Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
157 lines (127 loc) · 14.9 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

157 lines (127 loc) · 14.9 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for cymchad/baserecyclerviewadapterhelper

Objective: Compromise Application Using BaseRecyclerViewAdapterHelper

Attack Tree Visualization

Attack Goal: Compromise Application Using BaseRecyclerViewAdapterHelper (Critical Node - Root Goal) └───[OR]─> Exploit Vulnerabilities in BaseRecyclerViewAdapterHelper Logic ├───[OR]─> Exploit Incorrect Data Handling/Display │ ├───[AND]─> Trigger Data Binding Errors *(High-Risk Path) │ │ ├───> Supply Malformed Data to Adapter *(High-Risk Path) │ │ └───[Impact]─> Application Crash (DoS), UI Corruption, Potential Data Leakage ├───[OR]─> Exploit Event Handling Vulnerabilities (Item Clicks, etc.) (Critical Node - Event Handling) │ ├───[AND]─> Trigger Unintended Actions via Item Clicks *(High-Risk Path) │ │ ├───> Exploit logic based on item position within click listeners *(High-Risk Path) │ │ └───[Impact]─> Unauthorized actions, data modification, privilege escalation │ │ └───> Application's click listener performs sensitive actions based on item data *(High-Risk Path & Critical Node - Application Logic) │ │ └───[Impact]─> Unauthorized actions, data modification, privilege escalation │ └───[AND]─> Exploit Load More Functionality Issues *(High-Risk Path & Critical Node - DoS Potential) │ ├───> Trigger Excessive Load More Requests *(High-Risk Path) │ │ ├───> Rapid Scrolling to trigger load more repeatedly *(High-Risk Path) │ │ └───[Impact]─> Denial of Service (DoS) due to resource exhaustion, backend overload │ │ └───> Exploit lack of rate limiting in load more implementation (in application or library if applicable) *(High-Risk Path) │ │ └───[Impact]─> Denial of Service (DoS) due to resource exhaustion, backend overload └───[OR]─> Exploit Misuse of BaseRecyclerViewAdapterHelper by Application Developer (Critical Node - Developer Responsibility) ├───[AND]─> Vulnerable Custom Item Views *(High-Risk Path & Critical Node - Custom View Security) │ ├───> Application uses custom item views with vulnerabilities *(High-Risk Path) │ │ ├───> XSS-like vulnerabilities in custom view rendering (if displaying web content) *(High-Risk Path) │ │ └───[Impact]─> Code execution, data leakage, session hijacking │ │ └───> Logic vulnerabilities in custom view's event handlers *(High-Risk Path) │ │ └───[Impact]─> Unauthorized actions, data modification, privilege escalation └───[AND]─> Insecure Implementation of Click Listeners *(High-Risk Path & Critical Node - Click Listener Security) │ ├───> Application implements insecure click listeners using library's API *(High-Risk Path) │ │ ├───> Click listeners perform sensitive actions without proper authorization/validation *(High-Risk Path & Critical Node - Authorization) │ │ └───[Impact]─> Unauthorized actions, data manipulation, privilege escalation └───[AND]─> Insecure Data Handling in Adapter Implementation *(High-Risk Path & Critical Node - Data Handling) │ ├───> Application's adapter implementation has data handling flaws *(High-Risk Path) │ │ ├───> Adapter directly uses unsanitized user input *(High-Risk Path & Critical Node - Input Sanitization) │ │ └───[Impact]─> Data integrity issues, application logic bypass, information disclosure

Attack Tree Path: 1. Supply Malformed Data to Adapter (High-Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector: Attacker provides unexpected or malformed data to the RecyclerView adapter.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Malformed data input is a common occurrence, especially from external sources.
  • Impact: Moderate - Application crashes (DoS), UI corruption, potential minor data leakage through error messages.
  • Effort: Low - Easy to attempt by manipulating input data.
  • Skill Level: Low - Requires basic understanding of data binding and app structure.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Crashes are logged, but subtle UI corruption or data leakage might be harder to detect automatically.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Exploit logic based on item position within click listeners (High-Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector: Attacker manipulates UI or timing to trigger clicks on unintended items, exploiting application logic that relies on item position in click listeners.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Developers often rely on item position, and logic flaws are possible.
  • Impact: Moderate - Trigger actions on wrong items, leading to data modification or unauthorized actions.
  • Effort: Low - Requires understanding of application logic and potentially manipulating UI to trigger specific clicks.
  • Skill Level: Low - Requires basic app usage and understanding of UI interactions.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Application logic flaws might be detected through testing and code review.

Attack Tree Path: 3. Application's click listener performs sensitive actions based on item data (High-Risk Path & Critical Node - Application Logic)

  • Attack Vector: Application's click listeners perform sensitive actions (e.g., data deletion, financial transactions) based on item data without sufficient security checks.
  • Likelihood: High - Common application pattern to perform actions based on item clicks.
  • Impact: Significant - Unauthorized actions, data modification, privilege escalation (if application logic is flawed).
  • Effort: Low - Exploiting logic flaws in click listeners is often straightforward if vulnerabilities exist.
  • Skill Level: Low - Requires understanding of application functionality and basic interaction.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Depends on logging and monitoring of sensitive actions. Logic flaws can be hard to detect automatically.

Attack Tree Path: 4. Trigger Excessive Load More Requests (High-Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector: Attacker rapidly scrolls to the bottom of the RecyclerView to trigger a large number of "load more" requests.
  • Likelihood: High - Easy for any user to perform.
  • Impact: Moderate - Device resource exhaustion, potential backend overload, temporary Denial of Service.
  • Effort: Low - Simple user interaction.
  • Skill Level: Low - No special skills needed.
  • Detection Difficulty: Easy - Network monitoring, server logs can easily detect excessive requests.

Attack Tree Path: 5. Rapid Scrolling to trigger load more repeatedly (High-Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector: Specific method of triggering excessive load more requests by rapidly scrolling.
  • Likelihood: High - Easy for any user to perform.
  • Impact: Moderate - Device resource exhaustion, potential backend overload, temporary Denial of Service.
  • Effort: Low - Simple user interaction.
  • Skill Level: Low - No special skills needed.
  • Detection Difficulty: Easy - User behavior is easily observable, and network requests are logged.

Attack Tree Path: 6. Exploit lack of rate limiting in load more implementation (High-Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector: Application or library's load more functionality lacks proper rate limiting, allowing for abuse through excessive requests.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Rate limiting is often overlooked in initial implementations.
  • Impact: Moderate - Denial of Service (DoS) due to resource exhaustion (network, CPU, memory), potential backend overload.
  • Effort: Low - Easy to exploit if rate limiting is absent.
  • Skill Level: Low - No special skills needed.
  • Detection Difficulty: Easy - Network monitoring, server logs can easily detect excessive requests.

Attack Tree Path: 7. Application uses custom item views with vulnerabilities (High-Risk Path & Critical Node - Custom View Security)

  • Attack Vector: Application utilizes custom item views that contain security vulnerabilities.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Custom code is often a source of vulnerabilities.
  • Impact: Moderate/Significant - Depending on the vulnerability, could lead to data leakage, unauthorized actions, or even code execution (if WebView is involved).
  • Effort: Medium - Requires finding vulnerabilities within the custom view implementation.
  • Skill Level: Medium - Requires understanding of UI rendering and potentially web security principles if WebView is used.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Security scanning, code review, and penetration testing can detect these.

Attack Tree Path: 8. XSS-like vulnerabilities in custom view rendering (if displaying web content) (High-Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector: Custom item views render web content (e.g., using WebView) and are vulnerable to XSS-like attacks, allowing injection of malicious scripts.
  • Likelihood: Low - Developers should be aware of XSS, but mistakes happen, especially with complex custom views.
  • Impact: Significant - Code execution (if WebView involved), data leakage, session hijacking.
  • Effort: Medium - Requires finding injection points in custom view rendering logic.
  • Skill Level: Medium - Requires understanding of web security principles and UI rendering.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Security scanning, code review, and penetration testing can detect these.

Attack Tree Path: 9. Logic vulnerabilities in custom view's event handlers (High-Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector: Custom item views have logic vulnerabilities in their event handlers, allowing attackers to trigger unintended actions or bypass security checks.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Logic flaws in custom code are common.
  • Impact: Moderate - Unauthorized actions, data modification, privilege escalation (depending on custom view logic).
  • Effort: Low - Exploiting logic flaws can be straightforward if vulnerabilities exist.
  • Skill Level: Low - Requires understanding of application functionality and basic interaction.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Code review, functional testing, and penetration testing can detect these.

Attack Tree Path: 10. Application implements insecure click listeners using library's API (High-Risk Path & Critical Node - Click Listener Security)

  • Attack Vector: Application developers implement click listeners using the library's API in an insecure manner.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Insecure coding practices in click listener implementation are common.
  • Impact: Significant - Unauthorized actions, data manipulation, privilege escalation.
  • Effort: Low - Exploiting insecure click listener logic is often straightforward.
  • Skill Level: Low - Requires understanding of application functionality and basic interaction.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Code review, penetration testing, and authorization testing can detect these.

Attack Tree Path: 11. Click listeners perform sensitive actions without proper authorization/validation (High-Risk Path & Critical Node - Authorization)

  • Attack Vector: Click listeners execute sensitive actions without proper authorization or validation checks, allowing unauthorized users to perform actions.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Authorization and validation are often overlooked or implemented incorrectly.
  • Impact: Significant - Unauthorized actions, data manipulation, privilege escalation.
  • Effort: Low - Exploiting missing authorization is often straightforward.
  • Skill Level: Low - Requires understanding of application functionality and basic interaction.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Code review, penetration testing, and authorization testing can detect these.

Attack Tree Path: 12. Application's adapter implementation has data handling flaws (High-Risk Path & Critical Node - Data Handling)

  • Attack Vector: Application's adapter implementation contains flaws in how it handles data.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Data handling vulnerabilities are common in application logic.
  • Impact: Moderate - Data integrity issues, potential for application logic bypass, information disclosure.
  • Effort: Medium - Requires understanding of adapter logic and finding data handling flaws.
  • Skill Level: Medium - Requires some understanding of data structures and adapter implementation.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Code review, data flow analysis, and penetration testing can detect these.

Attack Tree Path: 13. Adapter directly uses unsanitized user input (High-Risk Path & Critical Node - Input Sanitization)

  • Attack Vector: Adapter directly uses user-provided input without proper sanitization, leading to potential vulnerabilities.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Developers might inadvertently use unsanitized input, especially in quick implementations.
  • Impact: Moderate - Data integrity issues, potential for application logic bypass, information disclosure.
  • Effort: Low - Exploiting unsanitized input is often straightforward.
  • Skill Level: Low - Requires basic understanding of data flow and input handling.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Code review, input validation testing, and penetration testing can detect these.