Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
116 lines (97 loc) · 10.2 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

116 lines (97 loc) · 10.2 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for element-hq/element-android

Objective: To gain unauthorized access to, or control over, user data or communications within an application built using the Element Android codebase, by exploiting vulnerabilities specific to the Element Android project.

Attack Tree Visualization

[Root]: Gain Unauthorized Access to/Control over User Data/Communications via Element-Android Vulnerabilities

|
|---[1] Exploit Vulnerabilities in Matrix SDK (matrix-android-sdk2)
|       |
|       |---[1.1] Cryptographic Weaknesses
|       |       |---[1.1.1] Improper Key Management [CRITICAL]
|       |       |---[1.1.2] Weak Encryption Algorithms/Implementations [CRITICAL]
|       |       |---[1.1.3]  E2EE Bypass [CRITICAL]
|       |
|       |---[1.2] Session Management Issues
|       |       |---[1.2.1]  Session Hijacking (SDK-Specific) [HIGH-RISK]
|       |
|       |---[1.3]  Data Handling Vulnerabilities (SDK-Specific)
|       |       |---[1.3.1]  Insecure Data Storage (SDK-Specific) [CRITICAL]
|       |       |---[1.3.3]  Unsafe Deserialization (SDK-Specific) [HIGH-RISK]
|       |
|       |---[1.4]  Matrix Protocol Implementation Flaws
|       |       |---[1.4.2]  Vulnerabilities in Federation Handling [HIGH-RISK]
|
|---[2] Exploit Vulnerabilities in Element-Android UI/Logic
|       |
|       |---[2.2]  Intent Spoofing/Injection
|       |       |---[2.2.1]  Malicious Intent Handling [HIGH-RISK]
|       |
|       |---[2.3]  WebView-Related Vulnerabilities (If Applicable)
|       |       |---[2.3.1]  Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in WebViews [HIGH-RISK] (Conditional)

Attack Tree Path: 1. Cryptographic Weaknesses (Critical Nodes)

  • 1.1.1 Improper Key Management [CRITICAL]:

    • Description: Flaws in how cryptographic keys are generated, stored, exchanged, or used within the matrix-android-sdk2. This could involve weak random number generators, predictable key derivation functions, insecure storage of private keys on the device (e.g., not using the Android Keystore system properly), or vulnerabilities in the key exchange protocol.
    • Likelihood: Low
    • Impact: Very High (Complete compromise of message confidentiality and user authentication)
    • Effort: High (Requires deep understanding of cryptography and SDK internals)
    • Skill Level: Expert
    • Detection Difficulty: Very Hard (Likely no visible signs unless actively monitored at a very low level)

  • 1.1.2 Weak Encryption Algorithms/Implementations [CRITICAL]:

    • Description: The use of outdated or cryptographically weak encryption algorithms (e.g., DES, RC4) or flawed implementations of strong algorithms (e.g., AES, Curve25519). Implementation flaws could include side-channel vulnerabilities (timing attacks, power analysis), incorrect padding schemes, or other subtle errors that weaken the encryption.
    • Likelihood: Very Low
    • Impact: Very High (Complete compromise of message confidentiality)
    • Effort: Very High (Requires finding and exploiting subtle implementation flaws, often requiring specialized tools and expertise)
    • Skill Level: Expert
    • Detection Difficulty: Very Hard (Requires deep cryptographic analysis and specialized tools)

  • 1.1.3 E2EE Bypass [CRITICAL]:

    • Description: A fundamental flaw in the implementation or management of end-to-end encryption (E2EE) within the SDK that allows an attacker to bypass the encryption entirely. This is distinct from breaking the encryption itself; it's a flaw that prevents E2EE from being properly applied or enforced. Examples include logic errors that cause messages to be sent in plaintext, vulnerabilities in the device verification process, or flaws in how room keys are managed.
    • Likelihood: Low
    • Impact: Very High (Access to plaintext messages for all affected users/rooms)
    • Effort: Very High (Requires finding a fundamental flaw in the E2EE implementation, likely involving a deep understanding of the Olm/Megolm protocols)
    • Skill Level: Expert
    • Detection Difficulty: Hard (Might be detectable through careful traffic analysis or server-side anomaly detection, but very difficult to pinpoint)

Attack Tree Path: 2. Session Management Issues (High-Risk)

  • 1.2.1 Session Hijacking (SDK-Specific) [HIGH-RISK]:
    • Description: An attacker gains unauthorized access to a user's active Matrix session by obtaining their session token. This is specific to how the matrix-android-sdk2 manages Matrix sessions, not a generic web session hijacking. Vulnerabilities could include predictable session token generation, insufficient token validation within the SDK, or flaws in how the SDK handles session refresh tokens.
    • Likelihood: Low
    • Impact: High (Full control of the user's account, ability to send/receive messages, join rooms, etc.)
    • Effort: Medium (Requires understanding of the SDK's session handling mechanisms and potentially exploiting other vulnerabilities to obtain the token)
    • Skill Level: Advanced
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Anomalous activity from the hijacked account might be detectable, such as unexpected messages or device logins)

Attack Tree Path: 3. Data Handling Vulnerabilities (SDK-Specific)

  • 1.3.1 Insecure Data Storage (SDK-Specific) [CRITICAL]:

    • Description: The SDK stores sensitive data (e.g., encryption keys, message history, access tokens) in an insecure manner on the device. This is not a general Android data storage issue; it's about how the SDK itself manages its data. Examples include storing keys in plaintext in SharedPreferences, using predictable file paths, or failing to encrypt sensitive data at rest.
    • Likelihood: Low
    • Impact: High (Access to encryption keys, message history, and other sensitive user data)
    • Effort: Medium (Requires local device access or exploiting another vulnerability to gain access to the device's file system)
    • Skill Level: Intermediate
    • Detection Difficulty: Hard (Requires forensic analysis of the device's storage)

  • 1.3.3 Unsafe Deserialization (SDK-Specific) [HIGH-RISK]:

    • Description: The SDK deserializes data from untrusted sources (e.g., Matrix events received from the homeserver) without proper validation. This can lead to code execution vulnerabilities if an attacker can craft a malicious serialized object. This is a vulnerability within the SDK's handling of Matrix data.
    • Likelihood: Low
    • Impact: High (Potential for arbitrary code execution within the context of the application)
    • Effort: High (Requires crafting a malicious payload that exploits a specific deserialization vulnerability)
    • Skill Level: Advanced
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Might be detectable through intrusion detection systems or by monitoring for unusual application behavior)

Attack Tree Path: 4. Matrix Protocol Implementation Flaws

  • 1.4.2 Vulnerabilities in Federation Handling [HIGH-RISK]:
    • Description: Flaws in how the SDK implements Matrix federation (communication between different Matrix homeservers). An attacker controlling a malicious homeserver could exploit these vulnerabilities to compromise users on other servers. Examples include vulnerabilities in how the SDK validates server signatures, handles room state updates from other servers, or processes federated events.
    • Likelihood: Low
    • Impact: High (Potential to compromise users across multiple Matrix servers, leading to widespread data breaches or service disruption)
    • Effort: High (Requires deep understanding of the Matrix federation protocol and the ability to operate a malicious homeserver)
    • Skill Level: Expert
    • Detection Difficulty: Hard (Requires monitoring inter-server communication for anomalies and potentially analyzing server logs)

Attack Tree Path: 5. Element-Android UI/Logic Vulnerabilities

  • 2.2.1 Malicious Intent Handling [HIGH-RISK]:

    • Description: Element-Android doesn't properly validate or sanitize Intents received from other applications. An attacker could craft a malicious Intent to trigger unintended actions within Element-Android (e.g., sending messages, changing settings, accessing sensitive data). This is specific to Element-Android's Intent handling, not a general Android vulnerability.
    • Likelihood: Low
    • Impact: Medium (Depends on the specific actions that can be triggered by malicious Intents)
    • Effort: Medium (Requires crafting a malicious Intent and finding a way to deliver it to Element-Android)
    • Skill Level: Intermediate
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Requires monitoring Intent traffic and analyzing Element-Android's Intent filters)

  • 2.3.1 Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in WebViews [HIGH-RISK] (Conditional):

    • Description: If Element-Android uses WebViews to display content and if it doesn't properly sanitize input displayed in those WebViews, an attacker could inject malicious JavaScript. This could allow the attacker to access the WebView's context, potentially interacting with the Element-Android application and accessing sensitive data. This is only a high-risk path if WebViews are used insecurely.
    • Likelihood: Low (Assuming developers follow best practices for WebView security)
    • Impact: Medium (Access to the WebView's context, potentially allowing interaction with the Element-Android application)
    • Effort: Medium (Requires finding an injection point within the content displayed in the WebView)
    • Skill Level: Intermediate
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Requires monitoring WebView traffic and analyzing the content displayed)