Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
85 lines (69 loc) · 8.01 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

85 lines (69 loc) · 8.01 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for arrow-kt/arrow

Objective: Compromise Application Using Arrow-kt

Attack Tree Visualization

  • Compromise Application Using Arrow-kt [OVERALL GOAL]
    • 1. Exploit Vulnerabilities in Arrow-kt Library Itself [CRITICAL NODE - Library Vulnerabilities]
      • 1.1. Discover and Exploit Known Vulnerabilities in Arrow-kt [HIGH RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE - Known Vulnerabilities]
        • 1.1.2. Exploit Known Vulnerability [HIGH RISK PATH]
    • 2. Exploit Misuse or Misconfiguration of Arrow-kt in Application Code [HIGH RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE - Application Misuse]
      • 2.1. Incorrect Error Handling with Either or Validated [HIGH RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE - Error Handling]
        • 2.1.1. Fail to Properly Handle Either.Left Cases, Leading to Unhandled Exceptions or Logic Errors [HIGH RISK PATH]
      • 2.3. Concurrency Issues with IO due to Misunderstanding or Incorrect Implementation [HIGH RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE - Concurrency with IO]
        • 2.3.1. Introduce Race Conditions by Incorrectly Sequencing IO Actions [HIGH RISK PATH]
      • 2.6. Denial of Service through Resource Exhaustion via IO [HIGH RISK PATH]

Attack Tree Path: 1. Exploit Vulnerabilities in Arrow-kt Library Itself [CRITICAL NODE - Library Vulnerabilities]

Attack Vector:

  • Targeting inherent security flaws within the Arrow-kt library code itself.
  • Breakdown:
    • This critical node represents the risk of vulnerabilities existing within the Arrow-kt library. If successful, exploitation can directly compromise applications using the library.
    • Mitigation primarily relies on the Arrow-kt project team's security practices and the application team's diligence in keeping the library updated.

Attack Tree Path: 1.1. Discover and Exploit Known Vulnerabilities in Arrow-kt [HIGH RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE - Known Vulnerabilities]

Attack Vector:

  • Identifying publicly disclosed vulnerabilities (e.g., CVEs, security advisories) in specific versions of Arrow-kt.
  • Exploiting these known vulnerabilities to compromise applications using vulnerable versions.
  • Breakdown:
    • This high-risk path focuses on exploiting known weaknesses. Attackers leverage publicly available information to target applications using outdated Arrow-kt versions.
    • 1.1.2. Exploit Known Vulnerability [HIGH RISK PATH]: This sub-path is the actual exploitation step. Attackers research and utilize existing exploits or develop their own based on vulnerability details.
    • Mitigation:
      • Vulnerability Scanning: Implement automated dependency scanning to detect outdated Arrow-kt versions.
      • Patch Management: Establish a process for promptly updating Arrow-kt to patched versions when vulnerabilities are disclosed.
      • Security Monitoring: Subscribe to security advisories and vulnerability databases related to Arrow-kt and Kotlin.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Exploit Misuse or Misconfiguration of Arrow-kt in Application Code [HIGH RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE - Application Misuse]

Attack Vector:

  • Exploiting vulnerabilities arising from incorrect or insecure usage of Arrow-kt features by application developers.
  • This is a broad category encompassing various misconfigurations and coding errors related to Arrow-kt.
  • Breakdown:
    • This critical node and high-risk path highlight that even a secure library can introduce vulnerabilities if misused. Developer errors are a significant attack surface.
    • Mitigation focuses on developer education, secure coding practices, and robust code review processes.

Attack Tree Path: 2.1. Incorrect Error Handling with Either or Validated [HIGH RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE - Error Handling]

Attack Vector:

  • Exploiting flaws in how developers handle errors using Arrow-kt's Either and Validated types.
  • Specifically, failing to handle Either.Left cases properly.
  • Breakdown:
    • 2.1.1. Fail to Properly Handle Either.Left Cases, Leading to Unhandled Exceptions or Logic Errors [HIGH RISK PATH]: This sub-path is a common and easily exploitable mistake. If Either.Left (representing an error) is not handled, it can lead to application crashes, unexpected behavior, or logic bypass.
    • Mitigation:
      • Developer Training: Educate developers on exhaustive error handling with Either and Validated, emphasizing the importance of handling all possible outcomes.
      • Code Reviews: Specifically review code for proper Either and Validated handling, ensuring all Left cases are addressed.
      • Linting/Static Analysis: Consider using or creating linters/static analysis rules to enforce mandatory Either handling.

Attack Tree Path: 2.3. Concurrency Issues with IO due to Misunderstanding or Incorrect Implementation [HIGH RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE - Concurrency with IO]

Attack Vector:

  • Exploiting concurrency bugs (race conditions, deadlocks, livelocks) introduced by incorrect or insecure use of Arrow-kt's IO monad for concurrent operations.
  • Specifically, introducing race conditions through improper sequencing of IO actions.
  • Breakdown:
    • 2.3.1. Introduce Race Conditions by Incorrectly Sequencing IO Actions [HIGH RISK PATH]: Race conditions are a common concurrency vulnerability. If IO actions are not sequenced and synchronized correctly, it can lead to data corruption, inconsistent application state, or even security vulnerabilities.
    • Mitigation:
      • Concurrency Training: Provide developers with thorough training on concurrent programming principles and best practices when using IO.
      • Code Reviews (Concurrency Focused): Conduct code reviews specifically focused on concurrency aspects of IO usage, looking for potential race conditions and synchronization issues.
      • Concurrency Testing: Implement rigorous concurrency testing, including stress testing and race condition detection tools.

Attack Tree Path: 2.6. Denial of Service through Resource Exhaustion via IO [HIGH RISK PATH]

Attack Vector:

  • Causing a Denial of Service (DoS) by exploiting inefficient or unbounded IO operations within the application.
  • This can be unintentional (due to developer error) or intentional (attacker-driven).
  • Breakdown:
    • This high-risk path focuses on resource exhaustion. If IO operations consume excessive resources (CPU, memory, network), it can lead to application slowdown or complete unavailability.
    • Mitigation:
      • Resource Limits: Implement resource limits (timeouts, memory limits) for IO operations, especially those triggered by external input.
      • Rate Limiting: Apply rate limiting to operations involving IO that are exposed to external users.
      • Input Validation: Thoroughly validate and sanitize user input to prevent injection of malicious input that could trigger resource-intensive IO operations.
      • Code Reviews (Performance Focused): Review code for potentially inefficient IO operations that could lead to resource exhaustion.
      • Resource Monitoring: Implement resource monitoring to detect and respond to resource exhaustion issues.