Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
83 lines (55 loc) · 8.7 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

83 lines (55 loc) · 8.7 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for airbnb/mavericks

Objective: Compromise Mavericks-Based Application by Exploiting Mavericks-Specific Weaknesses (Focus on High-Risk Areas)

Attack Tree Visualization

└── AND Compromise Mavericks-Based Application └── OR Exploit Developer Misuse/Anti-Patterns (Most likely attack vector in practice) ├── [HIGH RISK PATH] 3.1. Storing Sensitive Data Directly in Mavericks State [CRITICAL NODE] │ └── Insight: Developers might mistakenly store sensitive data (API keys, passwords, PII) directly in Mavericks state without proper encryption or protection, making it vulnerable to memory dumps, debugging tools, or reverse engineering. │ └── Action: Avoid storing sensitive data directly in Mavericks state. If necessary, encrypt sensitive data before storing it in state and decrypt it only when needed. Use secure storage mechanisms (e.g., Android Keystore) for sensitive credentials. └── OR Exploit State Management Vulnerabilities └── OR 1.2. State Exposure └── [HIGH RISK PATH] 1.2.1. Unintentional State Logging/Debugging in Production [CRITICAL NODE] └── Insight: Mavericks' debugging features or developer logging might inadvertently expose sensitive state information in production environments. └── Action: Disable verbose logging and debugging features in production builds. Review logging configurations to ensure no sensitive state is logged. Use build configurations to differentiate between debug and release logging. └── OR Exploit Developer Misuse/Anti-Patterns (Most likely attack vector in practice) └── [HIGH RISK PATH] 3.3. Over-reliance on Client-Side State for Security Decisions [CRITICAL NODE] └── Insight: Relying solely on client-side Mavericks state to enforce security decisions (e.g., authorization checks) is insecure. Attackers can manipulate client-side state to bypass security checks. └── Action: Implement security checks and authorization logic on the server-side. Use Mavericks state primarily for UI state management, not for security enforcement.

Attack Tree Path: [HIGH RISK PATH] 1.2.1. Unintentional State Logging/Debugging in Production [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector Description: Developers may leave verbose logging or debugging features enabled in production builds. If sensitive data is included in the Mavericks state and is logged, this information can be exposed through application logs. Attackers can potentially access these logs through various means depending on the application's deployment and logging infrastructure.

  • Likelihood: Medium - Common developer oversight, especially in fast-paced development cycles.

  • Impact: Medium/High - Exposure of sensitive data, depending on the nature of the data stored in the Mavericks state. This could include personal information, API keys, or other confidential details.

  • Effort: Low - Attackers can passively observe logs if they are accessible. Automated log scraping tools can be used to efficiently extract information.

  • Skill Level: Novice - Requires basic understanding of application logging and potentially access to log files or streams.

  • Detection Difficulty: Easy - Log monitoring and security audits of logging configurations can easily detect verbose logging in production. Static analysis tools can also identify potential logging of sensitive state.

  • Actionable Insights:

    • Disable verbose logging and debugging features in production builds.
    • Implement build configurations to differentiate between debug and release logging levels.
    • Regularly review logging configurations to ensure no sensitive state is inadvertently logged.
    • Consider using structured logging and carefully control what data is logged, especially in production.

Attack Tree Path: [HIGH RISK PATH] 3.1. Storing Sensitive Data Directly in Mavericks State [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector Description: Developers might mistakenly or unknowingly store sensitive data (API keys, passwords, Personally Identifiable Information - PII) directly within the Mavericks state without proper encryption or protection. This makes the sensitive data vulnerable to various attacks that can access application memory or storage. Attackers can use memory dumps, debugging tools, or reverse engineering techniques to extract this sensitive information.

  • Likelihood: Medium/High - A common developer mistake, especially in teams with less security awareness or under pressure to deliver quickly.

  • Impact: High - Exposure of sensitive data can lead to severe consequences, including account compromise, identity theft, financial loss, and reputational damage.

  • Effort: Low - Obtaining memory dumps or using debugging tools is relatively easy for attackers with basic Android development knowledge or access to a compromised device. Reverse engineering, while more complex, is also a feasible path for determined attackers.

  • Skill Level: Novice/Intermediate - Basic knowledge of Android debugging, memory analysis, or reverse engineering is sufficient to exploit this vulnerability.

  • Detection Difficulty: Hard - Difficult to detect at runtime. Requires thorough code reviews, static analysis tools that can identify potential storage of sensitive data in state, and secure coding training for developers.

  • Actionable Insights:

    • Strictly avoid storing sensitive data directly in Mavericks state without encryption.
    • If sensitive data must be managed by the application, encrypt it before storing it in the Mavericks state and decrypt it only when absolutely necessary and in a secure manner.
    • Utilize secure storage mechanisms provided by the Android platform, such as the Android Keystore, for managing sensitive credentials and encryption keys.
    • Implement static analysis checks to detect potential storage of sensitive data in state.
    • Conduct regular code reviews with a focus on sensitive data handling in Mavericks state.

Attack Tree Path: [HIGH RISK PATH] 3.3. Over-reliance on Client-Side State for Security Decisions [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector Description: Developers might incorrectly rely solely on the client-side Mavericks state to enforce security decisions, such as authorization checks or access control. Attackers can manipulate the client-side state (e.g., by modifying application memory, intercepting network requests, or reverse engineering the application logic) to bypass these client-side security checks and gain unauthorized access or perform actions they should not be permitted to.

  • Likelihood: Medium - Conceptual misunderstanding of client-side vs. server-side security is a common pitfall, especially for developers new to security principles or those primarily focused on UI/UX.

  • Impact: High - Bypassing security controls can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive resources, data manipulation, privilege escalation, and other severe security breaches.

  • Effort: Low - Manipulating client-side state can be achieved with relatively low effort using debugging tools, reverse engineering, or network interception techniques.

  • Skill Level: Novice/Intermediate - Basic understanding of client-side application architecture and debugging techniques is sufficient to exploit this vulnerability.

  • Detection Difficulty: Hard - Difficult to detect at runtime from the server-side perspective. Requires thorough security architecture reviews, penetration testing specifically targeting client-side security assumptions, and developer training on secure application design principles.

  • Actionable Insights:

    • Implement all critical security checks and authorization logic on the server-side.
    • Use Mavericks state primarily for managing UI state and application flow, not for enforcing security.
    • Clearly define the separation of concerns between client-side UI logic and server-side security enforcement in the application architecture.
    • Conduct security architecture reviews to identify and eliminate any reliance on client-side state for security decisions.
    • Perform penetration testing to validate server-side security controls and identify potential client-side bypass vulnerabilities.