displayed in Dialogs

Mitigation Strategy: Input Sanitization for Dialog Display

Description:

  1. Identify all locations in the application where user-provided data or external data is displayed within material-dialogs (e.g., in setContent, setMessage, list items, custom views).
  2. For each identified location, implement input sanitization before passing the data to material-dialogs methods for display.
  3. Choose the appropriate sanitization method based on the context where the dialog content is rendered. For example, if the dialog content might be interpreted as HTML (even indirectly), use HTML escaping. For plain text, ensure proper encoding to prevent control character interpretation.
  4. Test the sanitization by displaying various types of potentially malicious input within the dialog to confirm effective mitigation.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (High Severity): If material-dialogs is used in a context where content could be interpreted as HTML (e.g., if custom views within the dialog render web content, or if the underlying platform has HTML rendering capabilities in text views), unsanitized input can lead to XSS.

Impact:

  • XSS: High reduction in risk. Effective sanitization prevents XSS attacks originating from displayed user input within material-dialogs.

Currently Implemented:

  • Implemented in UserProfileDialog.java where user's "About Me" text is displayed using setMessage(). StringEscapeUtils.escapeHtml4() is used to sanitize the text before setting it as the message in the material-dialogs.

Missing Implementation:

  • Missing in CommentDisplayDialog.java where user comments are displayed in a RecyclerView within a custom material-dialogs. Comments are currently passed directly to the RecyclerView adapter without sanitization before being rendered in the dialog.

Mitigation Strategy: Validate User Input Received from Dialogs

Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation for Dialog Input

Description:

  1. Identify all dialogs created using material-dialogs that accept user input (e.g., using input(), custom views with input fields integrated into material-dialogs).
  2. Implement input validation immediately after receiving input from material-dialogs through its callbacks or listeners (e.g., in the positiveButton click listener of an input() dialog).
  3. Validate the input data based on expected data type, format, range, and application-specific business rules.
  4. Provide user-friendly error messages within the dialog context or through other appropriate UI feedback if validation fails, guiding the user to correct their input before proceeding.
  5. Consider disabling the positive button or preventing dialog dismissal until valid input is provided to enforce validation directly within the material-dialogs interaction flow.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Data Injection (Medium to High Severity): Insufficient validation of input received from material-dialogs can lead to data injection vulnerabilities in backend systems if this data is subsequently used in database queries or system commands.
  • Business Logic Bypass (Medium Severity): Lack of validation on dialog inputs can allow users to bypass intended application logic or constraints enforced through dialog interactions.
  • Application Errors and Instability (Low to Medium Severity): Invalid input from dialogs can cause unexpected application behavior or errors if not properly handled after being received from material-dialogs.

Impact:

  • Data Injection: Medium to High reduction in risk. Validation performed after receiving input from material-dialogs significantly reduces the risk of data injection.
  • Business Logic Bypass: High reduction in risk. Input validation within the dialog flow helps enforce business rules and prevents bypass attempts through dialog inputs.
  • Application Errors and Instability: Medium reduction in risk. Validating dialog input helps prevent errors caused by malformed or unexpected data received from material-dialogs.

Currently Implemented:

  • Partially implemented in RegistrationDialog.java which uses material-dialogs input() for email and password. Basic client-side format validation using regular expressions is performed in the positiveButton listener before proceeding with registration.

Missing Implementation:

  • Missing in EditProfileDialog.java which uses custom views within material-dialogs for profile editing. Input fields like "Username" and "Phone Number" in these custom views lack validation logic implemented in the dialog's button click listeners.
  • Error messages for validation failures are not consistently displayed within the material-dialogs context itself, sometimes relying on separate UI elements for feedback.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Handling of Sensitive Input in Dialogs

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Sensitive Input Handling in Material Dialogs

Description:

  1. Identify all dialogs created with material-dialogs that are used to collect sensitive information (e.g., passwords, API keys, personal identification numbers).
  2. When using material-dialogs input() for password fields, always utilize the appropriate inputType flag (InputType.TYPE_CLASS_TEXT | InputType.TYPE_TEXT_VARIATION_PASSWORD) to ensure characters are masked as they are typed within the dialog.
  3. When creating custom views for sensitive input within material-dialogs, ensure that the input fields within these custom views are also configured for secure input (e.g., using android:inputType="textPassword" in XML layouts for Android).
  4. Avoid logging sensitive input values after they are retrieved from material-dialogs in application logs or debugging outputs.
  5. When processing sensitive data obtained from material-dialogs, ensure it is handled securely in subsequent application logic (e.g., encrypted in transit and at rest if stored).

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Information Disclosure (High Severity): Insecure handling of sensitive input within material-dialogs can lead to accidental exposure of confidential data through logging or insecure display if not properly masked.
  • Credential Theft (High Severity): If password input fields in material-dialogs are not correctly configured for secure input, passwords might be displayed in plain text or logged, increasing the risk of credential theft.

Impact:

  • Information Disclosure: High reduction in risk. Using secure input types within material-dialogs and avoiding logging minimizes the risk of sensitive data leaks directly related to dialog interactions.
  • Credential Theft: High reduction in risk. Properly configuring password input fields in material-dialogs significantly reduces the risk of password compromise during user input.

Currently Implemented:

  • Password fields in LoginDialog.java and RegistrationDialog.java which use material-dialogs input() correctly utilize inputType(InputType.TYPE_CLASS_TEXT | InputType.TYPE_TEXT_VARIATION_PASSWORD).

Missing Implementation:

  • When custom views are used within material-dialogs for collecting sensitive information (if any are planned in the future), ensure the input fields in these custom views are also explicitly configured for secure input.
  • Logging practices should be reviewed to ensure no sensitive data retrieved from material-dialogs is inadvertently logged during development or in production.

Mitigation Strategy: Minimize Information Disclosure in Material Dialog Content

Mitigation Strategy: Minimize Dialog Information Disclosure

Description:

  1. Review the content of all dialogs created using material-dialogs and identify any instances where potentially sensitive information, debug details, or overly verbose error messages are displayed within the dialog's title, message, or custom views.
  2. Replace detailed technical error messages displayed by material-dialogs with generic, user-friendly messages that do not reveal internal system details or potential vulnerabilities.
  3. Ensure that debug information or development-specific messages are not accidentally included in material-dialogs displayed in production builds. Use conditional logic to display more detailed information only in debug/development environments and generic messages in production.
  4. Minimize the amount of information displayed in material-dialogs to only what is strictly necessary for the user to understand the context and take appropriate action. Avoid displaying unnecessary details that could be exploited by attackers.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Information Disclosure (Low to Medium Severity): Displaying excessive or sensitive information in material-dialogs, especially in error messages, can reveal internal system details, configuration information, or potential vulnerabilities to attackers.

Impact:

  • Information Disclosure: Medium reduction in risk. Minimizing information disclosure within material-dialogs reduces the attack surface and limits the information available to potential attackers through dialog interactions.

Currently Implemented:

  • Generic error messages are used in network request failure dialogs created with material-dialogs (e.g., "Network error occurred. Please try again.").

Missing Implementation:

  • Detailed error messages originating from backend validation failures might sometimes be directly passed to material-dialogs and displayed to the user. These should be replaced with more generic messages before being passed to material-dialogs for display.
  • Review all dialogs to ensure no debug-specific information is inadvertently included in production builds when using material-dialogs.

Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Update material-dialogs Library

Mitigation Strategy: Regular Material Dialogs Library Updates

Description:

  1. Establish a process for regularly checking for updates specifically to the material-dialogs library.
  2. Monitor the material-dialogs library's GitHub repository, release notes, and any security advisories related to the library for announcements of new versions and security patches.
  3. Utilize dependency management tools (e.g., Gradle in Android projects) to facilitate easy updating of the material-dialogs library version in the project.
  4. Test updated versions of material-dialogs in a development or staging environment specifically focusing on dialog-related functionality to ensure compatibility and prevent regressions before deploying to production.
  5. Prioritize applying security patches and updates for material-dialogs promptly to address any known vulnerabilities reported in the library itself.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities in Material Dialogs (High Severity): Using outdated versions of the material-dialogs library can expose the application to publicly known security vulnerabilities within the dialog library itself that attackers could potentially exploit.

Impact:

  • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities in Material Dialogs: High reduction in risk. Regularly updating material-dialogs ensures that any known vulnerabilities within the library are patched, significantly reducing the risk of exploitation targeting the dialog functionality.

Currently Implemented:

  • The project uses Gradle for dependency management, making library updates possible. Developers are generally aware of the need to update dependencies, including material-dialogs.

Missing Implementation:

  • There is no automated system specifically tracking updates for the material-dialogs library and proactively notifying developers when new versions are available. Updates are currently performed manually and might be delayed.
  • Formalized testing focused specifically on dialog functionality after updating material-dialogs in a staging environment before production deployment is not consistently performed.