Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
165 lines (122 loc) · 13 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

165 lines (122 loc) · 13 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for android/nowinandroid

Mitigation Strategy: Dependency Verification (Gradle Configuration)

Mitigation Strategy: Enable and configure Gradle's dependency verification feature within NiA's build files.

Description:

  1. Modify build.gradle.kts: In the relevant build.gradle.kts files (likely at the project and module levels), add configuration to enable dependency verification.
  2. Choose Verification Mode: Select either VERIFY_METADATA (for metadata consistency checks) or VERIFY_SIGNATURES (for digital signature verification – stronger).
  3. Create verification-metadata.xml (or similar): Create a file (typically named verification-metadata.xml) to store the trusted keys (for signature verification) or expected checksums (for metadata verification). This file will be referenced in the build.gradle.kts configuration.
  4. Populate Verification Data: Add the necessary public keys or checksums to the verification-metadata.xml file. This information needs to be obtained from the dependency providers.
  5. Test the Build: Run a Gradle build to ensure that the verification process works correctly. The build should fail if verification fails.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks (Medium/High): Prevents an attacker from substituting a legitimate NiA dependency with a malicious one during the build process.
  • Compromised Repository (Medium/High): Protects against a scenario where the repository hosting a NiA dependency is compromised.
  • Tampered Dependency (Medium/High): Detects if dependency was tampered.

Impact:

  • MitM Attacks: Significantly reduces the risk (close to 100% if signature verification is used and keys are managed securely).
  • Compromised Repository: Similar to MitM, significantly reduces the risk (close to 100% with signature verification).
  • Tampered Dependency: Significantly reduces the risk.

Currently Implemented:

  • Not implemented.

Missing Implementation:

  • Requires modifications to the build.gradle.kts files and the creation of a verification-metadata.xml file (or similar) with the appropriate configuration.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Data Storage (Room with SQLCipher - Code Integration)

Mitigation Strategy: Integrate SQLCipher into NiA's Room database implementation to encrypt locally stored data.

Description:

  1. Add SQLCipher Dependency: Add the net.zetetic:android-database-sqlcipher dependency to the appropriate build.gradle.kts file (likely in the :data module).
  2. Key Generation (Android Keystore): Use the Android Keystore System (as described in a separate mitigation, but implemented within NiA's code) to generate a strong, random encryption key. This involves using KeyGenerator or KeyPairGenerator within the NiA codebase.
  3. Key Storage (Android Keystore): Store the generated key securely in the Android Keystore, using a unique alias. This also involves code changes within NiA.
  4. Modify Room Database Configuration: In the code where the Room database is configured (likely in a DatabaseModule or similar), modify the configuration to use the SupportFactory provided by SQLCipher.
  5. Retrieve Key from Keystore: Before creating the database instance, retrieve the encryption key from the Android Keystore using its alias.
  6. Pass Key to SQLCipher: Pass the retrieved key to the SupportFactory when building the Room database.
  7. Test Encryption: Write unit tests to verify that data is being encrypted and decrypted correctly.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Data Breach (Local Storage) (High/Critical): Protects sensitive data stored in NiA's database from being accessed if the device is compromised.
  • Unauthorized Data Access (Medium/High): Prevents other applications on the device from accessing NiA's database contents.

Impact:

  • Data Breach (Local Storage): Reduces the risk significantly (close to 100% if the key is managed securely).
  • Unauthorized Data Access: Reduces the risk significantly (close to 100% with proper key management).

Currently Implemented:

  • Not implemented.

Missing Implementation:

  • Requires significant code changes in the :data module (or wherever the Room database is configured) to integrate SQLCipher and the Android Keystore.

Mitigation Strategy: Key Management (Android Keystore - Code Implementation)

Mitigation Strategy: Implement secure key management within NiA's code using the Android Keystore System.

Description:

  1. Identify Key Requirements: Determine the types of keys needed (e.g., symmetric encryption keys for SQLCipher).
  2. Key Generation Code: Write code (likely in a utility class or within the data layer) to use the KeyGenerator or KeyPairGenerator classes to generate keys. Specify the key algorithm, size, and purpose. Use setIsStrongBoxBacked(true) if hardware-backed keys are desired.
  3. Key Alias Management: Define constants or a configuration mechanism for managing key aliases.
  4. Key Storage Code: Write code to store the generated keys in the Android Keystore using the KeyStore class and the defined aliases.
  5. Key Retrieval Code: Write code to retrieve keys from the Keystore using their aliases.
  6. Error Handling: Implement proper error handling for key generation, storage, and retrieval failures.
  7. Unit Tests: Write unit tests to verify that key generation, storage, and retrieval are working correctly.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Key Compromise (Critical): Protects cryptographic keys used by NiA from being extracted from the application's code or resources.
  • Unauthorized Key Use (Critical): Limits the use of keys to authorized operations within NiA.

Impact:

  • Key Compromise: Significantly reduces the risk (close to 100% if hardware-backed keys are used).
  • Unauthorized Key Use: Significantly reduces the risk (close to 100%).

Currently Implemented:

  • Not directly applicable in NiA's current state (no encryption keys are used), but essential if SQLCipher or other encryption is added.

Missing Implementation:

  • Would be required if any encryption is implemented. This involves adding code to handle key generation, storage, and retrieval using the Android Keystore.

Mitigation Strategy: Certificate Pinning (OkHttpClient Configuration within NiA)

Mitigation Strategy: Configure OkHttpClient (used by Retrofit within NiA) to implement certificate pinning for secure network communication.

Description:

  1. Obtain Server Certificate(s): Obtain the public key certificate(s) of the server(s) that NiA will communicate with (if any future API integrations are planned).
  2. Calculate Certificate Hash(es): Calculate the SHA-256 hash(es) of the public key(s). This can be done using command-line tools or libraries.
  3. Modify Network Configuration: In the code where the OkHttpClient instance is created (likely in a NetworkModule or similar), create a CertificatePinner instance.
  4. Add Pins: Use the CertificatePinner.Builder to add pins for the expected server hostnames and the corresponding certificate hashes.
  5. Apply to OkHttpClient: Apply the CertificatePinner to the OkHttpClient instance.
  6. Use with Retrofit: Ensure that the configured OkHttpClient is used by Retrofit.
  7. Test Pinning: Write integration tests to verify that certificate pinning is working correctly. The tests should fail if the server presents a different certificate.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks (High/Critical): Prevents attackers from intercepting NiA's network communication by presenting a fake certificate.

Impact:

  • MitM Attacks: Significantly reduces the risk (close to 100% if implemented correctly).

Currently Implemented:

  • Not implemented.

Missing Implementation:

  • Would require code changes in the network layer (likely in a NetworkModule or similar) to configure OkHttpClient with a CertificatePinner.

Mitigation Strategy: Safe Rendering of External Content (Compose and Coil Configuration)

Mitigation Strategy: Ensure that external content (if any) is rendered safely within NiA's Compose UI, leveraging Coil's security features.

Description:

  1. Review Content Sources: Carefully review all sources of external content (e.g., news article descriptions, images).
  2. Sanitize Text (if necessary): If displaying text from external sources that might contain HTML, use a text sanitization library (or built-in Compose features) to remove any potentially malicious tags or attributes.
  3. Coil Configuration: Review and configure Coil's settings to ensure it's handling image loading securely. This might involve:
    • Disabling insecure features: Ensure that Coil is not configured to load images from insecure sources (e.g., HTTP).
    • Enabling security checks: Explore Coil's options for enabling additional security checks during image loading.
    • Using appropriate image formats: Prefer image formats that are less susceptible to vulnerabilities (e.g., WebP).
  4. Avoid WebView (if possible): Avoid using WebView for displaying external HTML content unless absolutely necessary. If WebView must be used, disable JavaScript and implement strict HTML sanitization (as described in previous responses).
  5. Unit/UI Tests: Write tests to verify that external content is being rendered safely and that no malicious code is being executed.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (High/Critical): Prevents attackers from injecting malicious JavaScript code into NiA through external content.
  • Content Injection (Medium/High): Prevents other types of malicious content injection.

Impact:

  • XSS: Significantly reduces the risk (close to 100% if sanitization and secure rendering practices are followed).
  • Content Injection: Reduces the risk, depending on the specific vulnerabilities and the effectiveness of the mitigation techniques.

Currently Implemented:

  • Partially. NiA uses Compose, which is inherently safer than WebView. It uses Coil for image loading.

Missing Implementation:

  • Explicit text sanitization might be needed if NiA starts displaying more complex text content from external sources.
  • A thorough review of Coil's configuration and security features is recommended.

Mitigation Strategy: Security-Focused Unit and Integration Tests (within NiA's test suite)

Mitigation Strategy: Add security-specific tests to NiA's existing unit and integration test suite.

Description:

  1. Identify Security-Critical Areas: Identify the parts of NiA's code that are most important for security (e.g., data handling, network communication, any future authentication/authorization logic).
  2. Write Input Validation Tests: Create tests that provide invalid, unexpected, and boundary-case input to these areas and verify that the code handles them gracefully (without crashing or exposing vulnerabilities).
  3. Write Injection Tests (if applicable): If there are any areas where user input is used to construct queries or commands (e.g., SQL queries, even though NiA uses Room), write tests to check for potential injection vulnerabilities.
  4. Write Network Security Tests (if applicable): If certificate pinning or other network security measures are implemented, write tests to verify that they are working correctly.
  5. Write Data Handling Tests: Write tests to verify that sensitive data is being handled securely (e.g., encrypted correctly, not logged unnecessarily).
  6. Integrate with CI: Ensure that these security tests are run automatically as part of NiA's continuous integration (CI) process.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Input Validation Errors (Medium/High): Catches errors in input validation within NiA's code.
  • Injection Vulnerabilities (High/Critical): Helps to identify and prevent injection vulnerabilities within NiA.
  • Regression Bugs (All Severities): Prevents security regressions from being introduced during code changes to NiA.

Impact:

  • Input Validation Errors: Reduces the risk significantly.
  • Injection Vulnerabilities: Reduces the risk.
  • Regression Bugs: Reduces the risk of introducing new vulnerabilities.

Currently Implemented:

  • Partially. NiA has a good test suite, but the extent of security-specific tests is unclear.

Missing Implementation:

  • More explicit security-focused tests could be added to cover specific vulnerability types and security-critical areas of NiA's code.