Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
98 lines (78 loc) · 6.63 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

98 lines (78 loc) · 6.63 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for alibaba/p3c

Objective: Introduce exploitable vulnerabilities into the application by leveraging developer reliance on p3c, either through misconfigurations, ignored warnings, or limitations of the p3c tooling itself.

Attack Tree Visualization

                                  Degrade Application Security/Performance
                                  (via p3c misuse/vulnerabilities)
                                              |
                                 -------------------------------------
                                 |                                   |
                  **1. Misinterpretation/Misapplication**        **2. Tooling/Integration Issues**
                  **of Guidelines**                                     |
                  |                                     -------------------------------------
      -----------------------------------                 |                                   |
      |                 |                 |                 |                                   |
      |                 |       **1.3 Ignoring**        |        **2.2 Incomplete/**
      |                 |       **Critical Warnings [CN]**   |        **Inaccurate Static**
      |                 |                 |                 |        **Analysis [CN]**
      |                 |   -----------------           |              |
      |                 |   |       |       |           |    ------------------------
      |                 |   **1.3.1** **1.3.2** **1.3.3** |    |              |
**1.2 Overly Strict**    |   **Security** **Perfor-** **Config-** |    **2.2.1**          **2.2.2 [HR]**
**Rules Leading to**     |   **Vulns [HR]** **mance**  **uration** |    **Undetected**     **Incomplete**
**Security Weaknesses** |   **Missed [CN]** **Degra-**  **Errors**    |    **Vulnerabilities** **Coverage of**
      |                 |                 **dation**              |                      **Custom Code**

----------------- | ----------------- | | | | | | 1.2.1 1.2.2 1.2.3 | 2.2.2.1 [HR] 2.2.2.2 [HR] Perfor- Security Code | p3c Plugin p3c Ruleset mance Holes [HR] Bloat | Fails to Does Not Hit Introduced | Recognize Cover New Due to by Overly | Custom Java Exces- Restric- | Security- Features or sive tive | Relevant Libraries Checks/ Rules | Code Logging (e.g., (e.g., Improper DoS) Input Validation)

Attack Tree Path: 1.2: Overly Strict Rules Leading to Security Weaknesses

Description: Ironically, enforcing coding guidelines too strictly can introduce vulnerabilities. Developers might find workarounds that bypass security mechanisms to comply with overly restrictive rules, or the rules themselves might inadvertently create weaknesses.

Attack Tree Path: 1.2.2: Security Holes [HR]

Description: Developers circumvent security best practices to adhere to overly restrictive p3c rules. For example, a rule limiting the complexity of input validation might lead developers to skip validation entirely, opening the door to injection attacks. Or, a prohibition against a specific (secure) library might force developers to write their own, potentially flawed, implementation. Likelihood: Low Impact: High to Very High Effort: Very Low Skill Level: Low to Medium Detection Difficulty: High

Attack Tree Path: 1.3: Ignoring Critical Warnings [CN]

Description: This is a critical decision point. If developers ignore warnings from the p3c static analysis tools, vulnerabilities will likely remain in the code.

Attack Tree Path: 1.3.1: Security Vulns Missed [HR][CN]

Description: Developers ignore security-related warnings from p3c, leading directly to unpatched vulnerabilities in the application. This is often due to alert fatigue, perceived irrelevance of the warnings, or time constraints. Likelihood: High Impact: High to Very High Effort: Very Low Skill Level: Medium to High Detection Difficulty: Medium to High

Attack Tree Path: 2.2: Incomplete/Inaccurate Static Analysis [CN]

Description: This represents the fundamental limitation of static analysis tools. They cannot catch all vulnerabilities, especially in complex code or with new language features/libraries.

Attack Tree Path: 2.2.2: Incomplete Coverage [HR]

Description: The p3c tool, by its nature, cannot cover all possible code patterns and vulnerabilities. This is a general weakness of static analysis. Likelihood: Medium Impact: High to Very High Effort: Very Low Skill Level: Medium to High Detection Difficulty: High

Attack Tree Path: 2.2.2.1: p3c Plugin Fails to Recognize Custom Security-Relevant Code [HR]

Description: The p3c plugin might not be able to analyze custom code that implements security features or interacts with sensitive data. This leaves a blind spot where vulnerabilities can easily hide. Likelihood: Medium to High Impact: High to Very High Effort: Very Low Skill Level: Medium to High Detection Difficulty: Very High

Attack Tree Path: 2.2.2.2: p3c Ruleset Does Not Cover New Java Features or Libraries [HR]

Description: New language features and third-party libraries are constantly being introduced, and the p3c ruleset may not be updated quickly enough to cover the potential vulnerabilities they introduce. Likelihood: Medium Impact: High to Very High Effort: Very Low Skill Level: Medium to High Detection Difficulty: High