Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
30 lines (25 loc) · 5.6 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

30 lines (25 loc) · 5.6 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for cymchad/baserecyclerviewadapterhelper

Attack Surface: 1. Insecure Drag and Drop Implementation

  • Description: Vulnerabilities arising from improper handling of data and permissions within drag and drop functionality, leading to unauthorized data modification or corruption.
  • How baserecyclerviewadapterhelper contributes: The library provides the core drag and drop framework for RecyclerViews. It relies on developers to implement callbacks that handle the actual data manipulation when items are reordered. Insecurely implemented callbacks directly expose this attack surface. The library's ease of use for drag and drop can inadvertently encourage developers to implement callbacks without sufficient security considerations.
  • Example: An application manages user roles and permissions in a list. Using baserecyclerviewadapterhelper's drag and drop, a developer implements a callback that directly reorders roles in the database based on UI drag events, without validating if the current user has permission to modify roles. An attacker, with limited privileges, could manipulate the UI to reorder roles, potentially elevating their own privileges or demoting administrators.
  • Impact: Data corruption, unauthorized data modification, privilege escalation, business logic bypass, potential for significant system compromise depending on the application's function.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strict Input Validation and Sanitization: Thoroughly validate and sanitize all data received within drag and drop callbacks before any data modification. Verify data integrity and prevent injection attacks.
    • Robust Authorization Checks: Implement mandatory authorization checks within the drag and drop callbacks. Ensure the user initiating the drag and drop operation has explicit permission to modify the affected data and its order.
    • Principle of Least Privilege: Design the application with the principle of least privilege in mind. Limit the permissions granted to users and ensure drag and drop operations are only allowed for authorized users and data.
    • Secure Data Handling: Use secure methods for updating data based on drag and drop events. Avoid direct, unsanitized database updates from UI events. Implement proper data access layers and security controls.
    • Audit Logging and Monitoring: Log all drag and drop operations that result in data modification, especially for sensitive data. Monitor logs for suspicious activity and potential unauthorized reordering attempts.

Attack Surface: 2. Critical Data Manipulation via Swipe to Dismiss with Insufficient Validation

  • Description: High-impact vulnerabilities arising from swipe-to-dismiss functionality when handlers for dismissal actions are implemented without adequate validation and authorization, leading to critical data loss or unauthorized actions.
  • How baserecyclerviewadapterhelper contributes: The library simplifies the implementation of swipe-to-dismiss. Developers define handlers to be executed when an item is swiped. If these handlers, designed to react to user swipes facilitated by the library, lack security checks, they become a direct attack vector. The ease of implementing swipe-to-dismiss can lead to overlooking necessary security measures in the dismissal handlers.
  • Example: A banking application displays a list of pending transactions. Using baserecyclerviewadapterhelper, swipe-to-dismiss is implemented to "cancel" transactions. The developer's swipe handler directly cancels the transaction in the backend system without requiring secondary confirmation (like PIN or password) or verifying if the user is authorized to cancel that specific transaction (e.g., transactions initiated by another user in a shared account). An attacker could potentially swipe and cancel legitimate transactions, causing financial loss or disrupting critical operations.
  • Impact: Critical data deletion, unauthorized execution of sensitive actions (like financial transactions cancellation), data loss with significant consequences, potential financial or operational damage.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Mandatory Confirmation Mechanisms: Always implement strong confirmation mechanisms (e.g., confirmation dialogs requiring PIN, password, or biometric authentication) before executing destructive or sensitive actions triggered by swipe-to-dismiss, especially for operations like deletion or cancellation.
    • Strict Authorization Checks: Implement robust authorization checks within the swipe-to-dismiss handlers. Verify that the user is authorized to perform the action (e.g., delete, cancel) on the specific data item being swiped.
    • Secure Action Handling: Ensure that the actions performed in swipe-to-dismiss handlers are executed securely. Avoid direct, unvalidated actions. Use secure backend APIs and services to handle sensitive operations.
    • Undo Functionality with Time Limit: Provide a clear "undo" option with a limited time window after a swipe-to-dismiss action, allowing users to easily revert accidental or unauthorized actions. This acts as a safety net.
    • Rate Limiting and Abuse Prevention: Implement rate limiting on swipe-to-dismiss actions, especially for sensitive operations, to mitigate potential automated or rapid swipe-based attacks aimed at causing data loss or disruption.