Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
138 lines (104 loc) · 16 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

138 lines (104 loc) · 16 KB

Okay, let's perform a deep security analysis of the Reaktive library based on the provided design review.

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: The objective of this deep analysis is to thoroughly examine the security implications of the Reaktive library's design, implementation, and dependencies. We aim to identify potential vulnerabilities, assess their risks, and propose concrete mitigation strategies. The focus is on security aspects specific to reactive programming and the Kotlin Multiplatform environment. Key components to be analyzed include:

    • Core Module: The heart of Reaktive, containing the base reactive types and operators. This is the most critical area for security analysis.
    • Interop Modules (RxJava 2/3, Coroutines): These modules bridge Reaktive with other asynchronous frameworks. We need to understand how these interactions might introduce vulnerabilities.
    • Threading and Concurrency Model: Reactive programming heavily relies on concurrency. Incorrect handling can lead to race conditions, deadlocks, and data corruption.
    • Error Handling: How errors are propagated and handled within reactive streams is crucial for application stability and preventing unexpected behavior.
    • Dependency Management: External dependencies can introduce vulnerabilities. We need to assess the security posture of Reaktive's dependencies.

  • Scope: This analysis focuses solely on the Reaktive library itself, as described in the provided design document and inferred from its GitHub repository (https://github.com/badoo/reaktive). We will not analyze the security of applications that use Reaktive, except to highlight how vulnerabilities in Reaktive could impact those applications. We will consider all target platforms (JVM, Android, iOS, JavaScript, Native) but will focus on areas where platform-specific vulnerabilities are most likely.

  • Methodology:

    1. Architecture and Data Flow Review: We will analyze the provided C4 diagrams and design descriptions to understand the library's architecture, components, and data flow. We will infer additional details from the GitHub repository's structure and code.
    2. Component-Specific Threat Modeling: For each key component (Core, Interop Modules, etc.), we will identify potential threats based on its functionality and interactions.
    3. Vulnerability Analysis: We will analyze the potential for specific vulnerabilities, such as race conditions, deadlocks, integer overflows, denial-of-service, and injection flaws. We will consider how these vulnerabilities might manifest in a reactive programming context.
    4. Dependency Analysis: We will examine the library's dependencies (as listed in build.gradle.kts files) for known vulnerabilities and security best practices.
    5. Mitigation Strategy Recommendation: For each identified threat and vulnerability, we will propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies tailored to the Reaktive library.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

  • Core Module:

    • Threats:

      • Race Conditions: Incorrectly synchronized access to shared mutable state within operators or subscribers could lead to data corruption or inconsistent behavior. This is the primary concern for the Core Module.
      • Deadlocks: Improper use of locks or other synchronization primitives could lead to deadlocks, freezing the reactive stream and potentially the entire application.
      • Resource Exhaustion (DoS): An attacker might be able to trigger the creation of an excessive number of subscriptions or the processing of extremely large data streams, leading to resource exhaustion (memory, CPU, threads). This is particularly relevant to operators that buffer or cache data.
      • Integer Overflows: Operators that perform arithmetic operations (e.g., sum, average) could be vulnerable to integer overflows if they don't handle large numbers correctly.
      • Unhandled Exceptions: Exceptions thrown within operators or subscribers, if not handled properly, could terminate the stream unexpectedly or lead to inconsistent state.
      • Logic Errors in Operators: Bugs in the implementation of operators could lead to incorrect data transformations or unexpected behavior, potentially creating security vulnerabilities in downstream application logic.

    • Data Flow: Data flows through the reactive stream from the source (e.g., Observable.create) through various operators to the subscribers. Each operator transforms the data in some way. The threading model determines which threads are used to execute the operators and subscribers.

    • Security Considerations:

      • Thread Safety: The Core Module must be thoroughly analyzed for thread safety. All shared mutable state must be protected by appropriate synchronization mechanisms (e.g., locks, atomic variables). The choice of synchronization primitives should be carefully considered to avoid performance bottlenecks.
      • Concurrency Model: The library's concurrency model (e.g., Schedulers) should be well-defined and documented. Developers need to understand how to use Schedulers safely to avoid race conditions and deadlocks.
      • Error Handling: The library should provide a consistent and robust mechanism for handling errors. Errors should be propagated through the stream to subscribers, allowing them to handle the errors gracefully. Unhandled exceptions should be avoided.
      • Input Validation: While the library doesn't directly handle user input, it should validate the parameters passed to its operators. This includes checking for null values, invalid ranges, and potential integer overflows.
      • Resource Management: The library should manage resources (e.g., threads, memory) efficiently. Operators that buffer or cache data should have limits on the amount of data they can store to prevent resource exhaustion.

  • Interop Modules (RxJava 2/3, Coroutines):

    • Threats:

      • Bridging Vulnerabilities: The interop modules act as bridges between Reaktive and other asynchronous frameworks. Vulnerabilities in these bridges could allow attacks to propagate between the frameworks. For example, a race condition in RxJava could be exposed through the RxJava interop module.
      • Inconsistent Error Handling: Different frameworks may have different error handling mechanisms. The interop modules need to ensure that errors are translated correctly between the frameworks to avoid unexpected behavior.
      • Dependency on Vulnerable Frameworks: If RxJava 2, RxJava 3, or Kotlin Coroutines have known vulnerabilities, the interop modules could be indirectly affected.

    • Data Flow: Data flows between Reaktive streams and the streams/flows of the other frameworks. The interop modules are responsible for converting between the different stream types and managing the interactions.

    • Security Considerations:

      • Dependency Security: The security of the interop modules depends heavily on the security of the underlying frameworks (RxJava 2/3, Coroutines). Regularly updating these dependencies is crucial.
      • Isolation: The interop modules should be designed to minimize the impact of vulnerabilities in one framework on the other. For example, an exception in RxJava should not crash the entire Reaktive stream.
      • Testing: Thorough testing of the interop modules is essential to ensure that they work correctly and securely. This includes testing edge cases and error handling scenarios.

  • Threading and Concurrency Model:

    • Threats: (Same as Core Module - Race Conditions, Deadlocks)
    • Security Considerations:
      • Clear Documentation: The threading model (Schedulers) must be clearly documented, explaining how to use them safely and avoid common concurrency pitfalls.
      • Thread Pool Management: If the library uses thread pools, it should manage them carefully to avoid resource exhaustion and ensure proper cleanup.
      • Avoidance of Shared Mutable State: Minimize shared mutable state whenever possible. Favor immutable data structures and thread-local variables.

  • Error Handling:

    • Threats:

      • Unhandled Exceptions: As mentioned above, unhandled exceptions can lead to crashes or inconsistent state.
      • Information Leakage: Error messages might inadvertently reveal sensitive information about the application or its data.

    • Security Considerations:

      • Consistent Error Propagation: Errors should be propagated consistently through the reactive stream, allowing subscribers to handle them appropriately.
      • Error Handling Operators: The library should provide operators for handling errors, such as onErrorResumeNext, onErrorReturn, and retry.
      • Avoidance of Sensitive Information in Error Messages: Error messages should be carefully crafted to avoid revealing sensitive information.

  • Dependency Management:

    • Threats:

      • Vulnerable Dependencies: External dependencies can introduce vulnerabilities.
      • Supply Chain Attacks: Attackers might compromise a dependency and inject malicious code.

    • Security Considerations:

      • Regular Updates: Dependencies should be regularly updated to the latest versions to patch known vulnerabilities.
      • Vulnerability Scanning: Use tools like Dependabot (GitHub) or Snyk to scan dependencies for known vulnerabilities.
      • Dependency Pinning: Consider pinning dependency versions to prevent unexpected updates that might introduce breaking changes or vulnerabilities. However, balance this with the need to apply security updates.
      • Signed Artifacts: Use signed artifacts to verify the integrity of dependencies.

3. Inferred Architecture, Components, and Data Flow

Based on the design review and the GitHub repository, we can infer the following:

  • Architecture: Reaktive follows a modular architecture, with a core module providing the base functionality and separate modules for interoperability with other frameworks. This modularity helps to isolate concerns and reduce the impact of vulnerabilities.
  • Components: The key components are the reactive types (Observable, Flowable, Single, Completable, Maybe), operators (map, filter, subscribeOn, observeOn, etc.), Schedulers (for controlling threading), and the interop modules.
  • Data Flow: Data flows through the reactive stream from the source to the subscribers, passing through various operators that transform the data. Schedulers control the threading of the operations. Error handling is integrated into the data flow, with errors being propagated as special events.

4. Specific Security Considerations for Reaktive

  • Backpressure: Reaktive's Flowable type supports backpressure, which is a mechanism for handling situations where the source produces data faster than the subscriber can consume it. Incorrectly implemented backpressure can lead to denial-of-service vulnerabilities. The library should ensure that backpressure is handled correctly and that subscribers cannot be overwhelmed by a fast producer.
  • subscribeOn and observeOn Operators: These operators control the threading of the reactive stream. Misusing these operators can lead to race conditions or deadlocks. The library should provide clear guidance on how to use these operators safely.
  • Custom Operators: Developers can create custom operators. These custom operators could introduce vulnerabilities if they are not carefully designed and implemented. The library should provide guidelines for creating secure custom operators.
  • Kotlin Multiplatform Considerations:
    • Platform-Specific Vulnerabilities: Each target platform (JVM, Android, iOS, JavaScript, Native) has its own set of potential vulnerabilities. The library should be tested thoroughly on all supported platforms to ensure that it is secure on each platform.
    • Native Code: If the library uses native code (for performance or platform-specific functionality), this code should be carefully reviewed for security vulnerabilities.
    • JavaScript Security: When targeting JavaScript, the library should be aware of the security considerations of the JavaScript environment, such as the same-origin policy and cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities. While Reaktive itself doesn't directly handle user input or interact with the DOM, it's important to be aware of these risks in the broader context of a JavaScript application.

5. Actionable Mitigation Strategies

  • Core Module:

    • MUST Thread Safety Audit: Conduct a thorough thread safety audit of the Core Module, focusing on shared mutable state and synchronization primitives. Use tools like FindBugs, SpotBugs, or IntelliJ IDEA's concurrency analysis features.
    • MUST Fuzz Testing: Implement fuzz testing to explore edge cases and uncover potential vulnerabilities related to unexpected input or threading issues. Use a fuzzing framework like libFuzzer or Jazzer (for JVM).
    • MUST Integer Overflow Checks: Add checks for integer overflows in operators that perform arithmetic operations.
    • SHOULD Resource Limits: Implement limits on the amount of data that can be buffered or cached by operators to prevent resource exhaustion.
    • SHOULD Backpressure Validation: Thoroughly test and validate the backpressure implementation to ensure it handles all scenarios correctly and prevents DoS.

  • Interop Modules:

    • MUST Dependency Updates: Regularly update RxJava 2/3 and Kotlin Coroutines dependencies to the latest versions.
    • MUST Vulnerability Scanning: Use a vulnerability scanner (e.g., Dependabot, Snyk) to monitor dependencies for known vulnerabilities.
    • SHOULD Isolation Testing: Test the interop modules to ensure that vulnerabilities in one framework do not propagate to the other.

  • Threading and Concurrency Model:

    • MUST Documentation: Provide clear and comprehensive documentation on the threading model (Schedulers) and how to use them safely.
    • SHOULD Thread Pool Configuration: If thread pools are used, provide options for configuring their size and behavior.

  • Error Handling:

    • MUST Consistent Error Propagation: Ensure that errors are propagated consistently through the reactive stream.
    • MUST Review Error Messages: Review error messages to ensure they do not reveal sensitive information.

  • Dependency Management:

    • MUST Vulnerability Scanning: Use a vulnerability scanner (e.g., Dependabot, Snyk) to monitor dependencies for known vulnerabilities.
    • SHOULD Dependency Pinning: Consider pinning dependency versions, balancing security updates with stability.
    • SHOULD Signed Artifacts: Use signed artifacts to verify the integrity of dependencies.

  • General:

    • MUST Security Code Reviews: Incorporate security considerations into code reviews. Ensure that reviewers are trained to identify potential security vulnerabilities.
    • SHOULD Regular Security Audits: Conduct periodic security audits, either internally or by external experts.
    • SHOULD Security Training: Provide security training to developers working on the library.
    • SHOULD Static Analysis: Integrate static analysis tools (Detekt, ktlint) into the CI/CD pipeline to catch potential issues early.

This deep analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the security considerations for the Reaktive library. By implementing the recommended mitigation strategies, the Badoo team can significantly enhance the security of the library and reduce the risk of vulnerabilities. The most critical areas to focus on are thread safety, resource management, and dependency security.