Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
54 lines (47 loc) · 4.97 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

54 lines (47 loc) · 4.97 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for android/nowinandroid

Attack Surface: Remote Data Fetching and Processing

  • Description: The application fetches news, topics, and author data. While currently using local assets, the architecture is designed to potentially use a remote API. This involves network communication and data parsing, all managed by NiA's code.
  • How NiA Contributes: NiA uses Retrofit and OkHttp for network requests and kotlinx.serialization for JSON parsing. The data structure, fetching logic, and display are all defined within NiA. This is the core functionality of the app.
  • Example: If a backend is implemented, an attacker could use SQL injection on the server to inject malicious news content, which NiA would then display to users.
  • Impact: Users could be exposed to phishing links, malware, or misinformation. The app's reputation would be severely damaged.
  • Risk Severity: High (if a real backend is used)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers:
      • Implement strict HTTPS certificate validation, potentially including certificate pinning.
      • Keep Retrofit, OkHttp, and kotlinx.serialization updated.
      • If a backend is implemented:
        • Crucially: Implement robust server-side input validation and sanitization. This is the primary defense.
        • Protect against all common web vulnerabilities (SQLi, XSS, CSRF, etc.).
        • Implement rate limiting and DoS protection.
        • Regular security audits and penetration testing of the backend are essential.
      • Fuzz test the JSON parsing logic within NiA.

Attack Surface: WebView Usage

  • Description: Although NiA primarily uses Jetpack Compose, any use of WebView to display web content introduces a significant attack surface. This is entirely dependent on NiA's implementation choices.
  • How NiA Contributes: The decision to use WebView and all aspects of its configuration and the content loaded are completely controlled by NiA's code.
  • Example: If NiA were to use a WebView to display author information fetched from a remote source, an attacker could inject malicious JavaScript into the author data, leading to XSS within the NiA app.
  • Impact: XSS attacks, JavaScript injection, potential access to local files or device features (if misconfigured), and other WebView-related vulnerabilities, all within the context of the NiA app.
  • Risk Severity: High (if WebView is used)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers:
      • Prioritize avoiding WebView entirely. Use Jetpack Compose for all UI elements.
      • If WebView is absolutely, unavoidably necessary:
        • Enable JavaScript only if strictly required and with extreme caution.
        • Disable file access (setAllowFileAccess(false)).
        • Enable Safe Browsing (setSafeBrowsingEnabled(true)).
        • Thoroughly sanitize all data displayed in the WebView, regardless of the source.
        • Use a custom WebViewClient to intercept and validate every loaded URL.
        • Load content only from trusted, HTTPS-secured sources, and validate those sources rigorously.

Attack Surface: Build and Release Process

  • Description: The security of NiA's build and release process is critical to prevent the distribution of compromised app versions. This includes code signing and the handling of build artifacts.
  • How NiA Contributes: NiA's build configuration (obfuscation, minification), signing key management, and the entire release pipeline are directly part of NiA's development process.
  • Example: An attacker gains access to the NiA developer's signing key and uses it to sign a malicious version of the app, distributing it through unofficial channels or even potentially compromising the official distribution channel.
  • Impact: Users could unknowingly install a compromised version of NiA, leading to data theft, malware infection, or other severe consequences. This is a catastrophic security failure.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers:
      • Enable code obfuscation (R8/ProGuard) and minification in release builds.
      • Securely store the app's signing key. Use a hardware security module (HSM) if feasible. This is paramount.
      • Use Google Play App Signing to delegate key management to Google. This significantly reduces the risk of key compromise.
      • Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all accounts involved in the release process (developer accounts, CI/CD systems, etc.).
      • Regularly review and update the build and release pipeline security, including access controls and build tool configurations.
      • Implement robust build integrity checks.