Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
51 lines (44 loc) · 6.23 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

51 lines (44 loc) · 6.23 KB

Threat Model Analysis for cymchad/baserecyclerviewadapterhelper

Threat: Malicious Data Injection Leading to XSS (via WebView in ItemView)

  • Description: An attacker crafts input that, after being passed to the adapter, is rendered within a WebView inside a custom ItemView. If BRVAH's handling of this data, or the custom ItemView's implementation, doesn't properly sanitize the input, this can lead to a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The attacker's script could then execute within the context of the WebView, potentially accessing sensitive data or performing unauthorized actions. This is high severity because it directly involves how BRVAH handles data passed to it, and the potential for XSS is a significant risk.
    • Impact:
      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) execution within the application's context.
      • Theft of sensitive data (cookies, tokens, etc.) accessible to the WebView.
      • Unauthorized actions performed on behalf of the user.
      • Defacement or modification of the application's UI.
    • Affected Component: setData(), addData(), setNewData(), any method that accepts data displayed in the RecyclerView, and critically, the custom ItemView implementation that includes the WebView. BRVAH's role is in passing the potentially malicious data to the vulnerable ItemView.
    • Risk Severity: High.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Strict Data Sanitization (in ItemView): The primary mitigation is within the custom ItemView. Never directly display unsanitized data in a WebView. Use a robust HTML sanitization library (e.g., OWASP Java Encoder) to escape or remove any potentially malicious HTML tags or attributes before setting the content of the WebView.
      • Content Security Policy (CSP): If possible, implement a Content Security Policy (CSP) for the WebView to restrict the sources from which scripts can be loaded. This adds a layer of defense even if sanitization fails.
      • Avoid WebViews (if possible): If the content doesn't require a WebView, use a TextView or other safer view component. WebView introduces a significantly larger attack surface.
      • Input Validation (as a secondary defense): While input validation should happen before data reaches the adapter, it's still a good practice to validate data types and formats as a secondary defense.

Threat: Compromised Library Dependency (Malicious Code in BRVAH)

  • Description: An attacker compromises the official BRVAH repository or a dependency repository (Maven Central, JCenter, etc.) and injects malicious code directly into the BRVAH library itself. This is a critical threat because it bypasses any input validation or sanitization performed by the application. The malicious code could do anything, from stealing data to taking control of the device.
    • Impact:
      • Complete application compromise.
      • Data theft (all data accessible to the application).
      • Potential for device compromise.
      • Remote code execution.
    • Affected Component: The entire BRVAH library.
    • Risk Severity: Critical.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Dependency Verification (Checksums): This is the most important mitigation. Always verify the checksum (e.g., SHA-256) of the downloaded BRVAH library file against the official checksum published by the library maintainers. Do this every time you update the library. Automate this process as part of your build pipeline.
      • Dependency Pinning: Pin the BRVAH library to a specific, known-good version (e.g., implementation 'com.github.cymcsg:BaseRecyclerViewAdapterHelper:3.0.10'). Do not use version ranges (e.g., 3.0.+) that could automatically pull in a compromised version. Only update after verifying the checksum of the new version.
      • Private Artifact Repository: Use a private artifact repository (e.g., JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus) with:
        • Strict access controls.
        • Vulnerability scanning of uploaded artifacts.
        • Proxying of external repositories with caching and checksum verification.
      • Software Composition Analysis (SCA): Use SCA tools (e.g., Snyk, OWASP Dependency-Check) to automatically scan your project's dependencies for known vulnerabilities. These tools can often detect compromised libraries.
      • Do not use unofficial builds or forks: Unless you have fully audited the code.

Threat: Header/Footer Injection Leading to XSS (via WebView)

  • Description: Similar to the first threat, but specifically targeting header and footer views. If the application dynamically generates header or footer views using addHeaderView() or addFooterView(), and these views contain a WebView, and the data used to populate these views comes from an untrusted source without proper sanitization, an attacker could inject malicious JavaScript.
    • Impact: Same as the first threat (XSS).
    • Affected Component: addHeaderView(), addFooterView(), custom header/footer view implementations (specifically those containing a WebView).
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Strict Data Sanitization (in Header/Footer View): As with the first threat, the primary mitigation is within the custom header/footer view. Sanitize any data displayed in a WebView using a robust HTML sanitization library.
      • Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a CSP for the WebView within the header/footer.
      • Avoid WebViews (if possible): Prefer safer view components if a WebView is not strictly necessary.
      • Input Validation (Secondary): Validate input before it reaches the adapter, but this is a secondary defense. The core issue is the lack of sanitization within the view.
      • Avoid Dynamic Generation (if possible): If the header/footer content is static, avoid generating it dynamically from potentially untrusted data.