Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
78 lines (68 loc) · 5.94 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

78 lines (68 loc) · 5.94 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for android/nowinandroid

Objective: To gain unauthorized access to user data, manipulate application content, or disrupt the application's functionality by exploiting vulnerabilities specific to the Now in Android application's codebase, dependencies, or configuration.

Attack Tree Visualization

[Attacker's Goal] | --------------------------------------------------- | | [Exploit Data Layer Vulnerabilities] [Exploit Dependency Vulnerabilities] [HIGH-RISK] | | ------------------- ----------------------------------- | | | [1. SQL Injection] [2. Data Exposure] [9. Third-Party Libraries] {CRITICAL} [HIGH-RISK] [HIGH-RISK] | | | ----------------------------------- [1a. Bypass Auth] [2a. Read] [9a. Supply Chain Attack] [HIGH-RISK] [1b. Modify Data] [Sensitive Data] [9b. Known Vuln. in Dependency] {CRITICAL} [HIGH-RISK]

Attack Tree Path: 1. Exploit Data Layer Vulnerabilities: SQL Injection [HIGH-RISK]

  • Description: Although NiA uses Room, which generally protects against SQL injection if used correctly, improper use of @RawQuery or string concatenation within queries could introduce vulnerabilities.
    • Sub-Attacks:
      • 1a. Bypass Auth: An attacker could craft a SQL injection payload to bypass authentication mechanisms and gain unauthorized access.
      • 1b. Modify Data: An attacker could inject SQL code to modify, delete, or insert data into the database.
    • Likelihood: Low (Due to Room, but not impossible)
    • Impact: High (Data breach, modification, authentication bypass)
    • Effort: Medium (Requires finding a vulnerable @RawQuery or string concatenation)
    • Skill Level: Intermediate (Understanding of SQL injection and Room)
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Detectable with static analysis and code review)
    • Mitigation:
      • Strictly use parameterized queries with @RawQuery.
      • Avoid any string concatenation within SQL queries.
      • Employ static analysis tools to detect SQL injection vulnerabilities.
      • Implement input validation as a defense-in-depth measure.

Attack Tree Path: 1. Exploit Data Layer Vulnerabilities: Data Exposure [HIGH-RISK]

  • Description: Sensitive data (user IDs, topic preferences, etc.) might be inadvertently exposed through logging, error messages, or insecure communication.
    • Sub-Attacks:
      • 2a. Read Sensitive Data: An attacker could gain access to sensitive information by observing logs, error messages, or network traffic.
    • Likelihood: Medium (Accidental logging or error messages are common)
    • Impact: Medium to High (Depends on the sensitivity of the exposed data)
    • Effort: Low (Often requires just observing logs or error messages)
    • Skill Level: Beginner (Basic understanding of application behavior)
    • Detection Difficulty: Easy to Medium (Logs/errors are often visible; identifying sensitive data requires analysis)
    • Mitigation:
      • Review all logging statements to ensure no sensitive data is logged.
      • Implement robust error handling that avoids exposing internal details.
      • Use HTTPS for all communication and consider certificate pinning.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Exploit Dependency Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK]: 9. Third-Party Libraries {CRITICAL}

  • Description: This is the most likely attack vector. Vulnerabilities in third-party libraries used by NiA (Retrofit, OkHttp, Coil, etc.) can be exploited.
    • Sub-Attacks:
      • 9a. Supply Chain Attack [HIGH-RISK]: A malicious actor compromises a legitimate library, injecting malicious code that is then distributed to applications using that library.
        • Likelihood: Medium (Increasingly common attack vector)
        • Impact: Very High (Potential for complete application compromise)
        • Effort: High (Requires compromising a library's build or distribution process)
        • Skill Level: Expert (Advanced understanding of software supply chains)
        • Detection Difficulty: Very Hard (Requires sophisticated monitoring and analysis)
        • Mitigation:
          • Use signed artifacts.
          • Verify the integrity of dependencies.
          • Implement robust software composition analysis (SCA).
      • 9b. Known Vulnerability in Dependency [HIGH-RISK] {CRITICAL}: An attacker exploits a publicly known vulnerability in a third-party library used by the application.
        • Likelihood: High (Libraries frequently have vulnerabilities)
        • Impact: Variable (Depends on the specific vulnerability; can be Low to Very High)
        • Effort: Variable (Depends on the vulnerability; can be Low to High)
        • Skill Level: Variable (Depends on the vulnerability; can be Beginner to Expert)
        • Detection Difficulty: Easy to Medium (Vulnerability scanners can identify known vulnerabilities)
        • Mitigation:
          • Use a dependency management tool (Gradle) to keep libraries updated.
          • Employ vulnerability scanning tools (Snyk, Dependabot, OWASP Dependency-Check).
          • Establish a process for rapid patching of vulnerable dependencies.
          • Minimize the number of dependencies used.